Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title complex, C26H24N2O2, was synthesized by the reaction of 1-naphthaldehyde with 1,4-bis­(amino­oxy)butane in ethanol. The mol­ecule has crystallographic inversion symmetry. The inter­molecular distance between the nearest naphthalene rings is 3.141 (2) Å, indicating a strong inter­molecular π–π stacking inter­action.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807040822/om2146sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807040822/om2146Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 663783

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 273 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.046
  • wR factor = 0.120
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.7

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT066_ALERT_1_C Predicted and Reported Transmissions Identical . ? PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ? PLAT152_ALERT_1_C Supplied and Calc Volume s.u. Inconsistent ..... ? PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 1 C26 H24 N2 O2
Alert level G PLAT804_ALERT_5_G ARU-Pack Problem in PLATON Analysis ............ 1 Times
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Schiff bases have been widely used as versatile ligands in the formation of transition metal complexes (Aysegul et al., 2005). They have been found to possess potent activities including inorganic biochemistry (Niederhoffer et al., 1984), catalysis (Srinivasan et al., 1986; Zhang et al., 1990), medical imaging (Tisato et al., 1994), optical materials (Lacroix, 2001) and thin films (Sundari et al., 1997). Although most Schiff base derivatives are stable in solution and in the solid state, C=N bonds often suffer an exchange reaction (Koehler et al., 1964) as well as hydrolysis (Cordes & Jencks, 1962). Rate constants of oxime formation are smaller than those of imine formation, and the equilibrium constants are larger by several orders of magnitude (Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima, 2005). Hence, the title compound should be stable enough to resist the metathesis of the C=N bonds (Akine et al., 2001). In recent years, we have been very much interested in the chemistry of salen-type derivatives, such as 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006), 4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[ethylenedioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong & Feng, 2006),4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[(1,3-propylene) dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong, Feng & Yang, 2006), and 2,2'-[(propane-1,3-diyldioxy)bis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Duan et al., 2007). In this paper, a bisoxime ligand, 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane was designed and synthesized, and shown in Fig. 1. The molecule is disposed about a crystallographic centre of symmetry, and the molecule adopts an extended conformation where the two naphthaldoxime moieties are apart from each other. The oxime groups have the anti-conformation, which is similar to what is observed in our previously reported salen-type bisoxime of 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006). Noteworthy is that the distance between the nearest naphthane rings, parallel to that of another molecule, is 3.141 (2) Å, revealing a strong intermolecular π-π stacking interaction as shown in Fig. 2.

Related literature top

Related structures are given by Dong, Duan et al. (2006); Dong & Feng (2006); Dong, Feng & Yang (2006); Duan et al. (2007).

For related literature, see: Akine et al. (2001, 2006); Akine, Takanori, Dong & Nabeshima (2005); Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima (2005); Aysegul et al. (2005); Cordes & Jencks (1962); Koehler et al. (1964); Lacroix (2001); Niederhoffer et al. (1984); Srinivasan et al. (1986); Sundari et al. (1997); Tisato et al. (1994); Zhang et al. (1990).

Experimental top

2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane was synthesized according to an analogous method reported earlier (Akine, Takanori, Dong & Nabeshima, 2005; Akine et al., 2006). To an ethanol solution (5 ml) of 1-naphthaldehyde (213.6 mg, 1.36 mmol) was added an ethanol (3 ml) solution of 1,4-bis(aminooxy)butane (70.8 mg, 0.67 mmol). The solution was stirred at 328 K for 5 h, then concentrated to about 2 ml under reduced pressure. The precipitate was filtered and washed successively with ethanol and hexane. The product was dried under vacuum and purified by recrystallization from ethanol to yield 182.5 mg of the title compound. Yield, 68.7%. mp. 363–364 K. Anal. Calc. for C26H24N2O2: C, 78.76; H, 6.10; N, 7.07. Found: C, 78.68; H, 6.03; N, 7.21. IR: νC=N, 1624 cm-1 and νC-O, 1175 cm-1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 1.97 (s, 4H), 4.36 (s, 4H), 7.46 (t, J= 7.6 Hz, 4H), 7.51 (t, J= 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (dd, J= 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J= 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (d, J= 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.54(d, J= 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.74 (s, 2H). Colorless block-shaped single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained after several weeks by slow evaporation from an ethanol solution of 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane.

Refinement top

Non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. H atoms were treated as riding atoms with distances C—H = 0.97 (CH2), or 0.93 Å (CH), and Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C).

Structure description top

Schiff bases have been widely used as versatile ligands in the formation of transition metal complexes (Aysegul et al., 2005). They have been found to possess potent activities including inorganic biochemistry (Niederhoffer et al., 1984), catalysis (Srinivasan et al., 1986; Zhang et al., 1990), medical imaging (Tisato et al., 1994), optical materials (Lacroix, 2001) and thin films (Sundari et al., 1997). Although most Schiff base derivatives are stable in solution and in the solid state, C=N bonds often suffer an exchange reaction (Koehler et al., 1964) as well as hydrolysis (Cordes & Jencks, 1962). Rate constants of oxime formation are smaller than those of imine formation, and the equilibrium constants are larger by several orders of magnitude (Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima, 2005). Hence, the title compound should be stable enough to resist the metathesis of the C=N bonds (Akine et al., 2001). In recent years, we have been very much interested in the chemistry of salen-type derivatives, such as 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006), 4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[ethylenedioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong & Feng, 2006),4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[(1,3-propylene) dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong, Feng & Yang, 2006), and 2,2'-[(propane-1,3-diyldioxy)bis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Duan et al., 2007). In this paper, a bisoxime ligand, 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane was designed and synthesized, and shown in Fig. 1. The molecule is disposed about a crystallographic centre of symmetry, and the molecule adopts an extended conformation where the two naphthaldoxime moieties are apart from each other. The oxime groups have the anti-conformation, which is similar to what is observed in our previously reported salen-type bisoxime of 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006). Noteworthy is that the distance between the nearest naphthane rings, parallel to that of another molecule, is 3.141 (2) Å, revealing a strong intermolecular π-π stacking interaction as shown in Fig. 2.

Related structures are given by Dong, Duan et al. (2006); Dong & Feng (2006); Dong, Feng & Yang (2006); Duan et al. (2007).

For related literature, see: Akine et al. (2001, 2006); Akine, Takanori, Dong & Nabeshima (2005); Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima (2005); Aysegul et al. (2005); Cordes & Jencks (1962); Koehler et al. (1964); Lacroix (2001); Niederhoffer et al. (1984); Srinivasan et al. (1986); Sundari et al. (1997); Tisato et al. (1994); Zhang et al. (1990).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecule structure with the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids for non-hydrogen atoms are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view showing the formation of π-π interactions.
2,2'-[(Butane-1,4-diyldioxy)bis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthalene top
Crystal data top
C26H24N2O2F(000) = 420
Mr = 396.47Dx = 1.241 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.0910 (18) ÅCell parameters from 625 reflections
b = 5.8499 (13) Åθ = 2.3–20.6°
c = 20.019 (3) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
β = 94.779 (2)°T = 273 K
V = 1061.0 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 20.37 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1868 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1031 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.042
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 1010
Tmin = 0.971, Tmax = 0.988k = 66
5177 measured reflectionsl = 2311
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.121H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.99 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0505P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1868 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
136 parametersΔρmax = 0.10 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.12 e Å3
Crystal data top
C26H24N2O2V = 1061.0 (3) Å3
Mr = 396.47Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 9.0910 (18) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
b = 5.8499 (13) ÅT = 273 K
c = 20.019 (3) Å0.37 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm
β = 94.779 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1868 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
1031 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.971, Tmax = 0.988Rint = 0.042
5177 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0460 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.121H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.99Δρmax = 0.10 e Å3
1868 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.12 e Å3
136 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.2816 (2)0.9484 (3)0.08370 (9)0.0617 (5)
O10.29043 (17)1.1226 (2)0.03499 (7)0.0710 (5)
C10.4221 (3)1.2525 (4)0.05003 (11)0.0651 (7)
H1A0.50761.15270.05270.078*
H1B0.41851.32960.09280.078*
C20.4328 (2)1.4251 (3)0.00515 (11)0.0621 (6)
H2A0.43491.34510.04750.075*
H2B0.34531.52070.00790.075*
C30.1568 (3)0.8486 (4)0.07499 (10)0.0578 (6)
H30.09020.90630.04140.069*
C40.1082 (2)0.6522 (3)0.11266 (10)0.0515 (6)
C50.0180 (3)0.5460 (4)0.08575 (11)0.0639 (6)
H50.06910.60970.04810.077*
C60.0726 (3)0.3454 (4)0.11292 (12)0.0716 (7)
H60.15830.27760.09350.086*
C70.0009 (3)0.2513 (4)0.16784 (12)0.0670 (7)
H70.03260.11450.18470.080*
C80.1274 (2)0.3570 (3)0.19992 (11)0.0553 (6)
C90.1829 (2)0.5628 (3)0.17299 (10)0.0496 (6)
C100.3057 (2)0.6688 (4)0.20813 (11)0.0605 (6)
H100.34290.80350.19150.073*
C110.3708 (3)0.5778 (4)0.26582 (12)0.0726 (7)
H110.45140.65090.28810.087*
C120.3168 (3)0.3742 (4)0.29177 (13)0.0786 (8)
H120.36130.31340.33140.094*
C130.1998 (3)0.2660 (4)0.25924 (13)0.0712 (7)
H130.16660.12920.27630.085*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0703 (14)0.0557 (11)0.0602 (12)0.0035 (10)0.0109 (10)0.0136 (9)
O10.0752 (12)0.0672 (10)0.0696 (11)0.0148 (9)0.0007 (8)0.0229 (8)
C10.0700 (18)0.0629 (15)0.0626 (15)0.0090 (13)0.0065 (12)0.0065 (12)
C20.0685 (16)0.0572 (14)0.0603 (14)0.0061 (11)0.0040 (12)0.0096 (11)
C30.0609 (16)0.0590 (14)0.0538 (14)0.0015 (12)0.0072 (11)0.0073 (11)
C40.0541 (14)0.0513 (13)0.0503 (13)0.0003 (11)0.0113 (11)0.0043 (11)
C50.0660 (16)0.0705 (16)0.0558 (14)0.0066 (14)0.0085 (12)0.0017 (12)
C60.0682 (17)0.0765 (17)0.0709 (17)0.0187 (14)0.0107 (13)0.0089 (14)
C70.0762 (18)0.0506 (14)0.0781 (18)0.0114 (13)0.0290 (14)0.0064 (13)
C80.0615 (16)0.0474 (13)0.0595 (14)0.0048 (12)0.0204 (12)0.0014 (11)
C90.0507 (13)0.0489 (13)0.0508 (13)0.0059 (11)0.0132 (11)0.0002 (10)
C100.0585 (15)0.0623 (14)0.0607 (15)0.0027 (12)0.0060 (12)0.0076 (12)
C110.0614 (16)0.0891 (18)0.0664 (17)0.0012 (14)0.0001 (13)0.0146 (14)
C120.0694 (19)0.094 (2)0.0727 (17)0.0194 (16)0.0103 (14)0.0299 (15)
C130.0727 (19)0.0606 (16)0.0838 (19)0.0141 (14)0.0278 (15)0.0187 (14)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C31.274 (3)C6—C71.355 (3)
N1—O11.417 (2)C6—H60.9300
O1—C11.429 (2)C7—C81.412 (3)
C1—C21.506 (3)C7—H70.9300
C1—H1A0.9700C8—C131.413 (3)
C1—H1B0.9700C8—C91.428 (3)
C2—C2i1.504 (4)C9—C101.413 (3)
C2—H2A0.9700C10—C111.361 (3)
C2—H2B0.9700C10—H100.9300
C3—C41.463 (3)C11—C121.404 (3)
C3—H30.9300C11—H110.9300
C4—C51.375 (3)C12—C131.357 (3)
C4—C91.434 (3)C12—H120.9300
C5—C61.402 (3)C13—H130.9300
C5—H50.9300
C3—N1—O1109.64 (17)C7—C6—H6120.4
N1—O1—C1109.40 (15)C5—C6—H6120.4
O1—C1—C2107.81 (17)C6—C7—C8121.3 (2)
O1—C1—H1A110.1C6—C7—H7119.4
C2—C1—H1A110.1C8—C7—H7119.4
O1—C1—H1B110.1C7—C8—C13121.4 (2)
C2—C1—H1B110.1C7—C8—C9119.82 (19)
H1A—C1—H1B108.5C13—C8—C9118.7 (2)
C2i—C2—C1113.0 (2)C10—C9—C8118.12 (18)
C2i—C2—H2A109.0C10—C9—C4123.95 (19)
C1—C2—H2A109.0C8—C9—C4117.91 (18)
C2i—C2—H2B109.0C11—C10—C9121.4 (2)
C1—C2—H2B109.0C11—C10—H10119.3
H2A—C2—H2B107.8C9—C10—H10119.3
N1—C3—C4126.4 (2)C10—C11—C12120.3 (2)
N1—C3—H3116.8C10—C11—H11119.9
C4—C3—H3116.8C12—C11—H11119.9
C5—C4—C9119.1 (2)C13—C12—C11120.2 (2)
C5—C4—C3115.5 (2)C13—C12—H12119.9
C9—C4—C3125.35 (19)C11—C12—H12119.9
C4—C5—C6122.5 (2)C12—C13—C8121.3 (2)
C4—C5—H5118.8C12—C13—H13119.4
C6—C5—H5118.8C8—C13—H13119.4
C7—C6—C5119.2 (2)
C3—N1—O1—C1172.74 (18)C7—C8—C9—C41.3 (3)
N1—O1—C1—C2176.28 (17)C13—C8—C9—C4179.82 (19)
O1—C1—C2—C2i179.6 (2)C5—C4—C9—C10174.4 (2)
O1—N1—C3—C4176.55 (19)C3—C4—C9—C107.1 (3)
N1—C3—C4—C5167.4 (2)C5—C4—C9—C84.1 (3)
N1—C3—C4—C911.1 (3)C3—C4—C9—C8174.37 (19)
C9—C4—C5—C63.6 (3)C8—C9—C10—C110.4 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6175.0 (2)C4—C9—C10—C11179.0 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C70.1 (4)C9—C10—C11—C120.2 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C82.9 (3)C10—C11—C12—C130.4 (4)
C6—C7—C8—C13176.6 (2)C11—C12—C13—C81.6 (4)
C6—C7—C8—C92.2 (3)C7—C8—C13—C12176.6 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C10177.3 (2)C9—C8—C13—C122.2 (3)
C13—C8—C9—C101.6 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y+3, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC26H24N2O2
Mr396.47
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)273
a, b, c (Å)9.0910 (18), 5.8499 (13), 20.019 (3)
β (°) 94.779 (2)
V3)1061.0 (3)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.37 × 0.33 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.971, 0.988
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5177, 1868, 1031
Rint0.042
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.596
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.046, 0.121, 0.99
No. of reflections1868
No. of parameters136
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.10, 0.12

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 2003), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).

 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds