Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, di­bromo(3-hydroxy-5-hydroxy­methyl-2-methyl-4-pyridine­carbox­aldehyde semicarbazone-κ3N1,O3,O3′)copper(II), [CuBr2(C9H12N4O3)], consists of discrete complex units with the tridentate pyridoxal semicarbazone ligand as a zwitterion in an almost planar configuration. The CuII ions are in a distorted square-pyramidal coordination, with the equatorial Br atom at a distance of 2.4017 (6) Å and the apical Br atom at a distance of 2.6860 (6) Å.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103001215/na1591sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103001215/na1591Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 207990

Comment top

Semicarbazones (sc) and thiosemicarbazones (tsc) are excellent chelating ligands of different denticity, and a great number of transition metal complexes containing these ligands have been described in the literature (Campbell, 1975; Padhye & Kauffman, 1985; Casas et al., 2000). Many of these sc and tsc complexes, especially those with tsc, possess a broad spectrum of biological activity (West et al., 1991). In addition, since both kinds of ligands form very stable and intensely coloured complexes, some of them are suggested as analytical reagents (Singh et al., 1978).

The synthesis, properties and structures, as well as the biological activities, of some transition metal complexes with pyridoxal (3-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methyl-pyridine-4-carbaldehyde) thiosemicarbazone (Pxtsc) have already been described (Belicchi Ferrari et al., 1987, 1994, 1995, 1998). Most of them are copper(II) complexes, where Pxtsc in the neutral or deprotonated form acts as a tridentate chelate ligand.

It would be of interest to compare copper(II) complexes containing pyridoxal thiosemicarbazone as an O,N,S ligand with related complexes containing pyridoxal semicarbazone (Pxsc) as a potential O,N,O ligand. However, to the best of our knowledge, no structures of Pxsc complexes have been described to date. In order to make possible the comparison of Pxsc and Pxtsc complexes, the title compound, (I), has been prepared and its crystal structure is described in this paper. \sch

Compound (I) consists of discrete complex units, with Pxsc coordinated as a neutral tridentate ligand (Fig. 1). As expected, the phenolic O atom (O2) is deprotonated, but this H atom is shifted to N4; therefore, Pxsc is zwitterionic. Similar behaviour has already been observed in CuII-Pxtsc complexes (Belicchi Ferrari et al., 1987, 1995, 1998), while in only one case is Pxtsc deprotonated (Belicchi Ferrari et al., 1987). Nearly all the bond distances in the Pxsc ligand in (I) are very close to the corresponding values found previously in Pxtsc ligands. One of the exceptions is O3—C7 [1.362 (4) Å], which seems a little short. This can be attributed to the unresolved disorder (see Experimental) of the alcoholic group, since a riding motion calculation (Busing & Levy, 1964) gives a quite reasonable value of 1.412 Å. The other exception is N2—C9, which is about 0.02 Å longer than the mean value in corresponding Pxtsc complexes. This can be a consequence of the absence of an S atom in the vicinity.

The whole ligand in (I) is very close to coplanarity; if only skeletal atoms are considered, the greatest deviation from the least-squares plane is only 0.031 (2) Å for atom O2. At the same time, atoms C6, C7 and Cu deviate from this plane by 0.046 (3), 0.206 (4) and −0.1757 (4) Å, respectively.

The dihedral angles between the pyridoxal moiety (A), and the six- (B) and five-membered (C) chelate rings (Fig. 1) are as follows: A—B 4.70 (6), A—C 4.27 (7) and B—C 6.57 (5)°. On average, these values are smaller than the corresponding values in CuII-Pxtsc complexes, which, very probably, can be ascribed to the more extended electron delocalization in the Pxsc ligand.

The CuII atoms in (I) are in a distorted square-pyramidal environment, with atoms Br1, N1, O1 and O2 in the basal plane (Fig. 1). The Cu—O2 (phenolic) bond is shorter than Cu—O1 and Cu—N1 (Table 1). Both these observations are in agreement with similar features found in CuII-Pxtsc complexes. The Cu—O2 bond distance is close to the value found recently in one CuII N-salicylidene-rac-alaninato complex [1.965 (2) Å; Warda, 1998], where the ligand has a very similar skeleton. The basal and apical Cu—Br distances are significantly different (Table 1) and, using the criteria of Orpen et al. (1989), they belong to the classes of short and long Cu—Br bonds, respectively. Our experimental distances are very close to the mean values listed in the paper cited above.

The basal plane of the coordination polyhedron of (I) is tetrahedrally deformed, with a maximum distance from the least-squares plane of 0.209 (2) Å for N1. As expected, the Cu atom is displaced towards the apical Br2 atom by 0.3585 (4) Å. With respect to the plane defined by atoms N1, O1 and O2, the basal Br1 atom is displaced outwards by 0.6405 (4) Å.

Possible hydrogen bonds are listed in Table 2. Due to the presence of the N2—H2N···O3 bond, a centrosymmetric dimer with almost coplanar chelate ligands is formed. The O3—H3O···Br1 and N3—H3AN···Br1 hydrogen bonds further join such dimers into sheets approximately parallel to the plane (355). However, the apically coordinated Br2 atoms belong to neighbouring sheets, where they take part in two additional hydrogen bonds, connecting the sheets and stabilizing the overall structure (Table 2).

Experimental top

The title complex was prepared by the reaction of CuBr2·2H2O and Pxsc (in a 1:1 molar ratio). Warm MeOH was used as the solvent. After standing overnight, green single crystals of (I) of suitable size were obtained.

Refinement top

With the exception of the H atoms belonging to the CH2OH group (Fig. 1), it was possible to find all H atoms in the ΔF maps. However, at the final stage of the refinement, the H atoms were positioned geometrically (N—H 0.86, O—H 0.82 and C—H 0.93–0.97 Å) Is this added text OK? and refined using a riding model, with fixed isotropic displacement parameters 20% larger than those of the attached atoms. The H atom of the OH group was modelled using option HFIX 143 in SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997). It is worth noting that an attempt to model this H atom with the program HYDROGEN (Nardelli, 1999) resulted in a nearly identical geometry. Two electron-density peaks on the final ΔF map, 1.16 and 0.85 e Å−3, located near atoms O3 and C7, respectively, together with an elongated O3 ellipsoid (Fig. 1), indicated disorder of the alcoholic group. However, all attempts to model this disorder were unsuccessful. Similar disorder has also been observed in Pxtsc complexes (Belicchi Ferrari et al., 1987).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART-NT (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEX8a (McArdle, 1995; Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PARST (Nardelli, 1983, 1995).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), with the atom- and ring-numbering schemes. Displacement ellipsoids are plotted at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
Dibromo(pyridoxal semicarbazone-κ3N1,O3,O3')copper(II) top
Crystal data top
[CuBr2(C9H12N4O3)]Z = 2
Mr = 447.59F(000) = 434
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.218 Mg m3
a = 7.5764 (10) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.7614 (11) ÅCell parameters from 769 reflections
c = 10.8154 (14) Åθ = 4.9–56.7°
α = 92.965 (3)°µ = 7.60 mm1
β = 97.881 (2)°T = 298 K
γ = 108.709 (3)°Plate, green
V = 670.05 (15) Å30.18 × 0.14 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
Bruker Model CCD area-detector
diffractometer
4057 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2678 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.037
Detector resolution: 81.92 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 3.0°
ϕ and ω scansh = 1010
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(XPREP in SHELXTL; Bruker, 1997)
k = 1212
Tmin = 0.291, Tmax = 0.587l = 1515
7646 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.063 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0213P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.85(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
4057 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.16 e Å3
174 parametersΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: heavy-atom methodExtinction coefficient: 0.0016 (3)
Crystal data top
[CuBr2(C9H12N4O3)]γ = 108.709 (3)°
Mr = 447.59V = 670.05 (15) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 7.5764 (10) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 8.7614 (11) ŵ = 7.60 mm1
c = 10.8154 (14) ÅT = 298 K
α = 92.965 (3)°0.18 × 0.14 × 0.07 mm
β = 97.881 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker Model CCD area-detector
diffractometer
4057 independent reflections
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(XPREP in SHELXTL; Bruker, 1997)
2678 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.291, Tmax = 0.587Rint = 0.037
7646 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0330 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.063H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.85Δρmax = 1.16 e Å3
4057 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
174 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Preliminary cell constants are calculated from 119 strong reflections (120 frames, each 0.3° in ω). Final cell parameters are determined using 769 reflections in a global refinement of data obtained after integration of intensities. During data collection, five sets of exposures in combination of ω and ϕ scans nominally covered over a hemisphere of the reciprocal space. Each exposure was collected 20 s and covered 0.25° in ω. The crystal-to-detector distance was 3.8 cm.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br11.06532 (5)0.76179 (4)0.71736 (4)0.04243 (11)
Br20.68362 (5)0.95380 (4)0.84096 (3)0.03304 (10)
Cu0.73454 (5)0.72847 (4)0.68497 (4)0.02544 (10)
O10.7549 (3)0.8643 (2)0.5434 (2)0.0292 (5)
O20.6829 (3)0.5569 (2)0.7888 (2)0.0339 (5)
O30.1085 (4)0.3557 (3)0.6695 (4)0.0867 (12)
H3O0.04960.42930.72460.130*
N10.4704 (3)0.6393 (2)0.5941 (2)0.0223 (5)
N20.4442 (3)0.7228 (3)0.4936 (2)0.0280 (6)
H2N0.33640.70160.44650.034*
N30.5843 (4)0.9275 (3)0.3789 (3)0.0325 (6)
H3AN0.68161.00250.36300.039*
H3BN0.47610.90850.33290.039*
N40.3654 (4)0.2429 (3)0.9149 (2)0.0283 (6)
H4N0.36950.18480.97630.034*
C10.5263 (4)0.3524 (3)0.8985 (3)0.0238 (6)
C20.5213 (4)0.4534 (3)0.7997 (3)0.0232 (6)
C30.3467 (4)0.4293 (3)0.7224 (3)0.0218 (6)
C40.1826 (4)0.3048 (3)0.7442 (3)0.0275 (7)
C50.1973 (4)0.2158 (3)0.8434 (3)0.0317 (7)
H5C0.09060.13680.86100.038*
C60.7024 (4)0.3646 (4)0.9819 (3)0.0326 (7)
H6AC0.76700.47561.01460.049*
H6BC0.78180.32650.93540.049*
H6CC0.67290.29981.05000.049*
C70.0058 (5)0.2559 (4)0.6541 (4)0.0379 (8)
H71C0.01920.25490.56860.045*
H72C0.08060.14660.66630.045*
C80.3292 (4)0.5236 (3)0.6186 (3)0.0249 (6)
H8C0.21220.49990.56800.030*
C90.6012 (4)0.8416 (3)0.4739 (3)0.0237 (6)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.02325 (17)0.0475 (2)0.0602 (3)0.01147 (14)0.01120 (16)0.02805 (18)
Br20.0451 (2)0.03091 (16)0.02657 (18)0.01427 (13)0.01006 (14)0.01159 (13)
Cu0.02213 (19)0.02415 (17)0.0257 (2)0.00150 (14)0.00129 (15)0.01071 (15)
O10.0267 (11)0.0275 (10)0.0274 (12)0.0010 (8)0.0013 (10)0.0109 (9)
O20.0239 (11)0.0326 (11)0.0382 (14)0.0003 (9)0.0010 (10)0.0201 (10)
O30.0464 (18)0.0639 (19)0.137 (3)0.0231 (15)0.027 (2)0.026 (2)
N10.0249 (12)0.0187 (11)0.0225 (14)0.0057 (9)0.0032 (10)0.0081 (10)
N20.0252 (13)0.0275 (12)0.0290 (15)0.0062 (10)0.0015 (11)0.0159 (11)
N30.0339 (15)0.0317 (13)0.0330 (16)0.0094 (11)0.0071 (12)0.0185 (12)
N40.0356 (15)0.0283 (12)0.0221 (14)0.0092 (11)0.0073 (12)0.0142 (11)
C10.0296 (16)0.0204 (13)0.0205 (16)0.0070 (11)0.0034 (13)0.0033 (12)
C20.0239 (15)0.0199 (13)0.0234 (16)0.0033 (11)0.0054 (12)0.0032 (12)
C30.0243 (15)0.0177 (12)0.0228 (16)0.0049 (10)0.0051 (12)0.0063 (11)
C40.0245 (15)0.0239 (14)0.0321 (19)0.0047 (12)0.0040 (14)0.0068 (13)
C50.0270 (17)0.0295 (15)0.0352 (19)0.0018 (12)0.0082 (14)0.0141 (14)
C60.0346 (18)0.0327 (16)0.0294 (18)0.0116 (13)0.0013 (14)0.0075 (14)
C70.0308 (18)0.0288 (16)0.051 (2)0.0018 (13)0.0129 (16)0.0077 (15)
C80.0223 (14)0.0231 (13)0.0268 (17)0.0046 (11)0.0015 (13)0.0062 (12)
C90.0292 (16)0.0210 (13)0.0217 (16)0.0079 (11)0.0068 (13)0.0037 (12)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—Cu2.4017 (6)N4—C51.339 (4)
Br2—Cu2.6860 (6)N4—H4N0.8600
Cu—O21.895 (2)C1—C21.426 (4)
Cu—O11.980 (2)C1—C61.474 (4)
Cu—N11.990 (2)C2—C31.411 (4)
O1—C91.247 (3)C3—C41.424 (4)
O2—C21.294 (3)C3—C81.444 (4)
O3—C71.362 (4)C4—C51.372 (4)
O3—H3O0.8200C4—C71.534 (5)
N1—C81.286 (3)C5—H5C0.9300
N1—N21.368 (3)C6—H6AC0.9600
N2—C91.358 (3)C6—H6BC0.9600
N2—H2N0.8600C6—H6CC0.9600
N3—C91.321 (4)C7—H71C0.9700
N3—H3AN0.8600C7—H72C0.9700
N3—H3BN0.8600C8—H8C0.9300
N4—C11.329 (3)
O2—Cu—O1165.90 (9)O2—C2—C1115.0 (3)
O2—Cu—N189.77 (9)C3—C2—C1118.4 (2)
O1—Cu—N180.23 (9)C2—C3—C4119.4 (3)
O2—Cu—Br191.72 (7)C2—C3—C8122.2 (2)
O1—Cu—Br193.06 (6)C4—C3—C8118.4 (3)
N1—Cu—Br1154.38 (7)C5—C4—C3118.8 (3)
O2—Cu—Br297.85 (7)C5—C4—C7118.4 (3)
O1—Cu—Br293.30 (6)C3—C4—C7122.5 (3)
N1—Cu—Br297.30 (7)N4—C5—C4119.9 (3)
Br1—Cu—Br2107.81 (2)N4—C5—H5C120.1
C9—O1—Cu113.6 (2)C4—C5—H5C120.1
C2—O2—Cu128.5 (2)C1—C6—H6AC109.5
C7—O3—H3O109.5C1—C6—H6BC109.5
C8—N1—N2118.9 (2)H6AC—C6—H6BC109.5
C8—N1—Cu129.9 (2)C1—C6—H6CC109.5
N2—N1—Cu111.2 (2)H6AC—C6—H6CC109.5
C9—N2—N1114.9 (2)H6BC—C6—H6CC109.5
C9—N2—H2N122.6O3—C7—C4113.8 (3)
N1—N2—H2N122.6O3—C7—H71C108.8
C9—N3—H3AN120.0C4—C7—H71C108.8
C9—N3—H3BN120.0O3—C7—H72C108.8
H3AN—N3—H3BN120.0C4—C7—H72C108.8
C1—N4—C5125.1 (3)H71C—C7—H72C107.7
C1—N4—H4N117.4N1—C8—C3122.0 (3)
C5—N4—H4N117.4N1—C8—H8C119.0
N4—C1—C2118.3 (3)C3—C8—H8C119.0
N4—C1—C6119.2 (3)O1—C9—N3122.5 (3)
C2—C1—C6122.6 (3)O1—C9—N2119.8 (3)
O2—C2—C3126.6 (3)N3—C9—N2117.7 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3O···Br1i0.822.773.358 (3)130
N2—H2N···O3ii0.861.902.752 (4)174
N3—H3AN···Br1iii0.862.613.457 (2)170
N3—H3BN···Br2iv0.862.653.338 (3)138
N4—H4N···Br2v0.862.393.226 (3)165
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x, y+1, z+1; (iii) x+2, y+2, z+1; (iv) x+1, y+2, z+1; (v) x+1, y+1, z+2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[CuBr2(C9H12N4O3)]
Mr447.59
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)7.5764 (10), 8.7614 (11), 10.8154 (14)
α, β, γ (°)92.965 (3), 97.881 (2), 108.709 (3)
V3)670.05 (15)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)7.60
Crystal size (mm)0.18 × 0.14 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker Model CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionEmpirical (using intensity measurements)
(XPREP in SHELXTL; Bruker, 1997)
Tmin, Tmax0.291, 0.587
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7646, 4057, 2678
Rint0.037
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.714
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.033, 0.063, 0.85
No. of reflections4057
No. of parameters174
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.16, 0.56

Computer programs: SMART-NT (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Siemens, 1996), SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEX8a (McArdle, 1995; Burnett & Johnson, 1996), SHELXL97 and PARST (Nardelli, 1983, 1995).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—Cu2.4017 (6)Cu—O11.980 (2)
Br2—Cu2.6860 (6)Cu—N11.990 (2)
Cu—O21.895 (2)
O2—Cu—O1165.90 (9)N1—Cu—Br1154.38 (7)
O2—Cu—N189.77 (9)O2—Cu—Br297.85 (7)
O1—Cu—N180.23 (9)O1—Cu—Br293.30 (6)
O2—Cu—Br191.72 (7)N1—Cu—Br297.30 (7)
O1—Cu—Br193.06 (6)Br1—Cu—Br2107.81 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3O···Br1i0.822.773.358 (3)130
N2—H2N···O3ii0.861.902.752 (4)174
N3—H3AN···Br1iii0.862.613.457 (2)170
N3—H3BN···Br2iv0.862.653.338 (3)138
N4—H4N···Br2v0.862.393.226 (3)165
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x, y+1, z+1; (iii) x+2, y+2, z+1; (iv) x+1, y+2, z+1; (v) x+1, y+1, z+2.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds