Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, mer-[RuCl3N(C18H15As)2], is the first structurally characterized example of a nitride complex in which ruthenium is six-coordinated to monodentate ligands only. The Ru[triple bond]N bond length [1.6161 (15) Å] is relatively long, and the trans influence of the nitride ligand is reflected by the difference between the Ru—Cltrans and Ru—Clcis bond lengths [0.1234 (4) Å]. The N—Ru—Cltrans axis is sited on a twofold axis.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103015014/jz1564sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103015014/jz1564Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 221053

Comment top

Ruthenium nitrido complexes have been well known since 1972 (Griffith & Pawson, 1972). However, all of the structurally characterized RuN complexes with monodentate auxiliary ligands are square pyramidal and five-coordinate (Phillips & Skapski, 1975; Collison et al., 1981; Sharpley et al., 1988; Liang & Sharpley, 1996), which fact provides a qualitative indication of the strong trans-influence of the nitrido ligand. In order to obtain a good quantitative measure of the trans-influence unperturbed by the steric requirements of polydentate ligands, we have undertaken a study of mer-[RuNCl3(AsPh3)2] (I).

The structure of (I) consists of discrete monomers, and the coordination geometry (Fig. 1 and Table 1) of is distorted octahedral. The three chloride ligands are arranged in a meridional configuration in which one chloride ligand is trans to the nitride, as proposed by Pawson & Griffith (1975).

The RuN bond length of 1.6161 (15) Å is relatively long compared with other ruthenium nitrido compounds and is only exceeded in bis(1,2-bezenedithiolate)nitridoruthenate(VI) [1.613 (5) and 1.621 (5) Å in two independent molecules; Sellmann et al., 1997] and µ-oxo-tetrakis(2,5-dimethyl-2,5-hexanediamine-N,N')nitridodiruthenium(VI) [1.66 (1) Å; Chiu et al., 1996].

The Ru—As bond length of 2.5533 (3) Å is the longest reported Ru—As bond length in ruthenium compounds with AsPh3 and related ligands. Note that arsine ligands support ruthenium in oxidation states varying from Ru0 in [Ru(AsPh3)(CO)4] (Martin et al., 1983) to RuVI in ruthenium nitride complexes such as the title compound.

In five- and six-coordinate complexes with strong π-donor ligands, such as oxide and nitride ligands, the central metal is invariably displaced out of the plane of the equatorial ligands, towards the multiply bonded ligand. This phenomenon is much less pronounced in the six-coordinate compounds, probably as a result of steric interactions. Given the N—Ru—Cl1 and N—Ru—As angles of 93.325 (7) and 93.59 (1)° in (I), the Ru atom lies 0.1483 (2) Å above the equatorial plane defined by? the two Cl and two As atoms. This deviation is less than half the out-of-plane distances seen in five-coordinate nitrido compounds, where the deviations range from 0.34 Å in [MoN(N3)4]- (Dehnicke et al., 1980) to 0.768 Å in [TcN(Se2CC(CN)2)]2- (Abram et al., 1991). In (I), the Ru—Cltrans bond length [2.5020 (4) Å] is longer than the Ru—Clcis bond length [2.3786 (3) Å]. This trans influence is relatively small compared with that observed for other six-coordinate nitrido complexes (cf. Table 2), possibly because of the small out-of-plane displacement of the Ru atom in (I), which reflects the steric bulk of the AsPh3 ligands and the concomitant strain involved in closing all angles involving the arsine ligands.

The closely related compound mer-[Ru(NO)Cl3(AsPh3)2] (Souza et al., 1995) is isostructual with (I). The geometric parameters of these two complexes are almost identical (Table 3), but the nitrosyl ligand does not exert any trans influence. This result is parallelled for first-row transition metals by the strong trans influence found in [Mn(N)(CN)5]3- [0.253 (7) Å; Bendix et al., 2000] and the absence of any trans influence in [Mn(NO)(CN)5]3- [0.03 (1) Å; Tullberg and Vannerberg, 1967). These findings reflect the general rule that, while strong π-donor ligands exert a trans influence, π-acceptors do not (Lyne & Mingos, 1995).

Importantly, the steric demands of the AsPh3 ligand shield the nitrido ligand in (I) from intermolecular interactions. Accordingly, the packing (Fig. 2) is governed by the arrangement of the phenyl groups of the AsPh3 ligands, with several relatively short intermolecular C···C distances [3.696–3.9 Å]. The rhombicity of the molecules is mirrored in the packing; all RuN directions are parallel (or antiparallel) and all As—As vectors are parallel. The packing thus explains the strong dichroism of the solid compound and makes it a good candidate for polarized single-crystal absorption and luminescence spectroscopy (Cowman et al., 1976; Lamet et al., 1993) on an unperturbed RuN moiety.

Experimental top

Compound (I) was prepared according to the method described by Pawson & Griffith (1975). Crystals were grown by adding a solution of [Bu4N][RuNCl4] in methanol to a solution of excess AsPh3 in acetone at room temperature and allowing slow evaporation of the solvent. The crystals are pronouncedly dichroic, namely red and yellow.

Refinement top

H atoms were found in a difference Fourier map and were included in the refinement at idealized positions, riding on their parent atom, with C—H bond lengths of 0.93 Å.

Structure description top

Ruthenium nitrido complexes have been well known since 1972 (Griffith & Pawson, 1972). However, all of the structurally characterized RuN complexes with monodentate auxiliary ligands are square pyramidal and five-coordinate (Phillips & Skapski, 1975; Collison et al., 1981; Sharpley et al., 1988; Liang & Sharpley, 1996), which fact provides a qualitative indication of the strong trans-influence of the nitrido ligand. In order to obtain a good quantitative measure of the trans-influence unperturbed by the steric requirements of polydentate ligands, we have undertaken a study of mer-[RuNCl3(AsPh3)2] (I).

The structure of (I) consists of discrete monomers, and the coordination geometry (Fig. 1 and Table 1) of is distorted octahedral. The three chloride ligands are arranged in a meridional configuration in which one chloride ligand is trans to the nitride, as proposed by Pawson & Griffith (1975).

The RuN bond length of 1.6161 (15) Å is relatively long compared with other ruthenium nitrido compounds and is only exceeded in bis(1,2-bezenedithiolate)nitridoruthenate(VI) [1.613 (5) and 1.621 (5) Å in two independent molecules; Sellmann et al., 1997] and µ-oxo-tetrakis(2,5-dimethyl-2,5-hexanediamine-N,N')nitridodiruthenium(VI) [1.66 (1) Å; Chiu et al., 1996].

The Ru—As bond length of 2.5533 (3) Å is the longest reported Ru—As bond length in ruthenium compounds with AsPh3 and related ligands. Note that arsine ligands support ruthenium in oxidation states varying from Ru0 in [Ru(AsPh3)(CO)4] (Martin et al., 1983) to RuVI in ruthenium nitride complexes such as the title compound.

In five- and six-coordinate complexes with strong π-donor ligands, such as oxide and nitride ligands, the central metal is invariably displaced out of the plane of the equatorial ligands, towards the multiply bonded ligand. This phenomenon is much less pronounced in the six-coordinate compounds, probably as a result of steric interactions. Given the N—Ru—Cl1 and N—Ru—As angles of 93.325 (7) and 93.59 (1)° in (I), the Ru atom lies 0.1483 (2) Å above the equatorial plane defined by? the two Cl and two As atoms. This deviation is less than half the out-of-plane distances seen in five-coordinate nitrido compounds, where the deviations range from 0.34 Å in [MoN(N3)4]- (Dehnicke et al., 1980) to 0.768 Å in [TcN(Se2CC(CN)2)]2- (Abram et al., 1991). In (I), the Ru—Cltrans bond length [2.5020 (4) Å] is longer than the Ru—Clcis bond length [2.3786 (3) Å]. This trans influence is relatively small compared with that observed for other six-coordinate nitrido complexes (cf. Table 2), possibly because of the small out-of-plane displacement of the Ru atom in (I), which reflects the steric bulk of the AsPh3 ligands and the concomitant strain involved in closing all angles involving the arsine ligands.

The closely related compound mer-[Ru(NO)Cl3(AsPh3)2] (Souza et al., 1995) is isostructual with (I). The geometric parameters of these two complexes are almost identical (Table 3), but the nitrosyl ligand does not exert any trans influence. This result is parallelled for first-row transition metals by the strong trans influence found in [Mn(N)(CN)5]3- [0.253 (7) Å; Bendix et al., 2000] and the absence of any trans influence in [Mn(NO)(CN)5]3- [0.03 (1) Å; Tullberg and Vannerberg, 1967). These findings reflect the general rule that, while strong π-donor ligands exert a trans influence, π-acceptors do not (Lyne & Mingos, 1995).

Importantly, the steric demands of the AsPh3 ligand shield the nitrido ligand in (I) from intermolecular interactions. Accordingly, the packing (Fig. 2) is governed by the arrangement of the phenyl groups of the AsPh3 ligands, with several relatively short intermolecular C···C distances [3.696–3.9 Å]. The rhombicity of the molecules is mirrored in the packing; all RuN directions are parallel (or antiparallel) and all As—As vectors are parallel. The packing thus explains the strong dichroism of the solid compound and makes it a good candidate for polarized single-crystal absorption and luminescence spectroscopy (Cowman et al., 1976; Lamet et al., 1993) on an unperturbed RuN moiety.

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell refinement: DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997) and SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of the molecular structure of [RuNCl3(AsPh3)2], with the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing, showing the parallel and antiparallel Ru N directions parallel to the b axis. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms have been omitted for clarity.
mer-trichloronitridobis(triphenylarsine)ruthenium(VI) top
Crystal data top
[RuCl3N(AsC18H15)2]F(000) = 1656
Mr = 833.87Dx = 1.713 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 34589 reflections
a = 12.0020 (4) Åθ = 2.2–35.0°
b = 14.5630 (9) ŵ = 2.79 mm1
c = 18.526 (2) ÅT = 122 K
β = 92.882 (5)°Prism, red and yellow
V = 3234.0 (4) Å30.27 × 0.18 × 0.14 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
7120 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube6361 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.045
ω and φ scansθmax = 35.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: integration
Gaussian integration (Coppens, 1970)
h = 1919
Tmin = 0.462, Tmax = 0.877k = 2323
55021 measured reflectionsl = 2929
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.052H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0173P)2 + 4.8314P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
7120 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
196 parametersΔρmax = 0.62 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.93 e Å3
Crystal data top
[RuCl3N(AsC18H15)2]V = 3234.0 (4) Å3
Mr = 833.87Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 12.0020 (4) ŵ = 2.79 mm1
b = 14.5630 (9) ÅT = 122 K
c = 18.526 (2) Å0.27 × 0.18 × 0.14 mm
β = 92.882 (5)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
7120 independent reflections
Absorption correction: integration
Gaussian integration (Coppens, 1970)
6361 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.462, Tmax = 0.877Rint = 0.045
55021 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0220 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.052H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09Δρmax = 0.62 e Å3
7120 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.93 e Å3
196 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Least-squares planes (x,y,z in crystal coordinates) and deviations from them (* indicates atom used to define plane)

- 0.0706 (0.0010) x + 14.5627 (0.0017) y + 0.0370 (0.0005) z = 3.8768 (0.0005)

* 0.0000 (0.0000) As1 * 0.0000 (0.0000) Cl1 * 0.0000 (0.0000) As1 * 0.0000 (0.0000) Cl1 - 0.1483 (0.0002) Ru1

Rms deviation of fitted atoms = 0.0000

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ru10.00000.255394 (8)0.25000.00929 (3)
N10.00000.14442 (10)0.25000.0153 (3)
Cl10.17848 (2)0.26487 (2)0.188570 (16)0.01445 (5)
Cl20.00000.42720 (3)0.25000.01609 (7)
As10.106252 (9)0.266385 (8)0.134322 (6)0.00948 (3)
C10.15328 (9)0.14305 (8)0.11152 (6)0.01168 (18)
C20.21054 (10)0.09280 (8)0.16602 (7)0.0142 (2)
H20.22640.11930.21100.017*
C30.24374 (11)0.00301 (8)0.15278 (7)0.0164 (2)
H30.28300.03020.18860.020*
C40.21818 (11)0.03692 (9)0.08593 (7)0.0183 (2)
H40.24060.09680.07710.022*
C50.15925 (12)0.01222 (9)0.03225 (7)0.0182 (2)
H50.14100.01540.01200.022*
C60.12729 (11)0.10298 (8)0.04445 (7)0.0149 (2)
H60.08910.13630.00820.018*
C70.02819 (9)0.30835 (8)0.04667 (6)0.01176 (18)
C80.07042 (10)0.26370 (8)0.02368 (7)0.0146 (2)
H80.09950.21740.05180.017*
C90.12484 (10)0.28882 (9)0.04138 (7)0.0166 (2)
H90.19020.25900.05690.020*
C100.08192 (11)0.35828 (9)0.08324 (7)0.0177 (2)
H100.11850.37470.12680.021*
C110.01552 (11)0.40321 (9)0.06015 (7)0.0179 (2)
H110.04370.45010.08800.021*
C120.07109 (10)0.37821 (8)0.00478 (7)0.0148 (2)
H120.13660.40810.02010.018*
C130.24129 (9)0.33844 (8)0.14375 (6)0.01186 (18)
C140.34570 (10)0.29664 (8)0.14436 (7)0.0156 (2)
H140.35140.23340.13860.019*
C150.44156 (11)0.35006 (10)0.15365 (8)0.0192 (2)
H150.51140.32220.15460.023*
C160.43369 (11)0.44470 (9)0.16155 (7)0.0181 (2)
H160.49800.48010.16750.022*
C170.32932 (11)0.48636 (9)0.16057 (7)0.0163 (2)
H170.32390.54970.16560.020*
C180.23283 (10)0.43345 (8)0.15209 (7)0.0144 (2)
H180.16310.46130.15200.017*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ru10.00894 (5)0.00864 (5)0.01011 (5)0.0000.00124 (4)0.000
N10.0158 (6)0.0132 (6)0.0170 (7)0.0000.0000 (5)0.000
Cl10.01121 (11)0.01749 (12)0.01422 (12)0.00021 (8)0.00373 (9)0.00074 (9)
Cl20.01383 (16)0.01050 (15)0.0239 (2)0.0000.00106 (14)0.000
As10.00927 (5)0.00871 (5)0.01031 (5)0.00031 (3)0.00109 (4)0.00038 (3)
C10.0116 (4)0.0106 (4)0.0128 (5)0.0003 (3)0.0001 (4)0.0003 (3)
C20.0154 (5)0.0130 (5)0.0138 (5)0.0018 (4)0.0017 (4)0.0001 (4)
C30.0170 (5)0.0135 (5)0.0185 (5)0.0037 (4)0.0005 (4)0.0015 (4)
C40.0224 (6)0.0121 (5)0.0205 (6)0.0024 (4)0.0035 (5)0.0008 (4)
C50.0260 (6)0.0141 (5)0.0146 (5)0.0011 (4)0.0014 (5)0.0034 (4)
C60.0190 (5)0.0132 (5)0.0124 (5)0.0009 (4)0.0000 (4)0.0003 (4)
C70.0112 (4)0.0121 (4)0.0118 (5)0.0010 (3)0.0011 (4)0.0003 (3)
C80.0129 (5)0.0156 (5)0.0151 (5)0.0018 (4)0.0014 (4)0.0006 (4)
C90.0141 (5)0.0189 (5)0.0164 (5)0.0005 (4)0.0038 (4)0.0019 (4)
C100.0194 (6)0.0181 (5)0.0151 (5)0.0045 (4)0.0040 (4)0.0010 (4)
C110.0209 (6)0.0158 (5)0.0167 (5)0.0012 (4)0.0011 (4)0.0043 (4)
C120.0142 (5)0.0145 (5)0.0156 (5)0.0008 (4)0.0016 (4)0.0019 (4)
C130.0111 (4)0.0126 (4)0.0118 (5)0.0024 (3)0.0007 (4)0.0005 (4)
C140.0123 (5)0.0150 (5)0.0194 (5)0.0002 (4)0.0005 (4)0.0022 (4)
C150.0107 (5)0.0231 (6)0.0237 (6)0.0013 (4)0.0000 (4)0.0036 (5)
C160.0152 (5)0.0215 (6)0.0175 (5)0.0063 (4)0.0010 (4)0.0043 (4)
C170.0180 (5)0.0144 (5)0.0165 (5)0.0045 (4)0.0017 (4)0.0027 (4)
C180.0135 (5)0.0135 (5)0.0162 (5)0.0012 (4)0.0009 (4)0.0005 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ru1—N11.6161 (15)C7—C81.3979 (16)
Ru1—As12.5533 (3)C8—C91.3906 (17)
Ru1—Cl12.3786 (3)C8—H80.9300
Ru1—Cl1i2.3786 (3)C9—C101.3893 (19)
Ru1—Cl22.5020 (4)C9—H90.9300
Ru1—As1i2.5533 (3)C10—C111.3887 (19)
As1—C131.9313 (11)C10—H100.9300
As1—C71.9327 (11)C11—C121.3942 (18)
As1—C11.9357 (11)C11—H110.9300
C1—C61.3938 (17)C12—H120.9300
C1—C21.3991 (16)C13—C141.3927 (17)
C2—C31.3924 (17)C13—C181.3965 (16)
C2—H20.9300C14—C151.3924 (18)
C3—C41.3884 (19)C14—H140.9300
C3—H30.9300C15—C161.3898 (19)
C4—C51.3896 (19)C15—H150.9300
C4—H40.9300C16—C171.3911 (19)
C5—C61.3979 (17)C16—H160.9300
C5—H50.9300C17—C181.3932 (17)
C6—H60.9300C17—H170.9300
C7—C121.3937 (17)C18—H180.9300
N1—Ru1—Cl193.325 (7)C5—C6—H6120.4
N1—Ru1—Cl1i93.324 (7)C12—C7—C8120.04 (11)
Cl1—Ru1—Cl1i173.350 (15)C12—C7—As1121.44 (9)
N1—Ru1—Cl2180.0C8—C7—As1118.44 (9)
Cl1—Ru1—Cl286.675 (7)C9—C8—C7119.69 (11)
Cl1i—Ru1—Cl286.676 (7)C9—C8—H8120.2
N1—Ru1—As193.59 (1)C7—C8—H8120.2
Cl1—Ru1—As194.047 (8)C10—C9—C8120.28 (12)
Cl1i—Ru1—As185.537 (8)C10—C9—H9119.9
Cl2—Ru1—As186.41 (1)C8—C9—H9119.9
N1—Ru1—As1i93.59 (1)C11—C10—C9120.07 (12)
Cl1—Ru1—As1i85.535 (8)C11—C10—H10120.0
Cl1i—Ru1—As1i94.046 (8)C9—C10—H10120.0
Cl2—Ru1—As1i86.41 (1)C10—C11—C12120.12 (12)
As1—Ru1—As1i172.812 (7)C10—C11—H11119.9
C13—As1—C7105.86 (5)C12—C11—H11119.9
C13—As1—C1105.74 (5)C7—C12—C11119.79 (11)
C7—As1—C1104.15 (5)C7—C12—H12120.1
C13—As1—Ru1114.23 (3)C11—C12—H12120.1
C7—As1—Ru1118.92 (3)C14—C13—C18120.17 (11)
C1—As1—Ru1106.76 (4)C14—C13—As1120.92 (9)
C6—C1—C2120.28 (11)C18—C13—As1118.88 (9)
C6—C1—As1121.90 (9)C15—C14—C13119.63 (11)
C2—C1—As1117.76 (9)C15—C14—H14120.2
C3—C2—C1119.91 (11)C13—C14—H14120.2
C3—C2—H2120.0C16—C15—C14120.46 (12)
C1—C2—H2120.0C16—C15—H15119.8
C4—C3—C2119.87 (12)C14—C15—H15119.8
C4—C3—H3120.1C15—C16—C17119.80 (12)
C2—C3—H3120.1C15—C16—H16120.1
C3—C4—C5120.30 (11)C17—C16—H16120.1
C3—C4—H4119.9C16—C17—C18120.21 (12)
C5—C4—H4119.9C16—C17—H17119.9
C4—C5—C6120.33 (12)C18—C17—H17119.9
C4—C5—H5119.8C17—C18—C13119.72 (11)
C6—C5—H5119.8C17—C18—H18120.1
C1—C6—C5119.29 (11)C13—C18—H18120.1
C1—C6—H6120.4
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[RuCl3N(AsC18H15)2]
Mr833.87
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)122
a, b, c (Å)12.0020 (4), 14.5630 (9), 18.526 (2)
β (°) 92.882 (5)
V3)3234.0 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.79
Crystal size (mm)0.27 × 0.18 × 0.14
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD area-detector
Absorption correctionIntegration
Gaussian integration (Coppens, 1970)
Tmin, Tmax0.462, 0.877
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
55021, 7120, 6361
Rint0.045
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.806
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.022, 0.052, 1.09
No. of reflections7120
No. of parameters196
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.62, 0.93

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999), DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992), EVALCCD (Duisenberg, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997) and SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ru1—N11.6161 (15)Ru1—Cl12.3786 (3)
Ru1—As12.5533 (3)Ru1—Cl22.5020 (4)
N1—Ru1—Cl193.325 (7)N1—Ru1—As193.59 (1)
Cl1—Ru1—Cl1i173.350 (15)Cl1—Ru1—As194.047 (8)
N1—Ru1—Cl2180.0Cl2—Ru1—As186.41 (1)
Cl1—Ru1—Cl286.675 (7)As1—Ru1—As1i172.812 (7)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z+1/2.
Comparative geometric parameters (Å, °) for a few selected six-coordinate nitrido complexes top
ComplexAverage
MNM—XtransM—XcisNM—Leq
mer-[RuNCl3(AsPh3)2] a
1.6161 (15)2.5020 (4)2.3786 (3)93.325 (7)-93.59 (1)
fac-[OsNCl3(dpae)] b
1.68 (2)2.507 (5)2.377 (5)86.5 (5)-102.6 (5)
[OsNCl5]2- c
1.614 (13)2.605 (4)2.363 (4)95.44 (6)-97.5 (5)
[OsN(CN)5]2- d
1.647 (7)2.353 (8)2.080 (8)93.3 (3)-99.4 (3)
[ReN(NCS)5]2- e
1.657 (12)2.307 (12)2.023 (8)95.5 (4)-96.8 (5)
mer-[ReNBr2(PMe2Ph)3] f
1.667 (6)2.795 (1)2.587 (1)91.0 (2)-103.6 (2)
Notes: (a) present work; (b) Lam et al. (1993) [dpae is bis(diphenylarsino)ethane]; (c) Bright & Ibers (1969); (d) Che et al. (1989); (e) Carrondo et al. (1978); (f) Schmidt-Brücken & Abram (2001);
Comparative geometric parameters (Å, °) for mer-[RuNCl3(AsPh3)2] and mer-[Ru(NO)Cl3(AsPh3)2]. top
mer-[RuNCl3(AsPh3)2]mer-[Ru(NO)Cl3(AsPh3)2]
Ru—N1.6161 (15)1.729 (7)
Ru—Clcis2.3786 (3)2.384 (1)
Ru—Cltrans2.5020 (4)2.346 (2)
N—Ru—Clcis93.325 (7)90.0 (1)
N—Ru—As93.59 (1)91.5 (1)
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds