Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
In the crystal structure of the title compound, C14H10I2N2, the molecule lies on a crystallographic inversion center, and hence the two imine groups are mutually trans.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 289807
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 193 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.003 Å
- R factor = 0.021
- wR factor = 0.056
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 20.0
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C
PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.07
PLAT431_ALERT_2_C Short Inter HL..A Contact I1 .. N1 .. 3.23 Ang.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem
0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem
2 ALERT level C = Check and explain
0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check
0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: XCIF (Bruker, 2001).
N,
N'-Bis(3-iodophenyl)ethylenediimine
top
Crystal data top
C14H10I2N2 | F(000) = 856 |
Mr = 460.04 | Dx = 2.159 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 879 reflections |
a = 16.262 (4) Å | θ = 2.6–28.3° |
b = 4.7074 (11) Å | µ = 4.43 mm−1 |
c = 18.708 (4) Å | T = 193 K |
β = 98.829 (4)° | Tabular, yellow |
V = 1415.2 (6) Å3 | 0.34 × 0.24 × 0.06 mm |
Z = 4 | |
Data collection top
Siemens Platform CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1760 independent reflections |
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube | 1607 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.022 |
Profile data from ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.2° |
Absorption correction: integration (XPREP in SHELXTL; Bruker, 2001) | h = −21→21 |
Tmin = 0.295, Tmax = 0.771 | k = −6→6 |
6991 measured reflections | l = −24→24 |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.056 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0295P)2 + 1.6495P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.06 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1760 reflections | Δρmax = 0.72 e Å−3 |
88 parameters | Δρmin = −0.79 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.0047 (2) |
Special details top
Experimental. One distinct cell was identified using SMART (Bruker, 2001). Four frame
series were integrated and filtered for statistical outliers using
SAINT (Bruker, 2001) then corrected for absorption by integration using
SHELXTL/XPREP (Bruker, 2001) before using
SAINT/SADABS (Bruker, 2001) to sort, merge, and scale the
combined data. A series of identical frames was collected twice during the
experiment to monitor decay. No decay correction was applied. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes. |
Refinement. Systematic conditions suggested the ambiguous space group. Structure was phased
by direct methods. The space group choice was confirmed by successful
convergence of the full-matrix least-squares refinement on F2. The
highest peak in the final difference Fourier map was in the vicinity of atom
I1; the final map had no other significant features. A final analysis of
variance between observed and calculated structure factors showed little
dependence on amplitude or resolution. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
C1 | 0.03012 (13) | 0.5940 (5) | 0.52037 (12) | 0.0298 (5) | |
H1 | 0.0858 | 0.5914 | 0.5107 | 0.095 (13)* | |
C2 | 0.07114 (13) | 0.9415 (5) | 0.60663 (11) | 0.0283 (4) | |
C3 | 0.15177 (14) | 0.9815 (5) | 0.59080 (13) | 0.0322 (5) | |
H3 | 0.1700 | 0.8788 | 0.5524 | 0.053 (8)* | |
C4 | 0.20477 (13) | 1.1712 (5) | 0.63129 (12) | 0.0275 (4) | |
C5 | 0.17915 (16) | 1.3240 (5) | 0.68736 (13) | 0.0338 (5) | |
H5 | 0.2157 | 1.4550 | 0.7147 | 0.038 (7)* | |
C6 | 0.09907 (19) | 1.2823 (5) | 0.70278 (15) | 0.0388 (6) | |
H6 | 0.0810 | 1.3847 | 0.7413 | 0.049 (8)* | |
C7 | 0.04556 (14) | 1.0938 (5) | 0.66277 (12) | 0.0314 (5) | |
H7 | −0.0091 | 1.0682 | 0.6737 | 0.039 (7)* | |
I1 | 0.325791 (9) | 1.22825 (4) | 0.607495 (9) | 0.03758 (10) | |
N1 | 0.01194 (15) | 0.7582 (4) | 0.56736 (15) | 0.0438 (6) | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
C1 | 0.0242 (10) | 0.0308 (11) | 0.0345 (12) | −0.0052 (9) | 0.0046 (9) | −0.0054 (9) |
C2 | 0.0266 (10) | 0.0289 (10) | 0.0296 (11) | −0.0066 (8) | 0.0046 (8) | −0.0053 (8) |
C3 | 0.0278 (10) | 0.0346 (11) | 0.0355 (12) | −0.0065 (9) | 0.0084 (9) | −0.0107 (9) |
C4 | 0.0252 (11) | 0.0271 (10) | 0.0298 (11) | −0.0034 (8) | 0.0023 (8) | 0.0015 (8) |
C5 | 0.0355 (12) | 0.0360 (11) | 0.0288 (11) | −0.0104 (10) | 0.0015 (9) | −0.0079 (9) |
C6 | 0.0406 (15) | 0.0433 (14) | 0.0340 (13) | −0.0096 (10) | 0.0110 (11) | −0.0150 (10) |
C7 | 0.0294 (11) | 0.0359 (12) | 0.0299 (11) | −0.0069 (9) | 0.0076 (9) | −0.0061 (9) |
I1 | 0.02493 (12) | 0.04507 (13) | 0.04290 (14) | −0.01160 (6) | 0.00572 (7) | −0.00591 (6) |
N1 | 0.0263 (11) | 0.0552 (15) | 0.0528 (15) | −0.0174 (8) | 0.0148 (10) | −0.0272 (10) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—N1 | 1.240 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.388 (3) |
C1—C1i | 1.447 (4) | C4—I1 | 2.101 (2) |
C1—H1 | 0.9500 | C5—C6 | 1.390 (4) |
C2—C7 | 1.387 (3) | C5—H5 | 0.9500 |
C2—C3 | 1.401 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.380 (3) |
C2—N1 | 1.412 (3) | C6—H6 | 0.9500 |
C3—C4 | 1.383 (3) | C7—H7 | 0.9500 |
C3—H3 | 0.9500 | | |
| | | |
N1—C1—C1i | 122.6 (3) | C5—C4—I1 | 119.59 (16) |
N1—C1—H1 | 118.7 | C4—C5—C6 | 118.9 (2) |
C1i—C1—H1 | 118.7 | C4—C5—H5 | 120.6 |
C7—C2—C3 | 119.3 (2) | C6—C5—H5 | 120.6 |
C7—C2—N1 | 116.7 (2) | C7—C6—C5 | 120.7 (2) |
C3—C2—N1 | 123.9 (2) | C7—C6—H6 | 119.6 |
C4—C3—C2 | 119.7 (2) | C5—C6—H6 | 119.6 |
C4—C3—H3 | 120.1 | C6—C7—C2 | 120.4 (2) |
C2—C3—H3 | 120.1 | C6—C7—H7 | 119.8 |
C3—C4—C5 | 121.0 (2) | C2—C7—H7 | 119.8 |
C3—C4—I1 | 119.45 (17) | C1—N1—C2 | 122.1 (2) |
| | | |
C7—C2—C3—C4 | 0.1 (4) | C5—C6—C7—C2 | 0.3 (4) |
N1—C2—C3—C4 | 178.4 (2) | C3—C2—C7—C6 | −0.2 (4) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | −0.3 (4) | N1—C2—C7—C6 | −178.6 (2) |
C2—C3—C4—I1 | 179.68 (17) | C1i—C1—N1—C2 | −179.8 (3) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 0.4 (4) | C7—C2—N1—C1 | −173.6 (3) |
I1—C4—C5—C6 | −179.5 (2) | C3—C2—N1—C1 | 8.1 (4) |
C4—C5—C6—C7 | −0.5 (4) | | |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email
support@iucr.org for assistance.