Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680704679X/nc2062sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680704679X/nc2062Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 663840
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 298 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.003 Å
- R factor = 0.039
- wR factor = 0.111
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.3
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT152_ALERT_1_C Supplied and Calc Volume s.u. Inconsistent ..... ? PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H3A .. O3 .. 2.65 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H5B .. O2 .. 2.64 Ang.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 3 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
For related work on monomers and polymers for nuclear track detection purposes, see: Mascarenhas et al. (2006). For related literature, see: Bondi (1964).
Diethylene glycol (10 g, 0.094 mol) was condended with allyl chlorosulphonate (26.695 g, 0.19 mol) in the presence of pyridine (16.53 g, 0.209 mol). The product obtained was purified by column chromatography. Yield: 25.61 g (86%) of a colourless solid (m.p. 43–45°C). Crystals suitable for structure determination were prepared by recrystallizing from a mixture of 1:1 ethyl acetate and petroleum ether.
The H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry (C—H = 0.93 and 0.97 Å and were refined isotropic (Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)) using a riding model.
As part of an ongoing research programme, we are designing monomers and polymers for nuclear track detection purpose (Mascarenhas et al., 2006). During the course of this study we have synthesized two monomers namely diethylene glycol bis(allylsulfonate) (I) and the corresponding isomer allyl diglycol sulphite (ADS) having the same molecular formula [C10H18O7S2] but different functional groups. Interestingly compound (I) is a solid while the functional isomer (ADS) is a liquid at room temperature. The structure of (I) is described in this report.
In the crystal structure of the title compound the molecules are located with the ether oxygen atom (O1) on a 2-fold axis with one half of the molecule constituting the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1). An analysis of the structure reveals that each molecule of (I) is hydrogen bonded to four symmetry related molecules with the aid of C—H···O interactions (Fig. 2). All these O···H contacts are shorter than the sum of their van der Waals radii (Bondi, 1964) (Table 1).
For related work on monomers and polymers for nuclear track detection purposes, see: Mascarenhas et al. (2006). For related literature, see: Bondi (1964).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001).
C10H18O7S2 | F(000) = 664 |
Mr = 314.38 | Dx = 1.424 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 2760 reflections |
a = 12.022 (3) Å | θ = 2.8–26.0° |
b = 8.3484 (18) Å | µ = 0.39 mm−1 |
c = 14.894 (3) Å | T = 298 K |
β = 101.096 (3)° | Block, colourless |
V = 1466.8 (5) Å3 | 0.38 × 0.38 × 0.22 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer | 1437 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1233 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.019 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) | h = −14→13 |
Tmin = 0.867, Tmax = 0.920 | k = −10→9 |
4456 measured reflections | l = −18→18 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.111 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0668P)2 + 0.3626P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.06 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1437 reflections | Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 |
88 parameters | Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.0102 (14) |
C10H18O7S2 | V = 1466.8 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 314.38 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 12.022 (3) Å | µ = 0.39 mm−1 |
b = 8.3484 (18) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 14.894 (3) Å | 0.38 × 0.38 × 0.22 mm |
β = 101.096 (3)° |
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer | 1437 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) | 1233 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.867, Tmax = 0.920 | Rint = 0.019 |
4456 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.111 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 |
1437 reflections | Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 |
88 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.47766 (16) | 0.3496 (2) | 0.66959 (12) | 0.0598 (5) | |
H1A | 0.5433 | 0.4147 | 0.6654 | 0.072* | |
H1B | 0.4140 | 0.4203 | 0.6711 | 0.072* | |
C2 | 0.45113 (15) | 0.2405 (2) | 0.58925 (12) | 0.0583 (5) | |
H2A | 0.4486 | 0.3002 | 0.5330 | 0.070* | |
H2B | 0.5090 | 0.1584 | 0.5931 | 0.070* | |
C3 | 0.38595 (16) | −0.1408 (2) | 0.60957 (12) | 0.0575 (5) | |
H3A | 0.3680 | −0.2459 | 0.5830 | 0.069* | |
H3B | 0.4666 | −0.1230 | 0.6142 | 0.069* | |
C4 | 0.35810 (16) | −0.1363 (2) | 0.70316 (12) | 0.0633 (5) | |
H4 | 0.3820 | −0.0481 | 0.7400 | 0.076* | |
C5 | 0.3028 (2) | −0.2478 (3) | 0.73597 (16) | 0.0864 (7) | |
H5A | 0.2778 | −0.3374 | 0.7008 | 0.104* | |
H5B | 0.2880 | −0.2383 | 0.7948 | 0.104* | |
O1 | 0.5000 | 0.25490 (19) | 0.7500 | 0.0588 (5) | |
O2 | 0.34023 (10) | 0.16683 (15) | 0.59020 (8) | 0.0564 (4) | |
O3 | 0.19171 (12) | −0.01518 (16) | 0.53390 (11) | 0.0709 (4) | |
O4 | 0.34969 (13) | 0.01089 (16) | 0.45264 (9) | 0.0689 (4) | |
S1 | 0.30943 (4) | 0.00679 (5) | 0.53678 (3) | 0.0551 (2) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0652 (12) | 0.0545 (11) | 0.0604 (10) | 0.0051 (8) | 0.0139 (8) | 0.0084 (8) |
C2 | 0.0543 (10) | 0.0676 (12) | 0.0549 (10) | 0.0098 (8) | 0.0153 (7) | 0.0064 (8) |
C3 | 0.0533 (10) | 0.0643 (11) | 0.0548 (9) | 0.0123 (8) | 0.0098 (7) | 0.0046 (8) |
C4 | 0.0588 (11) | 0.0730 (13) | 0.0572 (10) | 0.0088 (9) | 0.0091 (8) | 0.0067 (9) |
C5 | 0.0861 (17) | 0.0939 (17) | 0.0859 (15) | 0.0038 (13) | 0.0334 (12) | 0.0152 (12) |
O1 | 0.0705 (12) | 0.0506 (10) | 0.0527 (9) | 0.000 | 0.0054 (8) | 0.000 |
O2 | 0.0527 (7) | 0.0643 (8) | 0.0539 (7) | 0.0107 (6) | 0.0147 (5) | −0.0047 (5) |
O3 | 0.0506 (8) | 0.0839 (10) | 0.0737 (9) | 0.0082 (6) | 0.0008 (6) | 0.0005 (7) |
O4 | 0.0794 (11) | 0.0815 (10) | 0.0454 (7) | 0.0187 (7) | 0.0109 (6) | −0.0017 (5) |
S1 | 0.0523 (3) | 0.0662 (4) | 0.0451 (3) | 0.01240 (18) | 0.0054 (2) | −0.00064 (17) |
C1—O1 | 1.4170 (19) | C3—H3B | 0.9700 |
C1—C2 | 1.489 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.293 (3) |
C1—H1A | 0.9700 | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
C1—H1B | 0.9700 | C5—H5A | 0.9300 |
C2—O2 | 1.471 (2) | C5—H5B | 0.9300 |
C2—H2A | 0.9700 | O1—C1i | 1.4169 (19) |
C2—H2B | 0.9700 | O2—S1 | 1.5626 (13) |
C3—C4 | 1.495 (2) | O3—S1 | 1.4196 (15) |
C3—S1 | 1.7764 (18) | O4—S1 | 1.4279 (15) |
C3—H3A | 0.9700 | ||
O1—C1—C2 | 108.31 (14) | S1—C3—H3B | 109.3 |
O1—C1—H1A | 110.0 | H3A—C3—H3B | 107.9 |
C2—C1—H1A | 110.0 | C5—C4—C3 | 123.9 (2) |
O1—C1—H1B | 110.0 | C5—C4—H4 | 118.0 |
C2—C1—H1B | 110.0 | C3—C4—H4 | 118.0 |
H1A—C1—H1B | 108.4 | C4—C5—H5A | 120.0 |
O2—C2—C1 | 107.61 (13) | C4—C5—H5B | 120.0 |
O2—C2—H2A | 110.2 | H5A—C5—H5B | 120.0 |
C1—C2—H2A | 110.2 | C1i—O1—C1 | 112.15 (19) |
O2—C2—H2B | 110.2 | C2—O2—S1 | 118.61 (10) |
C1—C2—H2B | 110.2 | O3—S1—O4 | 118.74 (10) |
H2A—C2—H2B | 108.5 | O3—S1—O2 | 105.25 (7) |
C4—C3—S1 | 111.66 (13) | O4—S1—O2 | 109.83 (8) |
C4—C3—H3A | 109.3 | O3—S1—C3 | 108.96 (9) |
S1—C3—H3A | 109.3 | O4—S1—C3 | 109.21 (8) |
C4—C3—H3B | 109.3 | O2—S1—C3 | 103.77 (8) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+3/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2A···O3ii | 0.97 | 2.53 | 3.219 (2) | 128 |
C2—H2B···O4iii | 0.97 | 2.41 | 3.332 (2) | 159 |
C3—H3A···O3iv | 0.97 | 2.65 | 3.594 (2) | 163 |
C5—H5B···O2v | 0.93 | 2.64 | 3.447 (2) | 146 |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iv) −x+1/2, −y−1/2, −z+1; (v) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+3/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H18O7S2 |
Mr | 314.38 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 12.022 (3), 8.3484 (18), 14.894 (3) |
β (°) | 101.096 (3) |
V (Å3) | 1466.8 (5) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.39 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.38 × 0.38 × 0.22 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART APEX CCD |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.867, 0.920 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 4456, 1437, 1233 |
Rint | 0.019 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.617 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.039, 0.111, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 1437 |
No. of parameters | 88 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.23, −0.26 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2001), SAINT (Bruker, 2001), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999).
C1—O1 | 1.4170 (19) | C4—C5 | 1.293 (3) |
C1—C2 | 1.489 (3) | O1—C1i | 1.4169 (19) |
C2—O2 | 1.471 (2) | O2—S1 | 1.5626 (13) |
C3—C4 | 1.495 (2) | O3—S1 | 1.4196 (15) |
C3—S1 | 1.7764 (18) | O4—S1 | 1.4279 (15) |
O1—C1—C2 | 108.31 (14) | O3—S1—O4 | 118.74 (10) |
O2—C2—C1 | 107.61 (13) | O3—S1—O2 | 105.25 (7) |
C4—C3—S1 | 111.66 (13) | O4—S1—O2 | 109.83 (8) |
C5—C4—C3 | 123.9 (2) | O3—S1—C3 | 108.96 (9) |
C1i—O1—C1 | 112.15 (19) | O4—S1—C3 | 109.21 (8) |
C2—O2—S1 | 118.61 (10) | O2—S1—C3 | 103.77 (8) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+3/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2A···O3ii | 0.97 | 2.53 | 3.219 (2) | 128 |
C2—H2B···O4iii | 0.97 | 2.41 | 3.332 (2) | 159 |
C3—H3A···O3iv | 0.97 | 2.65 | 3.594 (2) | 163 |
C5—H5B···O2v | 0.93 | 2.64 | 3.447 (2) | 146 |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iv) −x+1/2, −y−1/2, −z+1; (v) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+3/2. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
As part of an ongoing research programme, we are designing monomers and polymers for nuclear track detection purpose (Mascarenhas et al., 2006). During the course of this study we have synthesized two monomers namely diethylene glycol bis(allylsulfonate) (I) and the corresponding isomer allyl diglycol sulphite (ADS) having the same molecular formula [C10H18O7S2] but different functional groups. Interestingly compound (I) is a solid while the functional isomer (ADS) is a liquid at room temperature. The structure of (I) is described in this report.
In the crystal structure of the title compound the molecules are located with the ether oxygen atom (O1) on a 2-fold axis with one half of the molecule constituting the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1). An analysis of the structure reveals that each molecule of (I) is hydrogen bonded to four symmetry related molecules with the aid of C—H···O interactions (Fig. 2). All these O···H contacts are shorter than the sum of their van der Waals radii (Bondi, 1964) (Table 1).