Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title tetra­nuclear complex, [Cu4(C11H13NO4)4], which has crystallographic \overline{4} symmetry, the CuII ions are coordinated by the tridentate Schiff base ligands, forming a tetra­nuclear Cu4O4 cubane-like configuration. The CuII ion adopts a CuNO4 distorted square-pyramidal coordination environment. In the crystal structure, inter­molecular O—H...O bonds help to form a three-dimensional structure.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807037920/hb2463sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807037920/hb2463Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 660073

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 298 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.004 Å
  • R factor = 0.027
  • wR factor = 0.075
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.1

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B PLAT601_ALERT_2_B Structure Contains Solvent Accessible VOIDS of . 151.00 A   3
Alert level C CELLV02_ALERT_1_C The supplied cell volume s.u. differs from that calculated from the cell parameter s.u.'s by > 2 Calculated cell volume su = 15.17 Cell volume su given = 13.00 PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.88 PLAT152_ALERT_1_C Supplied and Calc Volume s.u. Inconsistent ..... ? PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 1 C44 H52 Cu4 N4 O16
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.885 Tmax scaled 0.431 Tmin scaled 0.405 PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Cu1 (2) 2.23
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Considerable efforts have been devoted to the study of polynuclear CuII complexes due to their importance as models for enzymatic systems (Beinert, 1980) and in studying metal-metal interactions. The chemistry of transition metal complexes of hydroxy(aryl-OH and alkyl-OH) rich molecules containing imine/amine group is important in the biomimetic studies of metalloproteins (Mishtu et al., 2002).

A few structurally characterized multinuclear complexes containing Schiff base ligands has been reported (Mishtu et al., 2002). As part of our ongoing studies (Dong et al., 2007) in this area, we report here the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, (I), a tetracopper(II) complex with a tridentate Schiff base ligand derived from the condensation of salicylaldehyde and trihydroxymethylaminomethane. Mishtu et al. (2002) reported the same cluster as a hydrate in a different space group.

Compound (I) contains a teranuclear cubane core based on an approximately cubic array of alternating copper and oxygen atoms (Fig. 1). Each CuII atom resides in a distorted square-pyramid coordination environment with one nitrogen and two oxygen atoms from one Schiff base ligand and two oxygen atoms from the neighboring units of the cubane. The Cu atom deviates from the basal plane formed by O1, N1, O2 and O2i (i = y - 1/4, -x + 5/4, -z + 9/4) by 0.0672 (12) Å, with a significantly longer Cu—Oapical bond distance (Table 1).

Within the cluster, the Cu···Cu distances [3.591 (4) Å, 3.154 (3) Å] are similar to the reported values for related structures (Si et al., 2002; Mishtu et al., 2002), indicating no significant bonding interactions between the CuII ions in (I).

In the crystal structure, the intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds help to form a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2, Table 2).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Beinert (1980); Dong et al. (2007); Mishtu et al. (2002); Si et al. (2002).

Experimental top

Trihydroxymethylaminomethane (1 mmol, 121.14 mg) was dissolved in hot methanol (10 ml) and added in portions to a methanol solution (3 ml) of salicylaldehyde (1 mmol, 0.11 ml). The mixture was then stirred at 323 K for 2 h. Subsequently, an aqueous solution (2 ml) of cupric acetate hydrate (1 mmol, 199.7 mg) was added dropwise and stirred for another 5 h. The solution was held at room temperature for ten days, whereupon blue blocks of (I) were obtained.

Refinement top

All the H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å, O—H = 0.82 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl, O).

Structure description top

Considerable efforts have been devoted to the study of polynuclear CuII complexes due to their importance as models for enzymatic systems (Beinert, 1980) and in studying metal-metal interactions. The chemistry of transition metal complexes of hydroxy(aryl-OH and alkyl-OH) rich molecules containing imine/amine group is important in the biomimetic studies of metalloproteins (Mishtu et al., 2002).

A few structurally characterized multinuclear complexes containing Schiff base ligands has been reported (Mishtu et al., 2002). As part of our ongoing studies (Dong et al., 2007) in this area, we report here the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, (I), a tetracopper(II) complex with a tridentate Schiff base ligand derived from the condensation of salicylaldehyde and trihydroxymethylaminomethane. Mishtu et al. (2002) reported the same cluster as a hydrate in a different space group.

Compound (I) contains a teranuclear cubane core based on an approximately cubic array of alternating copper and oxygen atoms (Fig. 1). Each CuII atom resides in a distorted square-pyramid coordination environment with one nitrogen and two oxygen atoms from one Schiff base ligand and two oxygen atoms from the neighboring units of the cubane. The Cu atom deviates from the basal plane formed by O1, N1, O2 and O2i (i = y - 1/4, -x + 5/4, -z + 9/4) by 0.0672 (12) Å, with a significantly longer Cu—Oapical bond distance (Table 1).

Within the cluster, the Cu···Cu distances [3.591 (4) Å, 3.154 (3) Å] are similar to the reported values for related structures (Si et al., 2002; Mishtu et al., 2002), indicating no significant bonding interactions between the CuII ions in (I).

In the crystal structure, the intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds help to form a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2, Table 2).

For related literature, see: Beinert (1980); Dong et al. (2007); Mishtu et al. (2002); Si et al. (2002).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of (I), showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids (arbitrary spheres for the H atoms). The asymmetric atoms are labelled.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of (I) with hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines.
Tetrakis(µ3-2-{[1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2-οxidoethyl]iminomethyl}phenolato)tetracopper(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cu4(C11H13NO4)4]Dx = 1.528 Mg m3
Mr = 1147.06Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, I41/aCell parameters from 5431 reflections
Hall symbol: -I 4adθ = 2.4–28.1°
a = 17.209 (3) ŵ = 1.75 mm1
c = 16.836 (3) ÅT = 298 K
V = 4986.0 (13) Å3Block, blue
Z = 40.53 × 0.49 × 0.48 mm
F(000) = 2352
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2203 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1821 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.050
ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 2018
Tmin = 0.457, Tmax = 0.487k = 2016
12748 measured reflectionsl = 1820
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.075H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0407P)2 + 3.0697P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2203 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
156 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Cu4(C11H13NO4)4]Z = 4
Mr = 1147.06Mo Kα radiation
Tetragonal, I41/aµ = 1.75 mm1
a = 17.209 (3) ÅT = 298 K
c = 16.836 (3) Å0.53 × 0.49 × 0.48 mm
V = 4986.0 (13) Å3
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2203 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
1821 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.457, Tmax = 0.487Rint = 0.050
12748 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0280 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.075H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.32 e Å3
2203 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
156 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.396178 (15)0.739558 (15)1.069439 (16)0.02320 (12)
N10.37415 (11)0.69497 (11)0.96723 (11)0.0261 (4)
O10.31430 (10)0.81400 (10)1.06436 (10)0.0347 (4)
O20.48427 (9)0.66875 (9)1.07064 (8)0.0235 (4)
O30.36321 (12)0.57702 (11)0.82462 (11)0.0452 (5)
H30.35180.53090.82860.068*
O40.32782 (10)0.58053 (12)1.07332 (10)0.0393 (5)
H40.36440.57611.10420.059*
C10.32492 (15)0.72192 (14)0.91698 (15)0.0341 (6)
H10.31920.69510.86940.041*
C20.27757 (15)0.79070 (15)0.92818 (15)0.0343 (6)
C30.27275 (14)0.83153 (14)1.00084 (15)0.0293 (5)
C40.22008 (15)0.89372 (15)1.00520 (17)0.0400 (7)
H4A0.21510.92081.05270.048*
C50.17574 (18)0.91569 (17)0.94118 (18)0.0492 (8)
H5A0.14200.95770.94590.059*
C60.18063 (19)0.87623 (18)0.87002 (19)0.0543 (9)
H60.15080.89140.82670.065*
C70.23011 (18)0.81440 (18)0.86439 (17)0.0497 (8)
H70.23260.78700.81680.060*
C80.40970 (14)0.61676 (13)0.95857 (14)0.0262 (5)
C90.48709 (13)0.61901 (14)1.00416 (14)0.0285 (5)
H9A0.50000.56691.02170.034*
H9B0.52790.63640.96860.034*
C100.42851 (15)0.59321 (15)0.87300 (15)0.0355 (6)
H10A0.45810.63470.84840.043*
H10B0.46140.54750.87430.043*
C110.35195 (14)0.55883 (15)0.99569 (15)0.0328 (6)
H11A0.30660.55490.96170.039*
H11B0.37610.50790.99800.039*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.02486 (18)0.02156 (18)0.02318 (18)0.00370 (11)0.00404 (12)0.00364 (11)
N10.0298 (11)0.0224 (10)0.0260 (10)0.0035 (8)0.0045 (9)0.0034 (8)
O10.0382 (10)0.0368 (10)0.0291 (9)0.0146 (8)0.0113 (8)0.0098 (8)
O20.0288 (9)0.0195 (8)0.0222 (9)0.0043 (6)0.0045 (7)0.0024 (6)
O30.0653 (14)0.0341 (11)0.0362 (10)0.0008 (9)0.0197 (10)0.0073 (9)
O40.0288 (10)0.0581 (12)0.0310 (10)0.0011 (9)0.0001 (8)0.0036 (9)
C10.0433 (16)0.0315 (14)0.0273 (13)0.0041 (12)0.0095 (12)0.0054 (11)
C20.0384 (15)0.0309 (14)0.0336 (14)0.0049 (11)0.0102 (12)0.0015 (11)
C30.0303 (14)0.0229 (12)0.0346 (14)0.0016 (10)0.0066 (11)0.0009 (11)
C40.0381 (16)0.0364 (15)0.0456 (16)0.0106 (12)0.0080 (13)0.0057 (13)
C50.0496 (18)0.0366 (16)0.061 (2)0.0180 (13)0.0146 (15)0.0033 (14)
C60.061 (2)0.0534 (19)0.0489 (19)0.0191 (16)0.0243 (15)0.0073 (15)
C70.064 (2)0.0486 (18)0.0360 (16)0.0164 (15)0.0187 (14)0.0041 (14)
C80.0288 (13)0.0239 (12)0.0258 (12)0.0027 (10)0.0032 (10)0.0069 (10)
C90.0254 (13)0.0289 (13)0.0312 (14)0.0042 (10)0.0018 (11)0.0075 (11)
C100.0441 (16)0.0339 (15)0.0287 (14)0.0027 (12)0.0008 (12)0.0082 (11)
C110.0323 (14)0.0298 (14)0.0364 (15)0.0016 (10)0.0008 (11)0.0002 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—O11.9063 (16)C3—C41.404 (3)
Cu1—N11.9218 (19)C4—C51.374 (4)
Cu1—O2i1.9438 (15)C4—H4A0.9300
Cu1—O21.9451 (16)C5—C61.380 (4)
Cu1—O2ii2.5930 (16)C5—H5A0.9300
N1—C11.284 (3)C6—C71.366 (4)
N1—C81.486 (3)C6—H60.9300
O1—C31.321 (3)C7—H70.9300
O2—C91.410 (3)C8—C101.531 (3)
O2—Cu1iii1.9438 (15)C8—C91.538 (3)
O3—C101.416 (3)C8—C111.540 (3)
O3—H30.8200C9—H9A0.9700
O4—C111.421 (3)C9—H9B0.9700
O4—H40.8200C10—H10A0.9700
C1—C21.449 (3)C10—H10B0.9700
C1—H10.9300C11—H11A0.9700
C2—C71.410 (4)C11—H11B0.9700
C2—C31.413 (3)
O1—Cu1—N194.72 (7)C6—C5—H5A119.6
O1—Cu1—O2i91.99 (7)C7—C6—C5118.8 (3)
N1—Cu1—O2i169.85 (7)C7—C6—H6120.6
O1—Cu1—O2176.00 (7)C5—C6—H6120.6
N1—Cu1—O285.00 (7)C6—C7—C2122.3 (3)
O2i—Cu1—O288.83 (7)C6—C7—H7118.9
N1—Cu1—O2ii113.99 (7)C2—C7—H7118.9
O2i—Cu1—O2ii72.12 (6)N1—C8—C10114.8 (2)
O2—Cu1—O2ii76.28 (6)N1—C8—C9106.55 (18)
C1—N1—C8122.3 (2)C10—C8—C9107.05 (19)
C1—N1—Cu1125.16 (17)N1—C8—C11106.31 (19)
C8—N1—Cu1111.62 (14)C10—C8—C11110.29 (19)
C3—O1—Cu1126.14 (15)C9—C8—C11111.9 (2)
C9—O2—Cu1iii128.79 (14)O2—C9—C8112.44 (18)
C9—O2—Cu1113.51 (13)O2—C9—H9A109.1
Cu1iii—O2—Cu1108.40 (7)C8—C9—H9A109.1
C10—O3—H3109.5O2—C9—H9B109.1
C11—O4—H4109.5C8—C9—H9B109.1
N1—C1—C2125.5 (2)H9A—C9—H9B107.8
N1—C1—H1117.3O3—C10—C8115.2 (2)
C2—C1—H1117.3O3—C10—H10A108.5
C7—C2—C3118.8 (2)C8—C10—H10A108.5
C7—C2—C1117.6 (2)O3—C10—H10B108.5
C3—C2—C1123.5 (2)C8—C10—H10B108.5
O1—C3—C4118.7 (2)H10A—C10—H10B107.5
O1—C3—C2123.7 (2)O4—C11—C8113.1 (2)
C4—C3—C2117.5 (2)O4—C11—H11A109.0
C5—C4—C3121.8 (3)C8—C11—H11A109.0
C5—C4—H4A119.1O4—C11—H11B109.0
C3—C4—H4A119.1C8—C11—H11B109.0
C4—C5—C6120.8 (3)H11A—C11—H11B107.8
C4—C5—H5A119.6
N1—Cu1—O2—O186.3 (9)
Symmetry codes: (i) y1/4, x+5/4, z+9/4; (ii) x+1, y+3/2, z; (iii) y+5/4, x+1/4, z+9/4.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O4iv0.821.912.723 (3)172
O4—H4···O1iii0.821.852.668 (2)171
Symmetry codes: (iii) y+5/4, x+1/4, z+9/4; (iv) y1/4, x+3/4, z1/4.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu4(C11H13NO4)4]
Mr1147.06
Crystal system, space groupTetragonal, I41/a
Temperature (K)298
a, c (Å)17.209 (3), 16.836 (3)
V3)4986.0 (13)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.75
Crystal size (mm)0.53 × 0.49 × 0.48
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.457, 0.487
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
12748, 2203, 1821
Rint0.050
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.075, 1.06
No. of reflections2203
No. of parameters156
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.32, 0.19

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1996), SAINT (Siemens, 1996), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b), SHELXTL.

Selected bond lengths (Å) top
Cu1—O11.9063 (16)Cu1—O21.9451 (16)
Cu1—N11.9218 (19)Cu1—O2ii2.5930 (16)
Cu1—O2i1.9438 (15)
Symmetry codes: (i) y1/4, x+5/4, z+9/4; (ii) x+1, y+3/2, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O4iii0.821.912.723 (3)172
O4—H4···O1iv0.821.852.668 (2)171
Symmetry codes: (iii) y1/4, x+3/4, z1/4; (iv) y+5/4, x+1/4, z+9/4.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds