metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Poly[(μ5-3,5-di­nitro­benzoato)rubidium]

aXi'an Medical University, Department of Pharmacy, Hanguang Road No.137, Xi'an 710021, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: miaoyanqing66@163.com

(Received 11 May 2011; accepted 14 June 2011; online 30 June 2011)

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Rb(C7H3N2O6)]n, comprises an Rb cation and a 3,5-dinitro­benzoate anion. The Rb cation is eight-coordinated by O atoms from five 3,5-dinitro­benzoate anions. On the other hand, each 3,5-dinitro­benzoate anion links five Rb cations with the carboxyl­ate groups as μ3-bridging. The metal atom is firstly linked by the carboxyl­ate groups into a chain along the c-axis direction, which is further linked by bonds between the Rb and nitro O atoms, giving a three-dimensional framework.

Related literature

For 3,5-dinitro­benzoate complexes, see: Askarinejad et al. (2007[Askarinejad, A., Fadaei, M. R., Morsali, A. & Mahjoub, A. R. (2007). J. Coord. Chem. 60, 753-761.]); Madej et al. (2007[Madej, A., Oleksyn, B. J. & Śliwiński, J. (2007). Pol. J. Chem. 81, 1201-1218.]). For Rb—O bond lengths, see: Cametti et al. (2005[Cametti, M., Nissinen, M., Cort, A. D., Mandolini, L. & Rissanen, K. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3831-3837.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [Rb(C7H3N2O6)]

  • Mr = 296.58

  • Monoclinic, I 2/a

  • a = 7.2789 (15) Å

  • b = 18.072 (4) Å

  • c = 7.3652 (14) Å

  • β = 91.70 (3)°

  • V = 968.4 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 5.13 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.64 × 0.40 × 0.14 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996[Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.]) Tmin = 0.396, Tmax = 1.000

  • 4663 measured reflections

  • 896 independent reflections

  • 760 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.053

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033

  • wR(F2) = 0.078

  • S = 1.06

  • 896 reflections

  • 75 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002[Bruker (2002). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002[Bruker (2002). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

In the coordination chemistry of 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid, it has been found that the 3,5-dinitrobenzoate moiety functions as a multidentate ligand (Askarinejad et al., 2007; Madej et al., 2007) with versatile binding and coordination modes. In this paper, we report the crystal structure of the title compound, a new Rb complex obtained by the reaction of 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid and RbOH in water.

The asymmetric unit of the title compound comprises a Rb cation and a 3,5-dinitrobenzoate anion. Rb cation lies on and the dinitrobenzoate is centred upon crystallographic twofold axes. The Rb cation is coordinated to eight O atoms from five 3,5-dinitrobenzoate anions (Fig. 1) with the Rb—O distances ranging from 2.761 (2) Å to 3.124 (4) Å, which are well within the range reported in the literature (Cametti et al., 2005). The Rb centre is firstly linked by the carboxylic groups to give a one-dimensional chain along the c-axis direction, which is further linked by the phenyl groups to give a three-dimensional framework of the title compound (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For 3,5-dinitrobenzoate complexes, see: Askarinejad et al. (2007); Madej et al. (2007). For Rb—O bond lengths, see: Cametti et al. (2005).

Experimental top

3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid and RbOH were commercially available and used without further purification. To asolution of 10 mmol 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid in 30 ml bidistilled water, a solution of 10 mmol RbOH in 20 ml bidistilled water was added dropwise at room temperature. After vigorous stirring for 1 h, the resulting solution was then evaporated to a volume of about 15 ml in vacuum and filtered hot. The filtrate was then set aside for crystallization at room temperature. Three weeks later, colorless prism crystals of the titlecompound suitable for X-ray determination were isolated.

Refinement top

Carbon-bound H atoms were placed at calculated positions and were treated as riding on the parent C atoms with C – H = 0.93 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of (I), showing the atomic numbering scheme. Non-H atoms are shown with 30% probability displacement ellipsoids. Symmetry codes: (i) 1.5 - x, y, 1 - z; (ii) x, 1.5 - y, -1/2 + z; (iii) 0.5 - x, 1.5 - y, 1.5 - z; (iv) 0.5 - x, y, 1 - z; (v) -1/2 + x, 1 - y, z; (vi) 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The three-dimensional framework of (I).
Poly[(µ5-3,5-dinitrobenzoato)rubidium] top
Crystal data top
[Rb(C7H3N2O6)]F(000) = 576
Mr = 296.58Dx = 2.034 Mg m3
Monoclinic, I2/aMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -I 2yaCell parameters from 1610 reflections
a = 7.2789 (15) Åθ = 3.0–25.4°
b = 18.072 (4) ŵ = 5.13 mm1
c = 7.3652 (14) ÅT = 293 K
β = 91.70 (3)°Prism, colorless
V = 968.4 (3) Å30.64 × 0.40 × 0.14 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD
diffractometer
896 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube760 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.053
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 25.3°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.396, Tmax = 1.000k = 2120
4663 measured reflectionsl = 87
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.078H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0418P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
896 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
75 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.55 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Rb(C7H3N2O6)]V = 968.4 (3) Å3
Mr = 296.58Z = 4
Monoclinic, I2/aMo Kα radiation
a = 7.2789 (15) ŵ = 5.13 mm1
b = 18.072 (4) ÅT = 293 K
c = 7.3652 (14) Å0.64 × 0.40 × 0.14 mm
β = 91.70 (3)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD
diffractometer
896 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
760 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.396, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.053
4663 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0330 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.078H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
896 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.55 e Å3
75 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Rb10.25000.54657 (2)0.50000.0557 (2)
C10.75000.8732 (3)0.50000.0493 (11)
H1A0.75000.92460.50000.059*
C20.6036 (4)0.83316 (17)0.5606 (4)0.0451 (8)
C30.5991 (4)0.75684 (17)0.5597 (4)0.0421 (7)
H3A0.49610.73160.59860.050*
C40.75000.7185 (2)0.50000.0387 (10)
C50.75000.6342 (2)0.50000.0398 (10)
N10.4460 (5)0.87295 (16)0.6344 (4)0.0595 (8)
O10.6019 (3)0.60328 (12)0.5293 (4)0.0649 (7)
O20.3212 (4)0.83742 (15)0.6978 (4)0.0696 (7)
O30.4500 (5)0.94073 (15)0.6317 (5)0.0913 (11)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Rb10.0317 (3)0.0382 (3)0.0985 (4)0.0000.0213 (2)0.000
C10.066 (3)0.040 (2)0.043 (3)0.0000.004 (2)0.000
C20.0482 (19)0.0444 (17)0.0429 (17)0.0112 (15)0.0053 (14)0.0032 (14)
C30.0381 (17)0.0441 (16)0.0441 (17)0.0020 (15)0.0020 (13)0.0032 (14)
C40.035 (2)0.042 (2)0.039 (2)0.0000.0038 (18)0.000
C50.028 (2)0.035 (2)0.056 (3)0.0000.0009 (19)0.000
N10.068 (2)0.0532 (18)0.0576 (18)0.0181 (16)0.0117 (15)0.0056 (15)
O10.0359 (13)0.0414 (12)0.118 (2)0.0037 (11)0.0118 (13)0.0012 (13)
O20.0555 (16)0.0686 (17)0.0860 (18)0.0089 (13)0.0222 (14)0.0045 (14)
O30.113 (3)0.0515 (15)0.112 (2)0.0326 (16)0.049 (2)0.0202 (16)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Rb1—O12.761 (2)C1—C21.374 (4)
Rb1—O1i2.925 (2)C1—C2iii1.374 (4)
Rb1—O2ii3.113 (3)C1—H1A0.9300
Rb1—O3ii3.125 (3)C2—C31.380 (4)
O1—Rb1—O1iv136.43 (9)C1—C2—C3122.9 (3)
O1—Rb1—O1i132.92 (7)C1—C2—N1118.9 (3)
O1iv—Rb1—O1i90.36 (6)C3—C2—N1118.2 (3)
O1i—Rb1—O1v44.43 (9)C2—C3—C4118.9 (3)
O1—Rb1—O2ii82.42 (8)C2—C3—H3A120.5
O1iv—Rb1—O2ii68.41 (8)C4—C3—H3A120.5
O1i—Rb1—O2ii120.08 (7)C3iii—C4—C3119.9 (4)
O1v—Rb1—O2ii138.23 (8)C3—C4—C5120.07 (19)
O2ii—Rb1—O2vi95.32 (11)O1—C5—O1iii126.3 (4)
O1—Rb1—O3ii111.10 (10)O1—C5—C4116.83 (19)
O1iv—Rb1—O3ii65.51 (9)O1iii—C5—C4116.83 (19)
O1i—Rb1—O3ii79.74 (8)O2—N1—O3123.5 (3)
O1v—Rb1—O3ii108.31 (7)O2—N1—C2118.9 (3)
O2ii—Rb1—O3ii40.35 (7)O3—N1—C2117.6 (3)
O2vi—Rb1—O3ii131.54 (7)C5—O1—Rb1164.54 (19)
O2ii—Rb1—O3vi131.54 (8)C5—O1—Rb1v94.6 (2)
O3ii—Rb1—O3vi171.57 (10)Rb1—O1—Rb1v89.64 (6)
C2—C1—C2iii116.5 (4)N1—O2—Rb1ii93.5 (2)
C2—C1—H1A121.8N1—O3—Rb1ii92.7 (2)
C3—C4—C5—O110.3 (2)C3—C2—N1—O22.7 (5)
C3iii—C4—C5—O1169.7 (2)C1—C2—N1—O32.8 (4)
C1—C2—N1—O2175.8 (3)C3—C2—N1—O3178.8 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1, z; (ii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+3/2; (iii) x+3/2, y, z+1; (iv) x+1/2, y, z+1; (v) x+1, y+1, z+1; (vi) x, y+3/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Rb(C7H3N2O6)]
Mr296.58
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, I2/a
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)7.2789 (15), 18.072 (4), 7.3652 (14)
β (°) 91.70 (3)
V3)968.4 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)5.13
Crystal size (mm)0.64 × 0.40 × 0.14
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.396, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4663, 896, 760
Rint0.053
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.602
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.033, 0.078, 1.06
No. of reflections896
No. of parameters75
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.29, 0.55

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2002), SAINT (Bruker, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

 

Acknowledgements

This work was supported financially by grants from the Scientific Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Province Department of Health (2010D54), the Natural Science Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Science and Technology Department (SJ08B19) and the Scientific Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Education Department (09 J K709). Jing You is thanked for helping to improve the English.

References

First citationAskarinejad, A., Fadaei, M. R., Morsali, A. & Mahjoub, A. R. (2007). J. Coord. Chem. 60, 753–761.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2002). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCametti, M., Nissinen, M., Cort, A. D., Mandolini, L. & Rissanen, K. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3831–3837.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMadej, A., Oleksyn, B. J. & Śliwiński, J. (2007). Pol. J. Chem. 81, 1201–1218.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds