addenda and errata\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
CHEMISTRY
ISSN: 2053-2296

Bis(2,4-penta­nedionato)cobalt(II)

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
*Correspondence e-mail: jxf@leicester.ac.uk

(Received 24 February 2011; accepted 4 April 2011; online 5 May 2011)

The structure of Co(acac)2 reported by us [Burgess et al. (2000[Burgess, J., Fawcett, J., Russell, D. R. & Gilani, S. R. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 649-650.]). Acta Cryst. C56, 649–650] has been reassessed in view of a recent article [Vreshch et al. (2010[Vreshch, V. D., Yang, J.-H., Zhang, H., Filatov, A. S. & Dikarev, E. V. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 8430-8434.]). Inorg. Chem. 49, 8430–8434], which suggests that the compound might actually be Cu(acac)2. Using the structure-factor data deposited with the original article, the evidence is slightly in favour of Cu(acac)2, although the crystallographic data alone, in this case, cannot unequivocally distinguish between the two possibilities. We concede that we may indeed have been mistaken, but that there is still some element of mystery.

1. Comment

Under the title `Monomeric Square-Planar Cobalt(II) Acetyl­acetonate: Mystery or Mistake', Dikarev and co-workers (Vreshch et al., 2010[Vreshch, V. D., Yang, J.-H., Zhang, H., Filatov, A. S. & Dikarev, E. V. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 8430-8434.]) have recently challenged our determination of the structure of the title compound (Burgess et al., 2000[Burgess, J., Fawcett, J., Russell, D. R. & Gilani, S. R. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 649-650.]). We were at the time surprised at our isolation of unsolvated monomeric bis­(2,4-penta­nedionato)cobalt(II) [cobalt(II) acetyl­acetonate], for four of the five reasons listed in their Introduction. We do not share their surprise at our product being green [Cu(acac)2, which they deem our product to be, is blue]. Indeed we consider any attempt to use colour as diagnostic or predictive of stereochemistry for transition metal complexes to be unwise. Octa­hedral cobalt(II) complexes, though often pink, can be any shade of the six primary and secondary colours, including the deep blue commonly assumed diagnostic of tetra­hedral cobalt(II) species (Bartecki et al., 2011[Bartecki, A., Burgess, J. & Kurzak, K. (2011). The Color of Metal Compounds, 3rd ed., ch. 4. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Taylor and Francis.]). Moreover, in view of the big difference between the `typical' colours of pink for octa­hedral, blue for tetra­hedral Co2+ complexes, how is one to predict with any confidence the `expected' colour of square-planar Co2+ species? Thanks to a detailed re-examination of our X-ray data, very kindly undertaken by the Editor of Acta Cryst. Section C (Linden, 2011[Linden, A. (2011). Private communication.]), it is apparent that our data may be inter­preted in terms of Co(acac)2 or Cu(acac)2, though admittedly the evidence is just slightly in favour of the latter. The structure-factor data deposited with the original article were used in a re-refinement of the original model in which the Co atom was replaced by a Cu atom. The R factor reduced from 0.0515 (for Co) to 0.0508 (for Cu), which is hardly significant. Plots of contoured difference Fourier map sections passing through the metal centre are quite noisy and they show no discernable differences between the two refinements, although the maximum and minimum residual electron-density values are actually larger for the Cu refinement (0.98 and −1.11 e Å−3, respectively, for the Co model compared with 1.14 and −1.28 e Å−3 for the Cu model). Validation of the Co model reveals a C alert for the Hirshfeld test involving the Co1—O1 and Co1—O2 bonds. This test is sometimes indicative of misassigned elements in the model (Hirshfeld, 1976[Hirshfeld, F. L. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 239-244.]; Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]). There is no corresponding validation alert with the Cu model. In view of this, and of the chemical reasons to be suspicious of the nature of our product, there is a real possibility that our original publication is in error. Unfortunately, none of the original four authors now has access to either the laboratory or computational facilities needed to attempt to repeat our work. The answer to the question posed by the title of our critics' paper is thus that we may indeed have been mistaken, but that there is still some element of mystery. We may even have had a mixed or doped product (Co,Cu)(acac)2; contamination of the Co material by a little Cu may well have templated the Co mol­ecule, thus leading to the unusual geometry for the Co complex. Curiously the R factor in the above test refinements drops to 0.0493 if a 1:1 Co:Cu mixture is assumed. In any event, we do not subscribe to the philosophy that unexpected products cannot be made [cf. inert gas compounds and Dasent (1965[Dasent, W. E. (1965). In Nonexistent Compounds. New York: Marcel Dekker.])].

References

First citationBartecki, A., Burgess, J. & Kurzak, K. (2011). The Color of Metal Compounds, 3rd ed., ch. 4. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Taylor and Francis.  Google Scholar
First citationBurgess, J., Fawcett, J., Russell, D. R. & Gilani, S. R. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 649–650.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationDasent, W. E. (1965). In Nonexistent Compounds. New York: Marcel Dekker.  Google Scholar
First citationHirshfeld, F. L. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 239–244.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationLinden, A. (2011). Private communication.  Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationVreshch, V. D., Yang, J.-H., Zhang, H., Filatov, A. S. & Dikarev, E. V. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 8430–8434.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
CHEMISTRY
ISSN: 2053-2296
Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds