Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The crystal structure of dithallium carbonate, Tl2CO3 (C2/m, Z = 4), was investigated at pressures of up to 7.4 GPa using single-crystal X-ray diffraction in a diamond anvil cell. It is stable to at least 5.82 GPa. All atoms except for one of the O atoms lie on crystallographic mirror planes. At higher pressures, the material undergoes a phase transition that destroys the single crystal.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270110005652/fa3213sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270110005652/fa3213Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

pdf

Portable Document Format (PDF) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270110005652/fa3213sup3.pdf
Supplementary material

Comment top

Pistorius & Clark (1969), Meisalo & Kalliomäki (1976), Adams et al. (1983), Lee et al. (1993) and Grzechnik & Friese (2008) reported previously on the high-pressure behaviour of Tl2CO3. A sequence of phase transitions at 2, 4.2 and 6.7 GPa was discovered by Meisalo & Kalliomäki (1976), in which the phases below 6.7 GPa were supposed to be structurally very similar. Adams et al. (1983) also observed phase transitions near 1.3 and 3.8 GPa using IR and Raman spectroscopies. However, a single-crystal diffraction study demonstrated that thallium carbonate (C2/m, Z = 4) is structurally stable at least to 3.56 GPa (Grzechnik & Friese, 2008). The most likely reason for this discrepancy is that the X-ray and spectroscopic data by Meisalo & Kalliomäki (1976) and Adams et al. (1983), respectively, were poorly resolved and the pressures were non-hydrostatic. In this study, we continue our work on Tl2CO3 using single-crystal X-ray diffraction in a diamond anvil cell to characterize the postulated (Meisalo & Kalliomäki, 1976; Adams et al., 1983) pressure-induced polymorphs above about 4 and 6.7 GPa.

A crystal of dithallium carbonate was slowly compressed to a pressure of 5.82 GPa. Indexing of the diffraction data, analysis of the reconstructed reciprocal space, and structure solution and refinement clearly showed that the material (C2/m, Z = 4) does not transform to a new polymorph at about 4 GPa. However, on further compression to a pressure of 7.4 GPa, no single-crystal reflections were detected. Instead, weak and very smeared incomplete Debye–Scherrer rings were visible in the diffraction diagrams on the image plate. These observations indicate that Tl2CO3 does undergo a pressure-induced phase transition at about 6.7 GPa (Meisalo & Kalliomäki, 1976) that also destroys the single crystal. It is thus the only transformation of those reported in the literature that we observe in our high-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction data under hydrostatic conditions.

As observed at ambient pressure (Marchand et al., 1975) and at 3.56 GPa (Grzechnik & Friese, 2008), all atoms except for one of the O atoms lie on crystallographic mirror planes at 5.82 GPa. Two non-equivalent Tl+ cations are in asymmetric coordination environments attributable to their electron lone pairs (E). The Tl1 cation is coordinated to seven O atoms at distances in the range 2.50 (11)–2.9 (2) Å. The coordination around the Tl2 cation includes five O atoms at distances in the range 2.42 (19)–3.2 (3) Å. The compression mainly affects the part of the structure where the Tl+ lone pairs are placed. A comparison with the structural data at lower pressures shows that it is the longest Tl—O distances that diminish the most, while the short ones are relatively incompressible or even increase slightly. The fact that the spread of the Tl—O distances becomes smaller on compression to 5.82 GPa indicates that the coordination environments around the Tl atoms tend to become more uniform, due to the diminished (but nevertheless still existent) stereoactivity of the electron lone pairs.

When only the Tl—O distances below 3 Å are considered, the crystal structure at ambient conditions can be viewed as a stack of corrugated layers of cations and carbonate groups along the a axis (Fig. 1). The suppression of the E pairs results in the structure losing its layered character at 5.82 GPa. This is also reflected in the fact that the Tl···Tl distances between adjacent layers are considerably shortened with increasing pressure. Thus, the interlayer Tl1···Tl2 and Tl2···Tl2 distances are 3.588 (1) and 3.693 (1) Å, respectively, at ambient pressure, 3.50 (1) and 3.338 (8) Å, respectively, at 3.56 GPa, and 3.42 (2) and 3.26 (2) Å, respectively, at 5.82 GPa, indicating increasing Tl···Tl interactions between the layers on compression. These interactions might be responsible for the axial compressibility along the a axis that (within the estimated standard deviations) changes little between 3.56 and 5.82 GPa.

The other striking aspect of the high-pressure behaviour of Tl2CO3 is the rotation of the carbonate groups to accommodate the electron lone pairs (Fig. 1). The pressure-induced lattice contraction and changes in the orientation of the carbonate group in Tl2CO3 cause a decrease of the shortest C···C distance from 3.46 Å under ambient conditions (Marchand et al., 1975) to 2.4 (3) Å at 5.82 GPa. At the intermediate pressure of 3.56 GPa, this distance is 3.09 (16) Å (Grzechnik & Friese, 2008). Since experimental data for the shortest C—C distances in X2CO3 (X = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs or Tl) at higher pressures are not available, the result of this study can only be compared with the theoretical work by Cancarevic et al. (2006), in which the C···C distances in high-pressure phases of Li2CO3 are expected to be below 2.5 Å.

Experimental top

The crystals were synthesized according to the method described by Marchand et al. (1975). High-pressure data were collected at 5.82 and 7.40 GPa in a Boehler–Almax-type diamond anvil cell (Boehler, 2006) at room temperature using a Stoe IPDS 2T diffractometer with Mo Kα radiation. A 0.250 mm hole was drilled into a stainless steel gasket preindented to a thickness of about 0.08 mm. The intensities were indexed, integrated and corrected for absorption using the Stoe software (Stoe & Cie, 2006). Areas of the images shaded by the diamond anvil cell were masked prior to integration. Corrections for the effect of absorption by the diamond anvil and the crystal were made using the program ABSORB (Angel, 2004). The ruby luminescence method (Mao et al., 1986) was used for pressure calibration and a 1:1 mixture of pentane and isopentane was used as pressure medium. The hydrostatic pressure limit is 7.4 GPa (Piermarini et al., 1973), higher than that of propan-2-ol, which is 4.2 GPa (Angel et al., 2007), used in the previous work on this compound (Grzechnik & Friese, 2008).

Refinement top

Data at 5.82 GPa were refined with the program JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006). All atoms were refined isotropically. Isotropic displacement parameters of the two O atoms were restrained to be equal and the isotropic displacement parameter of C was set to 0.5Uiso(O). Due to the fact that the C-atom position could not be refined reliably, we had to introduce distance and angle restraints for the carbonate group, as in our previous study of Tl2CO3 (Grzechnik & Friese, 2008).

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); data reduction: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Crystal structures of Tl2CO3 at different pressures. Tl—O bond distances below 3.5 Å are shown. Distances longer than and shorter than 3 Å are drawn as thin and thick grey lines, respectively. The C—O distances are drawn as thick black lines.
Dithallium carbonate top
Crystal data top
Tl2CO3F(000) = 768
Mr = 468.8Dx = 8.244 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yCell parameters from 931 reflections
a = 12.02 (2) Åθ = 4.4–28.1°
b = 5.150 (2) ŵ = 85.08 mm1
c = 7.198 (4) ÅT = 300 K
β = 122.08 (10)°Irregular shape, colourless
V = 377.6 (8) Å30.10 × 0.07 × 0.05 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS 2T
diffractometer
81 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focusRint = 0.114
Plane graphite monochromatorθmax = 28.1°, θmin = 4.4°
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1h = 99
rotation method scansk = 66
931 measured reflectionsl = 89
142 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F1 constraint
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.091Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/(σ2(F) + 0.0001F2)
wR(F2) = 0.088(Δ/σ)max = 0.041
S = 2.99Δρmax = 4.31 e Å3
142 reflectionsΔρmin = 4.44 e Å3
15 parametersExtinction correction: B-C type 1 Gaussian isotropic (Becker & Coppens, 1974)
6 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0
Crystal data top
Tl2CO3V = 377.6 (8) Å3
Mr = 468.8Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation
a = 12.02 (2) ŵ = 85.08 mm1
b = 5.150 (2) ÅT = 300 K
c = 7.198 (4) Å0.10 × 0.07 × 0.05 mm
β = 122.08 (10)°
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS 2T
diffractometer
81 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
931 measured reflectionsRint = 0.114
142 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.09115 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.0886 restraints
S = 2.99Δρmax = 4.31 e Å3
142 reflectionsΔρmin = 4.44 e Å3
Special details top

Refinement. All atoms isotropic. C—O distances and O—C—O angles in Carbonate group restricted. Uiso(O1) restricted to be equal to Uiso(O2). Uiso(C) restricted to 0.5*Uiso(O)

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Tl10.065 (2)00.306 (2)0.033 (2)*
Tl20.3650 (18)00.2592 (19)0.028 (2)*
O20.10 (2)0.280 (8)0.002 (19)0.046 (17)*
O10.16 (3)0.50.32 (2)0.046 (17)*
C10.12 (2)0.50.105 (19)0.023 (9)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
???????
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Tl1—Tl2i3.42 (2)Tl2—O2ix2.42 (19)
Tl1—Tl2ii3.42 (2)Tl2—O2x2.42 (19)
Tl1—O22.82 (18)Tl2—O2v3.07 (18)
Tl1—O2iii2.50 (11)Tl2—O1xi3.4 (3)
Tl1—O2iv2.50 (11)Tl2—O1vii3.2 (3)
Tl1—O2v2.82 (18)O2—O2iii2.4 (4)
Tl1—O1vi2.81 (14)O2—O2xii2.26 (6)
Tl1—O12.81 (14)O2—O12.3 (2)
Tl1—O1vii2.9 (2)C1—O21.31 (11)
Tl1—C1vi3.17 (14)C1—O2xii1.31 (11)
Tl1—C13.17 (14)C1—O11.4 (2)
Tl2—Tl2viii3.26 (2)C1—C1iii2.4 (3)
Tl2—O23.07 (18)
O2—Tl1—O2iii52 (7)O1—Tl1—O1vii74 (4)
O2—Tl1—O2iv89 (5)O2—Tl2—O2ix108 (5)
O2—Tl1—O2v61 (3)O2—Tl2—O2x83 (6)
O2—Tl1—O1vi106 (7)O2—Tl2—O2v56 (3)
O2—Tl1—O148 (5)O2—Tl2—O1xi141 (4)
O2—Tl1—O1vii99 (6)O2—Tl2—O1vii88 (6)
O2iii—Tl1—O2iv71 (3)O2ix—Tl2—O2x56 (4)
O2iii—Tl1—O2v89 (5)O2ix—Tl2—O2v83 (6)
O2iii—Tl1—O1vi133 (4)O2ix—Tl2—O1xi59 (5)
O2iii—Tl1—O168 (5)O2ix—Tl2—O1vii152 (2)
O2iii—Tl1—O1vii142 (4)O2x—Tl2—O2v108 (5)
O2iv—Tl1—O2v52 (7)O2x—Tl2—O1xi59 (5)
O2iv—Tl1—O1vi68 (5)O2x—Tl2—O1vii152 (2)
O2iv—Tl1—O1133 (4)O2v—Tl2—O1xi141 (4)
O2iv—Tl1—O1vii142 (4)O2v—Tl2—O1vii88 (6)
O2v—Tl1—O1vi48 (5)O1xi—Tl2—O1vii121 (6)
O2v—Tl1—O1106 (7)O2—C1—O2xii120 (14)
O2v—Tl1—O1vii99 (6)O2—C1—O1120 (7)
O1vi—Tl1—O1133 (9)O2xii—C1—O1120 (7)
O1vi—Tl1—O1vii74 (4)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y1/2, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z; (iii) x, y, z; (iv) x, y, z; (v) x, y, z; (vi) x, y1, z; (vii) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1; (viii) x+1, y, z+1; (ix) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (x) x+1/2, y+1/2, z; (xi) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (xii) x, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaTl2CO3
Mr468.8
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/m
Temperature (K)300
a, b, c (Å)12.02 (2), 5.150 (2), 7.198 (4)
β (°) 122.08 (10)
V3)377.6 (8)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)85.08
Crystal size (mm)0.10 × 0.07 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerStoe IPDS 2T
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections
931, 142, 81
Rint0.114
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.662
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.091, 0.088, 2.99
No. of reflections142
No. of parameters15
No. of restraints6
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)4.31, 4.44

Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006), JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Tl1—Tl2i3.42 (2)Tl2—O2v2.42 (19)
Tl1—O22.82 (18)Tl2—O2vi3.07 (18)
Tl1—O2ii2.50 (11)Tl2—O1vii3.4 (3)
Tl1—O12.81 (14)Tl2—O1iii3.2 (3)
Tl1—O1iii2.9 (2)C1—O21.31 (11)
Tl2—Tl2iv3.26 (2)C1—O11.4 (2)
Tl2—O23.07 (18)C1—C1ii2.4 (3)
O2—C1—O2viii120 (14)O2viii—C1—O1120 (7)
O2—C1—O1120 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y1/2, z; (ii) x, y, z; (iii) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1; (iv) x+1, y, z+1; (v) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (vi) x, y, z; (vii) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (viii) x, y+1, z.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds