Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807040822/om2146sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807040822/om2146Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 663783
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 273 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.003 Å
- R factor = 0.046
- wR factor = 0.120
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.7
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT066_ALERT_1_C Predicted and Reported Transmissions Identical . ? PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ? PLAT152_ALERT_1_C Supplied and Calc Volume s.u. Inconsistent ..... ? PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 1 C26 H24 N2 O2
Alert level G PLAT804_ALERT_5_G ARU-Pack Problem in PLATON Analysis ............ 1 Times
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Related structures are given by Dong, Duan et al. (2006); Dong & Feng (2006); Dong, Feng & Yang (2006); Duan et al. (2007).
For related literature, see: Akine et al. (2001, 2006); Akine, Takanori, Dong & Nabeshima (2005); Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima (2005); Aysegul et al. (2005); Cordes & Jencks (1962); Koehler et al. (1964); Lacroix (2001); Niederhoffer et al. (1984); Srinivasan et al. (1986); Sundari et al. (1997); Tisato et al. (1994); Zhang et al. (1990).
2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane was synthesized according to an analogous method reported earlier (Akine, Takanori, Dong & Nabeshima, 2005; Akine et al., 2006). To an ethanol solution (5 ml) of 1-naphthaldehyde (213.6 mg, 1.36 mmol) was added an ethanol (3 ml) solution of 1,4-bis(aminooxy)butane (70.8 mg, 0.67 mmol). The solution was stirred at 328 K for 5 h, then concentrated to about 2 ml under reduced pressure. The precipitate was filtered and washed successively with ethanol and hexane. The product was dried under vacuum and purified by recrystallization from ethanol to yield 182.5 mg of the title compound. Yield, 68.7%. mp. 363–364 K. Anal. Calc. for C26H24N2O2: C, 78.76; H, 6.10; N, 7.07. Found: C, 78.68; H, 6.03; N, 7.21. IR: νC=N, 1624 cm-1 and νC-O, 1175 cm-1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 1.97 (s, 4H), 4.36 (s, 4H), 7.46 (t, J= 7.6 Hz, 4H), 7.51 (t, J= 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (dd, J= 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J= 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (d, J= 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.54(d, J= 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.74 (s, 2H). Colorless block-shaped single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained after several weeks by slow evaporation from an ethanol solution of 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane.
Non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. H atoms were treated as riding atoms with distances C—H = 0.97 (CH2), or 0.93 Å (CH), and Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C).
Schiff bases have been widely used as versatile ligands in the formation of transition metal complexes (Aysegul et al., 2005). They have been found to possess potent activities including inorganic biochemistry (Niederhoffer et al., 1984), catalysis (Srinivasan et al., 1986; Zhang et al., 1990), medical imaging (Tisato et al., 1994), optical materials (Lacroix, 2001) and thin films (Sundari et al., 1997). Although most Schiff base derivatives are stable in solution and in the solid state, C=N bonds often suffer an exchange reaction (Koehler et al., 1964) as well as hydrolysis (Cordes & Jencks, 1962). Rate constants of oxime formation are smaller than those of imine formation, and the equilibrium constants are larger by several orders of magnitude (Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima, 2005). Hence, the title compound should be stable enough to resist the metathesis of the C=N bonds (Akine et al., 2001). In recent years, we have been very much interested in the chemistry of salen-type derivatives, such as 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006), 4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[ethylenedioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong & Feng, 2006),4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[(1,3-propylene) dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong, Feng & Yang, 2006), and 2,2'-[(propane-1,3-diyldioxy)bis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Duan et al., 2007). In this paper, a bisoxime ligand, 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane was designed and synthesized, and shown in Fig. 1. The molecule is disposed about a crystallographic centre of symmetry, and the molecule adopts an extended conformation where the two naphthaldoxime moieties are apart from each other. The oxime groups have the anti-conformation, which is similar to what is observed in our previously reported salen-type bisoxime of 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006). Noteworthy is that the distance between the nearest naphthane rings, parallel to that of another molecule, is 3.141 (2) Å, revealing a strong intermolecular π-π stacking interaction as shown in Fig. 2.
Related structures are given by Dong, Duan et al. (2006); Dong & Feng (2006); Dong, Feng & Yang (2006); Duan et al. (2007).
For related literature, see: Akine et al. (2001, 2006); Akine, Takanori, Dong & Nabeshima (2005); Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima (2005); Aysegul et al. (2005); Cordes & Jencks (1962); Koehler et al. (1964); Lacroix (2001); Niederhoffer et al. (1984); Srinivasan et al. (1986); Sundari et al. (1997); Tisato et al. (1994); Zhang et al. (1990).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).
C26H24N2O2 | F(000) = 420 |
Mr = 396.47 | Dx = 1.241 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 9.0910 (18) Å | Cell parameters from 625 reflections |
b = 5.8499 (13) Å | θ = 2.3–20.6° |
c = 20.019 (3) Å | µ = 0.08 mm−1 |
β = 94.779 (2)° | T = 273 K |
V = 1061.0 (3) Å3 | Block, colorless |
Z = 2 | 0.37 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1868 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1031 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.042 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.0° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −10→10 |
Tmin = 0.971, Tmax = 0.988 | k = −6→6 |
5177 measured reflections | l = −23→11 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.121 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.99 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0505P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1868 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
136 parameters | Δρmax = 0.10 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.12 e Å−3 |
C26H24N2O2 | V = 1061.0 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 396.47 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 9.0910 (18) Å | µ = 0.08 mm−1 |
b = 5.8499 (13) Å | T = 273 K |
c = 20.019 (3) Å | 0.37 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm |
β = 94.779 (2)° |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1868 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1031 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.971, Tmax = 0.988 | Rint = 0.042 |
5177 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.121 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.99 | Δρmax = 0.10 e Å−3 |
1868 reflections | Δρmin = −0.12 e Å−3 |
136 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.2816 (2) | 0.9484 (3) | 0.08370 (9) | 0.0617 (5) | |
O1 | 0.29043 (17) | 1.1226 (2) | 0.03499 (7) | 0.0710 (5) | |
C1 | 0.4221 (3) | 1.2525 (4) | 0.05003 (11) | 0.0651 (7) | |
H1A | 0.5076 | 1.1527 | 0.0527 | 0.078* | |
H1B | 0.4185 | 1.3296 | 0.0928 | 0.078* | |
C2 | 0.4328 (2) | 1.4251 (3) | −0.00515 (11) | 0.0621 (6) | |
H2A | 0.4349 | 1.3451 | −0.0475 | 0.075* | |
H2B | 0.3453 | 1.5207 | −0.0079 | 0.075* | |
C3 | 0.1568 (3) | 0.8486 (4) | 0.07499 (10) | 0.0578 (6) | |
H3 | 0.0902 | 0.9063 | 0.0414 | 0.069* | |
C4 | 0.1082 (2) | 0.6522 (3) | 0.11266 (10) | 0.0515 (6) | |
C5 | −0.0180 (3) | 0.5460 (4) | 0.08575 (11) | 0.0639 (6) | |
H5 | −0.0691 | 0.6097 | 0.0481 | 0.077* | |
C6 | −0.0726 (3) | 0.3454 (4) | 0.11292 (12) | 0.0716 (7) | |
H6 | −0.1583 | 0.2776 | 0.0935 | 0.086* | |
C7 | 0.0009 (3) | 0.2513 (4) | 0.16784 (12) | 0.0670 (7) | |
H7 | −0.0326 | 0.1145 | 0.1847 | 0.080* | |
C8 | 0.1274 (2) | 0.3570 (3) | 0.19992 (11) | 0.0553 (6) | |
C9 | 0.1829 (2) | 0.5628 (3) | 0.17299 (10) | 0.0496 (6) | |
C10 | 0.3057 (2) | 0.6688 (4) | 0.20813 (11) | 0.0605 (6) | |
H10 | 0.3429 | 0.8035 | 0.1915 | 0.073* | |
C11 | 0.3708 (3) | 0.5778 (4) | 0.26582 (12) | 0.0726 (7) | |
H11 | 0.4514 | 0.6509 | 0.2881 | 0.087* | |
C12 | 0.3168 (3) | 0.3742 (4) | 0.29177 (13) | 0.0786 (8) | |
H12 | 0.3613 | 0.3134 | 0.3314 | 0.094* | |
C13 | 0.1998 (3) | 0.2660 (4) | 0.25924 (13) | 0.0712 (7) | |
H13 | 0.1666 | 0.1292 | 0.2763 | 0.085* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0703 (14) | 0.0557 (11) | 0.0602 (12) | −0.0035 (10) | 0.0109 (10) | 0.0136 (9) |
O1 | 0.0752 (12) | 0.0672 (10) | 0.0696 (11) | −0.0148 (9) | 0.0007 (8) | 0.0229 (8) |
C1 | 0.0700 (18) | 0.0629 (15) | 0.0626 (15) | −0.0090 (13) | 0.0065 (12) | 0.0065 (12) |
C2 | 0.0685 (16) | 0.0572 (14) | 0.0603 (14) | −0.0061 (11) | 0.0040 (12) | 0.0096 (11) |
C3 | 0.0609 (16) | 0.0590 (14) | 0.0538 (14) | 0.0015 (12) | 0.0072 (11) | 0.0073 (11) |
C4 | 0.0541 (14) | 0.0513 (13) | 0.0503 (13) | 0.0003 (11) | 0.0113 (11) | −0.0043 (11) |
C5 | 0.0660 (16) | 0.0705 (16) | 0.0558 (14) | −0.0066 (14) | 0.0085 (12) | −0.0017 (12) |
C6 | 0.0682 (17) | 0.0765 (17) | 0.0709 (17) | −0.0187 (14) | 0.0107 (13) | −0.0089 (14) |
C7 | 0.0762 (18) | 0.0506 (14) | 0.0781 (18) | −0.0114 (13) | 0.0290 (14) | −0.0064 (13) |
C8 | 0.0615 (16) | 0.0474 (13) | 0.0595 (14) | 0.0048 (12) | 0.0204 (12) | 0.0014 (11) |
C9 | 0.0507 (13) | 0.0489 (13) | 0.0508 (13) | 0.0059 (11) | 0.0132 (11) | −0.0002 (10) |
C10 | 0.0585 (15) | 0.0623 (14) | 0.0607 (15) | −0.0027 (12) | 0.0060 (12) | 0.0076 (12) |
C11 | 0.0614 (16) | 0.0891 (18) | 0.0664 (17) | 0.0012 (14) | −0.0001 (13) | 0.0146 (14) |
C12 | 0.0694 (19) | 0.094 (2) | 0.0727 (17) | 0.0194 (16) | 0.0103 (14) | 0.0299 (15) |
C13 | 0.0727 (19) | 0.0606 (16) | 0.0838 (19) | 0.0141 (14) | 0.0278 (15) | 0.0187 (14) |
N1—C3 | 1.274 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.355 (3) |
N1—O1 | 1.417 (2) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
O1—C1 | 1.429 (2) | C7—C8 | 1.412 (3) |
C1—C2 | 1.506 (3) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C1—H1A | 0.9700 | C8—C13 | 1.413 (3) |
C1—H1B | 0.9700 | C8—C9 | 1.428 (3) |
C2—C2i | 1.504 (4) | C9—C10 | 1.413 (3) |
C2—H2A | 0.9700 | C10—C11 | 1.361 (3) |
C2—H2B | 0.9700 | C10—H10 | 0.9300 |
C3—C4 | 1.463 (3) | C11—C12 | 1.404 (3) |
C3—H3 | 0.9300 | C11—H11 | 0.9300 |
C4—C5 | 1.375 (3) | C12—C13 | 1.357 (3) |
C4—C9 | 1.434 (3) | C12—H12 | 0.9300 |
C5—C6 | 1.402 (3) | C13—H13 | 0.9300 |
C5—H5 | 0.9300 | ||
C3—N1—O1 | 109.64 (17) | C7—C6—H6 | 120.4 |
N1—O1—C1 | 109.40 (15) | C5—C6—H6 | 120.4 |
O1—C1—C2 | 107.81 (17) | C6—C7—C8 | 121.3 (2) |
O1—C1—H1A | 110.1 | C6—C7—H7 | 119.4 |
C2—C1—H1A | 110.1 | C8—C7—H7 | 119.4 |
O1—C1—H1B | 110.1 | C7—C8—C13 | 121.4 (2) |
C2—C1—H1B | 110.1 | C7—C8—C9 | 119.82 (19) |
H1A—C1—H1B | 108.5 | C13—C8—C9 | 118.7 (2) |
C2i—C2—C1 | 113.0 (2) | C10—C9—C8 | 118.12 (18) |
C2i—C2—H2A | 109.0 | C10—C9—C4 | 123.95 (19) |
C1—C2—H2A | 109.0 | C8—C9—C4 | 117.91 (18) |
C2i—C2—H2B | 109.0 | C11—C10—C9 | 121.4 (2) |
C1—C2—H2B | 109.0 | C11—C10—H10 | 119.3 |
H2A—C2—H2B | 107.8 | C9—C10—H10 | 119.3 |
N1—C3—C4 | 126.4 (2) | C10—C11—C12 | 120.3 (2) |
N1—C3—H3 | 116.8 | C10—C11—H11 | 119.9 |
C4—C3—H3 | 116.8 | C12—C11—H11 | 119.9 |
C5—C4—C9 | 119.1 (2) | C13—C12—C11 | 120.2 (2) |
C5—C4—C3 | 115.5 (2) | C13—C12—H12 | 119.9 |
C9—C4—C3 | 125.35 (19) | C11—C12—H12 | 119.9 |
C4—C5—C6 | 122.5 (2) | C12—C13—C8 | 121.3 (2) |
C4—C5—H5 | 118.8 | C12—C13—H13 | 119.4 |
C6—C5—H5 | 118.8 | C8—C13—H13 | 119.4 |
C7—C6—C5 | 119.2 (2) | ||
C3—N1—O1—C1 | 172.74 (18) | C7—C8—C9—C4 | −1.3 (3) |
N1—O1—C1—C2 | 176.28 (17) | C13—C8—C9—C4 | 179.82 (19) |
O1—C1—C2—C2i | 179.6 (2) | C5—C4—C9—C10 | −174.4 (2) |
O1—N1—C3—C4 | 176.55 (19) | C3—C4—C9—C10 | 7.1 (3) |
N1—C3—C4—C5 | −167.4 (2) | C5—C4—C9—C8 | 4.1 (3) |
N1—C3—C4—C9 | 11.1 (3) | C3—C4—C9—C8 | −174.37 (19) |
C9—C4—C5—C6 | −3.6 (3) | C8—C9—C10—C11 | 0.4 (3) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 175.0 (2) | C4—C9—C10—C11 | 179.0 (2) |
C4—C5—C6—C7 | 0.1 (4) | C9—C10—C11—C12 | 0.2 (3) |
C5—C6—C7—C8 | 2.9 (3) | C10—C11—C12—C13 | 0.4 (4) |
C6—C7—C8—C13 | 176.6 (2) | C11—C12—C13—C8 | −1.6 (4) |
C6—C7—C8—C9 | −2.2 (3) | C7—C8—C13—C12 | −176.6 (2) |
C7—C8—C9—C10 | 177.3 (2) | C9—C8—C13—C12 | 2.2 (3) |
C13—C8—C9—C10 | −1.6 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+3, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C26H24N2O2 |
Mr | 396.47 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 273 |
a, b, c (Å) | 9.0910 (18), 5.8499 (13), 20.019 (3) |
β (°) | 94.779 (2) |
V (Å3) | 1061.0 (3) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.08 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.37 × 0.33 × 0.15 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART CCD area-detector |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.971, 0.988 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 5177, 1868, 1031 |
Rint | 0.042 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.596 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.046, 0.121, 0.99 |
No. of reflections | 1868 |
No. of parameters | 136 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.10, −0.12 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 2003), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
Schiff bases have been widely used as versatile ligands in the formation of transition metal complexes (Aysegul et al., 2005). They have been found to possess potent activities including inorganic biochemistry (Niederhoffer et al., 1984), catalysis (Srinivasan et al., 1986; Zhang et al., 1990), medical imaging (Tisato et al., 1994), optical materials (Lacroix, 2001) and thin films (Sundari et al., 1997). Although most Schiff base derivatives are stable in solution and in the solid state, C=N bonds often suffer an exchange reaction (Koehler et al., 1964) as well as hydrolysis (Cordes & Jencks, 1962). Rate constants of oxime formation are smaller than those of imine formation, and the equilibrium constants are larger by several orders of magnitude (Akine, Takanori, Taniguchi & Nabeshima, 2005). Hence, the title compound should be stable enough to resist the metathesis of the C=N bonds (Akine et al., 2001). In recent years, we have been very much interested in the chemistry of salen-type derivatives, such as 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006), 4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[ethylenedioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong & Feng, 2006),4,4'-dibromo-2,2'-[(1,3-propylene) dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Dong, Feng & Yang, 2006), and 2,2'-[(propane-1,3-diyldioxy)bis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol (Duan et al., 2007). In this paper, a bisoxime ligand, 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthane was designed and synthesized, and shown in Fig. 1. The molecule is disposed about a crystallographic centre of symmetry, and the molecule adopts an extended conformation where the two naphthaldoxime moieties are apart from each other. The oxime groups have the anti-conformation, which is similar to what is observed in our previously reported salen-type bisoxime of 2,2'-[(1,4-butylene)dioxybis(nitrilomethylidyne)]dinaphthol (Dong, Duan et al., 2006). Noteworthy is that the distance between the nearest naphthane rings, parallel to that of another molecule, is 3.141 (2) Å, revealing a strong intermolecular π-π stacking interaction as shown in Fig. 2.