Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229614016829/fm3020sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229614016829/fm3020Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 1015250
Coordination polymers (CPs) based on multicarboxylate ligands and metal centres have received much attention in coordination chemistry due to their various topologies and potential applications, such as guest exchange, gas storage and separation, catalysis, drug delivery, luminescence etc. (He et al., 2014; Gandara et al., 2014; Furukawa et al., 2013; Li, Li, O'Keeffe & Yaghi, 2014; Cui et al., 2012; Betard & Fischer, 2012). Of these multicarboxylate based CPs, compounds having ligands with carboxylate groups attached to aromatic rings are found to be widely utilized and dominate the literature (Furukawa et al., 2013; Cook et al., 2013; Li, Li, Zhou et al., 2014). These ligands tend to be quite rigid, as the carboxylate groups are usually coplanar with the aromatic rings. In contrast, work on the construction of CPs based on flexible multicarboxylate ligands, where the carboxylate is attached to an aliphatic C atom, is still scarce, especially when the multicarboxylate ligand involves a mixture of rigid (aromatic) and flexible (aliphatic) carboxylate groups. The rational design of organic building blocks plays a key role in adjusting the coordination framework, and the nature of the coordinating donors may lead to the formation of unique networks with desired properties and functions (Li et al., 2010). 5-Carboxy-1-(carboxymethyl)pyridin-1-ium-2-olate (H2ccop) possesses one rigid carboxylate group, one flexible carboxylate group and one phenolate O atom, so it can act as an excellent multidentate ligand with a range of versatile binding and coordination modes. Though it is a good multidentate ligand, H2ccop has not been well exploited in building CPs and only a few metal complexes of H2ccop have been reported, most of them being zero-, one- or two-dimensional structures (Zhan et al., 2010; Yuan et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2009; Lin & He, 2007). On the basis of these considerations, we chose to react Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O with H2ccop and produced the title compound, [Zn(ccop)(H2O)]n, (I).
A mixture of zinc acetate dihydrate (0.148 g, 0.5 mmol), H2ccop (0.10 g, 0.5 mmol), NaOH (0.08 g, 0.2 mmol) and H2O (12 ml) was placed in a 23 ml Teflon reactor, which was heated to 403 K for 3 d and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 10 K h-1. The colourless crystals of (I) obtained were washed with methanol and dried in air (yield 0.12 g, 89%). IR (KBr, ν, cm-1): 3460 (s), 1662 (s), 1438 (m), 1396 (s), 1326 (w), 1267 (w), 1211 (w), 1141 (m), 997 (w), 937 (w), 858 (w), 792 (w), 663 (w), 607 (w), 522 (w).
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. C-bound H atoms were placed at calculated positions and treated as riding, with C—H = 0.93 and 0.97 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). Water H atoms were tentatively located in difference Fourier maps and were refined with distance restraints of O—H = 0.82 Å and H···H = 1.39 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O). The hightest residual electron-density peak is located 0.92 Å from atom O6 and the deepest hole is located 0.75 Å from atom Zn1.
The asymmetric unit of (I) contains one unique ZnII cation, one coordinated water molecule and one ccop2- ligand (Fig. 1). The ZnII centre is five-coordinated by four carboxylate O atoms from four different ccop2- ligands and one water molecule, adopting a distorted trigonal–biyramidal geometry. The Zn—O bond lengths and O—Zn—O bond angles are in the ranges 1.964 (3)–2.097 (3) Å, and 86.48 (11)–176.09 (13) and 111.27 (12)–125.25 (12)° [Why two angle ranges?], respectively (Table 2), which are within the ranges of observed values for other five-coordinated ZnII complexes with oxygen-donating ligands (Ma et al., 2013; Kumagai et al., 2003; Dong et al., 2012). In the polymeric structure of (I), the ccop2- ligands adopt the same µ4-bridging mode to link four ZnII cations. The ccop2- ligand bridges these metal centres in a head-to-tail fashion via the monodentate aromatic carboxylate O1 amd phenolate O5 atoms, to form a one-dimensional zigzag chain along the bc plane (Fig. 2a). The aliphatic carboxylate group of the ccop2- ligand adopts a bidentate-bridging mode, linking chains to form a two-dimensional layer network parallel to the c axis (Fig. 2b), which is further extended to give rise to a three-dimensional framework via additional Zn—O—Zn linkages (Fig. 2c). The coordinated water molecules provide additional hydrogen bonds to stabilize the crystal structure (Table 3).
Better insight into this framework can be achieved by topology analysis. In this structure, all the ZnII centres and the ccop2- ligands can be regarded as tetrahedral 4-connected nodes. The three-dimensional framework of (I) can then be simplified as a 4-connected sra topology with a Schläfli symbol of 42.63.8 (Blatov 2012; Alexandrov et al., 2011; Rosi et al., 2005) (Fig. 3).
Besides (I), there is only one three-dimensional CP based on ccop and a transition metal (Zhan et al., 2010), viz. [Cd(ccop)(H2)]n, (II). In (II), the aromatic and aliphatic carboxylate groups within the ccop2- ligand adopt bidentate–chelate and chelate–bridging modes, respectively, differing from those described in (I). Similar to (II), (I) can also be regarded as a further product for the phenolate O atom [This phrase is not at all clear - please revise as necessary], leading to the final three-dimensional architecture. Moreover, the coordination modes of the ccop2- ligands in (I) and (II) are unique, differing from those in other known ccop2--based complexes (Lin & He, 2007; Jiang et al., 2009; Yuan et al., 2011; Zhan et al., 2010). In contrast with (I), the three-dimensional framework structure of (II) includes left- and right-handed helical chains.
As part of a continuing programme dedicated to luminescent d10 systems, the three-dimensional fluorescence of (I) was investigated at room temperature with excitation and emission wavelengths of 344–354 and 360–630 nm, respectively, with intervals of 0.15 and 2 nm, respectively. Compound (I) exhibits blue photoluminescence with an emission maximum at 450 nm upon excitation in the range 344–354 nm. Compared with the emission peak of free H2ccop at 632 nm (Jiang et al., 2009), the emission maximum of (I) is clearly blue-shifted, due to the n–π* electronic transition of the ligand (Yang et al., 2008; Roy et al., 2009). The emission of (I) probably originates from a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) (Qiu et al., 2010) excited state, because the ccop2- ligand has a π-conjugated system in the pyridine ring and uses oxygen donors to coordinate to the ZnII cations, which enhances the `rigidity' of the ligand and thus reduces the loss of energy through a radiationless pathway (Fu et al., 2002).
In summary, we have successfully prepared a new three-dimensional zinc(II)-based coordination polymer with sra topology, which is constructed from the ccop2- ligand under hydrothermal conditions.
Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).
[Zn(C8H5NO4)(H2O)] | F(000) = 560 |
Mr = 278.52 | Dx = 2.020 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, Pna21 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: P 2c -2n | Cell parameters from 5300 reflections |
a = 16.9663 (13) Å | θ = 1.3–28.0° |
b = 10.8788 (8) Å | µ = 2.70 mm−1 |
c = 4.9606 (4) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 915.59 (12) Å3 | Block, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.31 × 0.26 × 0.19 mm |
Agilent Xcalibur diffractometer with Eos Gemini detector | 1569 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1444 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.041 |
ω scans | θmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.1° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011) | h = −20→20 |
Tmin = 0.451, Tmax = 0.613 | k = −13→13 |
5989 measured reflections | l = −5→5 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.064 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.030P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.00 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1569 reflections | Δρmax = 0.35 e Å−3 |
151 parameters | Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 |
4 restraints | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), with 647 Friedel pairs |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: −0.015 (19) |
[Zn(C8H5NO4)(H2O)] | V = 915.59 (12) Å3 |
Mr = 278.52 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, Pna21 | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 16.9663 (13) Å | µ = 2.70 mm−1 |
b = 10.8788 (8) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 4.9606 (4) Å | 0.31 × 0.26 × 0.19 mm |
Agilent Xcalibur diffractometer with Eos Gemini detector | 1569 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011) | 1444 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.451, Tmax = 0.613 | Rint = 0.041 |
5989 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.064 | Δρmax = 0.35 e Å−3 |
S = 1.00 | Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 |
1569 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), with 647 Friedel pairs |
151 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: −0.015 (19) |
4 restraints |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Zn1 | 0.52286 (2) | 0.73045 (3) | 0.98693 (15) | 0.01778 (13) | |
O1 | 0.62537 (15) | 0.6711 (3) | 0.8570 (6) | 0.0314 (7) | |
O2 | 0.63979 (18) | 0.5394 (3) | 1.1931 (7) | 0.0496 (10) | |
O3 | 0.99355 (19) | 0.7618 (3) | 0.3783 (7) | 0.0281 (7) | |
O4 | 0.93744 (16) | 0.7035 (2) | 0.7561 (5) | 0.0212 (6) | |
O5 | 0.93402 (13) | 0.4107 (2) | 0.5035 (8) | 0.0275 (6) | |
O6 | 0.47204 (18) | 0.5548 (3) | 0.9763 (11) | 0.0466 (8) | |
H6A | 0.4321 (17) | 0.549 (5) | 0.883 (8) | 0.070* | |
H6B | 0.471 (3) | 0.514 (5) | 1.117 (7) | 0.070* | |
N1 | 0.83676 (16) | 0.5516 (2) | 0.5328 (7) | 0.0164 (8) | |
C1 | 0.66003 (19) | 0.5847 (3) | 0.9750 (12) | 0.0246 (8) | |
C2 | 0.7332 (2) | 0.5349 (3) | 0.8482 (9) | 0.0214 (9) | |
C3 | 0.7683 (2) | 0.4267 (3) | 0.9438 (9) | 0.0218 (10) | |
H3A | 0.7455 | 0.3860 | 1.0891 | 0.026* | |
C4 | 0.8339 (2) | 0.3803 (3) | 0.8311 (9) | 0.0256 (10) | |
H4A | 0.8547 | 0.3066 | 0.8945 | 0.031* | |
C5 | 0.8718 (2) | 0.4430 (3) | 0.6158 (8) | 0.0220 (9) | |
C6 | 0.7692 (2) | 0.5944 (3) | 0.6444 (8) | 0.0184 (9) | |
H7A | 0.7472 | 0.6667 | 0.5786 | 0.022* | |
C7 | 0.8822 (2) | 0.6292 (3) | 0.3497 (8) | 0.0193 (8) | |
H8A | 0.8469 | 0.6842 | 0.2541 | 0.023* | |
H8B | 0.9089 | 0.5783 | 0.2178 | 0.023* | |
C8 | 0.94277 (19) | 0.7043 (3) | 0.5069 (12) | 0.0156 (7) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Zn1 | 0.0154 (2) | 0.0195 (2) | 0.0184 (2) | 0.00249 (15) | 0.0006 (3) | −0.0017 (4) |
O1 | 0.0222 (15) | 0.0302 (17) | 0.0417 (18) | 0.0104 (13) | 0.0062 (15) | 0.0057 (14) |
O2 | 0.037 (2) | 0.073 (3) | 0.039 (2) | 0.0101 (18) | 0.0175 (17) | 0.017 (2) |
O3 | 0.0305 (17) | 0.0330 (17) | 0.0208 (16) | −0.0115 (13) | 0.0055 (13) | −0.0014 (14) |
O4 | 0.0235 (15) | 0.0242 (15) | 0.0160 (16) | −0.0046 (12) | −0.0020 (12) | −0.0015 (12) |
O5 | 0.0202 (13) | 0.0206 (12) | 0.0418 (17) | 0.0057 (10) | 0.0101 (19) | 0.001 (2) |
O6 | 0.052 (2) | 0.0319 (16) | 0.056 (2) | −0.0157 (14) | −0.030 (2) | 0.012 (3) |
N1 | 0.0171 (15) | 0.0145 (14) | 0.018 (2) | 0.0003 (11) | 0.0031 (16) | −0.0009 (14) |
C1 | 0.0177 (19) | 0.0268 (19) | 0.029 (2) | −0.0001 (14) | 0.005 (3) | −0.003 (3) |
C2 | 0.0153 (19) | 0.023 (2) | 0.026 (2) | 0.0011 (16) | 0.0048 (17) | −0.0050 (19) |
C3 | 0.023 (2) | 0.0185 (18) | 0.024 (3) | −0.0036 (15) | 0.0050 (19) | 0.0066 (17) |
C4 | 0.024 (2) | 0.016 (2) | 0.036 (2) | 0.0006 (17) | 0.010 (2) | 0.0059 (19) |
C5 | 0.025 (2) | 0.0136 (18) | 0.027 (2) | −0.0031 (17) | −0.0031 (18) | −0.0025 (17) |
C6 | 0.016 (2) | 0.0166 (18) | 0.022 (2) | −0.0009 (16) | −0.0022 (18) | −0.0010 (17) |
C7 | 0.020 (2) | 0.018 (2) | 0.020 (2) | −0.0009 (16) | 0.0028 (18) | 0.0044 (17) |
C8 | 0.0154 (16) | 0.0155 (16) | 0.016 (2) | 0.0032 (13) | 0.000 (3) | 0.001 (3) |
Zn1—O1 | 1.964 (3) | N1—C6 | 1.355 (5) |
Zn1—O4i | 1.982 (3) | N1—C5 | 1.385 (4) |
Zn1—O3ii | 2.006 (3) | N1—C7 | 1.460 (5) |
Zn1—O5iii | 2.095 (2) | C1—C2 | 1.494 (5) |
Zn1—O6 | 2.097 (3) | C2—C6 | 1.347 (5) |
O1—C1 | 1.253 (5) | C2—C3 | 1.401 (5) |
O2—C1 | 1.238 (6) | C3—C4 | 1.345 (5) |
O3—C8 | 1.241 (5) | C3—H3A | 0.9300 |
O3—Zn1iv | 2.006 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.421 (5) |
O4—C8 | 1.239 (6) | C4—H4A | 0.9300 |
O4—Zn1v | 1.982 (3) | C6—H7A | 0.9300 |
O5—C5 | 1.244 (5) | C7—C8 | 1.527 (5) |
O5—Zn1vi | 2.095 (2) | C7—H8A | 0.9700 |
O6—H6A | 0.823 (10) | C7—H8B | 0.9700 |
O6—H6B | 0.826 (10) | ||
O1—Zn1—O4i | 125.25 (12) | C6—C2—C1 | 121.2 (4) |
O1—Zn1—O3ii | 123.43 (13) | C3—C2—C1 | 121.0 (4) |
O4i—Zn1—O3ii | 111.27 (12) | C4—C3—C2 | 121.8 (4) |
O1—Zn1—O5iii | 90.66 (11) | C4—C3—H3A | 119.1 |
O4i—Zn1—O5iii | 86.48 (11) | C2—C3—H3A | 119.1 |
O3ii—Zn1—O5iii | 90.52 (14) | C3—C4—C5 | 120.4 (4) |
O1—Zn1—O6 | 93.22 (14) | C3—C4—H4A | 119.8 |
O4i—Zn1—O6 | 90.88 (13) | C5—C4—H4A | 119.8 |
O3ii—Zn1—O6 | 87.75 (17) | O5—C5—N1 | 118.1 (4) |
O5iii—Zn1—O6 | 176.09 (13) | O5—C5—C4 | 125.8 (4) |
C1—O1—Zn1 | 120.6 (3) | N1—C5—C4 | 116.0 (3) |
C8—O3—Zn1iv | 133.7 (3) | C2—C6—N1 | 121.6 (3) |
C8—O4—Zn1v | 121.4 (2) | C2—C6—H7A | 119.2 |
C5—O5—Zn1vi | 125.3 (2) | N1—C6—H7A | 119.2 |
Zn1—O6—H6A | 115 (4) | N1—C7—C8 | 110.3 (3) |
Zn1—O6—H6B | 119 (4) | N1—C7—H8A | 109.6 |
H6A—O6—H6B | 114.1 (19) | C8—C7—H8A | 109.6 |
C6—N1—C5 | 122.3 (3) | N1—C7—H8B | 109.6 |
C6—N1—C7 | 120.1 (3) | C8—C7—H8B | 109.6 |
C5—N1—C7 | 116.9 (3) | H8A—C7—H8B | 108.1 |
O2—C1—O1 | 125.2 (4) | O4—C8—O3 | 124.5 (4) |
O2—C1—C2 | 117.0 (4) | O4—C8—C7 | 117.2 (3) |
O1—C1—C2 | 117.7 (4) | O3—C8—C7 | 118.3 (5) |
C6—C2—C3 | 117.7 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z+1; (iii) −x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z−1; (v) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z; (vi) −x+3/2, y−1/2, z−1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O6—H6B···O6vii | 0.83 (1) | 2.17 (2) | 2.911 (4) | 150 (4) |
O6—H6A···O2viii | 0.82 (1) | 1.82 (3) | 2.574 (5) | 152 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (vii) −x+1, −y+1, z+1/2; (viii) −x+1, −y+1, z−1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Zn(C8H5NO4)(H2O)] |
Mr | 278.52 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Pna21 |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 16.9663 (13), 10.8788 (8), 4.9606 (4) |
V (Å3) | 915.59 (12) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 2.70 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.31 × 0.26 × 0.19 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Agilent Xcalibur diffractometer with Eos Gemini detector |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.451, 0.613 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 5989, 1569, 1444 |
Rint | 0.041 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.599 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.029, 0.064, 1.00 |
No. of reflections | 1569 |
No. of parameters | 151 |
No. of restraints | 4 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.35, −0.29 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), with 647 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | −0.015 (19) |
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996).
Zn1—O1 | 1.964 (3) | Zn1—O5iii | 2.095 (2) |
Zn1—O4i | 1.982 (3) | Zn1—O6 | 2.097 (3) |
Zn1—O3ii | 2.006 (3) | ||
O1—Zn1—O4i | 125.25 (12) | O4i—Zn1—O6 | 90.88 (13) |
O1—Zn1—O3ii | 123.43 (13) | O3ii—Zn1—O6 | 87.75 (17) |
O4i—Zn1—O3ii | 111.27 (12) | O5iii—Zn1—O6 | 176.09 (13) |
O1—Zn1—O5iii | 90.66 (11) | C1—O1—Zn1 | 120.6 (3) |
O4i—Zn1—O5iii | 86.48 (11) | C8—O3—Zn1iv | 133.7 (3) |
O3ii—Zn1—O5iii | 90.52 (14) | C8—O4—Zn1v | 121.4 (2) |
O1—Zn1—O6 | 93.22 (14) | C5—O5—Zn1vi | 125.3 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z+1; (iii) −x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z−1; (v) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z; (vi) −x+3/2, y−1/2, z−1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O6—H6B···O6vii | 0.826 (10) | 2.17 (2) | 2.911 (4) | 150 (4) |
O6—H6A···O2viii | 0.823 (10) | 1.82 (3) | 2.574 (5) | 152 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (vii) −x+1, −y+1, z+1/2; (viii) −x+1, −y+1, z−1/2. |