Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The molecule of the title compound, C9H7NO, is nearly planar, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.018 (7) Å. In the crystal structure, two mol­ecules form an R22(8) centrosymmetric dimer through N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The three-dimensional packing is additionally stabilized through weak C—H...O inter­actions.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807057960/is2239sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807057960/is2239Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 672970

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 290 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.042
  • wR factor = 0.123
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.6

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H8 .. O .. 2.66 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H9 .. O .. 2.65 Ang.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Isoquinolines are important from both technological and applied points of view as a part of a significant class of compounds with a variety of pharmacological applications in anticancer, retroviral infections, rheumatoid arthritis and diabets treatment (Jayaraman et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 1997; Bernan et al., 1994; Koleva et al., 1998).

As part of our research on isoquinoline derivatives the structures of (3RS,4RS)-3-(2-furyl)-2-phenethyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-ylcarbonyl)-3,4- dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (Petrova et al., 2005) and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolinium hydrogensquarate (Kolev et al., 2007) were reported. The title compound,(I), was investigated in order to provide relevant information on the changes observed upon substitution.

In the asymmetric unit of (I), only one independent molecule is present (Fig. 1). The fused ring system is nearly planar with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.018 (7) Å. The molecules are coupled through bicyclic N—H1···Oi [symmetry code (i): -x + 1, -y + 2, -z + 1] hydrogen bonds and build R22(8) dimers (Fig. 2) (Bernstein et al., 1995). The three-dimensional packing is stabilized through weak C8—H8···Oii and C9—H9···Oii interactions [symmetry code (ii): 1/2 + x, 3/2 - y, 1/2 + z].

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Bernan et al. (1994); Bernstein et al. (1995); Ferrer et al. (2002); Jayaraman et al. (2000); Kolev et al. (2007); Koleva et al. (1998); Parveen et al. (1999); Petrova et al. (2005); Zhang et al. (1997).

Experimental top

Compound (I) was synthesized in a manner similar to the procedure described by Ferrer et al. (2002) and Parveen et al. (1999). Isocoumarin (996 mg, 6.8 mmol) in 2-methoxyethanol (30 ml) was saturated with ammonia for 3 h, after which the mixture was boiled under reflux for 18 h. Subsequent evaporation and recrystallization from ethylacetate yielded the title compound (815 mg, yield 82%). Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction have been obtained by slow evaporation from hydrazine/water mixture (4:1) at room temperature. IR (KBr pellet, ν, cm-1): The most intensive band in the IR spectrum is located at 1656 cm-1 and is characteristic for νCO stretching mode. Skeletal stretching of aromatic ring, νCC, are detected at 1605, 1549, 1475, 1346 and 1230 cm-1. The νC—H of the phenyl group appears at 551, 669 and 797 cm-1(m), and in the 2855–3160 cm-1 (w) region. The weak broad band at 3290 cm-1 is associated with the N—H group.

Refinement top

All H atoms were placed in idealized positions (C—H = 0.93 and N—H = 0.86 Å) and were constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C or N).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. View of the molecule and the atom-numbering scheme of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view of the molecular packing in (I). All H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonds have been omitted for clarity [symmetry code: (i) -x, 1 - y, -z].
Isoquinolin-1(2H)-one top
Crystal data top
C9H7NOF(000) = 304
Mr = 145.16Dx = 1.373 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMelting point: not measured K
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.6138 (17) ÅCell parameters from 22 reflections
b = 5.2965 (9) Åθ = 18.0–19.2°
c = 12.2946 (9) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 111.745 (9)°T = 290 K
V = 702.46 (17) Å3Prism, pale orange
Z = 40.36 × 0.36 × 0.34 mm
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD4
diffractometer
Rint = 0.044
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.1°
Graphite monochromatorh = 015
ω/2θ scansk = 66
3292 measured reflectionsl = 1615
1678 independent reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
1053 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: none
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.123 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0535P)2 + 0.0424P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1678 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.20 e Å3
101 parametersΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.033 (5)
Crystal data top
C9H7NOV = 702.46 (17) Å3
Mr = 145.16Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 11.6138 (17) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 5.2965 (9) ÅT = 290 K
c = 12.2946 (9) Å0.36 × 0.36 × 0.34 mm
β = 111.745 (9)°
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD4
diffractometer
Rint = 0.044
3292 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
1678 independent reflections intensity decay: none
1053 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0420 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.123H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
1678 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
101 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.67389 (14)0.5067 (3)0.44839 (13)0.0362 (4)
C20.79688 (14)0.4736 (3)0.52641 (13)0.0418 (4)
C30.86794 (17)0.2858 (4)0.50006 (17)0.0534 (5)
H30.94990.26150.54970.064*
C40.81862 (18)0.1389 (4)0.40290 (17)0.0581 (5)
H40.86750.01610.38700.070*
C50.69666 (18)0.1697 (4)0.32727 (16)0.0525 (5)
H50.66360.06660.26170.063*
C60.62517 (15)0.3528 (3)0.34971 (14)0.0447 (4)
H60.54350.37470.29880.054*
C70.59723 (14)0.7040 (3)0.46979 (13)0.0380 (4)
C80.77064 (15)0.8060 (3)0.64655 (14)0.0457 (4)
H80.80110.90650.71320.055*
C90.84330 (15)0.6297 (4)0.62860 (15)0.0485 (5)
H90.92380.60800.68210.058*
N0.65169 (12)0.8423 (3)0.56868 (11)0.0428 (4)
H1N0.60880.96040.58350.051*
O0.48896 (10)0.7471 (2)0.40287 (10)0.0481 (4)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0357 (8)0.0373 (8)0.0359 (7)0.0028 (7)0.0135 (6)0.0052 (7)
C20.0382 (9)0.0438 (10)0.0421 (9)0.0064 (7)0.0135 (7)0.0079 (7)
C30.0428 (10)0.0582 (12)0.0558 (10)0.0179 (9)0.0142 (8)0.0076 (9)
C40.0640 (12)0.0518 (11)0.0627 (12)0.0208 (9)0.0282 (10)0.0026 (9)
C50.0618 (11)0.0486 (10)0.0492 (10)0.0042 (9)0.0229 (9)0.0052 (8)
C60.0429 (9)0.0477 (10)0.0411 (9)0.0019 (8)0.0128 (7)0.0018 (7)
C70.0357 (8)0.0403 (9)0.0357 (8)0.0020 (7)0.0108 (7)0.0032 (7)
C80.0413 (9)0.0498 (10)0.0376 (8)0.0020 (8)0.0049 (7)0.0031 (7)
C90.0356 (9)0.0563 (11)0.0449 (9)0.0069 (8)0.0048 (7)0.0035 (8)
N0.0379 (7)0.0452 (8)0.0408 (7)0.0091 (6)0.0094 (6)0.0024 (6)
O0.0344 (6)0.0548 (8)0.0457 (6)0.0113 (5)0.0039 (5)0.0026 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C61.396 (2)C5—H50.9300
C1—C21.406 (2)C6—H60.9300
C1—C71.458 (2)C7—O1.2423 (18)
C2—C31.405 (2)C7—N1.358 (2)
C2—C91.432 (2)C8—C91.331 (2)
C3—C41.362 (3)C8—N1.3718 (19)
C3—H30.9300C8—H80.9300
C4—C51.386 (3)C9—H90.9300
C4—H40.9300N—H1N0.8600
C5—C61.370 (2)
C6—C1—C2120.15 (15)C5—C6—C1120.53 (16)
C6—C1—C7119.82 (14)C5—C6—H6119.7
C2—C1—C7120.02 (14)C1—C6—H6119.7
C3—C2—C1117.80 (15)O—C7—N121.01 (14)
C3—C2—C9123.28 (15)O—C7—C1123.22 (14)
C1—C2—C9118.92 (15)N—C7—C1115.77 (13)
C4—C3—C2120.99 (17)C9—C8—N121.28 (15)
C4—C3—H3119.5C9—C8—H8119.4
C2—C3—H3119.5N—C8—H8119.4
C3—C4—C5120.97 (17)C8—C9—C2119.67 (15)
C3—C4—H4119.5C8—C9—H9120.2
C5—C4—H4119.5C2—C9—H9120.2
C6—C5—C4119.54 (17)C7—N—C8124.31 (14)
C6—C5—H5120.2C7—N—H1N117.8
C4—C5—H5120.2C8—N—H1N117.8
C6—C1—C2—C31.2 (2)C6—C1—C7—O1.1 (2)
C7—C1—C2—C3178.18 (14)C2—C1—C7—O178.23 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C9178.33 (16)C6—C1—C7—N179.14 (14)
C7—C1—C2—C92.3 (2)C2—C1—C7—N1.5 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.8 (3)N—C8—C9—C20.2 (3)
C9—C2—C3—C4178.67 (18)C3—C2—C9—C8179.07 (17)
C2—C3—C4—C50.2 (3)C1—C2—C9—C81.4 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C60.9 (3)O—C7—N—C8179.94 (15)
C4—C5—C6—C10.5 (3)C1—C7—N—C80.2 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C50.5 (2)C9—C8—N—C71.1 (3)
C7—C1—C6—C5178.83 (15)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N—H1N···Oi0.861.962.818 (2)172
C8—H8···Oii0.932.663.243 (2)121
C9—H9···Oii0.932.653.230 (2)121
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+2, z+1; (ii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H7NO
Mr145.16
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)290
a, b, c (Å)11.6138 (17), 5.2965 (9), 12.2946 (9)
β (°) 111.745 (9)
V3)702.46 (17)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.36 × 0.36 × 0.34
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius CAD4
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3292, 1678, 1053
Rint0.044
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.660
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.123, 1.01
No. of reflections1678
No. of parameters101
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.20, 0.16

Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994), XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N—H1N···Oi0.861.962.818 (2)172
C8—H8···Oii0.932.663.243 (2)121
C9—H9···Oii0.932.653.230 (2)121
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+2, z+1; (ii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds