Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, [Cu(N3)2(C15H26N2)], the chiral alkaloid (−)-l-sparteine (Sp) acts as a bidentate ligand, with two azide ligands occupying the remaining coordination sites, forming a distorted CuN4 tetrahedron. The dihedral angle between the NSp—Cu—NSp and Nazide—Cu—Nazide planes is 55.3 (2)°. Principal dimensions include Cu—NSp = 2.011 (6) and 2.025 (5) Å, and Cu—Nazide = 1.939 (6) and 1.934 (7) Å. The mid-point of the NSp...NSp line does not lie exactly in the Nazide—Cu—Nazide plane, but is tilted towards one of the NSp atoms by 0.026 Å.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103000684/fg1677sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103000684/fg1677Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 205299

Comment top

There exist three diastereomers of sparteine: (-)-sparteine (6R,7S,8S,14S) (C15H26N2), (-)-α-isosparteine (6R,7S,8S,14R) (α-C15H26N2) and (-)-β-isosparteine (6S,7S,8S,14S) (β-C15H26N2). These sparteine ligands have attracted research attention and have been intensively utilized in medicinal chemistry (Cady et al., 1977) and asymmetric synthesis of the chiral compounds (Beak et al., 1996; Kretchmer, 1972; Mason & Peacock, 1973). Many crystal structures of copper(II) complexes with the neutral alkaloid sparteine diastereomers have been reported (Childers et al., 1975; Choi et al., 1995; Kim et al., 2001, 2002; Lee et al., 1998, 2000; Lopez et al., 1998). The sparteine copper(II) complexes that have been reported, with one exception (Lee et al., 1998), are four-coordinate and tetrahedrally distorted (Childers et al., 1975; Choi et al., 1995; Kim et al., 2001, 2002; Lee et al., 2000; Lopez et al., 1998) from the ligand-field favorable square-planar geometry (Figgis, 1966). The pseudo-tetrahedral geometry around the Cu(II) center of these complexes is due to the steric requirements imposed by the bulky sparteine ligand. However, the role of anionic ligand, L, in these complexes of the type [Cu(L)2(C15H26N2)] is also important in the ultimate molecular structure. We determined the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), in order to evaluate the extent of distortion imposed by the (-)-sparteine ligand compared with that imposed by the (-)-α-isosparteine. Actually, the extent of distortion towards a tetrahedron in (I) was higher than that in the (-)-α-isosparteine complex (Kim et al., 2002).

In complex (I), the (-)-sparteine acts as a bidentate, with two azide ligands occupying the remaining coordination sites, forming a distorted CuN4 tetrahedron (Fig. 1). The coordinated (-)-sparteine ligand in complex (I) consists of one terminal ring folded down over the metal (endo) and another terminal ring folded back away from the metal (exo), identical to the conformation of the free ligand (Boschmann et al., 1974; Wrobleski & Long, 1977). Two azide anions are bound terminally to the copper(II). The dihedral angle between the N1—Cu—N9 and N18—Cu—N21 planes in (I) is 55.3 (2)°, whereas that in Cu(N3)2(α-C15H26N2) is 50.2 (2)° (Kim et al., 2002). This smaller dihedral angle can be visualized as a balance between the crystal field stabilization effect and the steric effect of (-)-sparteine.

One of the parameters associated with the distortion of the tetrahedron is the 'tilt' of the bidentate sparteine ligand with respect to the N18—Cu—N21 plane. In complex (I), the mid-point of the N1—N9 line does not exactly lie on the N18—Cu—N21 plane but is tilted towards atom N1 only by 0.026 Å (1.8% of half of the N1—N9 distance). Similarly, the mid-point of the N18—N21 line is tilted towards atom N18 by 0.045 Å (3.0% of half of the N18—N21 distance). However, in Cu(N3)2(α-C15H26N2), the mid-point of the N1—N9 line is tilted towards atom N1 by 0.103 Å (7.2% of half of the N1—N9 distance) and that of the N18—N21 line is greatly tilted towards atom N18 by 0.264 Å (17.7% of half of the N18—N21 distance). In complex (I), the N1—Cu—N18 and N9—Cu—N21 angles differ by 2.1°, and similarly the N1—Cu—N21 and N9—Cu—N18 angles differ by only 2.2°. These results clearly indicate that the distortion towards a tetrahedron for the complex (I) is quite symmetrically twisted.

The Cu(II)-azide distances (Table 1) found in complex (I) agree with the Cu(II)—N distances found in copper(II) complexes containing a terminally bound azide ligand (Goher et al., 2001; Grove et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2002). The coordinating azide anions are nearly linear, but the (Cu)—N—N bonds are longer than the (Cu—N)—N—N bonds. This result suggests that the covalency in Cu(II)-azide bonding is appreciable and that the main contribution to the ground-state geometry of the coordinated azide is provided by the two canonical structures —N N+ N- —N-—N+N. This result is quite similar to that found in the [Cu(N3)2(α-C15H26N2)] complex (Kim et al., 2002).

Experimental top

The precursor copper(II) complex, [Cu(NO3)2(C15H26N2)], was prepared by mixing an ethanol–triethylorthoformate (5:1 v/v) solution of copper(II) nitrate hemipentahydrate with a stoichiometric amount of (-)-sparteine at room temperature for 2 h. The resulting blue precipitate was filtered, washed with cold absolute ethanol and then dried in a vacuum. The title complex, (I), was prepared from the substitution reaction of [Cu(NO3)2(C15H26N2)] with a stoichiometric amount of NaN3 in an ethanol-triethylorthoformate (5:1 v/v) solution. The dark-brown precipitate was filtered, washed with cold absolute ethanol and then dried in a vacuum. The single crystals were obtained by recrystallization at about 278 K from a dichloromethane–triethylorthoformate (5:1 v/v) solution. Analysis: calculated for CuC15H26N8 C 47.17, H 6.86, N 29.34%; found C 47.83, H 6.91, N, 29.59%.

Refinement top

Positional parameters of the H atoms on the sparteine ligand were calculated geometrically and constrained to ride on their attached atoms. Their isotropic displacement parameters were fixed at 1.2 times the equivalent isotropic displacement parameters of their parent atoms. The absolute configuration of (I) was known from the known configuration of the starting material and was confirmed by the value [-0.06 (3)] of the Flack parameter.

Structure description top

There exist three diastereomers of sparteine: (-)-sparteine (6R,7S,8S,14S) (C15H26N2), (-)-α-isosparteine (6R,7S,8S,14R) (α-C15H26N2) and (-)-β-isosparteine (6S,7S,8S,14S) (β-C15H26N2). These sparteine ligands have attracted research attention and have been intensively utilized in medicinal chemistry (Cady et al., 1977) and asymmetric synthesis of the chiral compounds (Beak et al., 1996; Kretchmer, 1972; Mason & Peacock, 1973). Many crystal structures of copper(II) complexes with the neutral alkaloid sparteine diastereomers have been reported (Childers et al., 1975; Choi et al., 1995; Kim et al., 2001, 2002; Lee et al., 1998, 2000; Lopez et al., 1998). The sparteine copper(II) complexes that have been reported, with one exception (Lee et al., 1998), are four-coordinate and tetrahedrally distorted (Childers et al., 1975; Choi et al., 1995; Kim et al., 2001, 2002; Lee et al., 2000; Lopez et al., 1998) from the ligand-field favorable square-planar geometry (Figgis, 1966). The pseudo-tetrahedral geometry around the Cu(II) center of these complexes is due to the steric requirements imposed by the bulky sparteine ligand. However, the role of anionic ligand, L, in these complexes of the type [Cu(L)2(C15H26N2)] is also important in the ultimate molecular structure. We determined the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), in order to evaluate the extent of distortion imposed by the (-)-sparteine ligand compared with that imposed by the (-)-α-isosparteine. Actually, the extent of distortion towards a tetrahedron in (I) was higher than that in the (-)-α-isosparteine complex (Kim et al., 2002).

In complex (I), the (-)-sparteine acts as a bidentate, with two azide ligands occupying the remaining coordination sites, forming a distorted CuN4 tetrahedron (Fig. 1). The coordinated (-)-sparteine ligand in complex (I) consists of one terminal ring folded down over the metal (endo) and another terminal ring folded back away from the metal (exo), identical to the conformation of the free ligand (Boschmann et al., 1974; Wrobleski & Long, 1977). Two azide anions are bound terminally to the copper(II). The dihedral angle between the N1—Cu—N9 and N18—Cu—N21 planes in (I) is 55.3 (2)°, whereas that in Cu(N3)2(α-C15H26N2) is 50.2 (2)° (Kim et al., 2002). This smaller dihedral angle can be visualized as a balance between the crystal field stabilization effect and the steric effect of (-)-sparteine.

One of the parameters associated with the distortion of the tetrahedron is the 'tilt' of the bidentate sparteine ligand with respect to the N18—Cu—N21 plane. In complex (I), the mid-point of the N1—N9 line does not exactly lie on the N18—Cu—N21 plane but is tilted towards atom N1 only by 0.026 Å (1.8% of half of the N1—N9 distance). Similarly, the mid-point of the N18—N21 line is tilted towards atom N18 by 0.045 Å (3.0% of half of the N18—N21 distance). However, in Cu(N3)2(α-C15H26N2), the mid-point of the N1—N9 line is tilted towards atom N1 by 0.103 Å (7.2% of half of the N1—N9 distance) and that of the N18—N21 line is greatly tilted towards atom N18 by 0.264 Å (17.7% of half of the N18—N21 distance). In complex (I), the N1—Cu—N18 and N9—Cu—N21 angles differ by 2.1°, and similarly the N1—Cu—N21 and N9—Cu—N18 angles differ by only 2.2°. These results clearly indicate that the distortion towards a tetrahedron for the complex (I) is quite symmetrically twisted.

The Cu(II)-azide distances (Table 1) found in complex (I) agree with the Cu(II)—N distances found in copper(II) complexes containing a terminally bound azide ligand (Goher et al., 2001; Grove et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2002). The coordinating azide anions are nearly linear, but the (Cu)—N—N bonds are longer than the (Cu—N)—N—N bonds. This result suggests that the covalency in Cu(II)-azide bonding is appreciable and that the main contribution to the ground-state geometry of the coordinated azide is provided by the two canonical structures —N N+ N- —N-—N+N. This result is quite similar to that found in the [Cu(N3)2(α-C15H26N2)] complex (Kim et al., 2002).

Computing details top

Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: SHELXTL (bruker, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) diagram of (I) showing the atom-numbering scheme and 30% probability ellipsoids. H atoms have been omitted for clarity.
(diazido-N)[(-)-sparteine-N,N']copper(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cu(N3)2(C15H26N2)]F(000) = 804
Mr = 381.98Dx = 1.455 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 40 reflections
a = 8.2870 (9) Åθ = 5.0–12.6°
b = 14.061 (3) ŵ = 1.27 mm1
c = 14.9685 (15) ÅT = 296 K
V = 1744.2 (5) Å3Irregular, dark brown
Z = 40.44 × 0.42 × 0.32 mm
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
2061 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.040
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.0°
2θ/ω scansh = 110
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
k = 118
Tmin = 0.882, Tmax = 0.938l = 1919
5383 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
4004 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0588P)2 + 0.8943P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.171(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.90 e Å3
4004 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.52 e Å3
218 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0055 (12)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1712 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.06 (3)
Crystal data top
[Cu(N3)2(C15H26N2)]V = 1744.2 (5) Å3
Mr = 381.98Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 8.2870 (9) ŵ = 1.27 mm1
b = 14.061 (3) ÅT = 296 K
c = 14.9685 (15) Å0.44 × 0.42 × 0.32 mm
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
2061 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.040
Tmin = 0.882, Tmax = 0.9383 standard reflections every 97 reflections
5383 measured reflections intensity decay: 1%
4004 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.171Δρmax = 0.90 e Å3
S = 1.06Δρmin = 0.52 e Å3
4004 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1712 Friedel pairs
218 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.06 (3)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All su values (except the su in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell su values are taken into account individually in the estimation of su values in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between su values in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell su values is used for estimating su values involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2; conventional R factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu0.40214 (10)0.39560 (6)0.68303 (5)0.0493 (3)
N10.1687 (7)0.3582 (4)0.6933 (4)0.0582 (16)
C20.1499 (10)0.2837 (7)0.7643 (6)0.077 (3)
H2A0.03690.26670.76980.093*
H2B0.18540.30920.82120.093*
C30.2479 (12)0.1953 (7)0.7419 (6)0.084 (3)
H3A0.36180.21120.74060.101*
H3B0.23160.14760.78780.101*
C40.1977 (15)0.1553 (7)0.6518 (6)0.101 (3)
H4A0.08760.13210.65500.121*
H4B0.26720.10240.63590.121*
C50.2103 (13)0.2330 (6)0.5812 (6)0.087 (3)
H5A0.32220.25180.57470.105*
H5B0.17380.20810.52420.105*
C60.1104 (12)0.3189 (6)0.6057 (5)0.069 (2)
H60.00070.29700.61470.082*
C70.1059 (9)0.3948 (6)0.5338 (5)0.068 (2)
H70.05830.36610.48030.082*
C80.0746 (11)0.5180 (6)0.6470 (6)0.074 (2)
H80.00570.57020.66750.089*
N90.3465 (6)0.4869 (4)0.5830 (3)0.0461 (14)
C100.5026 (9)0.5312 (5)0.5553 (5)0.059 (2)
H10A0.56520.48410.52320.071*
H10B0.56250.54800.60860.071*
C110.4881 (11)0.6180 (6)0.4978 (6)0.075 (2)
H11A0.43940.60100.44110.090*
H11B0.59460.64370.48600.090*
C120.3853 (12)0.6927 (6)0.5438 (5)0.074 (2)
H12A0.44020.71530.59700.088*
H12B0.36960.74640.50410.088*
C130.2251 (12)0.6517 (6)0.5690 (6)0.075 (2)
H13A0.16490.63770.51510.090*
H13B0.16480.69880.60270.090*
C140.2391 (10)0.5613 (5)0.6247 (5)0.057 (2)
H140.28900.57940.68150.068*
C150.0760 (11)0.4447 (7)0.7207 (6)0.077 (3)
H15A0.12460.47190.77380.093*
H15B0.03400.42680.73510.093*
C160.2685 (10)0.4365 (5)0.5071 (5)0.0565 (19)
H16A0.33880.38570.48670.068*
H16B0.25350.48050.45790.068*
C170.0058 (11)0.4764 (8)0.5634 (7)0.092 (3)
H17A0.01440.52420.51690.110*
H17B0.11280.45270.57710.110*
N180.4472 (8)0.4002 (6)0.8101 (4)0.0748 (18)
N190.5818 (9)0.4085 (5)0.8335 (4)0.0695 (18)
N200.7068 (12)0.4112 (7)0.8642 (6)0.117 (3)
N210.6048 (9)0.3481 (5)0.6371 (4)0.0694 (18)
N220.6664 (7)0.2785 (5)0.6687 (4)0.0621 (17)
N230.7313 (10)0.2115 (6)0.6922 (6)0.095 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu0.0417 (4)0.0607 (5)0.0454 (4)0.0009 (5)0.0009 (4)0.0030 (4)
N10.043 (3)0.072 (4)0.060 (4)0.001 (3)0.008 (3)0.013 (3)
C20.057 (5)0.096 (7)0.078 (5)0.011 (5)0.010 (4)0.027 (5)
C30.073 (6)0.076 (6)0.103 (7)0.013 (6)0.007 (6)0.035 (6)
C40.129 (10)0.066 (6)0.107 (7)0.027 (7)0.010 (7)0.000 (5)
C50.101 (7)0.070 (6)0.091 (6)0.022 (6)0.005 (6)0.002 (5)
C60.059 (5)0.077 (5)0.069 (5)0.021 (5)0.007 (5)0.002 (4)
C70.057 (4)0.082 (5)0.066 (4)0.016 (6)0.020 (4)0.006 (5)
C80.061 (6)0.075 (5)0.086 (6)0.022 (5)0.028 (5)0.007 (5)
N90.044 (3)0.048 (3)0.046 (3)0.003 (3)0.001 (3)0.003 (3)
C100.049 (4)0.054 (4)0.073 (5)0.003 (4)0.003 (4)0.008 (4)
C110.078 (6)0.060 (5)0.086 (6)0.004 (5)0.019 (5)0.019 (5)
C120.088 (6)0.056 (4)0.076 (5)0.001 (5)0.009 (6)0.012 (4)
C130.093 (7)0.056 (5)0.076 (5)0.020 (5)0.019 (5)0.012 (4)
C140.068 (6)0.050 (4)0.052 (4)0.015 (4)0.006 (4)0.005 (4)
C150.060 (5)0.096 (6)0.075 (5)0.014 (5)0.033 (5)0.011 (5)
C160.059 (5)0.063 (5)0.048 (4)0.002 (4)0.006 (4)0.007 (4)
C170.044 (5)0.112 (8)0.119 (8)0.006 (6)0.008 (5)0.032 (7)
N180.056 (4)0.113 (5)0.055 (3)0.001 (4)0.006 (3)0.007 (5)
N190.074 (5)0.067 (4)0.068 (4)0.019 (4)0.021 (4)0.007 (3)
N200.118 (7)0.107 (7)0.128 (7)0.041 (7)0.062 (6)0.034 (6)
N210.063 (4)0.075 (4)0.070 (4)0.021 (4)0.019 (4)0.017 (4)
N220.048 (3)0.067 (4)0.071 (4)0.002 (3)0.006 (3)0.016 (4)
N230.092 (6)0.080 (5)0.115 (6)0.017 (5)0.006 (6)0.030 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu—N12.011 (6)C8—H80.9800
Cu—N92.025 (5)N9—C101.495 (9)
Cu—N181.939 (6)N9—C141.508 (8)
Cu—N211.934 (7)N9—C161.488 (8)
N1—C21.500 (9)C10—C111.498 (10)
N1—C61.504 (9)C10—H10A0.9700
N1—C151.495 (10)C10—H10B0.9700
C2—C31.523 (12)C11—C121.518 (11)
C2—H2A0.9700C11—H11A0.9700
C2—H2B0.9700C11—H11B0.9700
C3—C41.519 (12)C12—C131.495 (12)
C3—H3A0.9700C12—H12A0.9700
C3—H3B0.9700C12—H12B0.9700
C4—C51.523 (11)C13—C141.524 (9)
C4—H4A0.9700C13—H13A0.9700
C4—H4B0.9700C13—H13B0.9700
C5—C61.510 (12)C14—H140.9800
C5—H5A0.9700C15—H15A0.9700
C5—H5B0.9700C15—H15B0.9700
C6—C71.516 (11)C16—H16A0.9700
C6—H60.9800C16—H16B0.9700
C7—C161.523 (10)C17—H17A0.9700
C7—C171.539 (12)C17—H17B0.9700
C7—H70.9800N18—N191.175 (8)
C8—C151.509 (11)N19—N201.134 (10)
C8—C141.531 (11)N21—N221.200 (8)
C8—C171.533 (12)N22—N231.140 (9)
N1—Cu—N990.2 (2)C10—N9—C14109.7 (6)
N1—Cu—N1896.8 (3)C16—N9—Cu111.2 (4)
N1—Cu—N21140.6 (3)C10—N9—Cu105.8 (4)
N9—Cu—N18138.4 (3)C14—N9—Cu105.6 (4)
N9—Cu—N2198.9 (2)N9—C10—C11115.5 (7)
N18—Cu—N21101.1 (3)N9—C10—H10A108.4
C15—N1—C2108.7 (6)C11—C10—H10A108.4
C15—N1—C6111.9 (6)N9—C10—H10B108.4
C2—N1—C6109.1 (6)C11—C10—H10B108.4
C15—N1—Cu107.6 (5)H10A—C10—H10B107.5
C2—N1—Cu109.7 (5)C10—C11—C12110.4 (7)
C6—N1—Cu109.8 (5)C10—C11—H11A109.6
N1—C2—C3111.1 (7)C12—C11—H11A109.6
N1—C2—H2A109.4C10—C11—H11B109.6
C3—C2—H2A109.4C12—C11—H11B109.6
N1—C2—H2B109.4H11A—C11—H11B108.1
C3—C2—H2B109.4C13—C12—C11110.2 (7)
H2A—C2—H2B108.0C13—C12—H12A109.6
C4—C3—C2110.6 (9)C11—C12—H12A109.6
C4—C3—H3A109.5C13—C12—H12B109.6
C2—C3—H3A109.5C11—C12—H12B109.6
C4—C3—H3B109.5H12A—C12—H12B108.1
C2—C3—H3B109.5C12—C13—C14113.1 (8)
H3A—C3—H3B108.1C12—C13—H13A109.0
C3—C4—C5109.4 (7)C14—C13—H13A109.0
C3—C4—H4A109.8C12—C13—H13B109.0
C5—C4—H4A109.8C14—C13—H13B109.0
C3—C4—H4B109.8H13A—C13—H13B107.8
C5—C4—H4B109.8N9—C14—C13113.4 (6)
H4A—C4—H4B108.2N9—C14—C8109.8 (6)
C6—C5—C4111.6 (8)C13—C14—C8112.6 (7)
C6—C5—H5A109.3N9—C14—H14106.9
C4—C5—H5A109.3C13—C14—H14106.9
C6—C5—H5B109.3C8—C14—H14106.9
C4—C5—H5B109.3N1—C15—C8111.0 (6)
H5A—C5—H5B108.0N1—C15—H15A109.4
N1—C6—C5109.3 (7)C8—C15—H15A109.4
N1—C6—C7111.6 (6)N1—C15—H15B109.4
C5—C6—C7113.9 (7)C8—C15—H15B109.4
N1—C6—H6107.3H15A—C15—H15B108.0
C5—C6—H6107.3N9—C16—C7111.6 (6)
C7—C6—H6107.3N9—C16—H16A109.3
C6—C7—C16115.8 (7)C7—C16—H16A109.3
C6—C7—C17109.6 (7)N9—C16—H16B109.3
C16—C7—C17108.7 (7)C7—C16—H16B109.3
C6—C7—H7107.5H16A—C16—H16B108.0
C16—C7—H7107.5C8—C17—C7104.9 (7)
C17—C7—H7107.5C8—C17—H17A110.8
C15—C8—C14115.1 (7)C7—C17—H17A110.8
C15—C8—C17109.9 (8)C8—C17—H17B110.8
C14—C8—C17111.1 (7)C7—C17—H17B110.8
C15—C8—H8106.7H17A—C17—H17B108.8
C14—C8—H8106.7Cu—N18—N19118.7 (6)
C17—C8—H8106.7N18—N19—N20172.6 (9)
C16—N9—C10111.2 (6)Cu—N21—N22120.7 (5)
C16—N9—C14113.0 (6)N21—N22—N23174.4 (9)
N21—Cu—N1—C15167.4 (5)C14—N9—C10—C1152.3 (9)
N18—Cu—N1—C1575.8 (5)Cu—N9—C10—C11165.8 (6)
N9—Cu—N1—C1563.1 (5)N9—C10—C11—C1256.0 (11)
N21—Cu—N1—C274.5 (7)C10—C11—C12—C1354.7 (10)
N18—Cu—N1—C242.4 (6)C11—C12—C13—C1454.0 (9)
N9—Cu—N1—C2178.8 (5)C16—N9—C14—C1375.8 (9)
N21—Cu—N1—C645.4 (7)C10—N9—C14—C1348.9 (9)
N18—Cu—N1—C6162.2 (5)Cu—N9—C14—C13162.6 (6)
N9—Cu—N1—C658.9 (5)C16—N9—C14—C851.2 (8)
C15—N1—C2—C3177.5 (7)C10—N9—C14—C8175.9 (6)
C6—N1—C2—C360.2 (9)Cu—N9—C14—C870.5 (6)
Cu—N1—C2—C360.1 (8)C12—C13—C14—N952.3 (10)
N1—C2—C3—C457.7 (9)C12—C13—C14—C8177.8 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C554.5 (11)C15—C8—C14—N967.9 (9)
C3—C4—C5—C656.6 (12)C17—C8—C14—N957.8 (8)
C15—N1—C6—C5179.1 (7)C15—C8—C14—C13164.7 (7)
C2—N1—C6—C560.6 (9)C17—C8—C14—C1369.6 (9)
Cu—N1—C6—C559.7 (7)C2—N1—C15—C8173.4 (7)
C15—N1—C6—C752.3 (9)C6—N1—C15—C852.9 (9)
C2—N1—C6—C7172.6 (7)Cu—N1—C15—C867.8 (8)
Cu—N1—C6—C767.2 (8)C14—C8—C15—N165.8 (10)
C4—C5—C6—N159.8 (10)C17—C8—C15—N160.5 (10)
C4—C5—C6—C7174.6 (8)C10—N9—C16—C7177.5 (6)
N1—C6—C7—C1664.8 (10)C14—N9—C16—C753.7 (8)
C5—C6—C7—C1659.5 (10)Cu—N9—C16—C764.8 (7)
N1—C6—C7—C1758.7 (9)C6—C7—C16—N963.3 (9)
C5—C6—C7—C17177.1 (7)C17—C7—C16—N960.6 (8)
N21—Cu—N9—C1682.8 (5)C15—C8—C17—C764.5 (9)
N18—Cu—N9—C16159.2 (5)C14—C8—C17—C764.1 (9)
N1—Cu—N9—C1658.6 (5)C6—C7—C17—C863.4 (9)
N21—Cu—N9—C1038.1 (5)C16—C7—C17—C864.2 (8)
N18—Cu—N9—C1079.9 (5)N21—Cu—N18—N1925.7 (8)
N1—Cu—N9—C10179.6 (5)N1—Cu—N18—N19170.4 (7)
N21—Cu—N9—C14154.3 (5)N9—Cu—N18—N1991.6 (8)
N18—Cu—N9—C1436.3 (6)N18—Cu—N21—N2250.2 (7)
N1—Cu—N9—C1464.2 (5)N1—Cu—N21—N2265.3 (8)
C16—N9—C10—C1173.4 (8)N9—Cu—N21—N22166.5 (6)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(N3)2(C15H26N2)]
Mr381.98
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c (Å)8.2870 (9), 14.061 (3), 14.9685 (15)
V3)1744.2 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.27
Crystal size (mm)0.44 × 0.42 × 0.32
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker P4
Absorption correctionψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.882, 0.938
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5383, 4004, 2061
Rint0.040
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.059, 0.171, 1.06
No. of reflections4004
No. of parameters218
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.90, 0.52
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 1712 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.06 (3)

Computer programs: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996), XSCANS, SHELXTL (bruker, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu—N12.011 (6)N18—N191.175 (8)
Cu—N92.025 (5)N19—N201.134 (10)
Cu—N181.939 (6)N21—N221.200 (8)
Cu—N211.934 (7)N22—N231.140 (9)
N1—Cu—N990.2 (2)N18—Cu—N21101.1 (3)
N1—Cu—N1896.8 (3)Cu—N18—N19118.7 (6)
N1—Cu—N21140.6 (3)N18—N19—N20172.6 (9)
N9—Cu—N18138.4 (3)Cu—N21—N22120.7 (5)
N9—Cu—N2198.9 (2)N21—N22—N23174.4 (9)
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds