Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The most remarkable aspect of the crystal structure of the title compound (systematic name: 3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-2H-naphtho[1,2-b]pyran-5,6-dione), C15H14O3, is that a π-stacking inter­action is present between the two naphthalene ring systems of symmetry-related mol­ecules. Apart from these π–π inter­actions, different mol­ecules are held together by weak C—H...O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270106021706/gz3007sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270106021706/gz3007Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 618622

Comment top

The title compound (systematic name: 3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-2H-naphthol[1,2-b]pyran-5,6-dione), (I), is a naphthoquinone which can be isolated on a small scale from South American trees of the families Bigoniaceae and Verbenaceae (Burnett & Thomson, 1968). It can be produced chemically on a large scale from lapachol, following the procedures developed by Hooker (1892). These consist of cyclization in sulfuric acid by nucleophilic attack on the O atom of the lapachol isoprenyl side chain, followed by further recrystallizations (Hooker et al., 1936). A research group at the Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil, first noted the activity of (I) against several micro-organisms (Lima et al., 1962; D'Alburquerque, 1968) and tumour cells (Ferreira de Santana et al., 1968; D'Alburquerque et al., 1972). In recent years, compound (I) has become very interesting as a potential agent against several diseases. It has antifungal, antiviral, antipsoriatic and anti-inflammatory activities (Guiraud et al., 1994; Li et al., 1993; Mueller et al., 1999). It is also active against parasites such as Tripanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas disease (Pinto et al., 2000). But it is its antineoplastic activity that has generated the greatest expectations of this molecule. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that (I) inhibits conventional therapy-resistant tumours, particularly malignant neoplasms with a slow cell cycle, such as prostate, colon and some ovarian and breast cancers (Planchon et al., 1995; Li et al., 2003; Park et al., 2005). 300 research articles and nearly 40 patents have been published on the subject in the last 15 years. Thus, its excellent pharmacological potential suggests that this drug could shortly be included in the therapeutic arsenal.

In this paper, we report the molecular and crystal structures of (I) (Fig. 1). Some X-ray data from structural derivatives of (I) have previously been reported (De Simone et al., 2002; Reibenspies et al., 1989; Di Chenna et al., 2001). It should be noted that the most similar structure already reported, 3-bromoβ-lapachone (De Simone et al., 2002), presents the benzo and quinone rings lying in the same plane, and the heterocycle is in a distorted half-chair conformation. In the present case, the structure of (I) also has benzo and quinone rings, designated A and B, respectively. A Cremer & Pople (1975) analysis of the six-membered non-planar ring, C?, gives ring-puckering parameters ϕ = 248.4 (3)° and θ = 52.4 (2)° and a puckering amplitude Q = 0.4497 (19) Å. Thus, the conformation of the ring is between the half-chair (H) and envelope (E) symmetrical forms.

The main differences between the reported analogues and compound (I) seem to be the strategy of self-assembly through weak intermolecular interactions. In the case of (I), the two planar rings in the molecule at (x, y, z) stack above the symmetry-related rings of the molecule at (−x + 1/2, y − 1/2, z), with distances of 3.659 and 3.509 Å between the centroids of rings A and B, respectively, a perpendicular distance between the rings of 3.432 Å, and centroid offsets of 1.270 and 0.731 Å, respectively. Fig. 2 shows this stacking interaction, which generates stacked molecules running almost parallel to the [010] direction. The supramolecular structure also contains a weak intermolecular C—H···O hydrogen bond between atoms O17 and O18 and aromatic and non-aromatic H atoms of symmetry-related molecules. Table 1 presents the geometric parameters of these weak interactions.

As reported previously, the strategy of self-assembly through these weak interactions is of central importance for efficient and specific biological reactions, and for the design of new supramolecules possessing interesting structural and physical or chemical properties. As an example, we have found that, by changing the crystal growing conditions of this molecule, we can dramatically modify its dissolution rate (Landin et al., 2005). This could be explained according to the different preferred orientations achieved. Further studies will be reported in subsequent publications.

Experimental top

Compound (I) was used as supplied, from a batch produced by the Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil, following the procedure of Hooker et al. (1936), and purified by ethanolic recrystallizations. Its 1H and 13C NMR spectra were completely assigned by two-dimensional NMR experiments using two-dimensional 1H-detected heteronuclear one-bond (HMQC) and multiplebond (HMBC) techniques, as follows: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 750 MHz, δ, p.p.m.): 1.468 (s, 6H, CH3), 1.854 (t, 2H, CH2), 2.573 (t, 2H, CH2), 7.503 (t, 1H, Ar), 7.638 (t, 1H, Ar), 7.796–7.822 (d, 1H, Ar), 8.049–8.070 (d, 1H, Ar); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 750 MHz, δ, p.p.m.): 16.169 (s), 26.768 (s), 31.621 (s), 79.252 (s), 112.729 (s) 124.040 (s), 128.566(s), 130.16 (s), 130.631 (s), 132.64 (s), 134.736 (s), 161.990 (s), 178.568 (s), 179.854 (s). The purity of (I) was confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Waters M600, photodiode array detector) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC Q100, TA Instruments, Delaware, USA). HPLC results showed a purity of approximately 100%. No impurities or degradation products were detected. DSC thermograms showed a single peak at 430 K, corresponding to the characteristic melting point of the drug (Krishna et al., 2004) with an enthalpy of 109 J g−1.

Refinement top

H atoms were positioned [geometrically?] and treated as riding, with C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C), or 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H. [Please check added text and correct as necessary]

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: XPREP (Bruker, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecule of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Six (Five?) adjacent symmetry-related molecules of (I), linked by π-stacking interactions along the c axis. Also shown (grey spheres) are the calculated centroids of the planar rings.
β-Lapachone top
Crystal data top
C15H14O3F(000) = 1024
Mr = 242.26Dx = 1.363 Mg m3
Dm = 1.311 (5) Mg m3
Dm measured by helium air pycnometer
Orthorhombic, PbcaCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2245 reflections
a = 12.8995 (6) Åθ = 1.0–90°
b = 6.8681 (3) ŵ = 0.77 mm1
c = 26.6419 (13) ÅT = 120 K
V = 2360.34 (19) Å3Prism, orange
Z = 80.31 × 0.13 × 0.13 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD 2000 area-detector
diffractometer
2300 independent reflections
Graphite monochromator2001 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 14 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.062
CCD scansθmax = 69.4°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2006)
h = 015
Tmin = 0.775, Tmax = 0.905k = 08
2300 measured reflectionsl = 030
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.170 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1016P)2 + 0.9714P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.12(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2077 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.28 e Å3
166 parametersΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0048 (9)
Crystal data top
C15H14O3V = 2360.34 (19) Å3
Mr = 242.26Z = 8
Orthorhombic, PbcaCu Kα radiation
a = 12.8995 (6) ŵ = 0.77 mm1
b = 6.8681 (3) ÅT = 120 K
c = 26.6419 (13) Å0.31 × 0.13 × 0.13 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD 2000 area-detector
diffractometer
2300 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2006)
2001 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.775, Tmax = 0.905Rint = 0.062
2300 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0610 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.170H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.12Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
2077 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
166 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. density measurement: helium air pycnometer (Quantachrome MPY-2).

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.65816 (13)0.1797 (2)0.56624 (6)0.0249 (4)
C20.59415 (14)0.1663 (2)0.52434 (6)0.0271 (4)
H20.5210.16980.52840.033*
C30.63655 (14)0.1477 (3)0.47649 (6)0.0312 (4)
H30.59230.14010.44810.037*
C40.74317 (15)0.1403 (3)0.47023 (6)0.0323 (5)
H40.77180.12450.43760.039*
C50.80787 (14)0.1559 (2)0.51154 (7)0.0312 (4)
H50.88090.15170.50720.037*
C60.76602 (13)0.1779 (2)0.55955 (6)0.0257 (4)
C70.83561 (13)0.2022 (2)0.60334 (7)0.0286 (4)
C80.78484 (13)0.2167 (2)0.65577 (6)0.0272 (4)
C90.67304 (14)0.2162 (2)0.65950 (6)0.0264 (4)
C100.61423 (13)0.1955 (2)0.61724 (6)0.0245 (4)
C110.62401 (14)0.2237 (3)0.71052 (6)0.0304 (5)
H11A0.61740.36070.72160.036*
H11B0.66810.15380.7350.036*
C120.51723 (13)0.1292 (3)0.70824 (6)0.0298 (4)
H12A0.52550.01350.70480.036*
H12B0.48010.15470.74010.036*
C130.45260 (13)0.2046 (3)0.66488 (6)0.0277 (4)
O140.51065 (9)0.18309 (17)0.61713 (4)0.0266 (4)
C150.35698 (14)0.0795 (3)0.65719 (7)0.0349 (5)
H15A0.31950.12420.62730.052*
H15B0.31180.090.68660.052*
H15C0.37790.05660.65260.052*
C160.42503 (13)0.4184 (3)0.66966 (6)0.0316 (5)
H16A0.48870.49530.67280.047*
H16B0.38180.43780.69950.047*
H16C0.38680.46010.63980.047*
O170.84203 (9)0.22549 (18)0.69258 (5)0.0341 (4)
O180.92912 (9)0.2132 (2)0.59969 (5)0.0377 (4)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0268 (9)0.0195 (8)0.0285 (9)0.0003 (6)0.0007 (6)0.0003 (6)
C20.0263 (8)0.0245 (8)0.0305 (9)0.0004 (7)0.0000 (7)0.0006 (6)
C30.0372 (10)0.0282 (9)0.0280 (9)0.0024 (7)0.0011 (7)0.0013 (7)
C40.0384 (10)0.0275 (9)0.0309 (9)0.0020 (7)0.0088 (7)0.0009 (7)
C50.0295 (9)0.0237 (9)0.0404 (10)0.0015 (7)0.0079 (7)0.0014 (7)
C60.0242 (9)0.0190 (8)0.0339 (9)0.0006 (6)0.0029 (7)0.0022 (6)
C70.0233 (9)0.0214 (8)0.0409 (10)0.0004 (6)0.0008 (7)0.0051 (7)
C80.0270 (9)0.0208 (9)0.0339 (9)0.0003 (6)0.0046 (7)0.0031 (6)
C90.0261 (9)0.0241 (9)0.0292 (9)0.0003 (6)0.0026 (7)0.0021 (6)
C100.0212 (9)0.0207 (8)0.0316 (10)0.0004 (6)0.0005 (6)0.0005 (6)
C110.0295 (9)0.0352 (10)0.0264 (9)0.0013 (7)0.0030 (7)0.0011 (7)
C120.0280 (9)0.0330 (9)0.0285 (9)0.0008 (7)0.0024 (6)0.0029 (7)
C130.0221 (8)0.0336 (10)0.0273 (9)0.0015 (7)0.0035 (6)0.0014 (6)
O140.0200 (6)0.0332 (7)0.0266 (7)0.0003 (5)0.0021 (4)0.0019 (5)
C150.0288 (9)0.0409 (11)0.0350 (9)0.0075 (8)0.0017 (7)0.0009 (8)
C160.0286 (9)0.0348 (10)0.0314 (9)0.0042 (7)0.0009 (7)0.0029 (7)
O170.0291 (7)0.0338 (8)0.0394 (8)0.0018 (5)0.0095 (5)0.0027 (5)
O180.0224 (7)0.0427 (8)0.0480 (9)0.0017 (5)0.0003 (5)0.0094 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C61.403 (2)C11—H11A0.99
C1—C101.476 (2)C11—H11B0.99
C2—C11.392 (2)C12—H12A0.99
C2—C31.393 (2)C12—H12B0.99
C2—H20.95C13—C121.516 (2)
C3—C41.386 (3)C13—C161.516 (2)
C3—H30.95C13—C151.517 (2)
C4—H40.95O14—C101.339 (2)
C5—C41.385 (3)O14—C131.483 (2)
C5—C61.396 (2)C15—H15A0.98
C5—H50.95C15—H15B0.98
C7—C61.482 (2)C15—H15C0.98
C7—C81.546 (2)C16—H16A0.98
C9—C101.365 (2)C16—H16B0.98
C9—C81.446 (3)C16—H16C0.98
C9—C111.500 (2)O17—C81.229 (2)
C11—C121.524 (2)O18—C71.212 (2)
C1—C6—C7119.99 (15)H12A—C12—H12B107.8
C1—C2—C3120.48 (16)C12—C11—H11B109.8
C1—C2—H2119.8C12—C11—H11A109.8
C2—C3—H3119.9C12—C13—C16113.32 (14)
C2—C1—C6119.07 (16)C12—C13—C15110.90 (15)
C2—C1—C10121.03 (16)C13—C16—H16A109.5
C3—C2—H2119.8C13—C16—H16B109.5
C3—C4—H4120C13—C15—H15A109.5
C4—C3—C2120.20 (16)C13—C15—H15B109.5
C4—C3—H3119.9C13—C12—C11112.47 (14)
C4—C5—C6120.21 (16)C13—C12—H12A109.1
C4—C5—H5119.9C13—C16—H16C109.5
C5—C6—C1120.06 (16)C13—C15—H15C109.5
C5—C6—C7119.95 (15)C13—C12—H12B109.1
C5—C4—C3119.94 (16)O14—C13—C16106.66 (13)
C5—C4—H4120O14—C13—C15103.78 (13)
C6—C5—H5119.9O14—C13—C12110.00 (13)
C6—C1—C10119.90 (15)O14—C10—C9124.27 (15)
C6—C7—C8117.52 (15)O14—C10—C1112.11 (14)
C8—C9—C11118.87 (15)H15A—C15—H15C109.5
C9—C11—C12109.28 (14)H15B—C15—H15C109.5
C9—C11—H11A109.8H15A—C15—H15B109.5
C9—C10—C1123.61 (16)C16—C13—C15111.66 (15)
C9—C11—H11B109.8H16A—C16—H16B109.5
C9—C8—C7118.98 (15)H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C10—C9—C8119.87 (16)H16B—C16—H16C109.5
C10—C9—C11121.11 (16)O17—C8—C9122.98 (17)
C10—O14—C13119.70 (12)O17—C8—C7118.04 (16)
H11A—C11—H11B108.3O18—C7—C6123.14 (16)
C11—C12—H12B109.1O18—C7—C8119.33 (16)
C11—C12—H12A109.1
C1—C2—C3—C40.7 (3)C10—C9—C8—O17176.46 (15)
C2—C1—C6—C7176.82 (14)C10—C9—C11—C1221.8 (2)
C2—C1—C10—C9177.53 (15)C10—O14—C13—C1231.2 (2)
C2—C1—C10—O143.8 (2)C10—O14—C13—C1692.07 (16)
C2—C1—C6—C52.3 (2)C10—O14—C13—C15149.89 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C51.5 (3)C10—C1—C6—C5177.73 (14)
C3—C2—C1—C61.2 (2)C10—C9—C8—C72.5 (2)
C3—C2—C1—C10178.80 (15)C10—C1—C6—C73.2 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C11.5 (2)C11—C9—C10—O140.9 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C7177.61 (15)C11—C9—C10—C1177.57 (15)
C6—C1—C10—O14176.17 (14)C11—C9—C8—O170.9 (2)
C6—C1—C10—C92.5 (2)C11—C9—C8—C7178.03 (14)
C6—C7—C8—O17175.82 (15)C13—O14—C10—C94.0 (2)
C6—C7—C8—C93.2 (2)C13—O14—C10—C1177.38 (12)
C6—C5—C4—C30.4 (3)O14—C13—C12—C1154.01 (19)
C8—C9—C11—C12153.65 (15)C15—C13—C12—C11168.23 (15)
C8—C7—C6—C5177.36 (14)C16—C13—C12—C1165.27 (19)
C8—C7—C6—C13.6 (2)O18—C7—C6—C53.4 (2)
C8—C9—C10—O14176.37 (14)O18—C7—C6—C1175.63 (15)
C8—C9—C10—C12.1 (2)O18—C7—C8—O175.0 (2)
C9—C11—C12—C1348.9 (2)O18—C7—C8—C9176.05 (15)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC15H14O3
Mr242.26
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)12.8995 (6), 6.8681 (3), 26.6419 (13)
V3)2360.34 (19)
Z8
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)0.77
Crystal size (mm)0.31 × 0.13 × 0.13
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD 2000 area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2006)
Tmin, Tmax0.775, 0.905
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2300, 2300, 2001
Rint0.062
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.607
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.061, 0.170, 1.12
No. of reflections2077
No. of parameters166
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.28, 0.30

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), XPREP (Bruker, 2006), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C9—C101.365 (2)O14—C101.339 (2)
C9—C111.500 (2)O14—C131.483 (2)
C11—C121.524 (2)O17—C81.229 (2)
C13—C121.516 (2)O18—C71.212 (2)
C9—C11—C12109.28 (14)C13—C12—C11112.47 (14)
C10—O14—C13119.70 (12)O14—C13—C12110.00 (13)
Weak hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D···ADistance D···AaAngle D—H···Ab
C11···O17i3.507 (2)142
C12···O17iii3.340 (2)143
C12···O17iv3.539 (2)165
C16···O18i3.334 (2)125
C3···O18ii3.492 (2)147
Notes: (a) distance between donor and acceptor atoms; (b) angle between donor, H atoms and acceptor atom. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 3/2+, y + 1/2, z; (ii) x − 1/2, −y + 1/2, −z + 1; (iii) −x + 3/2, y − 1/2, z; (iv) x − 1/2, y,-z + 3/2.]
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds