Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104030975/ob1206sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104030975/ob1206Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 264805
To a hot methanol solution of 2-amino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidine (62 mg, Aldrich) were added a few drops of sulfuric acid. The solution was warmed over a water bath for a few minutes. The resulting solution was allowed to cool slowly to room temperature. Crystals of (I) appeared from the mother liquor after a few days.
The positions of H atoms were determined from difference Fourier maps and refined freely along with their isotropic displacement parameters. The C—H, N—H and O—H bond lengths are 0.86 (2)–0.96 (2), 0.85 (2)–0.87 (2) and 0.82 (2) Å, respectively
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2004); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2004); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003) and ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Fig. 1. An ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) diagram of the asymmetric unit of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. | |
Fig. 2. The crystal structure of (I). Broken lines denote hydrogen bonds. |
C6H10N3+·HSO4− | F(000) = 464 |
Mr = 221.24 | Dx = 1.540 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -p 2ybc | Cell parameters from 4591 reflections |
a = 7.025 (1) Å | θ = 3.4–25.7° |
b = 6.724 (1) Å | µ = 0.33 mm−1 |
c = 20.200 (4) Å | T = 293 K |
β = 90.27 (3)° | Prism, colourless |
V = 954.2 (3) Å3 | 0.5 × 0.35 × 0.1 mm |
Z = 4 |
Kuma KM-4 CCD κ-geometry diffractometer | 1793 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1622 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.026 |
ω scans | θmax = 25.7°, θmin = 4.7° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (XEMP; Siemens, 1990) | h = −6→8 |
Tmin = 0.877, Tmax = 0.970 | k = −8→8 |
7253 measured reflections | l = −24→19 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: Fmap |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 | All H-atom parameters refined |
wR(F2) = 0.072 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0395P)2 + 0.4073P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.07 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1793 reflections | Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3 |
172 parameters | Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.015 (2) |
C6H10N3+·HSO4− | V = 954.2 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 221.24 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.025 (1) Å | µ = 0.33 mm−1 |
b = 6.724 (1) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 20.200 (4) Å | 0.5 × 0.35 × 0.1 mm |
β = 90.27 (3)° |
Kuma KM-4 CCD κ-geometry diffractometer | 1793 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (XEMP; Siemens, 1990) | 1622 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.877, Tmax = 0.970 | Rint = 0.026 |
7253 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.072 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.07 | Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3 |
1793 reflections | Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3 |
172 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
S1 | 1.03273 (5) | −0.16124 (5) | 0.322692 (17) | 0.01472 (14) | |
O1 | 1.04674 (16) | −0.39155 (16) | 0.33076 (6) | 0.0201 (3) | |
H1' | 0.997 (3) | −0.450 (4) | 0.2993 (11) | 0.044 (7)* | |
O2 | 1.14645 (15) | −0.08421 (17) | 0.37682 (6) | 0.0234 (3) | |
O3 | 1.11085 (15) | −0.11503 (16) | 0.25764 (5) | 0.0229 (3) | |
O4 | 0.83239 (14) | −0.10580 (16) | 0.32732 (5) | 0.0200 (3) | |
N1 | 0.72693 (17) | 0.25743 (19) | 0.37687 (6) | 0.0146 (3) | |
H1 | 0.768 (3) | 0.150 (3) | 0.3594 (10) | 0.035 (6)* | |
N2 | 0.98587 (19) | 0.2540 (2) | 0.44805 (7) | 0.0209 (3) | |
H2A | 1.053 (3) | 0.317 (3) | 0.4756 (10) | 0.027 (5)* | |
H2B | 1.030 (3) | 0.148 (3) | 0.4284 (10) | 0.029 (5)* | |
N3 | 0.77406 (17) | 0.51565 (18) | 0.45432 (6) | 0.0162 (3) | |
C2 | 0.8301 (2) | 0.3429 (2) | 0.42631 (7) | 0.0146 (3) | |
C4 | 0.6153 (2) | 0.5999 (2) | 0.43112 (7) | 0.0165 (3) | |
C5 | 0.5043 (2) | 0.5153 (2) | 0.38065 (7) | 0.0183 (3) | |
H5 | 0.389 (3) | 0.576 (3) | 0.3647 (9) | 0.024 (5)* | |
C6 | 0.5637 (2) | 0.3403 (2) | 0.35286 (7) | 0.0154 (3) | |
C7 | 0.5602 (3) | 0.7933 (2) | 0.46201 (9) | 0.0214 (4) | |
H7A | 0.450 (3) | 0.831 (3) | 0.4480 (11) | 0.043 (6)* | |
H7B | 0.568 (3) | 0.785 (3) | 0.5085 (11) | 0.032 (5)* | |
H7C | 0.647 (3) | 0.887 (4) | 0.4525 (11) | 0.048 (6)* | |
C8 | 0.4639 (2) | 0.2311 (3) | 0.29889 (9) | 0.0217 (4) | |
H8A | 0.361 (3) | 0.303 (3) | 0.2824 (10) | 0.036 (6)* | |
H8B | 0.544 (3) | 0.205 (3) | 0.2650 (12) | 0.047 (6)* | |
H8C | 0.424 (3) | 0.105 (3) | 0.3144 (11) | 0.040 (6)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
S1 | 0.0161 (2) | 0.0125 (2) | 0.0155 (2) | 0.00195 (13) | 0.00042 (14) | −0.00116 (14) |
O1 | 0.0274 (6) | 0.0135 (6) | 0.0194 (6) | 0.0026 (4) | −0.0018 (5) | −0.0004 (4) |
O2 | 0.0223 (6) | 0.0221 (6) | 0.0256 (6) | 0.0027 (4) | −0.0061 (5) | −0.0067 (5) |
O3 | 0.0264 (6) | 0.0214 (6) | 0.0209 (6) | 0.0054 (5) | 0.0065 (5) | 0.0041 (5) |
O4 | 0.0166 (5) | 0.0183 (6) | 0.0250 (6) | 0.0022 (4) | 0.0007 (4) | −0.0045 (4) |
N1 | 0.0161 (6) | 0.0137 (6) | 0.0139 (6) | 0.0003 (5) | 0.0017 (5) | −0.0019 (5) |
N2 | 0.0224 (7) | 0.0191 (7) | 0.0210 (7) | 0.0061 (6) | −0.0070 (6) | −0.0081 (6) |
N3 | 0.0193 (6) | 0.0148 (6) | 0.0146 (6) | 0.0019 (5) | 0.0001 (5) | −0.0012 (5) |
C2 | 0.0175 (7) | 0.0141 (7) | 0.0122 (7) | −0.0003 (6) | 0.0014 (5) | −0.0004 (5) |
C4 | 0.0191 (7) | 0.0149 (7) | 0.0156 (7) | 0.0012 (6) | 0.0039 (6) | 0.0023 (6) |
C5 | 0.0172 (7) | 0.0184 (8) | 0.0192 (8) | 0.0030 (6) | −0.0009 (6) | 0.0027 (6) |
C6 | 0.0157 (7) | 0.0174 (7) | 0.0133 (7) | −0.0017 (6) | 0.0020 (6) | 0.0033 (6) |
C7 | 0.0246 (8) | 0.0178 (8) | 0.0219 (9) | 0.0060 (7) | 0.0008 (7) | −0.0019 (7) |
C8 | 0.0206 (8) | 0.0232 (9) | 0.0211 (9) | −0.0012 (7) | −0.0039 (7) | −0.0023 (7) |
S1—O2 | 1.4470 (12) | N3—C2 | 1.3518 (19) |
S1—O4 | 1.4594 (11) | C4—C5 | 1.402 (2) |
S1—O3 | 1.4599 (12) | C4—C7 | 1.494 (2) |
S1—O1 | 1.5602 (11) | C5—C6 | 1.369 (2) |
O1—H1' | 0.82 (2) | C5—H5 | 0.962 (18) |
N1—C2 | 1.3587 (19) | C6—C8 | 1.487 (2) |
N1—C6 | 1.3621 (19) | C7—H7A | 0.86 (2) |
N1—H1 | 0.86 (2) | C7—H7B | 0.94 (2) |
N2—C2 | 1.320 (2) | C7—H7C | 0.90 (3) |
N2—H2A | 0.85 (2) | C8—H8A | 0.93 (2) |
N2—H2B | 0.87 (2) | C8—H8B | 0.90 (3) |
N3—C4 | 1.3337 (19) | C8—H8C | 0.95 (2) |
O2—S1—O4 | 112.91 (7) | C5—C4—C7 | 120.86 (14) |
O2—S1—O3 | 113.30 (7) | C6—C5—C4 | 118.52 (13) |
O4—S1—O3 | 111.72 (7) | C6—C5—H5 | 119.1 (11) |
O2—S1—O1 | 104.01 (7) | C4—C5—H5 | 122.3 (11) |
O4—S1—O1 | 107.89 (6) | N1—C6—C5 | 117.59 (13) |
O3—S1—O1 | 106.35 (6) | N1—C6—C8 | 116.88 (14) |
S1—O1—H1' | 111.7 (16) | C5—C6—C8 | 125.52 (14) |
C2—N1—C6 | 122.27 (13) | C4—C7—H7A | 110.7 (15) |
C2—N1—H1 | 118.8 (14) | C4—C7—H7B | 110.6 (12) |
C6—N1—H1 | 118.9 (14) | H7A—C7—H7B | 112.9 (19) |
C2—N2—H2A | 116.9 (13) | C4—C7—H7C | 110.1 (15) |
C2—N2—H2B | 120.9 (13) | H7A—C7—H7C | 110 (2) |
H2A—N2—H2B | 120.8 (19) | H7B—C7—H7C | 102.7 (19) |
C4—N3—C2 | 117.57 (13) | C6—C8—H8A | 111.6 (13) |
N2—C2—N3 | 119.51 (13) | C6—C8—H8B | 111.2 (15) |
N2—C2—N1 | 119.46 (13) | H8A—C8—H8B | 108.3 (19) |
N3—C2—N1 | 121.03 (13) | C6—C8—H8C | 109.8 (13) |
N3—C4—C5 | 122.99 (14) | H8A—C8—H8C | 110.6 (18) |
N3—C4—C7 | 116.16 (14) | H8B—C8—H8C | 105.1 (18) |
C4—N3—C2—N2 | −179.63 (14) | N3—C4—C5—C6 | −1.5 (2) |
C4—N3—C2—N1 | −0.8 (2) | C7—C4—C5—C6 | 178.36 (14) |
C6—N1—C2—N2 | 179.15 (13) | C2—N1—C6—C5 | −0.4 (2) |
C6—N1—C2—N3 | 0.3 (2) | C2—N1—C6—C8 | −179.72 (13) |
C2—N3—C4—C5 | 1.4 (2) | C4—C5—C6—N1 | 0.9 (2) |
C2—N3—C4—C7 | −178.48 (13) | C4—C5—C6—C8 | −179.78 (15) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1···O4 | 0.86 (2) | 1.90 (2) | 2.743 (2) | 172 (2) |
N2—H2B···O2 | 0.87 (2) | 2.05 (2) | 2.921 (2) | 175 (2) |
O1—H1′···O3i | 0.82 (2) | 1.76 (2) | 2.579 (2) | 169 (2) |
N2—H2A···N3ii | 0.85 (2) | 2.17 (2) | 3.017 (2) | 179 (2) |
C5—H5···O1iii | 0.96 (2) | 2.51 (2) | 3.422 (2) | 159 (1) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x−1, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C6H10N3+·HSO4− |
Mr | 221.24 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 7.025 (1), 6.724 (1), 20.200 (4) |
β (°) | 90.27 (3) |
V (Å3) | 954.2 (3) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.33 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.5 × 0.35 × 0.1 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Kuma KM-4 CCD κ-geometry diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (XEMP; Siemens, 1990) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.877, 0.970 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 7253, 1793, 1622 |
Rint | 0.026 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.609 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.027, 0.072, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 1793 |
No. of parameters | 172 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.24, −0.51 |
Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2004), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2004), CrysAlis RED, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), PLATON (Spek, 2003) and ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976), SHELXL97.
S1—O2 | 1.4470 (12) | N3—C4 | 1.3337 (19) |
S1—O4 | 1.4594 (11) | N3—C2 | 1.3518 (19) |
S1—O3 | 1.4599 (12) | C4—C5 | 1.402 (2) |
S1—O1 | 1.5602 (11) | C4—C7 | 1.494 (2) |
N1—C2 | 1.3587 (19) | C5—C6 | 1.369 (2) |
N1—C6 | 1.3621 (19) | C6—C8 | 1.487 (2) |
N2—C2 | 1.320 (2) | ||
O2—S1—O4 | 112.91 (7) | O4—S1—O1 | 107.89 (6) |
O2—S1—O3 | 113.30 (7) | O3—S1—O1 | 106.35 (6) |
O4—S1—O3 | 111.72 (7) | C2—N1—C6 | 122.27 (13) |
O2—S1—O1 | 104.01 (7) | C4—N3—C2 | 117.57 (13) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1···O4 | 0.86 (2) | 1.90 (2) | 2.743 (2) | 172 (2) |
N2—H2B···O2 | 0.87 (2) | 2.05 (2) | 2.921 (2) | 175 (2) |
O1—H1'···O3i | 0.82 (2) | 1.76 (2) | 2.579 (2) | 169 (2) |
N2—H2A···N3ii | 0.85 (2) | 2.17 (2) | 3.017 (2) | 179 (2) |
C5—H5···O1iii | 0.96 (2) | 2.51 (2) | 3.422 (2) | 159 (1) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x−1, y+1, z. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- Purchase subscription
- Reduced-price subscriptions
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
Pyrimidine and aminopyrimidine derivatives are biologically very important compounds as they occur in nature as components of nucleic acids. Some aminopyrimidine derivatives are used as antifolate drugs (Hunt et al., 1980; Baker & Santi, 1965). 2-Aminopyrimidine and its derivatives are of particular interest as adduct formers because of their ability to form stable hydrogen-bonded chains via their stereochemically associative amine group and the ring N atoms (Lynch et al., 2000). The crystal structures of aminopyrimidine derivatives (Schwalbe & Williams, 1982), aminopyrimidine carboxylates (Hu et al., 2002) and cocrystals (Chinnakali et al., 1999; Goswami et al., 2000; Etter, 1990) have been reported in the literature. The crystal structure of 2,4-diaminopyrimidinium sulfate has also been reported by one of us (Muthiah et al., 2001). Hydrogen-bonding patterns involving sulfate and sulfonate groups in biological systems and metal complexes are also of current interest (Onoda et al., 2001). Benzoic acid and sulfuric acid form a stable hydrogen-bonded complex that favours aerosol formation in the atmosphere (Zhang et al., 2004). In a sulfate-binding protein, the sulfate anion is bound mainly by seven hydrogen bonds, five of which are from the main-chain peptide NH groups (Pflugrath & Quiocho, 1985; Jacobson & Quiocho, 1988). The present study is aimed at understanding the hydrogen-bonding networks in the title compound, (I).
In (I), the asymmetric unit consists of a hydrogen sulfate anion and a 2-amino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidinium cation (ampyH) (Fig. 1). The protonation of the pyrimidine base on the N1 site is reflected in the change in bond angle. The C2—N3—C4 angle at the unprotonated atom N3 is 117.6 (1)°, while for the protonated atom N1 the C2—N1—C6 angle is 122.3 (1)°. The geometry of the ampyH cation agrees with that of other ampyH cations reported in the literature (Panneerselvam et al., 2004). The S—O distances lie between 1.447 (1) and 1.560 (1) Å, while the O—S—O angle ranges between 104.0 (1) and 113.3 (1)° (Table 1), indicating a distorted tetrahedral environment around the S atom. The S—O bond lengths and O—S—O bond angles of the sulfate group are consistent with the fact that the H atom is attached only to atom O1. Atoms O2 and O4 interact with the protonated pyrimidine moiety through a pair of nearly parallel N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 2), which are reminiscent of the carboxylate–amine interaction seen in ASP-27 of dihydrofolate reductase and the 2,4-diamino-5-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyl)pyrimidine cation (Kuyper, 1990). Thus in compound (I), the pair of sulfate O atoms mimics the role of the carboxylate group in its hydrogen-bonded interaction with the aminopyrimidinium motif. This type of interaction has also been observed in the crystal structure of 2-amino-5-nitro-4,6-dipiperidino-pyrimidinium hydrogensulfate monohydrate (Quesada et al., 2003). This pattern is also remarkably similar to that observed in the adeninium/sulfate systems (Langer & Huml, 1978) and in cytidinium salts with composite XYn anions capable of accepting hydrogen bonds through their Y atoms, e.g. NO3−, HSO4−, SO42−, H2PO4− and SiF62− (Gilski & Jaskólski, 1998).
The ampyH cations are paired centrosymmetrically through N2—H2A···N3ii and N3···H2Aii—N2ii hydrogen bonds (for symmetry code see Table 2). This configuration can be described by the graph-set notation R22(8) (Etter, 1990; Berstein et al., 1995). This type of base pairing has also been reported in trimethoprim salicylate methanol solvate (Panneerselvam et al., 2002), trimethoprim sulfate trihydrate (Muthiah et al., 2001), trimethoprimhydrogen maleate (Prabakaran et al., 2001) and trimethoprim perchlorate (Muthiah et al., 2002). The hydrogen sulfate ions self-assemble through O1—H1'···O3i hydrogen bonds, leading to a supramolecular chain along the b axis (Fig. 2). There is also a C—H···O hydrogen bond involving atoms C5 of the pyrimidine moiety and O1 of the hydrogen sulfate ion.