Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 66| Part 2| February 2010| Pages o483-o484
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810002102

(E)-1-(2,4-Di­nitro­phen­yl)-2-pentyl­idenehydrazine

Patrícia D. Neunfeldt,a Auri R. Duval,a Wilson Cunico,a Solange M. S. V. Wardell,b‡ Edward R. T. Tiekinkc* and James L. Wardelld

aDepartamento de Química Orgânica, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Campus Universitário, s/n°, Caixa Postal 354, 96010-900 Pelotas, RS, Brazil, bCHEMSOL, 1 Harcourt Road, Aberdeen AB15 5NY, Scotland, cDepartment of Chemistry, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and dCentro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico em Saúde (CDTS), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Casa Amarela, Campus de Manguinhos, Av. Brasil 4365, 21040-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
*Correspondence e-mail: edward.tiekink@gmail.com

(Received 7 January 2010; accepted 17 January 2010; online 30 January 2010)

The title compound, C11H14N4O4, is essentially planar with an r.m.s. deviation for the 19 non-H atoms of 0.152 Å. The conformation about the C=N bond is E, and the mol­ecule has a U-shape as the butyl group folds over towards the aromatic system. An intra­molecular C—H⋯N inter­action occurs. The crystal packing is dominated by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding and C—H⋯O contacts, leading to twisted zigzag supra­molecular chains along the c direction. The crystal packing brings two nitro O atoms into an unusually close proximity of 2.686 (4) Å. While the nature of this inter­action is not obvious, there are several precendents for such short nitro–nitro O⋯O contacts of less than 2.70 Å in the crystallographic literature.

Related literature

For background to the biological uses of hydrazones, see: Rollas & Küçükgüzel (2007[Rollas, S. & Küçükgüzel, G. S. (2007). Molecules, 12, 1910-1939.]). For background to the synthesis, see: Furniss et al. (1999[Furniss, B. S., Hannaford, A. J., Smith, P. W. G. & Tatchell, A. R. (1999). Vogel's Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed. London: Longmans.]); Neuenfeldt et al. (2009[Neuenfeldt, P. D., Drawanz, B. B., Cunico, W., Tiekink, E. R. T., Wardell, J. L. & Wardell, S. M. S. V. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o3190-o3191.]). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002[Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380-388.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C11H14N4O4

  • Mr = 266.26

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 31.162 (3) Å

  • b = 4.4930 (4) Å

  • c = 18.7329 (14) Å

  • β = 106.159 (4)°

  • V = 2519.2 (4) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.11 mm−1

  • T = 120 K

  • 0.32 × 0.03 × 0.02 mm
Data collection

  • -Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007[Sheldrick, G. M. (2007). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.628, Tmax = 1.000

  • 8172 measured reflections

  • 2174 independent reflections

  • 1451 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.115
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.078

  • wR(F2) = 0.183

  • S = 1.10

  • 2174 reflections

  • 179 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H1n⋯O4 0.87 (4) 1.99 (4) 2.616 (5) 128 (3)
N1—H1n⋯O4i 0.87 (4) 2.41 (4) 3.166 (5) 146 (4)
C3—H3⋯O1ii 0.95 2.39 3.335 (5) 176
C6—H6⋯N2 0.95 2.40 2.735 (5) 100
Symmetry codes: (i) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (ii) [-x, y, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: COLLECT (Hooft, 1998[Hooft, R. W. W. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) and COLLECT; data reduction: DENZO and COLLECT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006[Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.]); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). publCIF. In preparation.]).

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810002102/fj2271sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810002102/fj2271Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine is a frequently used reagent for the characterization of aldehydes and ketones (Furniss et al., 1999). The 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone products are generally formed readily in good yield and purity. The ready formation of 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazones of carbonyl compounds can be a disadvantage as found during the attempted formation of a thiazolidinone from 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, pentanal and mercaptoacetic acid, using a similar one-pot synthesis to that used successfully with amines, carbonyl compounds and mercaptoacetic acid (Neuenfeldt et al., 2009). Instead of the targeted thiazolidinone derivative, the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone of pentanal was isolated in very high yield: as shown below, this compound was efficiently produced from a reaction mixture reaction just involving 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine and pentanal. Hydrazones containing the –NHN=CH moiety constitute an important class of antimicrobial, anticonvulsant, analgesic, antiinflammatory, antiplatelet, antitubercular and antitumoral agents. (Rollas & Küçükgüzel, 2007).

To a first approximation, the molecule of (I), Fig. 1, is flat with the maximum deviations of torsion angles from the ideal 0 or 180 ° being 9.0 (7) ° for N2–C7–C8–C9, and -170.7 (4) ° for C1–N1–N2–C7; the r.m.s. deviation of the non-hydrogen atoms = 0.152 Å. The n-butyl side-chain folds over to be oriented towards the benzene ring. The conformation about the C7═N3 bond [1.270 (5) Å] is E. In the crystal packing, supramolecular chains are formed along the c direction. These are sustained by four-membered {···H···O}2 synthons as the amine-H1n atom is bifurcated forming intra- and intermolecular N–H···Onitro hydrogen bonds, Fig. 2 and Table 1. Additional stabilization to the chain is afforded by ten-membered {···ONC2H}2 synthons, Fig. 2 and Table 1. Whereas the smaller of the synthons is disposed about a centre of inversion, the larger has crystallographic 2-fold symmetry and has a distinct folded conformation. The latter induces considerable kinks in the chain as emphasized in Fig. 3 which illustrates the formation of 2-D arrays via N–O···π interactions [N–O3···Cg(C1–C6)i = 3.163 (3) Å with an angle at O3 = 89.9 (2) ° where Cg is the ring centroid of the C1–C6 ring and symmetry operation i = x, -1 + y, z]. Globally, the layers formed in the bc plane stack along the a direction with interdigitation of the saturated residues. It is noted that the packing of molecules brings into close proximity two nitro-O atoms, i.e. O4···O4ii = 2.686 (4) Å for ii: -x, 1 - y, 1 - z. While the nature of this interaction is not obvious, there are approximately 50 precendents for such Onitro···Onitro contacts < 2.70 Å in the crystallographic literature (Allen, 2002).

Related literature top

For background to the biological uses of hydrazones, see: Rollas & Küçükgüzel (2007). For background to the synthesis, see: Furniss et al. (1999); Neuenfeldt et al. (2009). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002).

Experimental top

A mixture of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine 1 (3 mmol) and pentanal 2 (3 mmol) in toluene (35 ml) was heated at 403 K with a Dean-Stark trap for 3 h. The reaction was cooled and the crude product was recrystallized from ethanol, yield 69%. m.p. 371–372 K. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 11.00 (br, 1H, NH), 9.11 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 8.29 (dd, 1H, J = 9.6 and 2.4 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 5.2 Hz), 2.43 (m, 2H), 1.60 (m, 2H), 1.43 (sext, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 0.97 (t, 3H, J = 7.6 Hz) p.p.m.

Refinement top

The C-bound H atoms were geometrically placed (C–H = 0.95–0.99 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.2–1.5Ueq(C). The methyl H atoms were rotated to fit the electron density. The N–H atom was located in a difference map and refined with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N). The reported structure, while unambiguous, is not optimal owing to the poor quality of the crystals available for analysis.

Structure description top

2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine is a frequently used reagent for the characterization of aldehydes and ketones (Furniss et al., 1999). The 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone products are generally formed readily in good yield and purity. The ready formation of 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazones of carbonyl compounds can be a disadvantage as found during the attempted formation of a thiazolidinone from 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, pentanal and mercaptoacetic acid, using a similar one-pot synthesis to that used successfully with amines, carbonyl compounds and mercaptoacetic acid (Neuenfeldt et al., 2009). Instead of the targeted thiazolidinone derivative, the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone of pentanal was isolated in very high yield: as shown below, this compound was efficiently produced from a reaction mixture reaction just involving 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine and pentanal. Hydrazones containing the –NHN=CH moiety constitute an important class of antimicrobial, anticonvulsant, analgesic, antiinflammatory, antiplatelet, antitubercular and antitumoral agents. (Rollas & Küçükgüzel, 2007).

To a first approximation, the molecule of (I), Fig. 1, is flat with the maximum deviations of torsion angles from the ideal 0 or 180 ° being 9.0 (7) ° for N2–C7–C8–C9, and -170.7 (4) ° for C1–N1–N2–C7; the r.m.s. deviation of the non-hydrogen atoms = 0.152 Å. The n-butyl side-chain folds over to be oriented towards the benzene ring. The conformation about the C7═N3 bond [1.270 (5) Å] is E. In the crystal packing, supramolecular chains are formed along the c direction. These are sustained by four-membered {···H···O}2 synthons as the amine-H1n atom is bifurcated forming intra- and intermolecular N–H···Onitro hydrogen bonds, Fig. 2 and Table 1. Additional stabilization to the chain is afforded by ten-membered {···ONC2H}2 synthons, Fig. 2 and Table 1. Whereas the smaller of the synthons is disposed about a centre of inversion, the larger has crystallographic 2-fold symmetry and has a distinct folded conformation. The latter induces considerable kinks in the chain as emphasized in Fig. 3 which illustrates the formation of 2-D arrays via N–O···π interactions [N–O3···Cg(C1–C6)i = 3.163 (3) Å with an angle at O3 = 89.9 (2) ° where Cg is the ring centroid of the C1–C6 ring and symmetry operation i = x, -1 + y, z]. Globally, the layers formed in the bc plane stack along the a direction with interdigitation of the saturated residues. It is noted that the packing of molecules brings into close proximity two nitro-O atoms, i.e. O4···O4ii = 2.686 (4) Å for ii: -x, 1 - y, 1 - z. While the nature of this interaction is not obvious, there are approximately 50 precendents for such Onitro···Onitro contacts < 2.70 Å in the crystallographic literature (Allen, 2002).

For background to the biological uses of hydrazones, see: Rollas & Küçükgüzel (2007). For background to the synthesis, see: Furniss et al. (1999); Neuenfeldt et al. (2009). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002).

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Hooft, 1998); cell refinement: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I) showing the atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A view of the supramolecular chain in (I) mediated by N–H···O hydrogen bonding and C–H···O contacts, shown as blue and orange dashed lines, respectively. Colour code: O, red; N, blue; C, grey; and H, green.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. A view of the supramolecular 2-D array in (I) with N–O···π interactions shown as purple dashed lines. This figure highlights the zigzag topology of the chains shown in Fig. 2. Colour code: O, red; N, blue; C, grey; and H, green.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. A view of the stacking of layers (illustrated in Fig. 3) in (I) with the interdigitation of the n-butyl residues. Colour code: O, red; N, blue; C, grey; and H, green.
(E)-1-(2,4-Dinitrophenyl)-2-pentylidenehydrazine top
Crystal data top
C11H14N4O4F(000) = 1120
Mr = 266.26Dx = 1.404 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 14843 reflections
a = 31.162 (3) Åθ = 2.9–27.5°
b = 4.4930 (4) ŵ = 0.11 mm−1
c = 18.7329 (14) ÅT = 120 K
β = 106.159 (4)°Needle, yellow
V = 2519.2 (4) Å30.32 × 0.03 × 0.02 mm
Z = 8
Data collection top
-Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer		2174 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enraf Nonius FR591 rotating anode1451 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
10 cm confocal mirrors monochromatorRint = 0.115
Detector resolution: 9.091 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.0°
φ and ω scansh = −36→36
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007)		k = −5→5
Tmin = 0.628, Tmax = 1.000l = −22→22
8172 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.078Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.183H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0406P)2 + 14.6755P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2174 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
179 parametersΔρmax = 0.28 e Å−3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.27 e Å−3
Crystal data top
C11H14N4O4V = 2519.2 (4) Å3
Mr = 266.26Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 31.162 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm−1
b = 4.4930 (4) ÅT = 120 K
c = 18.7329 (14) Å0.32 × 0.03 × 0.02 mm
β = 106.159 (4)°
Data collection top
-Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer		2174 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007)		1451 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.628, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.115
8172 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0780 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.183H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0406P)2 + 14.6755P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2174 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.28 e Å−3
179 parametersΔρmin = −0.27 e Å−3
Special details top

Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.04985 (11)−0.5722 (7)0.23571 (16)0.0294 (8)
O20.11770 (10)−0.4264 (8)0.24360 (16)0.0360 (9)
O3−0.03340 (10)−0.1033 (7)0.37999 (16)0.0263 (8)
O4−0.00644 (9)0.2652 (7)0.45386 (15)0.0240 (7)
N10.07910 (11)0.3841 (8)0.49031 (18)0.0194 (8)
H1N0.0551 (14)0.401 (10)0.505 (2)0.023*
N20.11897 (11)0.5276 (8)0.52633 (18)0.0224 (9)
N30.08254 (13)−0.4163 (9)0.26201 (19)0.0267 (9)
N4−0.00244 (11)0.0661 (8)0.41033 (19)0.0213 (8)
C10.07833 (13)0.2003 (10)0.4333 (2)0.0197 (10)
C20.04022 (13)0.0353 (10)0.3940 (2)0.0185 (9)
C30.04158 (14)−0.1701 (9)0.3391 (2)0.0191 (9)
H30.0161−0.28680.31590.023*
C40.08074 (14)−0.2003 (10)0.3192 (2)0.0222 (10)
C50.11852 (14)−0.0324 (10)0.3534 (2)0.0242 (10)
H50.1450−0.05280.33810.029*
C60.11736 (14)0.1613 (10)0.4090 (2)0.0230 (10)
H60.14340.27330.43210.028*
C70.11826 (14)0.6629 (11)0.5855 (2)0.0248 (10)
H70.0922 (15)0.660 (11)0.604 (2)0.030*
C80.15800 (14)0.8254 (11)0.6307 (2)0.0281 (11)
H8A0.16930.72070.67880.034*
H8B0.14851.02660.64150.034*
C90.19629 (14)0.8581 (12)0.5957 (2)0.0292 (11)
H9A0.20410.65930.58020.035*
H9B0.18630.98300.55050.035*
C100.23763 (15)0.9966 (13)0.6476 (3)0.0382 (13)
H10A0.22931.18960.66550.046*
H10B0.24850.86540.69140.046*
C110.27528 (16)1.0479 (14)0.6126 (3)0.0481 (15)
H11A0.28260.86020.59210.072*
H11B0.30161.12160.65030.072*
H11C0.26601.19510.57270.072*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0374 (18)0.0244 (18)0.0233 (16)0.0013 (17)0.0035 (14)−0.0058 (15)
O20.0333 (18)0.050 (2)0.0308 (17)0.0130 (18)0.0186 (15)−0.0036 (17)
O30.0273 (16)0.0281 (19)0.0246 (15)−0.0065 (15)0.0090 (13)−0.0059 (15)
O40.0244 (16)0.0223 (18)0.0265 (15)0.0017 (13)0.0093 (13)−0.0074 (15)
N10.0163 (18)0.019 (2)0.0236 (18)0.0000 (16)0.0061 (15)−0.0035 (17)
N20.0181 (17)0.026 (2)0.0231 (19)−0.0029 (16)0.0052 (15)0.0018 (17)
N30.037 (2)0.023 (2)0.0218 (19)0.010 (2)0.0108 (18)0.0006 (17)
N40.0228 (19)0.020 (2)0.0219 (18)0.0005 (17)0.0078 (16)0.0023 (18)
C10.022 (2)0.017 (2)0.019 (2)0.0026 (19)0.0042 (18)0.0026 (19)
C20.019 (2)0.017 (2)0.019 (2)−0.0002 (18)0.0047 (18)0.0006 (19)
C30.024 (2)0.010 (2)0.021 (2)0.0042 (18)0.0025 (18)0.0015 (18)
C40.029 (2)0.018 (2)0.021 (2)0.005 (2)0.0091 (19)0.0028 (19)
C50.022 (2)0.025 (3)0.028 (2)0.005 (2)0.0105 (19)0.009 (2)
C60.019 (2)0.022 (3)0.028 (2)−0.0008 (19)0.0082 (19)0.006 (2)
C70.023 (2)0.027 (3)0.024 (2)−0.004 (2)0.0054 (19)−0.003 (2)
C80.030 (2)0.028 (3)0.027 (2)−0.008 (2)0.009 (2)−0.005 (2)
C90.027 (2)0.033 (3)0.027 (2)−0.006 (2)0.006 (2)0.001 (2)
C100.032 (3)0.043 (4)0.033 (3)−0.010 (2)−0.002 (2)0.004 (3)
C110.032 (3)0.056 (4)0.054 (3)−0.008 (3)0.009 (3)0.010 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—N31.221 (5)C5—H50.9500
O2—N31.238 (4)C6—H60.9500
O3—N41.236 (4)C7—C81.483 (6)
O4—N41.240 (4)C7—H70.96 (4)
N1—C11.345 (5)C8—C91.521 (6)
N1—N21.396 (5)C8—H8A0.9900
N1—H1N0.87 (4)C8—H8B0.9900
N2—C71.270 (5)C9—C101.515 (6)
N3—C41.458 (5)C9—H9A0.9900
N4—C21.451 (5)C9—H9B0.9900
C1—C21.420 (6)C10—C111.513 (6)
C1—C61.423 (5)C10—H10A0.9900
C2—C31.391 (6)C10—H10B0.9900
C3—C41.378 (5)C11—H11A0.9800
C3—H30.9500C11—H11B0.9800
C4—C51.395 (6)C11—H11C0.9800
C5—C61.365 (6)
C1—N1—N2118.9 (3)N2—C7—C8121.3 (4)
C1—N1—H1N119 (3)N2—C7—H7122 (3)
N2—N1—H1N122 (3)C8—C7—H7117 (3)
C7—N2—N1114.4 (3)C7—C8—C9115.5 (4)
O1—N3—O2124.8 (4)C7—C8—H8A108.4
O1—N3—C4118.7 (3)C9—C8—H8A108.4
O2—N3—C4116.6 (4)C7—C8—H8B108.4
O3—N4—O4122.6 (3)C9—C8—H8B108.4
O3—N4—C2119.2 (3)H8A—C8—H8B107.5
O4—N4—C2118.2 (3)C10—C9—C8113.0 (4)
N1—C1—C2124.0 (4)C10—C9—H9A109.0
N1—C1—C6120.1 (4)C8—C9—H9A109.0
C2—C1—C6115.8 (4)C10—C9—H9B109.0
C3—C2—C1122.5 (4)C8—C9—H9B109.0
C3—C2—N4115.9 (4)H9A—C9—H9B107.8
C1—C2—N4121.6 (4)C11—C10—C9114.0 (4)
C4—C3—C2118.5 (4)C11—C10—H10A108.7
C4—C3—H3120.8C9—C10—H10A108.7
C2—C3—H3120.8C11—C10—H10B108.7
C3—C4—C5121.3 (4)C9—C10—H10B108.7
C3—C4—N3118.8 (4)H10A—C10—H10B107.6
C5—C4—N3119.8 (4)C10—C11—H11A109.5
C6—C5—C4119.8 (4)C10—C11—H11B109.5
C6—C5—H5120.1H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C4—C5—H5120.1C10—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C6—C1121.9 (4)H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C6—H6119.0H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C1—C6—H6119.0
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1n···O40.87 (4)1.99 (4)2.616 (5)128 (3)
N1—H1n···O4i0.87 (4)2.41 (4)3.166 (5)146 (4)
C3—H3···O1ii0.952.393.335 (5)176
C6—H6···N20.952.402.735 (5)100
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x, y, −z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H14N4O4
Mr266.26
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)31.162 (3), 4.4930 (4), 18.7329 (14)
β (°) 106.159 (4)
V (Å3)2519.2 (4)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm−1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.32 × 0.03 × 0.02
Data collection
Diffractometer-Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.628, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		8172, 2174, 1451
Rint0.115
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.078, 0.183, 1.10
No. of reflections2174
No. of parameters179
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0406P)2 + 14.6755P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.28, −0.27

Computer programs: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1n···O40.87 (4)1.99 (4)2.616 (5)128 (3)
N1—H1n···O4i0.87 (4)2.41 (4)3.166 (5)146 (4)
C3—H3···O1ii0.952.393.335 (5)176
C6—H6···N20.952.402.735 (5)100
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x, y, −z+1/2.
 

Footnotes

‡Additional correspondence author, e-mail: j.wardell@abdn.ac.uk.

Acknowledgements

The use of the EPSRC X-ray crystallographic service at the University of Southampton, England and the valuable assistance of the staff there is gratefully acknowledged. JLW acknowledges support from CAPES (Brazil).

References

First citationAllen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationBrandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
 First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationFurniss, B. S., Hannaford, A. J., Smith, P. W. G. & Tatchell, A. R. (1999). Vogel's Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed. London: Longmans.  Google Scholar
 First citationHooft, R. W. W. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
 First citationNeuenfeldt, P. D., Drawanz, B. B., Cunico, W., Tiekink, E. R. T., Wardell, J. L. & Wardell, S. M. S. V. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o3190–o3191.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
 First citationRollas, S. & Küçükgüzel, G. S. (2007). Molecules, 12, 1910–1939.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2007). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). publCIF. In preparation.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 66| Part 2| February 2010| Pages o483-o484
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810002102
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS