research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4, an open-framework structure isotypic with Co3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aInstitute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Structural Chemistry, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/164-SC, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: felix.eder@tuwien.ac.at

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, Scotland (Received 30 March 2020; accepted 31 March 2020; online 3 April 2020)

Single crystals of Ni3(TeO(OH)2)2(PO4)2, trinickel(II) bis[(oxidodihydoxidotellurate(IV)] bis(phosphate),were obtained by hydro­thermal synthesis at 483 K, starting from NiCO3·2Ni(OH)2, TeO2 and H3PO4 in a molar ratio of 1:2:2. The crystal structure of Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 is isotypic with that of Co3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 [Zimmermann et al. (2011[Zimmermann, I., Kremer, R. K. & Johnsson, M. (2011). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 3080-3084.]). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 3080–3084]. The asymmetric unit comprises two Ni (site symmetries [\overline{1}], 2/m) one Te (m), one P (m), five O (three m, two 1) and one H (1) sites. The tellurium(IV) atom shows a coordination number of five, with the corresponding [TeO3(OH)2] polyhedron having a distorted square-pyramidal shape. The two NiII atoms are both octa­hedrally coordinated but form different structural elements: one constitutes chains made up from edge-sharing [NiO6] octa­hedra extending parallel to [010], and the other isolated [NiO2(OH)4] octa­hedra. The two kinds of nickel/oxygen octa­hedra are connected by the [TeO3(OH)2] pyramids and the [PO4] tetra­hedra through edge- and corner-sharing into a three-dimensional framework structure with channels extending parallel to [010]. Hydrogen bonds of medium strength between the hy­droxy groups and one of the phosphate O atoms consolidate the packing. A qu­anti­tative structure comparison between Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 and Co3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 is made.

1. Chemical context

The crystal chemistry of TeIV-containing compounds is very diverse and strongly influenced by the stereochemically active 5s2 lone pair. The space requirement of the latter frequently results in one-sided and low-symmetric coordination spheres around TeIV, as surveyed recently for the vast family of oxidotellurates(IV) (Christy et al., 2016[Christy, A. G., Mills, S. J. & Kampf, A. R. (2016). Miner. Mag. 80, 415-545.]). The polarities and shapes of corresponding oxidotellurate(IV) anions can be utilized in the search for new compounds with non-centrosymmetric structures. The absence of an inversion centre is a precondition for a substance to have ferro-, pyro- or piezoelectric properties or to have non-linear optical properties (Ok et al., 2006[Ok, K. M., Chi, E. O. & Halasyamani, P. S. (2006). Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 710-717.]). Combining oxidotellurates(IV) with additional (transition) metal cations often leads to open-framework structures because of the space required for the 5s2 lone pair. This way, either channels can be integrated within three-dimensional frameworks, or layers, chains or clusters of building blocks can be formed (Stöger & Weil, 2013[Stöger, B. & Weil, M. (2013). Miner. Petrol. 107, 253-263.]). Incorporating additional anions into transition-metal oxidotellurates(IV) increases the possibilities for structural diversification. Following this strategy, several mixed-anion oxotellurates(IV) have been characterized over the last decade, including sulfates [e.g. Cd4(SO4)(TeO3)3; Weil & Shirkhanlou, 2017[Weil, M. & Shirkhanlou, M. (2017). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 643, 330-339.]], selenates [e.g. Hg3(SeO4)(TeO3); Weil & Shirkhanlou, 2015[Weil, M. & Shirkhanlou, M. (2015). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 641, 1459-1466.]], nitrates [e.g. Ca6Te5O15(NO3)2; Stöger & Weil, 2013[Stöger, B. & Weil, M. (2013). Miner. Petrol. 107, 253-263.]] or phosphates [e.g. Co3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4; Zimmermann et al., 2011[Zimmermann, I., Kremer, R. K. & Johnsson, M. (2011). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 3080-3084.]].

In this communication we describe the synthesis and crystal structure analysis of Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4, which is isotypic with its cobalt(II) analogue. The two structures are qu­anti­tatively compared.

2. Structural commentary

Of the ten atoms in the asymmetric unit (2 Ni, 1 Te, 1 P, 5 O, 1 H), seven are situated on special positions. Ni1 is located on an inversion centre (Wyckoff position 4 f), Ni2 on a site with symmetry 2/m (2 b), Te1 and P1 both possess site symmetry m (4 i), and three of the oxygen sites (O1, O3, O4) are likewise located on a mirror plane (4 i) while the other two oxygen atoms and the hydrogen atom (O2, O5, H1) are located on general positions (8 j).

Both nickel atoms are coordinated octa­hedrally but otherwise show a different environment. Ni1 is surrounded by six oxygen atoms (O1, O2, O3 and their symmetry-related counterparts) and forms chains of edge-sharing [Ni1O6] octa­hedra extending parallel to [010]. The 1[Ni1O4/2O2/1] chains are not entirely straight; the octa­hedra are tilted against each other with every second unit being oriented in the same direction. The three pairs of Ni1—O bond lengths are rather similar (Table 1[link]), with an average length of 2.058 Å. The distance between neighbouring Ni1 atoms in a chains amounts to 2.9717 (11) Å. Ni2 is coordinated by two O atoms (O4 and its symmetry-related counterpart) in axial positions and by four hydroxide groups (O5 and its three symmetry-related counterparts) in the equatorial positions. The latter have a slightly longer bond than the former (Δ = 0.032 Å), with an average bond length of 2.084 Å for the six O atoms. The [Ni2O2(OH)4] octa­hedra are isolated from each other and are also not linked to the 1[Ni1O4/2O2/1] chains.

Table 1
Comparison of bond lengths (Å) in the isotypic M3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 compounds (M = Ni, Coa)

  M = Ni M = Co
Te1—O3 1.866 (2) 1.861 (4)
Te1—O5 2.0002 (18) 1.994 (3)
Te1—O2 2.3093 (18) 2.331 (3)
M1—O1 2.0343 (16) 2.051 (3)
M1—O2 2.0457 (18) 2.079 (3)
M1—O3 2.0940 (18) 2.143 (3)
M2—O4 2.061 (2) 2.076 (4)
M2—O5 2.0928 (19) 2.147 (3)
P1—O4 1.534 (3) 1.530 (4)
P1—O1 1.538 (2) 1.541 (5)
P1—O2 1.5449 (18) 1.550 (3)
(a) Unit-cell parameters: a = 19.4317 (10), b = 6.0249 (3), c = 4.7788 (2) Å, β = 103.139 (5)°, V = 544.83 (5) Å3 (Zimmermann et al., 2011[Zimmermann, I., Kremer, R. K. & Johnsson, M. (2011). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 3080-3084.]).

Te1 is coordinated by five oxygen atoms, two of them being hydroxide groups. The surrounding atoms form a distorted square pyramid (Fig. 1[link]), a coordination polyhedron that is comparatively rare in the crystal chemistry of oxidotellurates(IV), with a trigonal pyramid (TeO32–) as the most commonly observed type of anion (Christy et al., 2016[Christy, A. G., Mills, S. J. & Kampf, A. R. (2016). Miner. Mag. 80, 415-545.]). The Te1 atom is displaced from the basal plane of the pyramid by 0.1966 (2) Å. The two symmetry-related O2 atoms defining one side of the basal plane exhibit a significantly larger distance [2.3094 (18) Å] from Te than the two hy­droxy groups [2.0002 (18) Å] on the other side. The oxygen atom closest [O3, 1.866 (2) Å] to Te1 lies at the apex of the pyramid. The calculated bond-valence sum (BVS; Brown, 2002[Brown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model. Oxford University Press.]) of Te1 is 4.05 valence units (v.u.) based on the parameters of Brese & O'Keeffe (1991[Brese, N. E. & O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192-197.]). Using the revised parameters of Mills & Christy (2013[Mills, S. J. & Christy, A. G. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 145-149.]), a BVS of 3.93 v.u. was calculated. The [TeO3(OH)2] units are not connected to each other but share two edges with [Ni1O6] octa­hedra and two corners, being the hydroxide groups, with [Ni2O2(OH)4] octa­hedra, as well as a corner of the phosphate tetra­hedra. In this way, a three-dimensional framework structure is obtained with channels running parallel to [010]. The free-electron pairs point into the smaller type of channels whereas the hydrogen atoms of the hy­droxy group protrude into the larger type of channels. This results in hydrogen bonds of medium strength, with the OH groups linking to opposite O atoms (Fig. 2[link]; Table 2[link]).

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O5—H1⋯O4i 0.80 (5) 2.03 (5) 2.812 (3) 164 (6)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The square-pyramidal [TeO3(OH)2] polyhedron in the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 90% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) x, −y + 1, z.]
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The crystal structure of Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 in a projection along [010]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 90% probability level; hydrogen bonds are shown as orange lines.

As a result of the similar ionic radii (Shannon, 1976[Shannon, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 751-767.]) of six-coordinated Ni2+ (0.69 Å) and Co2+ (0.75 Å, assuming a high-spin d7 state), the comparable bond lengths in the two isotypic structures differ only marginally (Table 1[link]). The two structures were also qu­anti­tatively compared using the program compstru (de la Flor et al., 2016[Flor, G. de la, Orobengoa, D., Tasci, E., Perez-Mato, J. M. & Aroyo, M. I. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 653-664.]). The absolute distances between paired atoms are 0 Å for Ni1/Co1, 0 Å for Ni2/Co2, 0.0213 Å for P1, 0.0289 Å for O1, 0.0289 Å for O2, 0.0342 Å for O3, 0.0192 Å for O4 and 0.0271 Å for O5. The degree of lattice distortion is 0.0072, the arithmetic mean of the distance between paired atoms is 0.0227 Å, and the measure of similarity is 0.011.

3. Synthesis and crystallization

Crystals of Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 were obtained under hydro­thermal conditions. The starting materials, 0.1796 g (0.591 mmol) NiCO3·2Ni(OH)2, 0.1870 g TeO2 (1.172 mmol) and 0.16 g 85% H3PO4 (1.4 mmol), were weighed into a small Teflon vessel with a volume of ca 3 ml. The reactants were mixed, and the vessel filled to about two thirds with deionized water. The reaction vessel was heated inside a steel autoclave at 483 K for 7 d; the autoclave was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature over about four hours. A bright-green solid besides small amounts of a pale-yellow powder was obtained as the reaction product. X-ray powder diffraction of the bulk revealed Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 as the main product and TeO2 (corresponding to the pale-yellow powder) as a side product. A light-green block-shaped single crystal of Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 was selected for the diffraction experiment.

4. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3[link]. Atom labels and starting coordinates for refinement were adopted from the isotypic Co3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 structure (Zimmermann et al., 2011[Zimmermann, I., Kremer, R. K. & Johnsson, M. (2011). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 3080-3084.]). The hydrogen atom of the hy­droxy group was located in a difference-Fourier map and was refined freely. The remaining maximum electron density of 3.6 e Å−3 is located 0.71 Å from P1. Modelling the corresponding site as a minor disorder component lead to unrealistic P—O distances and physically non-reasonable displacement parameters. We therefore did not consider this site in the final model.

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4
Mr 721.30
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/m
Temperature (K) 300
a, b, c (Å) 19.241 (7), 5.943 (2), 4.7808 (18)
β (°) 104.094 (8)
V3) 530.3 (3)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 11.05
Crystal size (mm) 0.08 × 0.06 × 0.03
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2016[Bruker (2016). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.600, 0.747
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 12917, 1292, 1212
Rint 0.054
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.820
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.022, 0.058, 1.11
No. of reflections 1292
No. of parameters 63
H-atom treatment All H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 3.84, −1.39
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016[Bruker (2016). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), ATOMS (Dowty, 2006[Dowty, E. (2006). ATOMS for Windows. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Computing details top

Data collection: APEX3 (Bruker, 2016); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2016); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2016); program(s) used to solve structure: coordinates from isotypic structure; program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: ATOMS (Dowty, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Trinickel(II) bis(oxidodihydoxidotellurate(IV)) bis(phosphate) top
Crystal data top
Ni3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4F(000) = 668
Mr = 721.30Dx = 4.518 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 19.241 (7) ÅCell parameters from 8089 reflections
b = 5.943 (2) Åθ = 3.6–35.3°
c = 4.7808 (18) ŵ = 11.05 mm1
β = 104.094 (8)°T = 300 K
V = 530.3 (3) Å3Block, light green
Z = 20.08 × 0.06 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
1212 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω– and φ–scanRint = 0.054
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2016)
θmax = 35.7°, θmin = 3.6°
Tmin = 0.600, Tmax = 0.747h = 3131
12917 measured reflectionsk = 99
1292 independent reflectionsl = 77
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: isomorphous structure methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.058 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0264P)2 + 2.8929P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.11(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1292 reflectionsΔρmax = 3.84 e Å3
63 parametersΔρmin = 1.39 e Å3
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Te10.39329 (2)0.5000000.84942 (4)0.00797 (6)
Ni10.2500000.2500000.5000000.00608 (8)
Ni20.5000001.0000001.0000000.00680 (11)
P10.33875 (4)0.0000000.09068 (16)0.00516 (13)
O10.30175 (13)0.0000000.3417 (5)0.0075 (4)
O20.31714 (9)0.2109 (3)0.9006 (4)0.0085 (3)
O30.32631 (13)0.5000000.4940 (5)0.0075 (4)
O40.42002 (13)0.0000000.2189 (5)0.0093 (4)
O50.45243 (10)0.7393 (3)0.7251 (4)0.0110 (3)
H10.441 (3)0.790 (10)0.565 (11)0.043 (14)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Te10.00681 (10)0.00738 (9)0.00868 (10)0.0000.00009 (7)0.000
Ni10.00630 (17)0.00493 (16)0.00686 (16)0.00020 (12)0.00132 (13)0.00027 (12)
Ni20.0063 (2)0.0062 (2)0.0081 (2)0.0000.00213 (19)0.000
P10.0061 (3)0.0051 (3)0.0049 (3)0.0000.0026 (2)0.000
O10.0095 (10)0.0062 (9)0.0084 (9)0.0000.0051 (8)0.000
O20.0094 (7)0.0071 (6)0.0084 (6)0.0011 (5)0.0009 (5)0.0023 (5)
O30.0085 (10)0.0060 (9)0.0074 (9)0.0000.0008 (8)0.000
O40.0062 (9)0.0137 (10)0.0077 (9)0.0000.0013 (7)0.000
O50.0098 (7)0.0118 (7)0.0109 (7)0.0046 (6)0.0017 (6)0.0004 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Te1—O31.866 (2)Ni1—Ni1iv2.9717 (11)
Te1—O52.0002 (18)Ni2—O4v2.061 (2)
Te1—O5i2.0002 (18)Ni2—O4vi2.061 (2)
Te1—O2i2.3093 (18)Ni2—O5vii2.0928 (19)
Te1—O22.3094 (18)Ni2—O5viii2.0928 (19)
Ni1—O12.0343 (16)Ni2—O5ix2.0928 (19)
Ni1—O1ii2.0343 (16)Ni2—O52.0928 (19)
Ni1—O2ii2.0457 (18)P1—O41.534 (3)
Ni1—O22.0457 (18)P1—O11.538 (2)
Ni1—O3ii2.0940 (18)P1—O2x1.5449 (18)
Ni1—O32.0940 (18)P1—O2xi1.5449 (18)
Ni1—Ni1iii2.9717 (11)
O3—Te1—O592.64 (8)O4vi—Ni2—O5viii93.01 (7)
O3—Te1—O5i92.64 (8)O5vii—Ni2—O5viii84.49 (11)
O5—Te1—O5i90.65 (11)O4v—Ni2—O5ix93.01 (7)
O3—Te1—O2i77.35 (7)O4vi—Ni2—O5ix86.99 (7)
O5—Te1—O2i85.64 (8)O5vii—Ni2—O5ix95.51 (11)
O5i—Te1—O2i169.13 (7)O5viii—Ni2—O5ix180.0
O3—Te1—O277.35 (7)O4v—Ni2—O586.99 (7)
O5—Te1—O2169.13 (7)O4vi—Ni2—O593.01 (7)
O5i—Te1—O285.64 (8)O5vii—Ni2—O5180.0
O2i—Te1—O296.14 (9)O5viii—Ni2—O595.51 (11)
O1—Ni1—O1ii180.0O5ix—Ni2—O584.49 (11)
O1—Ni1—O2ii89.40 (9)O4—P1—O1107.98 (14)
O1ii—Ni1—O2ii90.60 (9)O4—P1—O2x109.71 (9)
O1—Ni1—O290.60 (9)O1—P1—O2x110.48 (9)
O1ii—Ni1—O289.40 (9)O4—P1—O2xi109.71 (9)
O2ii—Ni1—O2180.0O1—P1—O2xi110.48 (9)
O1—Ni1—O3ii83.98 (8)O2x—P1—O2xi108.48 (14)
O1ii—Ni1—O3ii96.02 (8)P1—O1—Ni1iv130.69 (6)
O2ii—Ni1—O3ii78.95 (8)P1—O1—Ni1130.69 (6)
O2—Ni1—O3ii101.05 (8)Ni1iv—O1—Ni193.84 (10)
O1—Ni1—O396.02 (8)P1xii—O2—Ni1131.38 (11)
O1ii—Ni1—O383.98 (8)P1xii—O2—Te1125.39 (10)
O2ii—Ni1—O3101.05 (8)Ni1—O2—Te195.09 (6)
O2—Ni1—O378.95 (8)Te1—O3—Ni1108.58 (9)
O3ii—Ni1—O3180.0Te1—O3—Ni1iii108.58 (9)
O4v—Ni2—O4vi180.00 (7)Ni1—O3—Ni1iii90.40 (10)
O4v—Ni2—O5vii93.01 (7)P1—O4—Ni2xiii127.69 (15)
O4vi—Ni2—O5vii86.99 (7)Te1—O5—Ni2122.22 (9)
O4v—Ni2—O5viii86.99 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1; (iv) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1; (v) x+1, y+1, z+1; (vi) x, y+1, z+1; (vii) x+1, y+2, z+2; (viii) x, y+2, z; (ix) x+1, y, z+2; (x) x, y, z1; (xi) x, y, z1; (xii) x, y, z+1; (xiii) x, y1, z1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O5—H1···O4xiv0.80 (5)2.03 (5)2.812 (3)164 (6)
Symmetry code: (xiv) x, y+1, z.
Comparison of bond lengths (Å) in the isotypic M3Te2O2(PO4)2(OH)4 compounds (M = Ni, Coa) top
M = NiM = Co
Te1—O31.866 (2)1.861 (4)
Te1—O52.0002 (18)1.994 (3)
Te1—O22.3093 (18)2.331 (3)
M1—O12.0343 (16)2.051 (3)
M1—O22.0457 (18)2.079 (3)
M1—O32.0940 (18)2.143 (3)
M2—O42.061 (2)2.076 (4)
M2—O52.0928 (19)2.147 (3)
P1—O41.534 (3)1.530 (4)
P1—O11.538 (2)1.541 (5)
P1—O21.5449 (18)1.550 (3)
Note: (a) Unit-cell parameters: a = 19.4317 (10), b = 6.0249 (3), c = 4.7788 (2) Å, β = 103.139 (5)°, V = 544.83 (5) Å3 (Zimmermann et al., 2011).
 

Acknowledgements

The X-ray centre of the TU Wien is acknowledged for financial support and for providing access to the single-crystal and powder X-ray diffractometers.

References

First citationBrese, N. E. & O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBrown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2016). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationChristy, A. G., Mills, S. J. & Kampf, A. R. (2016). Miner. Mag. 80, 415–545.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDowty, E. (2006). ATOMS for Windows. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationFlor, G. de la, Orobengoa, D., Tasci, E., Perez-Mato, J. M. & Aroyo, M. I. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 653–664.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMills, S. J. & Christy, A. G. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 145–149.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationOk, K. M., Chi, E. O. & Halasyamani, P. S. (2006). Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 710–717.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationShannon, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 751–767.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationStöger, B. & Weil, M. (2013). Miner. Petrol. 107, 253–263.  Google Scholar
First citationWeil, M. & Shirkhanlou, M. (2015). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 641, 1459–1466.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
First citationWeil, M. & Shirkhanlou, M. (2017). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 643, 330–339.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationZimmermann, I., Kremer, R. K. & Johnsson, M. (2011). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 3080–3084.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds