Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The absolute stereochemistry of the title compound, C7H13NO3·H2O, was firmly established by X-ray crystallography. The crystal structure exists as O—H...O hydrogen-bonded layers of mol­ecules lying perpendicular to the a axis.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807038123/lh2473sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807038123/lh2473Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 660217

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 150 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • R factor = 0.033
  • wR factor = 0.038
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT153_ALERT_1_C The su's on the Cell Axes are Equal (x 100000) 20 Ang.
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 71.75 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1452 Count of symmetry unique reflns 899 Completeness (_total/calc) 161.51% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 553 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.615 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present no PLAT791_ALERT_1_G Confirm the Absolute Configuration of C2 = . R PLAT791_ALERT_1_G Confirm the Absolute Configuration of C3 = . S PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 1
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 4 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 3 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
checkCIF publication errors
Alert level A PUBL024_ALERT_1_A The number of authors is greater than 5. Please specify the role of each of the co-authors for your paper.
Author Response:
 Jenkinson, Sarah F. - Post Doc chemist and crystallographer Cowley,Andrew -
 Crystallographer Kato, Atsushi - collaborator on project Kato, Noriko -
 collaborator on project Hollinshead, Jackie - Industrial collaborator on
 project Nash, Robert J. - Industrial collaborator on project Booth, Kathrine V.
  - trainee crystallographer Fleet, George W. J. - Preparative Group Leader


1 ALERT level A = Data missing that is essential or data in wrong format 0 ALERT level G = General alerts. Data that may be required is missing

Comment top

L-N,N-Dimethylproline (L-stachydrine) and the L-2R,3S-3-hydroxy compound have been reported from the plant family Capparidaceae. Cornforth & Henry (1952) first reported the L-2R,3S compound from Capparis tomentosa and then Delaveau et al. (1973) conducted a taxonomic survey suggesting these compounds were ubiquitous in this plant family. The structure of the L-2R,3S form was confirmed by synthesis by Sakiyama et al. (1964). This is the first report of the L-2R,3S form in the genus Baphia (Leguminosae).

Refinement of the Flack enantiopole parameter gave a value of 0.08 (18), which for an enantio-pure material unambiguously shows the crystal to consist of the 2R enantiomer (i.e a derivative of a D amino acid).

The crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 1) exists as hydrogen bonded layers of molecules lying perpendicular to the a axis (Fig. 2). One of the hydrogen bonds (involving atom O2) is bifurcated.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Cornforth & Henry (1952); Delaveau et al. (1973); Sakiyama et al. (1964); Nash et al. (1986).

Experimental top

2.9 g of 2R, 3S 3-hydroxy-N, N-dimethylproline was obtained from the 50% EtOH extract of 2 kg of leaves of the African medicinal tree Baphia confusum (Fabaceae). The compound was isolated by binding it to Amberlite IR-120 (H+ form, 2L) and eluting with 2M NH4OH. The eluate was concentrated to give a brown oil (30.8 g). This oil was applied to an Amberlite CG-50 column (3.6 x 48 cm, NH4+ form) and eluted with distilled water. The concentrated eluate was chromatographed over a Dowex 1-X8 column (2.2 x 42 cm, OH-, form) with water. The eluate was concentrated to give a colorless oil (3.64 g). This oil was further chromatographed on a Amberlite CG-50 column (3.6 x 48 cm, NH4+ form) with water as an eluant to give 2R, 3S 3-hydroxy-N,N-dimethylproline·The compound was crystallized from 95% aq. EtOH by layering with acetone. The purification was followed using GC—MS of the trimethylsilyl-derivative (Nash et al., 1986) scanning from 100–400 daltons which gave distinctive fragmentation with major ions at 196 (20%), 226 (100%), 270 (20%) and 285 (80%) amu. m.p. crystals decomposed above 495 K, without melting; [α]D18 +17.2 (c, 0.21 in water).

Refinement top

The use of Cu—Kα radiation enabled the absolute configuration to be determined from the anomalous differences of the Friedel Pairs.

The H atoms were all located in a difference map, but those attached to carbon atoms were repositioned geometrically. The H atoms were initially refined with soft restraints on the bond lengths and angles to regularize their geometry (C—H in the range 0.93–0.98,O—H = 0.82 Å) and Uiso(H) (in the range 1.2–1.5 times Ueq of the parent atom), after which the positions were refined with riding constraints.

Structure description top

L-N,N-Dimethylproline (L-stachydrine) and the L-2R,3S-3-hydroxy compound have been reported from the plant family Capparidaceae. Cornforth & Henry (1952) first reported the L-2R,3S compound from Capparis tomentosa and then Delaveau et al. (1973) conducted a taxonomic survey suggesting these compounds were ubiquitous in this plant family. The structure of the L-2R,3S form was confirmed by synthesis by Sakiyama et al. (1964). This is the first report of the L-2R,3S form in the genus Baphia (Leguminosae).

Refinement of the Flack enantiopole parameter gave a value of 0.08 (18), which for an enantio-pure material unambiguously shows the crystal to consist of the 2R enantiomer (i.e a derivative of a D amino acid).

The crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 1) exists as hydrogen bonded layers of molecules lying perpendicular to the a axis (Fig. 2). One of the hydrogen bonds (involving atom O2) is bifurcated.

For related literature, see: Cornforth & Henry (1952); Delaveau et al. (1973); Sakiyama et al. (1964); Nash et al. (1986).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005)'; cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003); molecular graphics: CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: CRYSTALS.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as spheres of arbitary radius.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram showing the hydrogen bonded (dashed lines) layers lying perpendicular to the a-axis and the hydrogen bonds between each molecule and a molecule of water.
(2R,3S)-3-Hydroxy-N,N-dimethylproline monohydrate top
Crystal data top
C7H13NO3·H2OF(000) = 192
Mr = 177.20Dx = 1.404 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 2601 reflections
a = 6.0647 (2) Åθ = 5–70°
b = 7.1798 (2) ŵ = 0.97 mm1
c = 10.1956 (2) ÅT = 150 K
β = 109.195 (2)°Fragment, colourless
V = 419.27 (2) Å30.30 × 0.30 × 0.24 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini area-detector
diffractometer
1407 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.010
ω scansθmax = 71.8°, θmin = 4.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2005)
h = 77
Tmin = 0.75, Tmax = 0.79k = 88
3114 measured reflectionsl = 1212
1452 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on FHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 Method, part 1, Chebychev polynomial [Prince (1982). Mathematical Techniques in Crystallography and Materials Science. New York: Springer-Verlag; Watkin (1994). Acta Cryst. A50, 411–437] [weight] = 1.0/[A0*T0(x) + A1*T1(x) ··· + An-1]*Tn-1(x)]
where Ai are the Chebychev coefficients listed below and x = F /Fmax Method = Robust Weighting (Prince, 1982) W = [weight] * [1-(deltaF/6*sigmaF)2]2 Ai are: 13.0 -4.75 9.02
wR(F2) = 0.039(Δ/σ)max = 0.004
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.35 e Å3
1407 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
122 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 571 Friedel pairs
1 restraintAbsolute structure parameter: 0.08 (18)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Crystal data top
C7H13NO3·H2OV = 419.27 (2) Å3
Mr = 177.20Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21Cu Kα radiation
a = 6.0647 (2) ŵ = 0.97 mm1
b = 7.1798 (2) ÅT = 150 K
c = 10.1956 (2) Å0.30 × 0.30 × 0.24 mm
β = 109.195 (2)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini area-detector
diffractometer
1452 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2005)
1407 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
Tmin = 0.75, Tmax = 0.79Rint = 0.010
3114 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.039Δρmax = 0.35 e Å3
S = 1.08Δρmin = 0.29 e Å3
1407 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 571 Friedel pairs
122 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.08 (18)
1 restraint
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.1524 (3)0.2948 (2)0.27919 (14)0.0152
C20.3289 (2)0.3724 (2)0.21421 (13)0.0140
C30.2330 (2)0.4103 (2)0.05749 (15)0.0152
C40.4060 (3)0.5546 (2)0.03266 (15)0.0187
C50.5849 (3)0.5926 (2)0.17550 (16)0.0188
N10.4544 (2)0.5514 (2)0.27595 (12)0.0151
O10.11267 (19)0.38049 (18)0.37433 (11)0.0209
O20.0669 (2)0.14086 (17)0.22910 (11)0.0212
O30.00020 (18)0.47790 (18)0.02103 (11)0.0184
C60.2944 (3)0.7127 (2)0.27524 (16)0.0188
C70.6228 (3)0.5226 (2)0.41945 (15)0.0203
O40.2618 (2)0.5178 (2)0.65461 (14)0.0289
H10.040 (4)0.524 (3)0.056 (2)0.019 (5)*
H20.197 (5)0.497 (4)0.574 (3)0.043 (7)*
H30.153 (5)0.553 (4)0.682 (2)0.030 (5)*
H210.43980.26480.23670.0168*
H310.22300.29740.00160.0187*
H410.32200.67180.00780.0229*
H420.48450.50240.03150.0229*
H510.63750.72530.18340.0235*
H520.72330.50870.19310.0235*
H610.38980.82450.31730.0228*
H620.19110.67920.33050.0228*
H630.19630.74140.17750.0228*
H710.70120.64330.45610.0233*
H720.53660.47660.48150.0233*
H730.74290.42870.41660.0233*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0156 (6)0.0168 (6)0.0121 (6)0.0012 (5)0.0031 (5)0.0039 (5)
C20.0141 (6)0.0141 (6)0.0140 (7)0.0000 (5)0.0048 (5)0.0012 (5)
C30.0168 (6)0.0163 (6)0.0137 (6)0.0002 (5)0.0068 (5)0.0000 (5)
C40.0210 (7)0.0204 (7)0.0159 (7)0.0030 (6)0.0076 (6)0.0010 (5)
C50.0169 (6)0.0231 (8)0.0188 (7)0.0026 (5)0.0093 (6)0.0020 (6)
N10.0151 (5)0.0169 (6)0.0133 (6)0.0006 (4)0.0047 (5)0.0006 (4)
O10.0249 (5)0.0226 (5)0.0189 (5)0.0012 (4)0.0124 (4)0.0024 (4)
O20.0270 (6)0.0215 (5)0.0170 (5)0.0080 (5)0.0096 (4)0.0020 (4)
O30.0164 (5)0.0239 (5)0.0134 (5)0.0015 (4)0.0029 (4)0.0037 (4)
C60.0219 (7)0.0149 (6)0.0202 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0075 (6)0.0018 (5)
C70.0174 (7)0.0266 (8)0.0142 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0015 (6)0.0007 (6)
O40.0226 (5)0.0382 (8)0.0255 (7)0.0088 (5)0.0074 (5)0.0059 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.5366 (18)C5—H511.000
C1—O11.237 (2)C5—H521.000
C1—O21.256 (2)N1—C61.5098 (19)
C2—C31.5346 (19)N1—C71.4979 (18)
C2—N11.5207 (19)O3—H10.82 (2)
C2—H211.000C6—H611.000
C3—C41.553 (2)C6—H621.000
C3—O31.4217 (18)C6—H631.000
C3—H311.000C7—H711.000
C4—C51.528 (2)C7—H721.000
C4—H411.000C7—H731.000
C4—H421.000O4—H20.80 (3)
C5—N11.5152 (18)O4—H30.83 (3)
C2—C1—O1120.05 (13)C4—C5—H52110.8
C2—C1—O2113.37 (12)N1—C5—H52110.8
O1—C1—O2126.54 (14)H51—C5—H52109.5
C1—C2—C3115.71 (11)C2—N1—C5100.76 (11)
C1—C2—N1116.91 (11)C2—N1—C6114.40 (11)
C3—C2—N1104.34 (11)C5—N1—C6108.96 (12)
C1—C2—H2197.6C2—N1—C7112.05 (11)
C3—C2—H21111.9C5—N1—C7110.32 (11)
N1—C2—H21110.5C6—N1—C7109.94 (12)
C2—C3—C4104.06 (12)C3—O3—H1110.3 (14)
C2—C3—O3109.69 (11)N1—C6—H61109.5
C4—C3—O3113.31 (12)N1—C6—H62109.5
C2—C3—H31114.2H61—C6—H62109.5
C4—C3—H31110.7N1—C6—H63109.5
O3—C3—H31105.1H61—C6—H63109.5
C3—C4—C5105.65 (12)H62—C6—H63109.5
C3—C4—H41110.4N1—C7—H71109.5
C5—C4—H41110.4N1—C7—H72109.5
C3—C4—H42110.4H71—C7—H72109.5
C5—C4—H42110.4N1—C7—H73109.5
H41—C4—H42109.5H71—C7—H73109.5
C4—C5—N1104.15 (11)H72—C7—H73109.5
C4—C5—H51110.8H2—O4—H3103 (3)
N1—C5—H51110.8
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H1···O2i0.82 (2)1.91 (3)2.712 (2)168 (3)
O4—H3···O2ii0.83 (3)1.95 (3)2.777 (2)172 (3)
O4—H2···O10.80 (3)2.10 (3)2.873 (2)162 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC7H13NO3·H2O
Mr177.20
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)6.0647 (2), 7.1798 (2), 10.1956 (2)
β (°) 109.195 (2)
V3)419.27 (2)
Z2
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)0.97
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.30 × 0.24
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Gemini area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.75, 0.79
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections
3114, 1452, 1407
Rint0.010
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.616
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.033, 0.039, 1.08
No. of reflections1407
No. of parameters122
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.35, 0.29
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 571 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.08 (18)

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005)', CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003), CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996), CRYSTALS.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H1···O2i0.82 (2)1.91 (3)2.712 (2)168 (3)
O4—H3···O2ii0.83 (3)1.95 (3)2.777 (2)172 (3)
O4—H2···O10.80 (3)2.10 (3)2.873 (2)162 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds