organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

(2-Chloro-8-methyl­quinolin-3-yl)methanol

aOrganic and Medicinal Chemistry Research Laboratory, Organic Chemistry Division, School of Advanced Sciences, VIT University, Vellore 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India, bSolid State and Structural Chemistry Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, Karnataka, India, and cDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey
*Correspondence e-mail: akkurt@erciyes.edu.tr

(Received 25 May 2010; accepted 29 May 2010; online 5 June 2010)

The mol­ecule of title compound, C11H10ClNO, is close to being planar (r.m.s deviation for the non-H atoms = 0.017 Å). In the crystal, mol­ecules inter­act by way of O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, generating C(2) chains propagating in [010]. The crystal structure is consolidated by C—H⋯π inter­actions and aromatic ππ stacking inter­actions [centroid–centroid distance = 3.661 (2) Å].

Related literature

For a related structure and background references, see: Roopan et al. (2010[Roopan, S. M., Khan, F. N., Kumar, A. S., Hathwar, V. R. & Akkurt, M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1542.]). For a similar structure, see: Khan et al. (2009[Khan, F. N., Subashini, R., Kushwaha, A. K., Hathwar, V. R. & Ng, S. W. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2722.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C11H10ClNO

  • Mr = 207.65

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 14.963 (2) Å

  • b = 4.632 (1) Å

  • c = 14.469 (2) Å

  • β = 103.612 (1)°

  • V = 974.7 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.35 mm−1

  • T = 290 K

  • 0.40 × 0.24 × 0.11 mm

Data collection
  • Oxford Xcalibur Eos(Nova) CCD detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO CCD and CrysAlis PRO RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]) Tmin = 0.871, Tmax = 0.962

  • 7607 measured reflections

  • 1723 independent reflections

  • 790 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.167

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061

  • wR(F2) = 0.135

  • S = 0.85

  • 1723 reflections

  • 129 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is a centroid of the N1/C1–C3/C8/C9 ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1O⋯O1i 0.82 1.90 2.712 (4) 174
C10—H10ACg1ii 0.97 2.75 3.557 (4) 141
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) x, y+1, z.

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO CCD and CrysAlis PRO RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO CCD and CrysAlis PRO RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999[Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837-838.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

As part of our program which aimed to develop new selective and environmentally friendly methodologies for the preparation of 2-chloroquinolines (Roopan et al., 2010), we report here crystal structure of the title compound, (I).

The title molecule (I), (Fig. 1), except the hydroxyl and methyl H atoms, close to planar (r.m.s deviation 0.017 Å). The values of the geometric parameters in (I) are comparable to those of some similar structures (Khan et al., 2009).

In the solid-state, the molecules are linked via intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1, Fig. 2). The crystal structure is further stabilized by an intermolecular C–H···π interactions between the methylene H atom of ethenol substituent and the pyridine ring of an adjacent molecule, with a C10–H10A···Cg1ii separation of 2.75 Å (Table 1, Cg1 is the centroid of N1/C1–C3/C8/C9 pyridine ring; symmetry code: (ii) x, y + 1, z). In addition, the packing mode results in stabilizing π-π stacking interactions [Cg1···Cg2ii = 3.661 (2) Å, where Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the N1/C1–C3/C8/C9 and C4–C9 rings].

Related literature top

For a related structure and background references, see: Roopan et al. (2010). For a similar structure, see: Khan et al. (2009).

Experimental top

2-Chloro-8-methylquinoline-3-carbaldehyde (206 mg, 1 mmol), sodium borohydride (38 mg, 1 mmol) and catalytic amount of montmorillonite K-10 were taken in an open vessel and the resulting mixture was irradiating at 500 W for 4 min. Ethylacetate was poured into the reaction mixture and filtered off. The filtrated after removal of solvent ethy lacetate was subjected to column chromatography packed with silica and ethyl acetate/petroleum ether was used as the eluant. Colourless plates of (I) were grown by solvent evaporation from a solution of the compound in chloroform.

Refinement top

H atoms were positioned geometrically, with C—H = 0.93- 0.97 Å, and refined a riding model with Uiso(H) = 1.2 or 1.5 Ueq(C). The value of Rint [0.167] is greater than 0.12, which may reflect the poor crystal quality.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecule of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view of the packing of (I) with intermolecular O–H···O hydrogen bonding down the b axis. The H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonds have been omitted for clarity.
(2-Chloro-8-methylquinolin-3-yl)methanol top
Crystal data top
C11H10ClNOF(000) = 432
Mr = 207.65Dx = 1.415 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 972 reflections
a = 14.963 (2) Åθ = 2.0–20.5°
b = 4.632 (1) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 14.469 (2) ÅT = 290 K
β = 103.612 (1)°Plate, colourless
V = 974.7 (3) Å30.40 × 0.24 × 0.11 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Oxford Xcalibur Eos(Nova) CCD detector
diffractometer
1723 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source790 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.167
ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
h = 1717
Tmin = 0.871, Tmax = 0.962k = 55
7607 measured reflectionsl = 1717
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.135H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.85 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0492P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1723 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
129 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
Crystal data top
C11H10ClNOV = 974.7 (3) Å3
Mr = 207.65Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 14.963 (2) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
b = 4.632 (1) ÅT = 290 K
c = 14.469 (2) Å0.40 × 0.24 × 0.11 mm
β = 103.612 (1)°
Data collection top
Oxford Xcalibur Eos(Nova) CCD detector
diffractometer
1723 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
790 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.871, Tmax = 0.962Rint = 0.167
7607 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0610 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.135H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.85Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
1723 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
129 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles

Refinement. Refinement on F2 for ALL reflections except those flagged by the user for potential systematic errors. Weighted R-factors wR and all goodnesses of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The observed criterion of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating -R-factor-obs etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.13301 (8)0.6900 (2)0.03546 (7)0.0599 (5)
O10.0342 (2)0.8800 (5)0.2237 (2)0.0534 (11)
N10.2487 (2)0.3588 (7)0.0784 (2)0.0372 (11)
C10.1808 (3)0.5392 (8)0.0749 (2)0.0368 (14)
C20.1436 (3)0.6216 (7)0.1526 (3)0.0340 (14)
C30.1835 (3)0.4990 (8)0.2376 (3)0.0398 (16)
C40.2981 (3)0.1674 (9)0.3335 (3)0.0475 (17)
C50.3681 (3)0.0242 (10)0.3370 (3)0.0551 (17)
C60.3985 (3)0.0855 (9)0.2554 (3)0.0538 (17)
C70.3611 (3)0.0351 (9)0.1686 (3)0.0427 (17)
C80.2875 (3)0.2323 (8)0.1643 (3)0.0365 (12)
C90.2566 (3)0.3003 (8)0.2465 (3)0.0369 (14)
C100.0635 (3)0.8293 (8)0.1397 (3)0.0436 (16)
C110.3954 (3)0.0328 (10)0.0817 (3)0.0589 (17)
H1O0.009700.734000.238300.0800*
H30.162300.547000.291000.0480*
H40.277900.209700.388100.0570*
H50.395600.113900.394100.0660*
H60.446700.215400.260100.0640*
H10A0.081101.011700.116300.0520*
H10B0.012300.752500.092000.0520*
H11A0.446000.165200.098100.0880*
H11B0.415400.141900.057100.0880*
H11C0.346800.118400.034400.0880*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0614 (8)0.0749 (9)0.0457 (7)0.0113 (7)0.0170 (6)0.0132 (6)
O10.060 (2)0.0369 (17)0.078 (2)0.0016 (16)0.0457 (18)0.0011 (16)
N10.042 (2)0.035 (2)0.0375 (19)0.0031 (18)0.0153 (17)0.0004 (17)
C10.044 (3)0.031 (2)0.037 (2)0.007 (2)0.013 (2)0.0008 (19)
C20.040 (3)0.028 (2)0.037 (2)0.005 (2)0.015 (2)0.003 (2)
C30.044 (3)0.043 (3)0.039 (2)0.009 (2)0.023 (2)0.006 (2)
C40.051 (3)0.052 (3)0.042 (3)0.010 (3)0.016 (2)0.000 (2)
C50.053 (3)0.063 (3)0.047 (3)0.004 (3)0.007 (2)0.012 (2)
C60.038 (3)0.051 (3)0.071 (3)0.001 (2)0.010 (3)0.011 (3)
C70.037 (3)0.044 (3)0.048 (3)0.006 (2)0.012 (2)0.002 (2)
C80.037 (2)0.036 (2)0.038 (2)0.007 (2)0.012 (2)0.002 (2)
C90.043 (3)0.036 (2)0.034 (2)0.007 (2)0.014 (2)0.003 (2)
C100.046 (3)0.038 (2)0.053 (3)0.004 (2)0.024 (2)0.002 (2)
C110.050 (3)0.069 (3)0.063 (3)0.010 (3)0.024 (2)0.006 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C11.735 (3)C7—C111.499 (6)
O1—C101.406 (5)C7—C81.421 (6)
O1—H1O0.8200C8—C91.409 (6)
N1—C81.373 (5)C3—H30.9300
N1—C11.307 (5)C4—H40.9300
C1—C21.419 (6)C5—H50.9300
C2—C101.514 (6)C6—H60.9300
C2—C31.359 (6)C10—H10A0.9700
C3—C91.412 (6)C10—H10B0.9700
C4—C91.408 (6)C11—H11A0.9600
C4—C51.365 (6)C11—H11B0.9600
C5—C61.391 (6)C11—H11C0.9600
C6—C71.368 (6)
C10—O1—H1O110.00O1—C10—C2113.5 (3)
C1—N1—C8117.8 (3)C2—C3—H3119.00
Cl1—C1—N1116.2 (3)C9—C3—H3119.00
Cl1—C1—C2117.9 (3)C5—C4—H4120.00
N1—C1—C2126.0 (3)C9—C4—H4120.00
C1—C2—C3115.7 (4)C4—C5—H5120.00
C1—C2—C10121.3 (4)C6—C5—H5120.00
C3—C2—C10122.9 (4)C5—C6—H6118.00
C2—C3—C9121.4 (4)C7—C6—H6118.00
C5—C4—C9119.4 (4)O1—C10—H10A109.00
C4—C5—C6120.2 (4)O1—C10—H10B109.00
C5—C6—C7123.4 (4)C2—C10—H10A109.00
C6—C7—C11122.5 (4)C2—C10—H10B109.00
C8—C7—C11120.9 (4)H10A—C10—H10B108.00
C6—C7—C8116.6 (4)C7—C11—H11A109.00
N1—C8—C9121.0 (4)C7—C11—H11B109.00
C7—C8—C9120.8 (4)C7—C11—H11C109.00
N1—C8—C7118.2 (4)H11A—C11—H11B109.00
C3—C9—C4122.4 (4)H11A—C11—H11C109.00
C4—C9—C8119.6 (4)H11B—C11—H11C110.00
C3—C9—C8118.0 (4)
C8—N1—C1—Cl1179.2 (3)C9—C4—C5—C60.5 (7)
C8—N1—C1—C21.0 (6)C5—C4—C9—C3179.6 (4)
C1—N1—C8—C7179.8 (4)C5—C4—C9—C80.4 (6)
C1—N1—C8—C91.5 (6)C4—C5—C6—C70.7 (7)
Cl1—C1—C2—C3179.7 (3)C5—C6—C7—C80.0 (7)
Cl1—C1—C2—C101.3 (5)C5—C6—C7—C11179.6 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C30.1 (6)C6—C7—C8—N1179.6 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C10178.9 (4)C6—C7—C8—C90.9 (6)
C1—C2—C3—C90.7 (6)C11—C7—C8—N10.0 (6)
C10—C2—C3—C9178.3 (4)C11—C7—C8—C9178.7 (4)
C1—C2—C10—O1178.4 (3)N1—C8—C9—C31.0 (6)
C3—C2—C10—O10.6 (5)N1—C8—C9—C4179.8 (4)
C2—C3—C9—C4179.1 (4)C7—C8—C9—C3179.7 (4)
C2—C3—C9—C80.1 (6)C7—C8—C9—C41.1 (6)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
Cg1 is a centroid of the N1/C1–C3/C8/C9 ring.
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1O···O1i0.821.902.712 (4)174
C10—H10A···Cg1ii0.972.753.557 (4)141
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H10ClNO
Mr207.65
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)290
a, b, c (Å)14.963 (2), 4.632 (1), 14.469 (2)
β (°) 103.612 (1)
V3)974.7 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.35
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.24 × 0.11
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Xcalibur Eos(Nova) CCD detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis PRO RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
Tmin, Tmax0.871, 0.962
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7607, 1723, 790
Rint0.167
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.594
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.061, 0.135, 0.85
No. of reflections1723
No. of parameters129
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.23, 0.23

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), CrysAlis PRO RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
Cg1 is a centroid of the N1/C1–C3/C8/C9 ring.
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1O···O1i0.821.902.712 (4)174
C10—H10A···Cg1ii0.972.753.557 (4)141
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z.
 

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Science and Technology, India, for the use of the CCD facility set up under the FIST–DST program at SSCU, IISc. We also thank Professor T. N. Guru Row, IISc, Bangalore, for his help with the data collection. FNK thanks the DST for Fast Track Proposal funding.

References

First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKhan, F. N., Subashini, R., Kushwaha, A. K., Hathwar, V. R. & Ng, S. W. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2722.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationOxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO CCD and CrysAlis PRO RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.  Google Scholar
First citationRoopan, S. M., Khan, F. N., Kumar, A. S., Hathwar, V. R. & Akkurt, M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1542.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds