Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The crystal structure of the title compound, [Cu2(C12H7­N2O)2]·H2O, shows that this dinuclear complex has shorter Cu—N, Cu—O and Cu—Cu distances within the coordination sphere than similar reported complexes. The complex mol­ecule is located on a centre of symmetry and the water mol­ecule is on a twofold axis of the space group C2/c. The discrete complex mol­ecules are extended into a two-dimensional supramolecular array via π–π stacking interactions, intermolecular Cu...Cu interactions and C—H...O hydrogen bonds.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104010078/na1661sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104010078/na1661Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 243585

Comment top

The copper(II) complex of 1,10-phenanthroline, the first artificial nuclease, has been well investigated over the past two decades. Although [(phen)2Cu]+ or [(phen)2Cu2]+ (phen is 1,10-phenanthroline) are thought to be the active species for DNA cleavage (Sigman et al., 1993; Lu et al., 2003), it is still not known how these complexes bind to DNA. Therefore, investigating the structures of [(phen)2Cu]+ and [(phen)2Cu2]+ would be helpful for understanding the binding mode. Recently, three supramolecular isomers of dinuclear copper(I) 2-hydroxy-1,10-phenanthroline complexes, [Cu2(ophen)2], synthesized from 1,10-phenanthroline (ophen is? Please define) were studied by Zhang Tong et al. (2002). In our experiments, we have obtained a similar complex, the title compound, (I), and we report its crystal structure here. \sch

The geometric parameters of (I) are listed in Table 1 and the molecular conformation is illustrated in Fig. 1. The compound contains a [Cu2(oxo-phen)2] complex and a water molecule. The complex molecule is located on a centre of symmetry and the water molecule on a twofold axis of the space group C2/c. Each Cu+ ion adopts a square-planar geometry, being coordinated by two N atoms from an oxo-phen ligand and one O atom from another oxo-phen ligand, as well as one Cu atom. This structure is not much different from that reported by Zhang Tong et al. (2002). However, all coordination bonds around the Cu atoms [Cu—N 1.913 (4) and 2.110 (4) Å, Cu—O 1.883 (3) Å and Cu—Cu 2.497 (1) Å] are shorter than the corresponding bonds [Cu—N 1.953 (5)–2.274 (6) Å, Cu—O 1.916 (5)–1.923 (5) Å and Cu—Cu 2.661 (2)–2.679 (3) Å] in [Cu2(ophen)2] supramolecular isomers, especially the Cu—Cu distance, which is shorter by 0.164–0.182 Å but much closer to the values observed in mixed-valence Cu+/Cu2+ complexes [Cu—Cu 2.402 (1)–2.443 (2) Å; Zhang Tong et al., 2002; Zhang Tong & Chen, 2002]. Thus the coordination sphere of (I) is tighter and the interaction of both Cu+ ions is stronger.

The hydrogen-bonding geometry in (I) is listed in Table 2 and illustrated in Fig. 2. In the crystal packing, aromatic ππ stacking interactions are present between the ligand rings of the complex packed along y. These can be best described by considering the C6/C9—C12/N2 ring at (x, y, z) and the C4—C9 ring at (x, y − 1, z), with a centroid-centroid distance of 3.587 (7) Å. The weighted least-squares planes through these two rings are very nearly parallel, as the dihedral angle they form is only 0.40 (13)°. The interplanar spacing is 3.28 (5) Å and the centroid shift is 1.45 (11) Å. Along y, the shortest Cu···Cu contact is b = 3.6676 (3) Å. The coordination plane through atoms Cu1/N1/N2/O1 at (x, y, z) and the equivalent atoms at (1/2 − x, 1/2 + y, 3/2 − z) form a dihedral angle of 48.03 (13)°. This is the direction along which the complex molecules are joined via weak C—H···O hydrogen interactions (Table 2), giving rise to a zigzag chain that, together with the ππ stacking and Cu···Cu interactions, generates a supramolecular two-dimensional array extended along the length of the crystal.

Experimental top

All chemicals were of reagent grade and commercially available from the Beijing Chemical Reagents Company of China; they were used without further purification. Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (0.12 g), 1,10-phenanthroline (0.117 g), 4-aminobenzoic acid (0.034 g) and NaOH (0.02 g) were mixed with water (10 ml) and stirred at room temperature for 30 min. The mixture was then sealed in air and heated at 443 K for 6 d in a 30-ml Teflon-lined autoclave. After cooling, the black crystals of (I) were collected.

Refinement top

The residual electron density has a maximum located 0.85 Å from atom O1W. H atoms attached to C atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions with Csp2—H = 0.93 Å and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The water O atom is on a twofold axis, so one H atom is related to the other by symmetry. A peak was found 0.85 Å from the O atom but it forms an unacceptable angle of 150° with its symmetry relative. On the other hand, the O atom is affected by a rather large Ueq value of 0.380 (14) Å2, indicative of disorder, the probable cause of which is the lack of hydrogen-bonding interactions involving this water molecule, which is simply occluded in a hole of the structure. These are the reasons why the water H atoms were not considered in the present refinement.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. Atoms labelled with the suffix A are at the symmetry position (1/2 − x, 3/2 − y, 2 − z).
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The two-dimensional supramolecular array of (I). Dashed lines between cross-hatched spheres represent Cu···Cu interactions and the remaining dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.
Bis(µ-1,10-phenanthrolin-2-olato-κ3N,N',O)dicopper(I) monohydrate top
Crystal data top
[Cu2(C12H7N2O)2]·H2OF(000) = 1080
Mr = 535.49Dx = 1.751 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 1851 reflections
a = 30.344 (3) Åθ = 2.2–23.7°
b = 3.6676 (3) ŵ = 2.13 mm1
c = 19.1508 (17) ÅT = 293 K
β = 107.578 (1)°Plate, black
V = 2031.7 (3) Å30.28 × 0.15 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1780 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1506 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.033
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000)
h = 3635
Tmin = 0.587, Tmax = 0.920k = 44
6470 measured reflectionsl = 2222
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.198H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.143P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1780 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
150 parametersΔρmax = 1.48 e Å3
6 restraintsΔρmin = 0.52 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Cu2(C12H7N2O)2]·H2OV = 2031.7 (3) Å3
Mr = 535.49Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 30.344 (3) ŵ = 2.13 mm1
b = 3.6676 (3) ÅT = 293 K
c = 19.1508 (17) Å0.28 × 0.15 × 0.04 mm
β = 107.578 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1780 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000)
1506 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.587, Tmax = 0.920Rint = 0.033
6470 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0616 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.198H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14Δρmax = 1.48 e Å3
1780 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.52 e Å3
150 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

The water molecule in the compound shows positional disorder near the crystallographic symmetry (1 − x, y, 1.5 − z). After refined several cycles, O1w atom was determined by its average between the atom and symmetry correlational atom. The occupation factor of the water O atom is 0.5.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.265841 (19)0.64296 (15)0.95050 (3)0.0418 (4)
N10.30823 (14)0.5181 (11)0.8844 (2)0.0410 (9)
N20.32309 (15)0.8069 (10)1.0168 (2)0.0369 (9)
O10.29373 (12)1.0007 (10)1.10659 (18)0.0478 (9)
C10.2991 (2)0.3813 (12)0.8173 (3)0.0497 (14)
H10.26890.31600.79230.060*
C20.3331 (2)0.3320 (13)0.7830 (3)0.0580 (16)
H20.32530.24240.73540.070*
C30.3781 (2)0.4158 (14)0.8195 (3)0.0507 (13)
H30.40100.38150.79720.061*
C40.3894 (2)0.5564 (13)0.8922 (3)0.0460 (12)
C50.35247 (19)0.6082 (12)0.9209 (3)0.0403 (12)
C60.36095 (17)0.7600 (13)0.9919 (3)0.0377 (11)
C70.4347 (2)0.6544 (13)0.9343 (4)0.0531 (15)
H70.45920.62270.91530.064*
C80.44224 (19)0.7949 (14)1.0025 (3)0.0485 (13)
H80.47230.85261.03000.058*
C90.40577 (19)0.8568 (11)1.0333 (3)0.0416 (12)
C100.41170 (18)1.0063 (13)1.1040 (3)0.0449 (12)
H100.44101.07031.13380.054*
C110.37373 (19)1.0556 (13)1.1283 (3)0.0445 (12)
H110.37761.15761.17420.053*
C120.32904 (18)0.9533 (13)1.0844 (3)0.0401 (11)
O1W0.50000.451 (8)0.75000.380 (14)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0402 (5)0.0510 (5)0.0299 (5)0.0033 (2)0.0044 (3)0.0026 (2)
N10.046 (2)0.038 (2)0.029 (2)0.0013 (18)0.0028 (18)0.0011 (17)
N20.043 (2)0.038 (2)0.027 (2)0.0059 (17)0.0056 (18)0.0007 (16)
O10.048 (2)0.062 (2)0.0305 (18)0.0073 (18)0.0072 (16)0.0097 (17)
C10.064 (4)0.038 (3)0.039 (3)0.004 (2)0.001 (3)0.004 (2)
C20.093 (5)0.042 (3)0.035 (3)0.011 (3)0.014 (3)0.001 (2)
C30.069 (4)0.049 (3)0.036 (3)0.012 (3)0.018 (3)0.002 (2)
C40.058 (3)0.037 (2)0.044 (3)0.009 (2)0.017 (3)0.009 (2)
C50.047 (3)0.030 (2)0.039 (3)0.0037 (18)0.005 (2)0.0071 (18)
C60.044 (3)0.031 (2)0.034 (2)0.002 (2)0.006 (2)0.008 (2)
C70.059 (4)0.044 (3)0.060 (4)0.007 (2)0.022 (3)0.009 (2)
C80.042 (3)0.049 (3)0.049 (3)0.003 (2)0.005 (2)0.005 (2)
C90.046 (3)0.034 (2)0.037 (3)0.0016 (19)0.002 (2)0.0075 (19)
C100.046 (3)0.043 (3)0.038 (3)0.008 (2)0.000 (2)0.006 (2)
C110.060 (3)0.039 (3)0.030 (2)0.010 (2)0.007 (2)0.000 (2)
C120.049 (3)0.039 (2)0.029 (2)0.006 (2)0.007 (2)0.001 (2)
O1W0.380 (14)0.380 (14)0.380 (14)0.0000.114 (4)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O1i1.883 (3)C3—H30.9300
Cu1—N21.913 (4)C4—C51.403 (8)
Cu1—N12.109 (4)C4—C71.412 (9)
Cu1—Cu1i2.4971 (11)C5—C61.419 (7)
N1—C11.328 (7)C6—C91.397 (7)
N1—C51.354 (7)C7—C81.358 (8)
N2—C121.361 (6)C7—H70.9300
N2—C61.382 (7)C8—C91.420 (8)
O1—C121.279 (6)C8—H80.9300
O1—Cu1i1.883 (3)C9—C101.422 (8)
C1—C21.393 (9)C10—C111.378 (8)
C1—H10.9300C10—H100.9300
C2—C31.366 (9)C11—C121.414 (7)
C2—H20.9300C11—H110.9300
C3—C41.425 (8)
O1i—Cu1—N2173.36 (16)N1—C5—C4123.4 (5)
O1i—Cu1—N1104.07 (15)N1—C5—C6117.0 (5)
N2—Cu1—N182.57 (16)C4—C5—C6119.6 (5)
O1i—Cu1—Cu1i90.38 (11)N2—C6—C9122.7 (4)
N2—Cu1—Cu1i82.98 (13)N2—C6—C5116.8 (5)
N1—Cu1—Cu1i165.50 (11)C9—C6—C5120.5 (5)
C1—N1—C5118.3 (5)C8—C7—C4119.9 (6)
C1—N1—Cu1132.6 (4)C8—C7—H7120.0
C5—N1—Cu1109.1 (3)C4—C7—H7120.0
C12—N2—C6119.5 (4)C7—C8—C9122.2 (6)
C12—N2—Cu1126.0 (4)C7—C8—H8118.9
C6—N2—Cu1114.5 (3)C9—C8—H8118.9
C12—O1—Cu1i121.5 (3)C6—C9—C8118.1 (5)
N1—C1—C2122.6 (6)C6—C9—C10117.4 (5)
N1—C1—H1118.7C8—C9—C10124.5 (5)
C2—C1—H1118.7C11—C10—C9119.6 (5)
C3—C2—C1119.7 (5)C11—C10—H10120.2
C3—C2—H2120.2C9—C10—H10120.2
C1—C2—H2120.2C10—C11—C12120.9 (5)
C2—C3—C4119.5 (5)C10—C11—H11119.5
C2—C3—H3120.3C12—C11—H11119.5
C4—C3—H3120.3O1—C12—N2119.1 (4)
C5—C4—C7119.7 (5)O1—C12—C11121.0 (4)
C5—C4—C3116.4 (5)N2—C12—C11119.9 (5)
C7—C4—C3123.8 (5)
O1i—Cu1—N1—C11.9 (5)C12—N2—C6—C5179.6 (4)
N2—Cu1—N1—C1178.0 (5)Cu1—N2—C6—C51.6 (5)
Cu1i—Cu1—N1—C1173.5 (3)N1—C5—C6—N21.0 (6)
O1i—Cu1—N1—C5179.4 (3)C4—C5—C6—N2179.5 (4)
N2—Cu1—N1—C50.7 (3)N1—C5—C6—C9179.4 (4)
Cu1i—Cu1—N1—C55.2 (7)C4—C5—C6—C90.1 (7)
N1—Cu1—N2—C12179.9 (4)C5—C4—C7—C80.6 (7)
Cu1i—Cu1—N2—C121.2 (4)C3—C4—C7—C8178.4 (5)
N1—Cu1—N2—C61.3 (3)C4—C7—C8—C91.5 (8)
Cu1i—Cu1—N2—C6179.9 (3)N2—C6—C9—C8179.7 (4)
C5—N1—C1—C20.8 (7)C5—C6—C9—C80.7 (6)
Cu1—N1—C1—C2177.8 (3)N2—C6—C9—C100.6 (7)
N1—C1—C2—C32.0 (8)C5—C6—C9—C10179.8 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C40.6 (7)C7—C8—C9—C61.6 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C51.6 (7)C7—C8—C9—C10179.4 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C7179.4 (5)C6—C9—C10—C111.2 (7)
C1—N1—C5—C41.7 (7)C8—C9—C10—C11179.8 (4)
Cu1—N1—C5—C4179.4 (4)C9—C10—C11—C121.2 (7)
C1—N1—C5—C6178.9 (4)Cu1i—O1—C12—N22.3 (7)
Cu1—N1—C5—C60.1 (5)Cu1i—O1—C12—C11178.7 (3)
C7—C4—C5—N1179.3 (4)C6—N2—C12—O1179.0 (4)
C3—C4—C5—N12.8 (7)Cu1—N2—C12—O12.4 (7)
C7—C4—C5—C60.2 (7)C6—N2—C12—C110.0 (7)
C3—C4—C5—C6177.7 (4)Cu1—N2—C12—C11178.6 (3)
C12—N2—C6—C90.0 (7)C10—C11—C12—O1179.6 (5)
Cu1—N2—C6—C9178.8 (3)C10—C11—C12—N20.6 (7)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···O1ii0.932.523.448 (7)173
Symmetry code: (ii) x, y+1, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu2(C12H7N2O)2]·H2O
Mr535.49
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)30.344 (3), 3.6676 (3), 19.1508 (17)
β (°) 107.578 (1)
V3)2031.7 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.13
Crystal size (mm)0.28 × 0.15 × 0.04
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART 1K CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2000)
Tmin, Tmax0.587, 0.920
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6470, 1780, 1506
Rint0.033
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.061, 0.198, 1.14
No. of reflections1780
No. of parameters150
No. of restraints6
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.48, 0.52

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2000), SAINT (Bruker, 2000), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1999), SHELXTL/PC.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O1i1.883 (3)Cu1—N12.109 (4)
Cu1—N21.913 (4)Cu1—Cu1i2.4971 (11)
O1i—Cu1—N2173.36 (16)N2—Cu1—N182.57 (16)
O1i—Cu1—N1104.07 (15)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···O1ii0.932.523.448 (7)172.9
Symmetry code: (ii) x, y+1, z1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds