Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039517/gg3110sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039517/gg3110Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 660291
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 298 K
- Mean (C-C)= 0.002 Å
- R factor = 0.041
- wR factor = 0.127
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.6
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found No errors found in this datablock checkCIF publication errors
Alert level A PUBL024_ALERT_1_A The number of authors is greater than 5. Please specify the role of each of the co-authors for your paper.
Author Response: The first two co-authors were involved in the synthesis and characterization part. The second and the third were involved in the interpretation of the structue and the raw data and the preparation of the publication materials. The last two were involved in the single crystal data collection and structue refinement. |
1 ALERT level A = Data missing that is essential or data in wrong format 0 ALERT level G = General alerts. Data that may be required is missing
For related literature, see: Abu-Safieh et al. (2007); Allen et al. (1987); Bernstein et al. (1995); Burke-Laing & Laing (1976); Bustos et al. (2007); Guzei et al. (2007); Manfredini et al. (1992); Mavel et al. (1993); Sun et al. (2007); Tewari et al. (2002); Wang et al. (2007); Xia et al. (2007a,b); Yu et al. (2007).
For related literature, see: Yan (2007).
The title compound (I), prepared according to the following method (Abu-Safieh et al., 2007). H2NNH2·H2O (85%, 8 ml, 160 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 5-chloro-1,3-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole (88 mg, 5 mmol) dissolved in 30 ml absolute ethanol. After stirring for ca 15 min at ambient temperature, the mixture was refluxed (water bath) for ca 2 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo to dryness. The resulting residual solid, recrystallized from ethanol yielded X-ray quality yellow crystals (m.p. 452–453 K). Yield = 0.59 g (69%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.39 (s, 3H, CH3—C(3)), 3.92 (br s,, 2H, N(4)H2), 3.95 (s, 3H, N(1)—CH3), 8.07 (br s, 1H, N(3)H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.4 (C(7)), 39.3 (C(6)), 118.1 (C(3)), 145.0 (C(4)), 147.6 (C(5)); IR (cm-1): 3339 (υ(N—H)), 2970 (υ(C—H)), 1664 (υ(C═N)), 1582, 1367 (υ(NO2)).
All H atoms were located in the difference map and refined independently with isotropic thermal displacement coefficients.
Substituted pyrazolo-1,2,4-triazines constitute an important family of heterocyclic compounds due to their possible biological activity. including antifungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, antidepressant, antihypertensive properties (Tewari et al., 2002; Manfredini et al., 1992; Mavel et al., 1993). A novel method for the synthesis of many substituted pyrazolo[4,3 e][1,2,4]triazines has been reported very recently (Abu-Safieh et al., 2007). This synthesis based on the preparation of 5-hydrazinopyrazole from 5-chloro-1,3-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole followed by acylation and nitro group reduction to form the corresponding 4-amino-3-(acylhydrazino)pyrazoles. Then by using polyphosphoric acid via intramolecular oxidative cyclization the target pyrazolotriazines is obtained. In this paper, we report the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), which represents the first step product, 5-hydrazinopyrazole, of these reactions to the formation of pyrazolotriazines.
The title compound, (I), formed from the hydrazinolysis of 5-chloro-1,3-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole in an SN Ar addition-elimination reaction. A view of the structure of (I) and its atom-numbering scheme is shown in Fig. 1. Selected geometrical parameters are given in Table 1. The asymmetric unit of (I) is made up of one organic moiety composed of a central N-containing ring, with a methyl group connected to the 1-position of the ring, a methyl group in the 3-position of the ring, a nitro group (—NO2) in the 4-position of the ring and a hydrazine group NH2NH— group connected to the 5-position of the ring. The pyrazolo ring is planar, which can be attributed to a wide range of electron delocalization [maximum deviations of -0.0015 (9), -0.0014 (9) and 0.0018 (9) for N1, C4 and C5, respectively]. Compound (I) is comparable to other similar ones in Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; see for example: Yu et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Xia et al., 2007a,b; Bustos et al., 2007), except that the substituents at positions 3- (—NO2) and 4- (NH2NH—) are of the kind that are good candidates to participate in hydrogen bonding leading to a supramolecular architecture (see hydrogen bonding discussion below).
The bond distances of similar types within the ring are not equivalent [1.309 (2) and 1.3443 (17) Å for N2—C3 and N1—C5, respectively, and 1.410 (2) and 1.419 (2) Å for C4—C5 and C3—C4, respectively]. Furthermore, the N1—C6 bond distance is different (1.453 (2) Å) and significantly longer than the N1—C5 and N2—C3 bonds, which is indicative of some multiple bond character in both N1—C5 and N2—C3 (Guzei et al., 2007; Yan, 2007; Wang et al., 2007). The sum of the angles at N1 is 360°, indicating sp2 hybridization. The N1—C6 bond length is closer to the average Car—Nsp3 (pyramidal) value of 1.419 (17) Å than to the Car—Nsp2 1.353 (7) Å (Allen et al., 1987). The N1—N2 bond length is 1.3907 (18) Å, (smaller than a single bond) (1.41 Å; Burke-Laing & Laing, 1976; Guzei et al., 2007; Yan, 2007; Wang et al, 2007). The remaining bond lengths in (I) show no unusual values (Sun et al., 2007; Guzei et al., 2007; Yan, 2007; Wang et al., 2007).
There are three strong interactions (Table 2) of two types (N—H···O and N—H···N). These hydrogen bonds link molecules into two-dimensional corrugated sheets (Fig. 2) stacked along the b axis (Fig. 3). The significance of the hydrogen bonds is represented by relatively short D···A distances and D—H···A angles spanning 138 (2) to 164 (2)° (Table 2). These hydrogen bonds link the molecules to each other by four two-center N—H···O hydrogen bonds, in which the N—H and H2N species of the hydrazino group lead to a number of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 2). The NH2 group of the H2NH— species at (x, y, z) participitate in two N—H···O—NO hydrogen bonds [N4—H4A···O1 (x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, -z + 1) and N4—H4B···O2 (-x + 1/2, y - 1/2, z)], forming a centrosymmetric R42(12) ring (Bernstein et al., 1995), Fig. 3. In addition to these hydrogen bonds occurring between the molecules in the inversion related columns, there are also N—H···N hydrogen bonds [N3—H3···N2 (x, -y + 3/2, z - 1/2)].
As can be seen from the packing diagram (Fig. 3), the intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 2) and other less significant hydrogen bond interactions (longer interactions) cause to the formation of a three-dimensional supramolecular architecture, in which they may be effective in the stabilization of the crystal structure. Dipole-dipole and van der Waals interactions are also effective in the molecular packing.
For related literature, see: Abu-Safieh et al. (2007); Allen et al. (1987); Bernstein et al. (1995); Burke-Laing & Laing (1976); Bustos et al. (2007); Guzei et al. (2007); Manfredini et al. (1992); Mavel et al. (1993); Sun et al. (2007); Tewari et al. (2002); Wang et al. (2007); Xia et al. (2007a,b); Yu et al. (2007).
For related literature, see: Yan (2007).
Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: HELENA (Spek, 1996); program(s) used to solve structure: XS in SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: XL in SHELXTL; molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: XCIF in SHELXTL.
C5H9N5O2 | F(000) = 720 |
Mr = 171.17 | Dx = 1.482 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, Pbca | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2ab | Cell parameters from 1846 reflections |
a = 8.3129 (3) Å | θ = 2.1–28.0° |
b = 14.340 (3) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
c = 12.869 (4) Å | T = 298 K |
V = 1534.1 (6) Å3 | Block, yellow |
Z = 8 | 0.55 × 0.35 × 0.35 mm |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 1233 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.027 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 28.0°, θmin = 3.2° |
ω scans | h = −1→11 |
Absorption correction: numerical (Shape Tracing Software; Rigaku, 2003) | k = −1→18 |
Tmin = 0.945, Tmax = 0.967 | l = −16→16 |
4386 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 400 reflections |
1846 independent reflections | intensity decay: 3% |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 | All H-atom parameters refined |
wR(F2) = 0.127 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0736P)2 + 0.0821P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.04 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1846 reflections | Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 |
146 parameters | Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.0061 (18) |
C5H9N5O2 | V = 1534.1 (6) Å3 |
Mr = 171.17 | Z = 8 |
Orthorhombic, Pbca | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 8.3129 (3) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
b = 14.340 (3) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 12.869 (4) Å | 0.55 × 0.35 × 0.35 mm |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 1233 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: numerical (Shape Tracing Software; Rigaku, 2003) | Rint = 0.027 |
Tmin = 0.945, Tmax = 0.967 | 3 standard reflections every 400 reflections |
4386 measured reflections | intensity decay: 3% |
1846 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.127 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.04 | Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 |
1846 reflections | Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 |
146 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | 0.21521 (17) | 0.87426 (10) | 0.56075 (8) | 0.0607 (4) | |
N1 | 0.05276 (17) | 0.72636 (9) | 0.80896 (9) | 0.0422 (4) | |
O2 | 0.32124 (19) | 0.96616 (9) | 0.67586 (10) | 0.0670 (4) | |
N2 | 0.11316 (18) | 0.78454 (9) | 0.88612 (9) | 0.0464 (4) | |
N3 | 0.05167 (19) | 0.71807 (10) | 0.62276 (11) | 0.0485 (4) | |
H3 | 0.087 (2) | 0.7452 (13) | 0.5686 (13) | 0.050 (5)* | |
C3 | 0.1893 (2) | 0.85253 (11) | 0.83932 (11) | 0.0420 (4) | |
N4 | −0.0454 (2) | 0.63832 (13) | 0.61765 (12) | 0.0563 (4) | |
H4A | −0.108 (3) | 0.6468 (16) | 0.5671 (19) | 0.074 (7)* | |
H4B | 0.010 (3) | 0.5904 (19) | 0.598 (2) | 0.095 (10)* | |
C4 | 0.17954 (19) | 0.83961 (10) | 0.73019 (11) | 0.0383 (4) | |
N5 | 0.24162 (16) | 0.89595 (10) | 0.65299 (11) | 0.0446 (4) | |
C5 | 0.08993 (18) | 0.75750 (11) | 0.71340 (10) | 0.0378 (4) | |
C6 | −0.0289 (3) | 0.64202 (16) | 0.84255 (17) | 0.0608 (6) | |
H6C | −0.137 (4) | 0.647 (2) | 0.830 (2) | 0.130 (11)* | |
C7 | 0.2681 (3) | 0.92806 (15) | 0.89924 (15) | 0.0574 (5) | |
H7C | 0.239 (3) | 0.9836 (17) | 0.8771 (18) | 0.077 (7)* | |
H7A | 0.234 (3) | 0.9278 (17) | 0.972 (2) | 0.084 (7)* | |
H7B | 0.388 (3) | 0.9269 (19) | 0.888 (2) | 0.101 (9)* | |
H6A | −0.003 (4) | 0.631 (2) | 0.905 (3) | 0.109 (9)* | |
H6B | 0.010 (4) | 0.592 (3) | 0.810 (3) | 0.149 (15)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0709 (9) | 0.0775 (9) | 0.0338 (6) | −0.0148 (7) | 0.0073 (6) | 0.0072 (6) |
N1 | 0.0459 (8) | 0.0492 (7) | 0.0315 (6) | 0.0003 (6) | 0.0011 (5) | 0.0045 (5) |
O2 | 0.0827 (10) | 0.0577 (8) | 0.0607 (8) | −0.0225 (8) | 0.0039 (7) | 0.0039 (6) |
N2 | 0.0558 (9) | 0.0531 (8) | 0.0302 (6) | 0.0059 (7) | −0.0001 (6) | 0.0000 (5) |
N3 | 0.0568 (9) | 0.0576 (8) | 0.0311 (6) | −0.0131 (7) | 0.0003 (6) | 0.0011 (6) |
C3 | 0.0471 (9) | 0.0447 (8) | 0.0340 (7) | 0.0098 (7) | −0.0015 (7) | −0.0002 (6) |
N4 | 0.0603 (10) | 0.0643 (10) | 0.0443 (8) | −0.0149 (9) | −0.0077 (8) | −0.0001 (7) |
C4 | 0.0412 (8) | 0.0419 (7) | 0.0318 (7) | 0.0056 (7) | 0.0018 (6) | 0.0017 (6) |
N5 | 0.0461 (8) | 0.0486 (8) | 0.0392 (7) | −0.0007 (7) | 0.0045 (6) | 0.0049 (6) |
C5 | 0.0363 (8) | 0.0462 (8) | 0.0308 (7) | 0.0066 (7) | 0.0023 (6) | 0.0038 (6) |
C6 | 0.0703 (14) | 0.0654 (12) | 0.0469 (10) | −0.0140 (11) | 0.0002 (10) | 0.0173 (9) |
C7 | 0.0729 (15) | 0.0538 (11) | 0.0456 (10) | 0.0033 (10) | −0.0042 (9) | −0.0093 (8) |
O1—N5 | 1.2467 (18) | N4—H4A | 0.84 (3) |
N1—C5 | 1.3443 (17) | N4—H4B | 0.87 (3) |
N1—N2 | 1.3907 (18) | C4—N5 | 1.3805 (19) |
N1—C6 | 1.453 (2) | C4—C5 | 1.410 (2) |
O2—N5 | 1.2404 (18) | C6—H6C | 0.92 (3) |
N2—C3 | 1.309 (2) | C6—H6A | 0.84 (3) |
N3—C5 | 1.3347 (19) | C6—H6B | 0.90 (4) |
N3—N4 | 1.401 (2) | C7—H7C | 0.88 (3) |
N3—H3 | 0.851 (18) | C7—H7A | 0.98 (3) |
C3—C4 | 1.419 (2) | C7—H7B | 1.01 (3) |
C3—C7 | 1.482 (3) | ||
C5—N1—N2 | 111.77 (13) | O2—N5—C4 | 120.25 (14) |
C5—N1—C6 | 131.00 (15) | O1—N5—C4 | 118.26 (14) |
N2—N1—C6 | 117.12 (13) | N3—C5—N1 | 127.16 (15) |
C3—N2—N1 | 107.03 (12) | N3—C5—C4 | 127.85 (13) |
C5—N3—N4 | 121.60 (14) | N1—C5—C4 | 104.99 (12) |
C5—N3—H3 | 116.1 (12) | N1—C6—H6C | 110 (2) |
N4—N3—H3 | 122.3 (12) | N1—C6—H6A | 108 (2) |
N2—C3—C4 | 109.31 (14) | H6C—C6—H6A | 116 (3) |
N2—C3—C7 | 121.23 (15) | N1—C6—H6B | 111 (2) |
C4—C3—C7 | 129.46 (16) | H6C—C6—H6B | 110 (3) |
N3—N4—H4A | 105.9 (16) | H6A—C6—H6B | 102 (3) |
N3—N4—H4B | 110.6 (18) | C3—C7—H7C | 112.0 (15) |
H4A—N4—H4B | 102 (2) | C3—C7—H7A | 111.6 (15) |
N5—C4—C5 | 125.16 (13) | H7C—C7—H7A | 104 (2) |
N5—C4—C3 | 127.92 (15) | C3—C7—H7B | 110.7 (15) |
C5—C4—C3 | 106.90 (13) | H7C—C7—H7B | 104 (2) |
O2—N5—O1 | 121.49 (13) | H7A—C7—H7B | 115 (2) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N4—H4A···O1i | 0.84 (3) | 2.23 (3) | 3.044 (2) | 164 (2) |
N4—H4B···O2ii | 0.87 (3) | 2.48 (3) | 3.182 (3) | 138 (2) |
N3—H3···N2iii | 0.851 (18) | 2.396 (17) | 3.088 (2) | 138.8 (16) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, z; (iii) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C5H9N5O2 |
Mr | 171.17 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Pbca |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 8.3129 (3), 14.340 (3), 12.869 (4) |
V (Å3) | 1534.1 (6) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.12 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.55 × 0.35 × 0.35 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 |
Absorption correction | Numerical (Shape Tracing Software; Rigaku, 2003) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.945, 0.967 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 4386, 1846, 1233 |
Rint | 0.027 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.661 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.042, 0.127, 1.04 |
No. of reflections | 1846 |
No. of parameters | 146 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.26, −0.16 |
Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994), CAD-4 EXPRESS, HELENA (Spek, 1996), XS in SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003), XL in SHELXTL, XP in SHELXTL, XCIF in SHELXTL.
O1—N5 | 1.2467 (18) | N3—C5 | 1.3347 (19) |
N1—C5 | 1.3443 (17) | N3—N4 | 1.401 (2) |
N1—N2 | 1.3907 (18) | C3—C4 | 1.419 (2) |
N1—C6 | 1.453 (2) | C3—C7 | 1.482 (3) |
O2—N5 | 1.2404 (18) | C4—N5 | 1.3805 (19) |
N2—C3 | 1.309 (2) | C4—C5 | 1.410 (2) |
C5—N1—N2 | 111.77 (13) | N5—C4—C3 | 127.92 (15) |
C5—N1—C6 | 131.00 (15) | C5—C4—C3 | 106.90 (13) |
N2—N1—C6 | 117.12 (13) | O2—N5—O1 | 121.49 (13) |
C3—N2—N1 | 107.03 (12) | O2—N5—C4 | 120.25 (14) |
C5—N3—N4 | 121.60 (14) | O1—N5—C4 | 118.26 (14) |
N2—C3—C4 | 109.31 (14) | N3—C5—N1 | 127.16 (15) |
N2—C3—C7 | 121.23 (15) | N3—C5—C4 | 127.85 (13) |
C4—C3—C7 | 129.46 (16) | N1—C5—C4 | 104.99 (12) |
N5—C4—C5 | 125.16 (13) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N4—H4A···O1i | 0.84 (3) | 2.23 (3) | 3.044 (2) | 164 (2) |
N4—H4B···O2ii | 0.87 (3) | 2.48 (3) | 3.182 (3) | 138 (2) |
N3—H3···N2iii | 0.851 (18) | 2.396 (17) | 3.088 (2) | 138.8 (16) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, z; (iii) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
Substituted pyrazolo-1,2,4-triazines constitute an important family of heterocyclic compounds due to their possible biological activity. including antifungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, antidepressant, antihypertensive properties (Tewari et al., 2002; Manfredini et al., 1992; Mavel et al., 1993). A novel method for the synthesis of many substituted pyrazolo[4,3 e][1,2,4]triazines has been reported very recently (Abu-Safieh et al., 2007). This synthesis based on the preparation of 5-hydrazinopyrazole from 5-chloro-1,3-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole followed by acylation and nitro group reduction to form the corresponding 4-amino-3-(acylhydrazino)pyrazoles. Then by using polyphosphoric acid via intramolecular oxidative cyclization the target pyrazolotriazines is obtained. In this paper, we report the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), which represents the first step product, 5-hydrazinopyrazole, of these reactions to the formation of pyrazolotriazines.
The title compound, (I), formed from the hydrazinolysis of 5-chloro-1,3-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole in an SN Ar addition-elimination reaction. A view of the structure of (I) and its atom-numbering scheme is shown in Fig. 1. Selected geometrical parameters are given in Table 1. The asymmetric unit of (I) is made up of one organic moiety composed of a central N-containing ring, with a methyl group connected to the 1-position of the ring, a methyl group in the 3-position of the ring, a nitro group (—NO2) in the 4-position of the ring and a hydrazine group NH2NH— group connected to the 5-position of the ring. The pyrazolo ring is planar, which can be attributed to a wide range of electron delocalization [maximum deviations of -0.0015 (9), -0.0014 (9) and 0.0018 (9) for N1, C4 and C5, respectively]. Compound (I) is comparable to other similar ones in Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; see for example: Yu et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Xia et al., 2007a,b; Bustos et al., 2007), except that the substituents at positions 3- (—NO2) and 4- (NH2NH—) are of the kind that are good candidates to participate in hydrogen bonding leading to a supramolecular architecture (see hydrogen bonding discussion below).
The bond distances of similar types within the ring are not equivalent [1.309 (2) and 1.3443 (17) Å for N2—C3 and N1—C5, respectively, and 1.410 (2) and 1.419 (2) Å for C4—C5 and C3—C4, respectively]. Furthermore, the N1—C6 bond distance is different (1.453 (2) Å) and significantly longer than the N1—C5 and N2—C3 bonds, which is indicative of some multiple bond character in both N1—C5 and N2—C3 (Guzei et al., 2007; Yan, 2007; Wang et al., 2007). The sum of the angles at N1 is 360°, indicating sp2 hybridization. The N1—C6 bond length is closer to the average Car—Nsp3 (pyramidal) value of 1.419 (17) Å than to the Car—Nsp2 1.353 (7) Å (Allen et al., 1987). The N1—N2 bond length is 1.3907 (18) Å, (smaller than a single bond) (1.41 Å; Burke-Laing & Laing, 1976; Guzei et al., 2007; Yan, 2007; Wang et al, 2007). The remaining bond lengths in (I) show no unusual values (Sun et al., 2007; Guzei et al., 2007; Yan, 2007; Wang et al., 2007).
There are three strong interactions (Table 2) of two types (N—H···O and N—H···N). These hydrogen bonds link molecules into two-dimensional corrugated sheets (Fig. 2) stacked along the b axis (Fig. 3). The significance of the hydrogen bonds is represented by relatively short D···A distances and D—H···A angles spanning 138 (2) to 164 (2)° (Table 2). These hydrogen bonds link the molecules to each other by four two-center N—H···O hydrogen bonds, in which the N—H and H2N species of the hydrazino group lead to a number of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 2). The NH2 group of the H2NH— species at (x, y, z) participitate in two N—H···O—NO hydrogen bonds [N4—H4A···O1 (x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, -z + 1) and N4—H4B···O2 (-x + 1/2, y - 1/2, z)], forming a centrosymmetric R42(12) ring (Bernstein et al., 1995), Fig. 3. In addition to these hydrogen bonds occurring between the molecules in the inversion related columns, there are also N—H···N hydrogen bonds [N3—H3···N2 (x, -y + 3/2, z - 1/2)].
As can be seen from the packing diagram (Fig. 3), the intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 2) and other less significant hydrogen bond interactions (longer interactions) cause to the formation of a three-dimensional supramolecular architecture, in which they may be effective in the stabilization of the crystal structure. Dipole-dipole and van der Waals interactions are also effective in the molecular packing.