Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Mol­ecules of the title compound [systematic name: (5-amino-3-methyl­pyrazol-1-yl)(phenyl)methanone], C11H11N3O, con­tain an intra­molecular hydrogen bond. The mol­ecules are linked into sheets by a combination of N—H...N, C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds. Comparisons are made with the hydrogen-bonded structures of some related compounds.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270110006980/gg3230sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270110006980/gg3230Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 774891

Comment top

We report here the structure and supramolecular aggregation of the title compound, (I) (Fig. 1), a member of the class of 5-aminopyrazoles containing an aroyl substituent, which are useful and versatile intermediates in the synthesis of polyazaheterocycles (Bauer & Mahajanshetti, 1967; Tominaga et al., 1995), in particular fused pyrazole derivatives, which exhibit a wide range of potential applications (Elguero, 1984, 1996). We have recently reported (Quiroga et al., 2008) the structures of two aryl-substituted analogues, (II) and (III) (see scheme), which exhibit very different hydrogen-bonding arrangements, and we have therefore now investigated the unsubstituted parent compound, (I), the structure of which is reported here. Compound (I) was prepared using the same procedure as previously employed for (II) and (III), namely a deaminative condensation between 3-aminocrotononitrile and, in this case, benzohydrazide PhCONHNH2, in the presence of sodium acetate.

The molecule of (I) contains an intramolecular N—H···O hydrogen bond (Table 2), forming an S(6) motif (Bernstein et al., 1995), and this may assist in controlling the molecular conformation, since the carbonyl group is nearly coplanar with the pyrazole ring, as shown by the leading torsion angles (Table 1). The phenyl group, on the other hand, is markedly twisted out of this plane; the orientation of the phenyl ring may be dominated by the intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 2). The bond distances in (I) show no unexpected or unusual features.

The molecules of compound (I) are linked into sheets by a combination of N—H···N, C—H···O and C—H···π(arene) hydrogen bonds (Table 2). The H···O distance for the C—H···O interaction is quite long, but the formation of the sheet does not depend upon this interaction, as the sheet could, in fact, be envisaged as constructed solely from the N—H···N and C—H···π(arene) hydrogen bonds. The N—H···N hydrogen bond links molecules related by the c-glide plane at y = 3/4 into a C(5) chain running parallel to the [001] direction (Fig. 2), while the C—H···π(arene) hydrogen bond links molecules related by the 21 screw axis along (1/2, y, 3/4) into a chain running parallel to the [010] direction (Fig. 3). In addition to these two chains, the combination of which is sufficient to form a sheet lying parallel to (100), the rather long C—H···O hydrogen bond links molecules related by the c-glide plane at y = 5/4 into a C(6) chain running parallel to the [001]. Combination of the C(5) and C(6) chains parallel to [001] is itself sufficient to form a sheet parallel to (100) (Fig. 4) and, in fact, any pairwise combination of the chains generated by, respectively, the N—H···N, C—H···O and C—H···π(arene) hydrogen bonds will generate a sheet parallel to (100). A single sheet passes through each unit cell, but there are no direction-specific interactions between adjacent sheets. In particular, aromatic ππ stacking interactions are absent from the crystal structure of (I).

The two-dimensional hydrogen-bonded structure of (I) may be contrasted with the hydrogen-bonded structures of the singly-substituted analogues, (II) and (III) (Quiroga et al., 2008). In the crystal structure of the 4-methoxyphenyl analogue, (II), which crystallizes in space group P1, a combination of N—H···N and N—H···π(arene) hydrogen bonds links molecules related by translation into a chain of rings, while a C—H···O interaction, which is probably weaker than the analogous interaction in (I), links pairs of chains which are related by inversion and thus antiparallel. Hence, the hydrogen-bonded structure of (II) is strictly one-dimensional. In the 2-nitrophenyl analogue, (III), which crystallizes in space group Pna21, a combination of one N—H···N hydrogen bond and three independent C—H···O hydrogen bonds, all of them utilizing nitro O atoms as hydrogen-bond acceptors, links the molecules into a fairly complex three-dimensional structure. Hence, compounds (I)–(III) all crystallize in different space groups with very different unit-cell metrics, all exhibit different selections of intermolecular hydrogen bonds, and their hydrogen-bonded structures are, respectively, two-, one- and three-dimensional.

Rather closely related to the series of compounds (I)–(III) is compound (IV) (see scheme). This was reported (Kusakiewicz-Dawid et al., 2007) on a proof-of-constitution basis, with no description of the intermolecular aggregation. Compound (IV) crystallizes in space group No. 62, for which the authors employed the non-standard setting Pnam, with all of the non-H atoms lying on the mirror plane at z = 1/4. Analysis of the structure using the deposited atomic coordinates [Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; Allen, 2002) refcode HIVTAI] shows that the molecular conformation is associated with the occurrence of two intramolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds, each forming an S(6) ring, while a single intermolecular C—H···O hydrogen bond links molecules related by the 21 screw axis along (x, 1/4, 1/4) into C(5) chains (Fig. 5).

Experimental top

A mixture of 3-aminocrotononitrile (2 mmol), benzohydrazide (2 mmol) and sodium acetate trihydrate (2 mmol) in ethanol (50 ml) was heated under reflux for 2 h. The mixture was allowed to cool to ambient temperature, and it was then poured into water (50 ml) with vigorous stirring. Stirring was continued for 20 min. The resulting solid product, (I), was collected by filtration and recrystallized from ethanol to give colourless crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction (yield 94%, m.p. 369–370 K). MS (70 eV) m/z (%) = 201 (15, M+), 10 (100), 77 (55).

Refinement top

All H atoms were located in difference maps. H atoms bonded to C atoms were then treated as riding atoms in geometrically idealized positions, with C—H = 0.95 (aromatic and pyrazole) or 0.98 Å (methyl), and with Uiso(H) = kUeq(C), where k = 1.5 for the methyl group, which was permitted to rotate but not to tilt, and 1.2 for all other H atoms bonded to C atoms. The coordinates of H atoms bonded to N atoms were freely refined, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N), giving N—H distances of 0.89 (3) and 0.92 (3) Å. Data validation after the initial refinements appeared to be complete indicated that the refinement should be handled as a non-merohedral twin, with twinning matrix (1.000, 0.000, 0.682/0.000, -1.000, 0.000/0.000, 0.000, -1.000). From the original dataset [12071 measured reflections, R(int) = 0.0534], a modified dataset was prepared using the TwinRotMat option in PLATON (Spek, 2009), and this was used in conjunction with the HKLF5 option in SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), giving twin fractions of 0.175 (3) and 0.825 (3).

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell refinement: DIRAX/LSQ (Duisenberg et al., 2000); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the intramolecular N—H···O hydrogen bond and the formation of a C(5) chain along [001] built from N—H···N hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. For the sake of clarity, H atoms bonded to C atoms have been omitted. Atoms marked with an asterisk (*) or a hash (#) are at the symmetry positions (x, 3/2 - y, -1/2 + z), and (x, 3/2 - y, 1/2 + z), respectively.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. A stereoview of part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the formation of a chain along [010] built from C—H···π(arene) hydrogen bonds (dashed lines). For the sake of clarity, H atoms not involved in the motif shown have been omitted.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. A stereoview of part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the formation of a sheet parallel to (100) built from N—H···N and C—H···O hydrogen bonds (dashed lines). For the sake of clarity, H atoms bonded to C atoms but not involved in the motifs shown have been omitted.
[Figure 5] Fig. 5. A stereoview of part of the crystal structure of (IV) (Kusakiewicz-Dawid et al., 2007), showing the formation of two intramolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds and a C(5) chain running parallel to [100] and built from a single C—H···O hydrogen bond. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. The deposited atom coordinates (CSD refcode HIVTAI) were used and, for the sake of clarity, H atoms not involved in the motifs shown have been omitted.
(5-amino-3-methylpyrazol-1-yl)(phenyl)methanone top
Crystal data top
C11H11N3OF(000) = 424
Mr = 201.23Dx = 1.363 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 12071 reflections
a = 14.7443 (6) Åθ = 3.4–27.5°
b = 5.7669 (2) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 12.0082 (3) ÅT = 120 K
β = 106.119 (2)°Block, colourless
V = 980.90 (6) Å30.20 × 0.14 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
1919 independent reflections
Radiation source: Bruker Nonius FR591 rotating anode1673 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.000
Detector resolution: 9.091 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.4°
ϕ and ω scansh = 1817
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
k = 77
Tmin = 0.982, Tmax = 0.993l = 614
1919 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.113H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.20 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0167P)2 + 0.9259P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1919 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
144 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
Crystal data top
C11H11N3OV = 980.90 (6) Å3
Mr = 201.23Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 14.7443 (6) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 5.7669 (2) ÅT = 120 K
c = 12.0082 (3) Å0.20 × 0.14 × 0.08 mm
β = 106.119 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
1919 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
1673 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.982, Tmax = 0.993Rint = 0.000
1919 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0540 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.113H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.20Δρmax = 0.22 e Å3
1919 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
144 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.20857 (11)0.7648 (3)0.46776 (14)0.0169 (4)
N20.17823 (12)0.5803 (3)0.52468 (14)0.0174 (4)
C30.11733 (14)0.4671 (4)0.44037 (17)0.0195 (5)
C40.10605 (15)0.5706 (4)0.33066 (18)0.0222 (5)
H40.06650.51810.25850.027*
C50.16335 (14)0.7615 (4)0.34908 (17)0.0195 (5)
C110.27686 (14)0.9182 (4)0.52861 (18)0.0179 (4)
O110.29408 (11)1.0967 (3)0.48344 (13)0.0247 (4)
C1110.32752 (14)0.8565 (4)0.65061 (17)0.0165 (4)
C1120.37538 (14)0.6463 (4)0.67863 (17)0.0175 (4)
H1120.37150.53190.62060.021*
C1130.42857 (14)0.6055 (4)0.79143 (18)0.0207 (5)
H1130.46330.46530.81020.025*
C1140.43127 (14)0.7690 (4)0.87716 (18)0.0223 (5)
H1140.46680.73850.95480.027*
C1150.38249 (15)0.9765 (4)0.85033 (18)0.0225 (5)
H1150.38351.08660.90950.027*
C1160.33197 (14)1.0226 (4)0.73593 (18)0.0195 (5)
H1160.30071.16720.71630.023*
C310.06761 (15)0.2591 (4)0.46859 (19)0.0246 (5)
H31A0.09160.22440.55150.037*
H31B0.07890.12620.42340.037*
H31C0.00030.29030.44940.037*
N510.17776 (14)0.9329 (4)0.27829 (17)0.0252 (4)
H51A0.1690 (18)0.894 (4)0.204 (2)0.030*
H51B0.2260 (18)1.034 (5)0.313 (2)0.030*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0185 (8)0.0204 (9)0.0121 (8)0.0014 (7)0.0049 (6)0.0013 (7)
N20.0188 (9)0.0188 (9)0.0151 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0052 (7)0.0004 (7)
C30.0160 (10)0.0239 (11)0.0185 (10)0.0035 (8)0.0044 (8)0.0051 (9)
C40.0185 (10)0.0313 (12)0.0148 (10)0.0032 (9)0.0012 (8)0.0048 (9)
C50.0197 (10)0.0279 (11)0.0115 (9)0.0078 (9)0.0051 (8)0.0004 (9)
C110.0191 (10)0.0168 (10)0.0196 (10)0.0019 (8)0.0083 (8)0.0010 (9)
O110.0303 (8)0.0220 (8)0.0226 (8)0.0007 (7)0.0083 (7)0.0042 (7)
C1110.0147 (9)0.0184 (10)0.0173 (10)0.0029 (8)0.0056 (8)0.0004 (8)
C1120.0176 (10)0.0190 (10)0.0174 (10)0.0020 (8)0.0073 (8)0.0033 (9)
C1130.0175 (10)0.0212 (11)0.0226 (11)0.0012 (9)0.0043 (8)0.0026 (9)
C1140.0193 (10)0.0300 (12)0.0159 (10)0.0064 (9)0.0020 (8)0.0018 (9)
C1150.0233 (11)0.0248 (11)0.0197 (10)0.0087 (9)0.0064 (9)0.0084 (9)
C1160.0191 (10)0.0176 (10)0.0233 (11)0.0018 (8)0.0081 (9)0.0028 (9)
C310.0212 (10)0.0248 (11)0.0268 (12)0.0023 (9)0.0048 (9)0.0057 (10)
N510.0311 (11)0.0310 (11)0.0141 (9)0.0036 (9)0.0073 (8)0.0026 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C111.386 (3)C112—H1120.9500
N1—C51.396 (2)C113—C1141.388 (3)
N1—N21.404 (2)C113—H1130.9500
N2—C31.324 (3)C114—C1151.388 (3)
C3—C41.413 (3)C114—H1140.9500
C3—C311.493 (3)C115—C1161.395 (3)
C4—C51.368 (3)C115—H1150.9500
C4—H40.9500C116—H1160.9500
C5—N511.359 (3)C31—H31A0.9800
C11—O111.223 (3)C31—H31B0.9800
C11—C1111.491 (3)C31—H31C0.9800
C111—C1161.391 (3)N51—H51A0.89 (3)
C111—C1121.396 (3)N51—H51B0.92 (3)
C112—C1131.384 (3)
C11—N1—C5128.18 (18)C112—C113—C114120.1 (2)
C11—N1—N2120.68 (16)C112—C113—H113119.9
C5—N1—N2111.12 (16)C114—C113—H113119.9
C3—N2—N1103.98 (16)C115—C114—C113120.49 (19)
N2—C3—C4112.58 (19)C115—C114—H114119.8
N2—C3—C31119.60 (19)C113—C114—H114119.8
C4—C3—C31127.79 (19)C114—C115—C116119.6 (2)
C5—C4—C3106.36 (18)C114—C115—H115120.2
C5—C4—H4126.8C116—C115—H115120.2
C3—C4—H4126.8C111—C116—C115119.8 (2)
N51—C5—C4133.0 (2)C111—C116—H116120.1
N51—C5—N1121.0 (2)C115—C116—H116120.1
C4—C5—N1105.95 (18)C3—C31—H31A109.5
O11—C11—N1120.88 (18)C3—C31—H31B109.5
O11—C11—C111121.85 (19)H31A—C31—H31B109.5
N1—C11—C111117.27 (17)C3—C31—H31C109.5
C116—C111—C112120.22 (18)H31A—C31—H31C109.5
C116—C111—C11117.89 (18)H31B—C31—H31C109.5
C112—C111—C11121.72 (18)C5—N51—H51A116.0 (17)
C113—C112—C111119.66 (19)C5—N51—H51B114.0 (16)
C113—C112—H112120.2H51A—N51—H51B119 (2)
C111—C112—H112120.2
C11—N1—N2—C3177.29 (17)C5—N1—C11—C111168.10 (18)
C5—N1—N2—C31.1 (2)N2—N1—C11—C11110.0 (3)
N1—N2—C3—C40.4 (2)O11—C11—C111—C11650.9 (3)
N1—N2—C3—C31178.53 (17)N1—C11—C111—C116128.8 (2)
N2—C3—C4—C50.5 (2)O11—C11—C111—C112124.3 (2)
C31—C3—C4—C5177.4 (2)N1—C11—C111—C11256.0 (3)
C3—C4—C5—N51175.7 (2)C116—C111—C112—C1131.0 (3)
C3—C4—C5—N11.2 (2)C11—C111—C112—C113174.09 (19)
C11—N1—C5—N515.9 (3)C111—C112—C113—C1142.5 (3)
N2—N1—C5—N51175.85 (18)C112—C113—C114—C1151.4 (3)
C11—N1—C5—C4176.79 (19)C113—C114—C115—C1161.3 (3)
N2—N1—C5—C41.5 (2)C112—C111—C116—C1151.6 (3)
C5—N1—C11—O1112.2 (3)C11—C111—C116—C115176.92 (18)
N2—N1—C11—O11169.68 (18)C114—C115—C116—C1112.8 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N51—H51A···N2i0.89 (2)2.20 (2)3.048 (2)158 (2)
N51—H51B···O110.92 (3)2.05 (2)2.749 (3)132 (2)
C115—H115···O11ii0.952.553.387 (3)147
C113—H113···Cgiii0.952.843.514 (2)128
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+3/2, z1/2; (ii) x, y+5/2, z+1/2; (iii) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H11N3O
Mr201.23
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)14.7443 (6), 5.7669 (2), 12.0082 (3)
β (°) 106.119 (2)
V3)980.90 (6)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.14 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
Tmin, Tmax0.982, 0.993
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1919, 1919, 1673
Rint0.000
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.617
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.054, 0.113, 1.20
No. of reflections1919
No. of parameters144
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.22, 0.20

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999), DIRAX/LSQ (Duisenberg et al., 2000), EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003), SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Selected torsion angles (º) top
N2—N1—C11—O11169.68 (18)N1—C11—C111—C11256.0 (3)
N2—N1—C11—C11110.0 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N51—H51A···N2i0.89 (2)2.20 (2)3.048 (2)158 (2)
N51—H51B···O110.92 (3)2.05 (2)2.749 (3)132 (2)
C115—H115···O11ii0.952.553.387 (3)147
C113—H113···Cgiii0.952.843.514 (2)128
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+3/2, z1/2; (ii) x, y+5/2, z+1/2; (iii) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds