Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
4,5-Propyl­ene­di­thio-1,3-di­thiole-2-thione, C6H6S5, (I), crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P21/c. The molecular packing is characterized by pairs of S...S intermolecular contacts between neighbouring mol­ecules, which may account for the rather high thermal stablity of the crystal. 4,5-Propyl­ene­di­thio-1,3-di­thiol-2-one, C6H6OS4, (II), in which an O atom replaces the terminal S atom of (I), crystallizes in the non-centrosymmetric polar space group Cc. The packing pattern of (II) indicates that the macropolarization direction is along [101]. Although the packing patterns are qualitatively significantly different, the molecular structures of (I) and (II) are similar, each exhibiting a chair conformation.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103022662/fa1033sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I, II

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103022662/fa1033Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270103022662/fa1033IIsup3.hkl
Contains datablock 0313

CCDC references: 226140; 226141

Comment top

TTF (tetrathiafulvalene) and BEDT-TTF (bis(ethylenedithio)-tetrathiafulvalene) derivatives and their charge-transfer salts have received a lot of attention because of their high electronic conductivity or superconductivity (Williams et al., 1992). Replacement of the two ethylene units of BEDT-TTF with two propylene units gives another donor, namely BPDT-TTF [bis(propylenedithio)-tetrathiafulvalene] (Porter et al., 1987). In the course of synthesizing new BPDT-TTF-based molecular electronic conductors, we have determined the crystal structures of (I) and (II), which are the precursors of BPDT-TTF.

The molecular geometries of (I) and (II) are illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2, and bond lengths and angles are listed in Tables 1 and 2. In (I), the S5—C1 distance [1.652 (3) Å] is slightly longer than the typical CS double bond. The C2=C3 distance [1.341 (4) Å] corresponds to a double bond. The bonds involving the methylene C atoms, S3—C4 and S4—C6, have lengths of 1.816 (3) and 1.814 (4) Å, respectively, characteristic of S—C single bonds. The remaining six S—C bonds are in the range 1.723 (3)–1.756 (3) Å, which lies between the typical values for single S—C and double S=C bonds. As a result of replacing the terminal S atom of (I) by an O atom, the terminal C=O bond length [1.228 (8) Å] in (II) is drastically shorter than the corresponding C=S bond length in (I). This shortening is accompanied by an apparent increase in the neighboring C1—S1 and C1—S2 bond lengths, which average to 1.745 (6) Å [cf. 1.724 (3) Å for (I)]. This behaviour indicates that conjugation is more prominent in (I) than in (II). The other bond lengths in (II) are similar to their counterparts in (I).

Both (I) and (II) have planar five-membered rings (S1/C1/S2/C2/C3), with the maximum deviations from their least-squares planes being 0.011 (3) Å for atom C1 in (I) and 0.021 (7) Å for atom C1 in (II). In fact, as shown in Fig. 1 and 2, eight atoms (S5, C1, S1, S2, C2, C3, S3 and S4) in (I) are virtually coplanar. Three planes – plane 1 (S5/C1/S1/S2/C2/C3/S3/S4), plane 2 (S3/C4/C6/S4) and plane 3 (C4–C6) – form an overall chair conformation. The dihedral angle between planes 1 and 2 is 65.9 (1)°. Compound (II) also has a chair conformation, with the dihedral angle between plane 1 (O1/C1/S1/S2/C2/C3/S3/S4) and plane 2 (S3/C4/C6/S4) being 61.2 (2)°.

Compound (I) crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P21/c. As shown in Fig.3, there are several intermolecular S···S contacts shorter than 3.70 Å (the sum of the van der Waals radii). The S1···S1B(1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z), S5···S1B(1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z) and S2···S2C(1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) distances are 3.388 (2), 3.607 (2) and 3.637 (2) Å, respectively. Although there is also a short intermolecular S···S contact in (II) [S3···S4(x, −y, −1/2 + z) = 3.685 (2) Å], the S···S interactions in (II) are clearly less important than those in (I). The remarkable S···S intermolecular interactions of (I) endow the crystal with extra thermal stability, and the measured melting point of (I) (432.6 K) is considerably higher than that of (II) (393.5 K). Another important factor contributing to the thermal stability of (I) is the antiparallel packing mode of the molecular dipole moments, which results in strong intermolecular dipole–dipole interactions. The interesting packing feature of (II) is that all molecular dipole moments are basically in the same direction (see Fig. 4); this parallel packing arrangement results in a non-centrosymmetric polar space group, Cc, with the macropolarization direction along [1 0 1]. Most polar molecules crystallize in centrosymmetric structures with an antiparallel packing motif, as is the case with (I). Moreover, the probability of polar molecules crystallizing with a non-centrosymmetric polar structure, such as in the case of (II), is quite small.

Experimental top

Compound (I) was prepared according to the method of Kumasaki et al. (1998). (Bu4N)2[Zn(dmit)2] (dmit is the 2-thioxo-1,3-dithiole-4,5-dithiolate dianion, C3S52−) (57 g) was dissolved in acetonitrile (200 ml) and 1,3-dibromopropane (26 g) was added. The solution was stirred for 2 d at room temperature. The resulting orange precipitate was filtered off, chloroform was added to the residue and the solution was filtered. Activated charcoal was added to the filtrate and the solution was refluxed for 1.5 h. The solution was filtered and methanol was added. Compound (I) was obtained from this solution at room temperature. Compound (II) was obtained by the following procedure. Compound (I) (2.4 g) and Hg(CH3COO)2 (8 g) were added to chloroform–acetic acid (3:1; 120 ml). The solution was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. A white precipitate was obtained and filtered off. The filtered solution was washed with water and with a saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The solution was filtered and methanol was added. Milky white crystals were obtained.

Refinement top

The positions of the H atoms were checked in a difference Fourier map, and then all H atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their attached atoms [C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)].

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: XSCANS (Bruker, 1996); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: XSCANS; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Molecular structure of (II). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% level.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Packing in the structure of (I). The intermolecular S1···S1B(1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z), S5···S1B(1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z), S1···S5B(1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z) and S2···S2C(1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) distances are 3.388 (2), 3.607 (2), 3.607 (2) and 3.637 (2) Å, respectively.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Packing of (II), showing the macropolarization direction along [1 0 1].
(I) top
Crystal data top
C6H6S5Dx = 1.711 Mg m3
Mr = 238.41Melting point: 432.6 K
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.6572 (13) ÅCell parameters from 15 reflections
b = 10.9765 (14) Åθ = 5.7–12.5°
c = 18.1026 (17) ŵ = 1.18 mm1
β = 90.147 (11)°T = 293 K
V = 925.4 (3) Å3Prism, pale yellow
Z = 40.22 × 0.16 × 0.12 mm
F(000) = 488
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
1331 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.026
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.2°
ω scansh = 61
Absorption correction: ψ scan
XSCANS (Bruker, 1996)
k = 141
Tmin = 0.791, Tmax = 0.868l = 2323
3160 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
2110 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.093 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.033P)2 + 0.1689P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2110 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
101 parametersΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0145 (13)
Crystal data top
C6H6S5V = 925.4 (3) Å3
Mr = 238.41Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 4.6572 (13) ŵ = 1.18 mm1
b = 10.9765 (14) ÅT = 293 K
c = 18.1026 (17) Å0.22 × 0.16 × 0.12 mm
β = 90.147 (11)°
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
1331 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
XSCANS (Bruker, 1996)
Rint = 0.026
Tmin = 0.791, Tmax = 0.8683 standard reflections every 97 reflections
3160 measured reflections intensity decay: 1%
2110 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0360 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.093H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
2110 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
101 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S50.8413 (2)0.84196 (10)0.41231 (5)0.0560 (3)
S10.5764 (2)0.88534 (8)0.55954 (4)0.0437 (2)
S20.4518 (2)0.66204 (8)0.48310 (4)0.0427 (2)
S30.2061 (2)0.82882 (8)0.69005 (4)0.0447 (2)
S40.0646 (2)0.56337 (8)0.60079 (5)0.0462 (3)
C10.6330 (7)0.7989 (3)0.48127 (16)0.0392 (8)
C20.3417 (7)0.7858 (3)0.60344 (15)0.0350 (7)
C30.2820 (7)0.6815 (3)0.56797 (15)0.0348 (7)
C40.3671 (8)0.7153 (3)0.75024 (17)0.0452 (8)
H4A0.56660.70570.73620.054*
H4B0.36470.74670.80030.054*
C50.2285 (8)0.5902 (3)0.75068 (17)0.0472 (9)
H5A0.02460.60050.75950.057*
H5B0.30630.54480.79210.057*
C60.2648 (8)0.5134 (3)0.68137 (17)0.0466 (9)
H6A0.20780.43050.69270.056*
H6B0.46710.51180.66880.056*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S50.0586 (6)0.0692 (6)0.0403 (5)0.0012 (6)0.0166 (4)0.0100 (5)
S10.0573 (6)0.0393 (4)0.0345 (4)0.0049 (4)0.0069 (4)0.0026 (3)
S20.0536 (6)0.0428 (5)0.0318 (4)0.0016 (4)0.0085 (4)0.0032 (3)
S30.0600 (6)0.0402 (5)0.0340 (4)0.0080 (5)0.0114 (4)0.0023 (4)
S40.0457 (5)0.0495 (5)0.0434 (4)0.0103 (4)0.0050 (4)0.0016 (4)
C10.0409 (18)0.0451 (19)0.0316 (15)0.0050 (16)0.0018 (14)0.0029 (14)
C20.0397 (18)0.0366 (16)0.0288 (14)0.0051 (15)0.0055 (14)0.0026 (13)
C30.0359 (17)0.0375 (17)0.0309 (15)0.0032 (15)0.0015 (13)0.0001 (13)
C40.051 (2)0.054 (2)0.0314 (16)0.0035 (18)0.0004 (16)0.0040 (15)
C50.054 (2)0.050 (2)0.0369 (16)0.0054 (19)0.0070 (16)0.0114 (15)
C60.055 (2)0.0384 (18)0.0462 (18)0.0033 (18)0.0113 (17)0.0085 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S5—C11.652 (3)C2—C31.341 (4)
S1—C11.726 (3)C4—C51.518 (5)
S1—C21.739 (3)C4—H4A0.9700
S2—C11.723 (3)C4—H4B0.9700
S2—C31.743 (3)C5—C61.521 (4)
S3—C21.756 (3)C5—H5A0.9700
S3—C41.816 (3)C5—H5B0.9700
S4—C31.750 (3)C6—H6A0.9700
S4—C61.814 (4)C6—H6B0.9700
C1—S1—C297.31 (15)C5—C4—H4B108.1
C1—S2—C397.67 (15)S3—C4—H4B108.1
C2—S3—C4101.67 (15)H4A—C4—H4B107.3
C3—S4—C6101.55 (16)C4—C5—C6116.7 (3)
S5—C1—S2123.55 (19)C4—C5—H5A108.1
S5—C1—S1123.6 (2)C6—C5—H5A108.1
S2—C1—S1112.80 (18)C4—C5—H5B108.1
C3—C2—S1116.6 (2)C6—C5—H5B108.1
C3—C2—S3125.6 (2)H5A—C5—H5B107.3
S1—C2—S3117.83 (18)C5—C6—S4116.0 (2)
C2—C3—S2115.6 (2)C5—C6—H6A108.3
C2—C3—S4126.1 (2)S4—C6—H6A108.3
S2—C3—S4118.21 (18)C5—C6—H6B108.3
C5—C4—S3116.7 (2)S4—C6—H6B108.3
C5—C4—H4A108.1H6A—C6—H6B107.4
S3—C4—H4A108.1
(II) top
Crystal data top
C6H6OS4Dx = 1.621 Mg m3
Mr = 222.35Melting point: 393.5 K
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.358 (4) ÅCell parameters from 40 reflections
b = 4.5009 (11) Åθ = 8.9–14.2°
c = 13.066 (3) ŵ = 0.98 mm1
β = 108.736 (15)°T = 293 K
V = 911.0 (4) Å3Plate, pale yellow
Z = 40.34 × 0.22 × 0.02 mm
F(000) = 456
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
925 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.035
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.6°
θ/2θ scansh = 120
Absorption correction: ψ scan
XSCANS (Bruker, 1996)
k = 51
Tmin = 0.665, Tmax = 0.982l = 1616
1439 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1150 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.107 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0612P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1150 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
100 parametersΔρmin = 0.39 e Å3
2 restraintsAbsolute structure: The Flack parameter was refined (Flack, 1983), but did not give a clear result. This structure does not involve an absolute configuration question, and the absolute structure determination does not influence the interpretation of the chemical structure.
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.3 (2)
Crystal data top
C6H6OS4V = 911.0 (4) Å3
Mr = 222.35Z = 4
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα radiation
a = 16.358 (4) ŵ = 0.98 mm1
b = 4.5009 (11) ÅT = 293 K
c = 13.066 (3) Å0.34 × 0.22 × 0.02 mm
β = 108.736 (15)°
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
925 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
XSCANS (Bruker, 1996)
Rint = 0.035
Tmin = 0.665, Tmax = 0.9823 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1439 measured reflections intensity decay: 1%
1150 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.107Δρmax = 0.26 e Å3
S = 1.04Δρmin = 0.39 e Å3
1150 reflectionsAbsolute structure: The Flack parameter was refined (Flack, 1983), but did not give a clear result. This structure does not involve an absolute configuration question, and the absolute structure determination does not influence the interpretation of the chemical structure.
100 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.3 (2)
2 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.2758 (3)0.6940 (15)0.3317 (4)0.0885 (17)
S10.42429 (9)0.5282 (5)0.31386 (10)0.0633 (5)
S20.37451 (9)0.4254 (5)0.50660 (11)0.0619 (5)
S30.59282 (9)0.2158 (4)0.39996 (10)0.0528 (4)
S40.53331 (11)0.0880 (4)0.62378 (12)0.0589 (4)
C10.3453 (4)0.5705 (17)0.3749 (4)0.0611 (17)
C20.4977 (4)0.3332 (14)0.4199 (4)0.0457 (12)
C30.4752 (4)0.2816 (13)0.5084 (4)0.0461 (13)
C40.6738 (4)0.4126 (15)0.5074 (5)0.0550 (14)
H4A0.72560.43040.48710.066*
H4B0.65280.61210.51190.066*
C50.6981 (4)0.2747 (14)0.6182 (4)0.0541 (14)
H5A0.75170.36370.66270.065*
H5B0.70900.06490.61160.065*
C60.6323 (4)0.3049 (16)0.6766 (4)0.0581 (15)
H6B0.61650.51280.67580.070*
H6A0.65980.24890.75150.070*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.050 (3)0.140 (5)0.063 (3)0.033 (3)0.001 (2)0.003 (3)
S10.0449 (8)0.1028 (13)0.0375 (6)0.0088 (9)0.0067 (5)0.0087 (7)
S20.0418 (8)0.0947 (13)0.0525 (7)0.0073 (9)0.0197 (6)0.0011 (8)
S30.0437 (7)0.0749 (10)0.0419 (6)0.0051 (8)0.0166 (5)0.0090 (7)
S40.0591 (9)0.0665 (10)0.0538 (7)0.0105 (9)0.0217 (7)0.0180 (7)
C10.045 (3)0.086 (5)0.047 (3)0.006 (3)0.008 (3)0.007 (3)
C20.035 (3)0.059 (3)0.041 (2)0.002 (3)0.009 (2)0.007 (2)
C30.041 (3)0.052 (3)0.044 (2)0.003 (3)0.013 (2)0.003 (2)
C40.036 (3)0.067 (4)0.060 (3)0.001 (3)0.013 (3)0.012 (3)
C50.044 (3)0.054 (3)0.053 (3)0.007 (3)0.001 (2)0.011 (3)
C60.058 (3)0.068 (4)0.042 (2)0.010 (3)0.007 (2)0.009 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.228 (8)C2—C31.342 (7)
S1—C11.733 (6)C4—C51.507 (8)
S1—C21.750 (6)C4—H4A0.9700
S2—C11.757 (6)C4—H4B0.9700
S2—C31.763 (6)C5—C61.512 (9)
S3—C21.740 (5)C5—H5A0.9700
S3—C41.821 (6)C5—H5B0.9700
S4—C31.736 (6)C6—H6B0.9700
S4—C61.826 (7)C6—H6A0.9700
C1—S1—C296.6 (3)C5—C4—H4B108.2
C1—S2—C396.2 (3)S3—C4—H4B108.2
C2—S3—C4101.6 (3)H4A—C4—H4B107.4
C3—S4—C6103.4 (3)C4—C5—C6115.9 (5)
O1—C1—S1123.7 (5)C4—C5—H5A108.3
O1—C1—S2122.6 (5)C6—C5—H5A108.3
S1—C1—S2113.7 (3)C4—C5—H5B108.3
C3—C2—S3125.6 (4)C6—C5—H5B108.3
C3—C2—S1117.4 (4)H5A—C5—H5B107.4
S3—C2—S1116.9 (3)C5—C6—S4116.7 (4)
C2—C3—S4127.6 (4)C5—C6—H6B108.1
C2—C3—S2116.0 (4)S4—C6—H6B108.1
S4—C3—S2116.4 (3)C5—C6—H6A108.1
C5—C4—S3116.3 (5)S4—C6—H6A108.1
C5—C4—H4A108.2H6B—C6—H6A107.3
S3—C4—H4A108.2

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H6S5C6H6OS4
Mr238.41222.35
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/cMonoclinic, Cc
Temperature (K)293293
a, b, c (Å)4.6572 (13), 10.9765 (14), 18.1026 (17)16.358 (4), 4.5009 (11), 13.066 (3)
β (°) 90.147 (11) 108.736 (15)
V3)925.4 (3)911.0 (4)
Z44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.180.98
Crystal size (mm)0.22 × 0.16 × 0.120.34 × 0.22 × 0.02
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker P4
diffractometer
Bruker P4
diffractometer
Absorption correctionψ scan
XSCANS (Bruker, 1996)
ψ scan
XSCANS (Bruker, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.791, 0.8680.665, 0.982
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3160, 2110, 1331 1439, 1150, 925
Rint0.0260.035
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6500.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.036, 0.093, 1.03 0.044, 0.107, 1.04
No. of reflections21101150
No. of parameters101100
No. of restraints02
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.34, 0.300.26, 0.39
Absolute structure?The Flack parameter was refined (Flack, 1983), but did not give a clear result. This structure does not involve an absolute configuration question, and the absolute structure determination does not influence the interpretation of the chemical structure.
Absolute structure parameter?0.3 (2)

Computer programs: XSCANS (Bruker, 1996), XSCANS, SHELXTL (Bruker, 1997), SHELXTL.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) for (I) top
S5—C11.652 (3)S3—C21.756 (3)
S1—C11.726 (3)S3—C41.816 (3)
S1—C21.739 (3)S4—C31.750 (3)
S2—C11.723 (3)S4—C61.814 (4)
S2—C31.743 (3)C2—C31.341 (4)
C1—S1—C297.31 (15)C3—C2—S1116.6 (2)
C1—S2—C397.67 (15)C3—C2—S3125.6 (2)
C2—S3—C4101.67 (15)S1—C2—S3117.83 (18)
C3—S4—C6101.55 (16)C2—C3—S2115.6 (2)
S5—C1—S2123.55 (19)C2—C3—S4126.1 (2)
S5—C1—S1123.6 (2)S2—C3—S4118.21 (18)
S2—C1—S1112.80 (18)C5—C6—S4116.0 (2)
Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) for (II) top
O1—C11.228 (8)S3—C21.740 (5)
S1—C11.733 (6)S3—C41.821 (6)
S1—C21.750 (6)S4—C31.736 (6)
S2—C11.757 (6)S4—C61.826 (7)
S2—C31.763 (6)C2—C31.342 (7)
C1—S1—C296.6 (3)C3—C2—S3125.6 (4)
C1—S2—C396.2 (3)C3—C2—S1117.4 (4)
C2—S3—C4101.6 (3)S3—C2—S1116.9 (3)
C3—S4—C6103.4 (3)C2—C3—S4127.6 (4)
O1—C1—S1123.7 (5)C2—C3—S2116.0 (4)
O1—C1—S2122.6 (5)S4—C3—S2116.4 (3)
S1—C1—S2113.7 (3)C4—C5—C6115.9 (5)
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds