Download citation
Download citation
link to html
A novel three-dimensional ZnII complex, poly[aqua­(μ4-5-car­boxyl­ato-1-carboxyl­ato­methyl-2-oxido­pyridinium)zinc(II)], [Zn(C8H5NO4)(H2O)]n, has been prepared by hydro­thermal assembly of Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O and 5-carb­oxy-1-(carb­oxy­methyl)pyridin-1-ium-2-olate (H2ccop). The ccop2− anions bridge the ZnII cations in a head-to-tail fashion via monodentate aromatic carboxylate and phenolate O atoms to form an extended zigzag chain which runs parallel to the [011] direction. One O atom of the aliphatic carboxylate group of the ccop2− ligand coordinates to the ZnII atom of a neighbouring chain thereby producing undulating layers which lie parallel to the (01\overline 1) plane. A similar parallel undulating planar structure can be obtained if a path involving the other O atom of the aliphatic carboxylate group is considered. Thus, the aliphatic carboxylate group acts in a bridging bidentate mode to give extended –Zn–O–C–O–Zn– sequences running parallel to [001] which link the layers into an overall three-dimensional framework. The three-dimensional framework can be simplified as a 4-connected sra topology with a Schläfli symbol of 42.63.8 if all the ZnII centres and ccop2− anions are regarded as tetra­hedral 4-connected nodes. The three-dimensional luminescence spectrum was measured at room temperature with excitation and emission wavelengths of 344–354 and 360–630 nm, respectively, at inter­vals of 0.15 and 2 nm, respectively.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229614016829/fm3020sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229614016829/fm3020Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 1015250

Introduction top

Coordination polymers (CPs) based on multi­carboxyl­ate ligands and metal centres have received much attention in coordination chemistry due to their various topologies and potential applications, such as guest exchange, gas storage and separation, catalysis, drug delivery, luminescence etc. (He et al., 2014; Gandara et al., 2014; Furukawa et al., 2013; Li, Li, O'Keeffe & Yaghi, 2014; Cui et al., 2012; Betard & Fischer, 2012). Of these multi­carboxyl­ate based CPs, compounds having ligands with carboxyl­ate groups attached to aromatic rings are found to be widely utilized and dominate the literature (Furukawa et al., 2013; Cook et al., 2013; Li, Li, Zhou et al., 2014). These ligands tend to be quite rigid, as the carboxyl­ate groups are usually coplanar with the aromatic rings. In contrast, work on the construction of CPs based on flexible multi­carboxyl­ate ligands, where the carboxyl­ate is attached to an aliphatic C atom, is still scarce, especially when the multi­carboxyl­ate ligand involves a mixture of rigid (aromatic) and flexible (aliphatic) carboxyl­ate groups. The rational design of organic building blocks plays a key role in adjusting the coordination framework, and the nature of the coordinating donors may lead to the formation of unique networks with desired properties and functions (Li et al., 2010). 5-Carb­oxy-1-(carb­oxy­methyl)­pyridin-1-ium-2-olate (H2ccop) possesses one rigid carboxyl­ate group, one flexible carboxyl­ate group and one phenolate O atom, so it can act as an excellent multidentate ligand with a range of versatile binding and coordination modes. Though it is a good multidentate ligand, H2ccop has not been well exploited in building CPs and only a few metal complexes of H2ccop have been reported, most of them being zero-, one- or two-dimensional structures (Zhan et al., 2010; Yuan et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2009; Lin & He, 2007). On the basis of these considerations, we chose to react Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O with H2ccop and produced the title compound, [Zn(ccop)(H2O)]n, (I).

Experimental top

Synthesis and crystallization top

A mixture of zinc acetate dihydrate (0.148 g, 0.5 mmol), H2ccop (0.10 g, 0.5 mmol), NaOH (0.08 g, 0.2 mmol) and H2O (12 ml) was placed in a 23 ml Teflon reactor, which was heated to 403 K for 3 d and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 10 K h-1. The colourless crystals of (I) obtained were washed with methanol and dried in air (yield 0.12 g, 89%). IR (KBr, ν, cm-1): 3460 (s), 1662 (s), 1438 (m), 1396 (s), 1326 (w), 1267 (w), 1211 (w), 1141 (m), 997 (w), 937 (w), 858 (w), 792 (w), 663 (w), 607 (w), 522 (w).

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. C-bound H atoms were placed at calculated positions and treated as riding, with C—H = 0.93 and 0.97 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). Water H atoms were tentatively located in difference Fourier maps and were refined with distance restraints of O—H = 0.82 Å and H···H = 1.39 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O). The hightest residual electron-density peak is located 0.92 Å from atom O6 and the deepest hole is located 0.75 Å from atom Zn1.

Results and discussion top

The asymmetric unit of (I) contains one unique ZnII cation, one coordinated water molecule and one ccop2- ligand (Fig. 1). The ZnII centre is five-coordinated by four carboxyl­ate O atoms from four different ccop2- ligands and one water molecule, adopting a distorted trigonal–biyramidal geometry. The Zn—O bond lengths and O—Zn—O bond angles are in the ranges 1.964 (3)–2.097 (3) Å, and 86.48 (11)–176.09 (13) and 111.27 (12)–125.25 (12)° [Why two angle ranges?], respectively (Table 2), which are within the ranges of observed values for other five-coordinated ZnII complexes with oxygen-donating ligands (Ma et al., 2013; Kumagai et al., 2003; Dong et al., 2012). In the polymeric structure of (I), the ccop2- ligands adopt the same µ4-bridging mode to link four ZnII cations. The ccop2- ligand bridges these metal centres in a head-to-tail fashion via the monodentate aromatic carboxyl­ate O1 amd phenolate O5 atoms, to form a one-dimensional zigzag chain along the bc plane (Fig. 2a). The aliphatic carboxyl­ate group of the ccop2- ligand adopts a bidentate-bridging mode, linking chains to form a two-dimensional layer network parallel to the c axis (Fig. 2b), which is further extended to give rise to a three-dimensional framework via additional Zn—O—Zn linkages (Fig. 2c). The coordinated water molecules provide additional hydrogen bonds to stabilize the crystal structure (Table 3).

Better insight into this framework can be achieved by topology analysis. In this structure, all the ZnII centres and the ccop2- ligands can be regarded as tetra­hedral 4-connected nodes. The three-dimensional framework of (I) can then be simplified as a 4-connected sra topology with a Schläfli symbol of 42.63.8 (Blatov 2012; Alexandrov et al., 2011; Rosi et al., 2005) (Fig. 3).

Besides (I), there is only one three-dimensional CP based on ccop and a transition metal (Zhan et al., 2010), viz. [Cd(ccop)(H2)]n, (II). In (II), the aromatic and aliphatic carboxyl­ate groups within the ccop2- ligand adopt bidentate–chelate and chelate–bridging modes, respectively, differing from those described in (I). Similar to (II), (I) can also be regarded as a further product for the phenolate O atom [This phrase is not at all clear - please revise as necessary], leading to the final three-dimensional architecture. Moreover, the coordination modes of the ccop2- ligands in (I) and (II) are unique, differing from those in other known ccop2--based complexes (Lin & He, 2007; Jiang et al., 2009; Yuan et al., 2011; Zhan et al., 2010). In contrast with (I), the three-dimensional framework structure of (II) includes left- and right-handed helical chains.

As part of a continuing programme dedicated to luminescent d10 systems, the three-dimensional fluorescence of (I) was investigated at room temperature with excitation and emission wavelengths of 344–354 and 360–630 nm, respectively, with inter­vals of 0.15 and 2 nm, respectively. Compound (I) exhibits blue photoluminescence with an emission maximum at 450 nm upon excitation in the range 344–354 nm. Compared with the emission peak of free H2ccop at 632 nm (Jiang et al., 2009), the emission maximum of (I) is clearly blue-shifted, due to the n–π* electronic transition of the ligand (Yang et al., 2008; Roy et al., 2009). The emission of (I) probably originates from a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) (Qiu et al., 2010) excited state, because the ccop2- ligand has a π-conjugated system in the pyridine ring and uses oxygen donors to coordinate to the ZnII cations, which enhances the `rigidity' of the ligand and thus reduces the loss of energy through a radiationless pathway (Fu et al., 2002).

In summary, we have successfully prepared a new three-dimensional zinc(II)-based coordination polymer with sra topology, which is constructed from the ccop2- ligand under hydro­thermal conditions.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Alexandrov et al. (2011); Betard & Fischer (2012); Blatov (2012); Cook et al. (2013); Cui et al. (2012); Dong et al. (2012); Fu et al. (2002); Furukawa et al. (2013); Gandara et al. (2014); He et al. (2014); Jiang et al. (2009); Kumagai et al. (2003); Li et al. (2010); Li, Li, O'Keeffe & Yaghi (2014); Li, Li, Zhou, Li & O'Keeffe (2014); Lin & He (2007); Ma et al. (2013); Qiu et al. (2010); Rosi et al. (2005); Roy et al. (2009); Yang et al. (2008); Yuan et al. (2011); Zhan et al. (2010).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of the asymmetric unit of (I), showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: (i) x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, z + 1; (ii) x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, z; (iii) -x + 3/2, y + 1/2, z + 1/2.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. (a) The infinite zigzag-shaped chain of (I) along the bc plane, (b) a view of the two-dimensional layer structure of (I) parallel to the c axis and (c) a view of the three-dimensional framework of (I) parallel to the c axis.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. View of the sra-type 4-connected architecture of (I). Colour key: Zn2+ cations are shown as turquoise balls and ccop2- ligands as blue balls.
Poly[aqua(µ4-5-carboxylato-1-carboxylatomethyl-2-oxidopyridinium)zinc(II)] top
Crystal data top
[Zn(C8H5NO4)(H2O)]F(000) = 560
Mr = 278.52Dx = 2.020 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pna21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2c -2nCell parameters from 5300 reflections
a = 16.9663 (13) Åθ = 1.3–28.0°
b = 10.8788 (8) ŵ = 2.70 mm1
c = 4.9606 (4) ÅT = 293 K
V = 915.59 (12) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.31 × 0.26 × 0.19 mm
Data collection top
Agilent Xcalibur
diffractometer with Eos Gemini detector
1569 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1444 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.041
ω scansθmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
h = 2020
Tmin = 0.451, Tmax = 0.613k = 1313
5989 measured reflectionsl = 55
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.064 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.030P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1569 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.35 e Å3
151 parametersΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
4 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 647 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.015 (19)
Crystal data top
[Zn(C8H5NO4)(H2O)]V = 915.59 (12) Å3
Mr = 278.52Z = 4
Orthorhombic, Pna21Mo Kα radiation
a = 16.9663 (13) ŵ = 2.70 mm1
b = 10.8788 (8) ÅT = 293 K
c = 4.9606 (4) Å0.31 × 0.26 × 0.19 mm
Data collection top
Agilent Xcalibur
diffractometer with Eos Gemini detector
1569 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
1444 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.451, Tmax = 0.613Rint = 0.041
5989 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.064Δρmax = 0.35 e Å3
S = 1.00Δρmin = 0.29 e Å3
1569 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 647 Friedel pairs
151 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.015 (19)
4 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn10.52286 (2)0.73045 (3)0.98693 (15)0.01778 (13)
O10.62537 (15)0.6711 (3)0.8570 (6)0.0314 (7)
O20.63979 (18)0.5394 (3)1.1931 (7)0.0496 (10)
O30.99355 (19)0.7618 (3)0.3783 (7)0.0281 (7)
O40.93744 (16)0.7035 (2)0.7561 (5)0.0212 (6)
O50.93402 (13)0.4107 (2)0.5035 (8)0.0275 (6)
O60.47204 (18)0.5548 (3)0.9763 (11)0.0466 (8)
H6A0.4321 (17)0.549 (5)0.883 (8)0.070*
H6B0.471 (3)0.514 (5)1.117 (7)0.070*
N10.83676 (16)0.5516 (2)0.5328 (7)0.0164 (8)
C10.66003 (19)0.5847 (3)0.9750 (12)0.0246 (8)
C20.7332 (2)0.5349 (3)0.8482 (9)0.0214 (9)
C30.7683 (2)0.4267 (3)0.9438 (9)0.0218 (10)
H3A0.74550.38601.08910.026*
C40.8339 (2)0.3803 (3)0.8311 (9)0.0256 (10)
H4A0.85470.30660.89450.031*
C50.8718 (2)0.4430 (3)0.6158 (8)0.0220 (9)
C60.7692 (2)0.5944 (3)0.6444 (8)0.0184 (9)
H7A0.74720.66670.57860.022*
C70.8822 (2)0.6292 (3)0.3497 (8)0.0193 (8)
H8A0.84690.68420.25410.023*
H8B0.90890.57830.21780.023*
C80.94277 (19)0.7043 (3)0.5069 (12)0.0156 (7)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.0154 (2)0.0195 (2)0.0184 (2)0.00249 (15)0.0006 (3)0.0017 (4)
O10.0222 (15)0.0302 (17)0.0417 (18)0.0104 (13)0.0062 (15)0.0057 (14)
O20.037 (2)0.073 (3)0.039 (2)0.0101 (18)0.0175 (17)0.017 (2)
O30.0305 (17)0.0330 (17)0.0208 (16)0.0115 (13)0.0055 (13)0.0014 (14)
O40.0235 (15)0.0242 (15)0.0160 (16)0.0046 (12)0.0020 (12)0.0015 (12)
O50.0202 (13)0.0206 (12)0.0418 (17)0.0057 (10)0.0101 (19)0.001 (2)
O60.052 (2)0.0319 (16)0.056 (2)0.0157 (14)0.030 (2)0.012 (3)
N10.0171 (15)0.0145 (14)0.018 (2)0.0003 (11)0.0031 (16)0.0009 (14)
C10.0177 (19)0.0268 (19)0.029 (2)0.0001 (14)0.005 (3)0.003 (3)
C20.0153 (19)0.023 (2)0.026 (2)0.0011 (16)0.0048 (17)0.0050 (19)
C30.023 (2)0.0185 (18)0.024 (3)0.0036 (15)0.0050 (19)0.0066 (17)
C40.024 (2)0.016 (2)0.036 (2)0.0006 (17)0.010 (2)0.0059 (19)
C50.025 (2)0.0136 (18)0.027 (2)0.0031 (17)0.0031 (18)0.0025 (17)
C60.016 (2)0.0166 (18)0.022 (2)0.0009 (16)0.0022 (18)0.0010 (17)
C70.020 (2)0.018 (2)0.020 (2)0.0009 (16)0.0028 (18)0.0044 (17)
C80.0154 (16)0.0155 (16)0.016 (2)0.0032 (13)0.000 (3)0.001 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Zn1—O11.964 (3)N1—C61.355 (5)
Zn1—O4i1.982 (3)N1—C51.385 (4)
Zn1—O3ii2.006 (3)N1—C71.460 (5)
Zn1—O5iii2.095 (2)C1—C21.494 (5)
Zn1—O62.097 (3)C2—C61.347 (5)
O1—C11.253 (5)C2—C31.401 (5)
O2—C11.238 (6)C3—C41.345 (5)
O3—C81.241 (5)C3—H3A0.9300
O3—Zn1iv2.006 (3)C4—C51.421 (5)
O4—C81.239 (6)C4—H4A0.9300
O4—Zn1v1.982 (3)C6—H7A0.9300
O5—C51.244 (5)C7—C81.527 (5)
O5—Zn1vi2.095 (2)C7—H8A0.9700
O6—H6A0.823 (10)C7—H8B0.9700
O6—H6B0.826 (10)
O1—Zn1—O4i125.25 (12)C6—C2—C1121.2 (4)
O1—Zn1—O3ii123.43 (13)C3—C2—C1121.0 (4)
O4i—Zn1—O3ii111.27 (12)C4—C3—C2121.8 (4)
O1—Zn1—O5iii90.66 (11)C4—C3—H3A119.1
O4i—Zn1—O5iii86.48 (11)C2—C3—H3A119.1
O3ii—Zn1—O5iii90.52 (14)C3—C4—C5120.4 (4)
O1—Zn1—O693.22 (14)C3—C4—H4A119.8
O4i—Zn1—O690.88 (13)C5—C4—H4A119.8
O3ii—Zn1—O687.75 (17)O5—C5—N1118.1 (4)
O5iii—Zn1—O6176.09 (13)O5—C5—C4125.8 (4)
C1—O1—Zn1120.6 (3)N1—C5—C4116.0 (3)
C8—O3—Zn1iv133.7 (3)C2—C6—N1121.6 (3)
C8—O4—Zn1v121.4 (2)C2—C6—H7A119.2
C5—O5—Zn1vi125.3 (2)N1—C6—H7A119.2
Zn1—O6—H6A115 (4)N1—C7—C8110.3 (3)
Zn1—O6—H6B119 (4)N1—C7—H8A109.6
H6A—O6—H6B114.1 (19)C8—C7—H8A109.6
C6—N1—C5122.3 (3)N1—C7—H8B109.6
C6—N1—C7120.1 (3)C8—C7—H8B109.6
C5—N1—C7116.9 (3)H8A—C7—H8B108.1
O2—C1—O1125.2 (4)O4—C8—O3124.5 (4)
O2—C1—C2117.0 (4)O4—C8—C7117.2 (3)
O1—C1—C2117.7 (4)O3—C8—C7118.3 (5)
C6—C2—C3117.7 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+3/2, z; (ii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (iii) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y+3/2, z1; (v) x+1/2, y+3/2, z; (vi) x+3/2, y1/2, z1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O6—H6B···O6vii0.83 (1)2.17 (2)2.911 (4)150 (4)
O6—H6A···O2viii0.82 (1)1.82 (3)2.574 (5)152 (5)
Symmetry codes: (vii) x+1, y+1, z+1/2; (viii) x+1, y+1, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Zn(C8H5NO4)(H2O)]
Mr278.52
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pna21
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)16.9663 (13), 10.8788 (8), 4.9606 (4)
V3)915.59 (12)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.70
Crystal size (mm)0.31 × 0.26 × 0.19
Data collection
DiffractometerAgilent Xcalibur
diffractometer with Eos Gemini detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2011)
Tmin, Tmax0.451, 0.613
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5989, 1569, 1444
Rint0.041
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.599
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.064, 1.00
No. of reflections1569
No. of parameters151
No. of restraints4
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.35, 0.29
Absolute structureFlack (1983), with 647 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.015 (19)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2011), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Zn1—O11.964 (3)Zn1—O5iii2.095 (2)
Zn1—O4i1.982 (3)Zn1—O62.097 (3)
Zn1—O3ii2.006 (3)
O1—Zn1—O4i125.25 (12)O4i—Zn1—O690.88 (13)
O1—Zn1—O3ii123.43 (13)O3ii—Zn1—O687.75 (17)
O4i—Zn1—O3ii111.27 (12)O5iii—Zn1—O6176.09 (13)
O1—Zn1—O5iii90.66 (11)C1—O1—Zn1120.6 (3)
O4i—Zn1—O5iii86.48 (11)C8—O3—Zn1iv133.7 (3)
O3ii—Zn1—O5iii90.52 (14)C8—O4—Zn1v121.4 (2)
O1—Zn1—O693.22 (14)C5—O5—Zn1vi125.3 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+3/2, z; (ii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1; (iii) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y+3/2, z1; (v) x+1/2, y+3/2, z; (vi) x+3/2, y1/2, z1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O6—H6B···O6vii0.826 (10)2.17 (2)2.911 (4)150 (4)
O6—H6A···O2viii0.823 (10)1.82 (3)2.574 (5)152 (5)
Symmetry codes: (vii) x+1, y+1, z+1/2; (viii) x+1, y+1, z1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds