Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title complex, [Ir2(μ-Br)2(C8H12)2], displays a dinuclear structure with bridging Br atoms, generated by twofold symmetry. The coordination geometry around the Ir atom is pseudo-square-planar, involving two Br atoms and two η2 C=C bonds. The Ir2(μ-Br)2 core shows a bent geometry with a hinge angle of 101.58 (3)°.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807019769/hb2369sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807019769/hb2369Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 646655

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 100 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.010 Å
  • R factor = 0.034
  • wR factor = 0.064
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 31.2

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C RINTA01_ALERT_3_C The value of Rint is greater than 0.10 Rint given 0.129 PLAT020_ALERT_3_C The value of Rint is greater than 0.10 ......... 0.13 PLAT342_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 10 PLAT764_ALERT_4_C Overcomplete CIF Bond List Detected (Rep/Expd) . 1.14 Ratio
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 31.55 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 2840 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1731 Completeness (_total/calc) 164.07% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 1109 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.641 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Crystal data for many kinds of the binuclear complexes of d8 transition metal ions of type [L2M(µ-X)]2 (M= Rh or Ir, X = halide) and their theoretical analysis have been reported (Aullón, et al., 1998; Cotton, et al., 1999). The bromide analogues are fairly rare, however. Among these complexes cyclooctadiene complexes of group 8 transition elements [M(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 (COD = cis,cis-1,5-cyclooctadiene; M = IrI or RhI) have been used as starting key complexes for various kinds of IrI or RhI complexes useful as efficient catalyst precursors. For example, we have reported the molecular structure of [Ir(µ-Cl){(R)-binap}]2 (Yamagata et al., 1997), which was prepared from the reaction of [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 with two equivalents of (R)-BINAP {(R)-(+)-2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)-1,1'-binaphthyl}, and its use as an efficient catalyst for asymmetric hydrogenation of prochiral imines (Tani, et al., 1995). The catalytic asymmetric olefin hydroamination with [Ir(µ-Cl)(diphosphine)]2 and the structure of [Ir(µ-Cl){(R)-binap}]2 have also been investigated by Togni and his co-workers (Dorta, et al., 1997). Although [Rh(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 (De Ridder, et al., 1994) has an almost square planar structure (the hinge angle 169.1 (3)°), [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 (Cotton, et al., 1986) and [Rh(µ-Br)(cod)]2 (Pettinari, et al., 2002) show bent structures; the hinge angles are 109.4 (3)° and 148.7 (3)°, respectively. Thus, it may be interest to examine the structure of [Ir(µ-Br)(cod)]2, (I), which is reported here. (I) is isostructural with [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 and [Rh(µ-Br)(cod)]2. The Ir2(µ-Br)2 core in (I) shows a bent geometry with the hinge angles of 101.58 (3)°. The M···M distances of (I), [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2, and [Rh(µ-Br)(cod)]2 are 2.9034 (5), 2.910 (1), and 3.565 Å, respectively. The degree of the bending is Rh < Ir and Cl < Br. These tendencies can be explained by the differences in diffuseness of the metal d orbitals and by analyzing the <pz2/dz2> and <dz2/dz2> overlap integrals between the Slater orbitals (EH calculations) (Aullón, et al., 1998).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Aullón et al. (1998); Cotton et al. (1986, 1999); Dorta et al. (1997); Pettinari et al. (2002); De Ridder & Imhoef (1994); Tani et al. (1995); Yamagata et al. (1997).

Experimental top

To a Schlenk flask were added 2.11 g of Na2IrBr6 (2.94 mmol), H2O (20 ml), isopropyl alcohol (9.0 ml) and 1,5-cyclooctadiene (2.9 ml, 24 mmol). The mixture was heated under reflux for 12 hr and then cooled to ambient temperature. The whole volume was reduced to a small volume (ca 3 ml) under reduced pressure. To the residue were added 20 ml of H2O and 30 ml of toluene. The reddish organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted three times with toluene (20 ml each). The combined organic layer and the extracts were condensed to dryness. The resulting deep red solid was washed with ethanol, H2O, and ethanol successively and dried in vacuo to yield [Ir(µ-Br)(cod)]2 as a deep red solid (1.28 g, 57%). Recrystallization from THF afforded (I) as an analytically pure product. mp.: 469 K (melt, decomp. in capillary). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 308 K, δ, p.p.m.): 4.35 (m, 8H, =CH), 2.20 - 2.24 (m, 8H, –CHH–), 1.40 - 1.50 (m, 8H, –CHH–). IR (Nujol, cm-1): 410(w), 330(w). Analysis calculated for C16H24Br2Ir2: C 25.27, H 3.18%; found: C 25.22; H 2.83%.

Refinement top

All H-atoms were geometrically placed (C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) [or 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl groups].

Structure description top

Crystal data for many kinds of the binuclear complexes of d8 transition metal ions of type [L2M(µ-X)]2 (M= Rh or Ir, X = halide) and their theoretical analysis have been reported (Aullón, et al., 1998; Cotton, et al., 1999). The bromide analogues are fairly rare, however. Among these complexes cyclooctadiene complexes of group 8 transition elements [M(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 (COD = cis,cis-1,5-cyclooctadiene; M = IrI or RhI) have been used as starting key complexes for various kinds of IrI or RhI complexes useful as efficient catalyst precursors. For example, we have reported the molecular structure of [Ir(µ-Cl){(R)-binap}]2 (Yamagata et al., 1997), which was prepared from the reaction of [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 with two equivalents of (R)-BINAP {(R)-(+)-2,2'-bis(diphenylphosphanyl)-1,1'-binaphthyl}, and its use as an efficient catalyst for asymmetric hydrogenation of prochiral imines (Tani, et al., 1995). The catalytic asymmetric olefin hydroamination with [Ir(µ-Cl)(diphosphine)]2 and the structure of [Ir(µ-Cl){(R)-binap}]2 have also been investigated by Togni and his co-workers (Dorta, et al., 1997). Although [Rh(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 (De Ridder, et al., 1994) has an almost square planar structure (the hinge angle 169.1 (3)°), [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 (Cotton, et al., 1986) and [Rh(µ-Br)(cod)]2 (Pettinari, et al., 2002) show bent structures; the hinge angles are 109.4 (3)° and 148.7 (3)°, respectively. Thus, it may be interest to examine the structure of [Ir(µ-Br)(cod)]2, (I), which is reported here. (I) is isostructural with [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2 and [Rh(µ-Br)(cod)]2. The Ir2(µ-Br)2 core in (I) shows a bent geometry with the hinge angles of 101.58 (3)°. The M···M distances of (I), [Ir(µ-Cl)(cod)]2, and [Rh(µ-Br)(cod)]2 are 2.9034 (5), 2.910 (1), and 3.565 Å, respectively. The degree of the bending is Rh < Ir and Cl < Br. These tendencies can be explained by the differences in diffuseness of the metal d orbitals and by analyzing the <pz2/dz2> and <dz2/dz2> overlap integrals between the Slater orbitals (EH calculations) (Aullón, et al., 1998).

For related literature, see: Aullón et al. (1998); Cotton et al. (1986, 1999); Dorta et al. (1997); Pettinari et al. (2002); De Ridder & Imhoef (1994); Tani et al. (1995); Yamagata et al. (1997).

Computing details top

Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: PROCESS in TEXSAN PROCESS (Rigaku/MSC, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and local routines.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecule structure of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The H-atoms have been omitted. Symmetry code: (i) 1 - y, 1 - x, 3/2 - z.
Di-µ-bromido-bis[(η4-cycloocta-1,5-diene)iridium(I)] top
Crystal data top
[Ir2Br2(C8H12)2]Dx = 2.976 Mg m3
Mr = 760.57Melting point: 469 K
Tetragonal, P41212Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
Hall symbol: P 4abw 2nwCell parameters from 69455 reflections
a = 8.3839 (5) Åθ = 3.4–31.3°
c = 24.1471 (19) ŵ = 20.36 mm1
V = 1697.3 (2) Å3T = 100 K
Z = 4Block, red
F(000) = 13760.19 × 0.15 × 0.11 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
diffractometer
2840 independent reflections
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube2591 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.129
Detector resolution: 10.00 pixels mm-1θmax = 31.6°, θmin = 3.4°
ω scansh = 1212
Absorption correction: numerical
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1999)
k = 1212
Tmin = 0.114, Tmax = 0.431l = 3535
48361 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.064 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0225P)2 + 4.3085P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
2840 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.33 e Å3
91 parametersΔρmin = 2.56 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1112 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.02 (2)
Crystal data top
[Ir2Br2(C8H12)2]Z = 4
Mr = 760.57Mo Kα radiation
Tetragonal, P41212µ = 20.36 mm1
a = 8.3839 (5) ÅT = 100 K
c = 24.1471 (19) Å0.19 × 0.15 × 0.11 mm
V = 1697.3 (2) Å3
Data collection top
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
diffractometer
2840 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1999)
2591 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.114, Tmax = 0.431Rint = 0.129
48361 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.064Δρmax = 1.33 e Å3
S = 1.09Δρmin = 2.56 e Å3
2840 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1112 Friedel pairs
91 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.02 (2)
0 restraints
Special details top

Experimental. Indexing was performed from 3 oscillations which were exposed for 1.3 minutes. The camera radiuswas 127.40 mm. Readout performed in the 0.100 mm pixel mode. A total of 300 images, corresponding to 600.0 °. osillation angles, were collected with 4 different goniometer setting. Exposure time was 100 s per degree. The camera radiuswas 127.40 mm. Readout performed in the 0.100 mm pixel mode.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. Least-squares planes (x,y,z in crystal coordinates) and deviations from them (* indicates atom used to define plane)

- 1.1015 (0.0026) x + 8.0857 (0.0009) y + 5.5390 (0.0060) z = 7.6598 (0.0050)

* 0.0000 (0.0000) Ir * 0.0000 (0.0000) Br * 0.0000 (0.0000) Br_$1

Rms deviation of fitted atoms = 0.0000

8.0857 (0.0009) x - 1.1015 (0.0026) y + 5.5390 (0.0060) z = 7.6329 (0.0044)

Angle to previous plane (with approximate e.s.d.) = 78.42 (0.03)

* 0.0000 (0.0000) Ir_$1 * 0.0000 (0.0000) Br * 0.0000 (0.0000) Br_$1

Rms deviation of fitted atoms = 0.0000

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ir0.71261 (3)0.51576 (3)0.771695 (9)0.01892 (6)
Br0.55064 (8)0.55356 (8)0.68431 (2)0.02227 (14)
C10.8208 (8)0.5503 (8)0.8497 (2)0.0225 (14)
H10.71810.57610.86370.027*
C20.8474 (9)0.3900 (9)0.8320 (2)0.0233 (14)
H20.76090.31700.83370.028*
C31.0064 (9)0.3299 (9)0.8105 (3)0.0267 (15)
H3A1.02160.21780.82220.032*
H3B1.09350.39420.82690.032*
C41.0161 (9)0.3402 (9)0.7468 (3)0.0262 (15)
H4A1.12890.35340.73560.031*
H4B0.97680.23900.73060.031*
C50.9189 (8)0.4778 (9)0.7238 (2)0.0232 (13)
H50.85120.45630.69310.028*
C60.9213 (9)0.6350 (8)0.7443 (3)0.0241 (15)
H60.85150.71070.72790.029*
C71.0287 (9)0.6909 (10)0.7912 (3)0.0289 (15)
H7A1.06210.80230.78410.035*
H7B1.12590.62380.79210.035*
C80.9438 (10)0.6819 (9)0.8479 (3)0.0303 (17)
H8A1.02410.66330.87720.036*
H8B0.89100.78520.85560.036*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ir0.02031 (13)0.02195 (14)0.01450 (9)0.00101 (10)0.00110 (9)0.00051 (9)
Br0.0270 (4)0.0221 (3)0.0177 (3)0.0016 (3)0.0040 (2)0.0020 (2)
C10.022 (4)0.026 (4)0.019 (3)0.004 (3)0.002 (2)0.004 (2)
C20.021 (4)0.033 (4)0.016 (3)0.002 (3)0.002 (2)0.003 (2)
C30.025 (4)0.033 (4)0.023 (3)0.003 (3)0.000 (3)0.009 (3)
C40.030 (4)0.027 (4)0.022 (3)0.006 (3)0.008 (3)0.001 (3)
C50.020 (3)0.033 (4)0.017 (3)0.004 (3)0.000 (2)0.005 (3)
C60.028 (4)0.021 (3)0.023 (3)0.002 (3)0.002 (3)0.005 (2)
C70.025 (4)0.034 (4)0.028 (3)0.008 (3)0.000 (3)0.000 (3)
C80.036 (4)0.032 (4)0.023 (3)0.008 (3)0.008 (3)0.005 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ir—C52.105 (6)C3—H3A0.9900
Ir—C12.111 (6)C3—H3B0.9900
Ir—C62.121 (7)C4—C51.518 (9)
Ir—C22.123 (6)C4—H4A0.9900
Ir—Br2.5293 (7)C4—H4B0.9900
Ir—Bri2.5335 (7)C5—C61.408 (10)
Ir—Iri2.9034 (5)C5—H50.9500
Br—Iri2.5335 (7)C6—C71.519 (10)
C1—C21.429 (10)C6—H60.9500
C1—C81.511 (10)C7—C81.546 (10)
C1—H10.9500C7—H7A0.9900
C2—C31.517 (10)C7—H7B0.9900
C2—H20.9500C8—H8A0.9900
C3—C41.542 (9)C8—H8B0.9900
C5—Ir—C199.1 (3)C2—C3—H3A109.3
C5—Ir—C638.9 (3)C4—C3—H3A109.3
C1—Ir—C681.9 (3)C2—C3—H3B109.3
C5—Ir—C282.2 (3)C4—C3—H3B109.3
C1—Ir—C239.4 (3)H3A—C3—H3B108.0
C6—Ir—C290.5 (3)C5—C4—C3112.3 (6)
C5—Ir—Br90.09 (17)C5—C4—H4A109.1
C1—Ir—Br163.4 (2)C3—C4—H4A109.1
C6—Ir—Br97.13 (19)C5—C4—H4B109.1
C2—Ir—Br156.9 (2)C3—C4—H4B109.1
C5—Ir—Bri157.1 (2)H4A—C4—H4B107.9
C1—Ir—Bri91.95 (18)C6—C5—C4125.1 (6)
C6—Ir—Bri163.9 (2)C6—C5—Ir71.1 (4)
C2—Ir—Bri94.1 (2)C4—C5—Ir110.8 (4)
Br—Ir—Bri84.52 (3)C6—C5—H5117.5
C5—Ir—Iri104.1 (2)C4—C5—H5117.5
C1—Ir—Iri134.09 (18)Ir—C5—H588.1
C6—Ir—Iri137.95 (19)C5—C6—C7124.0 (7)
C2—Ir—Iri105.7 (2)C5—C6—Ir69.9 (4)
Br—Ir—Iri55.074 (17)C7—C6—Ir113.7 (4)
Bri—Ir—Iri54.939 (16)C5—C6—H6118.0
Ir—Br—Iri69.987 (19)C7—C6—H6118.0
C2—C1—C8124.8 (7)Ir—C6—H686.4
C2—C1—Ir70.7 (3)C6—C7—C8111.8 (6)
C8—C1—Ir111.5 (4)C6—C7—H7A109.3
C2—C1—H1117.6C8—C7—H7A109.3
C8—C1—H1117.6C6—C7—H7B109.3
Ir—C1—H187.7C8—C7—H7B109.3
C1—C2—C3123.5 (7)H7A—C7—H7B107.9
C1—C2—Ir69.8 (4)C1—C8—C7112.1 (6)
C3—C2—Ir113.5 (4)C1—C8—H8A109.2
C1—C2—H2118.2C7—C8—H8A109.2
C3—C2—H2118.2C1—C8—H8B109.2
Ir—C2—H286.8C7—C8—H8B109.2
C2—C3—C4111.6 (6)H8A—C8—H8B107.9
C5—Ir—Br—Iri107.2 (2)C3—C4—C5—C647.0 (10)
C1—Ir—Br—Iri128.8 (6)C3—C4—C5—Ir34.0 (8)
C6—Ir—Br—Iri145.6 (2)C1—Ir—C5—C664.8 (4)
C2—Ir—Br—Iri37.3 (5)C2—Ir—C5—C6100.5 (4)
Bri—Ir—Br—Iri50.44 (3)Br—Ir—C5—C6101.3 (4)
C5—Ir—C1—C265.7 (4)Bri—Ir—C5—C6177.3 (4)
C6—Ir—C1—C2100.8 (4)Iri—Ir—C5—C6155.1 (3)
Br—Ir—C1—C2171.5 (5)C1—Ir—C5—C456.5 (5)
Bri—Ir—C1—C294.1 (4)C6—Ir—C5—C4121.3 (7)
Iri—Ir—C1—C254.2 (5)C2—Ir—C5—C420.8 (5)
C5—Ir—C1—C855.1 (6)Br—Ir—C5—C4137.4 (5)
C6—Ir—C1—C820.1 (5)Bri—Ir—C5—C461.4 (7)
C2—Ir—C1—C8120.8 (7)Iri—Ir—C5—C483.6 (5)
Br—Ir—C1—C867.7 (9)C4—C5—C6—C73.1 (11)
Bri—Ir—C1—C8145.0 (5)Ir—C5—C6—C7105.7 (6)
Iri—Ir—C1—C8175.1 (4)C4—C5—C6—Ir102.6 (6)
C8—C1—C2—C32.1 (10)C1—Ir—C6—C5115.5 (4)
Ir—C1—C2—C3105.4 (6)C2—Ir—C6—C576.9 (4)
C8—C1—C2—Ir103.3 (6)Br—Ir—C6—C581.2 (4)
C5—Ir—C2—C1114.7 (4)Bri—Ir—C6—C5176.2 (5)
C6—Ir—C2—C176.6 (4)Iri—Ir—C6—C537.5 (5)
Br—Ir—C2—C1173.8 (4)C5—Ir—C6—C7119.3 (7)
Bri—Ir—C2—C188.0 (4)C1—Ir—C6—C73.8 (6)
Iri—Ir—C2—C1142.7 (4)C2—Ir—C6—C742.4 (6)
C5—Ir—C2—C34.1 (6)Br—Ir—C6—C7159.4 (5)
C1—Ir—C2—C3118.8 (8)Bri—Ir—C6—C764.5 (10)
C6—Ir—C2—C342.3 (6)Iri—Ir—C6—C7156.9 (4)
Br—Ir—C2—C367.4 (8)C5—C6—C7—C893.9 (8)
Bri—Ir—C2—C3153.1 (5)Ir—C6—C7—C812.8 (8)
Iri—Ir—C2—C398.4 (5)C2—C1—C8—C748.2 (9)
C1—C2—C3—C493.8 (8)Ir—C1—C8—C732.8 (8)
Ir—C2—C3—C413.2 (8)C6—C7—C8—C129.7 (9)
C2—C3—C4—C530.8 (9)
Symmetry code: (i) y+1, x+1, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Ir2Br2(C8H12)2]
Mr760.57
Crystal system, space groupTetragonal, P41212
Temperature (K)100
a, c (Å)8.3839 (5), 24.1471 (19)
V3)1697.3 (2)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)20.36
Crystal size (mm)0.19 × 0.15 × 0.11
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku R-AXIS RAPID
Absorption correctionNumerical
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1999)
Tmin, Tmax0.114, 0.431
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
48361, 2840, 2591
Rint0.129
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.736
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.034, 0.064, 1.09
No. of reflections2840
No. of parameters91
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.33, 2.56
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 1112 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.02 (2)

Computer programs: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998), RAPID-AUTO, PROCESS in TEXSAN PROCESS (Rigaku/MSC, 2004), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), SHELXL97 and local routines.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ir—C52.105 (6)Ir—Br2.5293 (7)
Ir—C12.111 (6)Ir—Bri2.5335 (7)
Ir—C62.121 (7)Ir—Iri2.9034 (5)
Ir—C22.123 (6)
Br—Ir—Bri84.52 (3)Ir—Br—Iri69.987 (19)
Symmetry code: (i) y+1, x+1, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds