Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039967/ez2094sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039967/ez2094Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 660141
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 295 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.004 Å
- R factor = 0.047
- wR factor = 0.111
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.7
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT029_ALERT_3_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.96
Alert level G PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Cu1 (2) 2.08
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
For related literature, see Peng et al. (2005); Caradoc-Davies & Hanton (2003); Hanton & Lee (2000); Hong et al. (2000). For the synthesis of the ligand, see Peng et al. (2006).
Bis(2-pyrimidinesulfanylmethyl)benzene was synthesized using a reported procedure (Peng et al., 2006). A mixture of CuCl (0.01 g, 0.1 mmol), bis(2-pyrimidinesulfanylmethyl)benzene (0.033 g, 0.1 mmol), CHCl3 (2.0 ml) and acetonitrile (4.0 ml) was stirred for 15 min in air and then transferred to a 13 ml Teflon-lined reactor and sealed, then heated in an oven to 393 K for 48 h, and cooled to room temperature at a rate of 3 K 0.5 h-1. The reaction mixture was filtered to give a yellow-red solution. Black block-shaped crystals of (I) were obtained by slow diffusion of diethyl ether into the solution after one week (yield 36%, based on Cu). Analysis calculated for C16H14Cl2CuN4S2: C 41.66, H 3.04, N 12.15%; found: C 41.81, H 3.13, N 11.97%.
The H atoms were placed at calculated positions [aromatic C–H = 0.93 Å and methylene C–H = 0.97 Å; Uiso(H) = 1.2 times Ueq(C)].
The coordination chemistry of flexible thioether ligands has attracted considerable attention recently (Caradoc-Davies & Hanton, 2003; Hanton & Lee, 2000; Hong et al., 2000). We are currently involved in the synthesis and study of Cu(I) complexes of a series of N-containing heterocyclic thioether ligands. We have found that the ligand geometry and counteranions play an essential role in the framework formation of the Cu(I) complexes (Peng et al., 2005; Peng et al., 2006). The title compound is obtained from the solvothermal reaction of copper(I) chloride and bis(2-pyrimidinesulfanylmethyl)benzene in the presence of chloroform and acetonitrile solvents. X-ray structure analysis of the crystals shows that atom Cu1 lies on a center of inversion and is coordinated by two chloride anions and two N atoms from two adjacent thioether ligands. The bond angles about the copper atom [exactly 180° for Cl–Cu–Cl and N–Cu–N, and 89.80 (7) and 90.20 (7)° for N–Cu–Cl] confirm that it is in a regular square-planar CuCl2N2 geometry. The necessity to balance charges and the geometrical preferences of metal ions indicate the divalent state of the copper ions, which result from Cu(I) being oxidized in air. The thioether ligands, acting as bidentate connectors, link adjacent Cu(II) ions into a zigzag one-dimensional chain.
For related literature, see Peng et al. (2005); Caradoc-Davies & Hanton (2003); Hanton & Lee (2000); Hong et al. (2000). For the synthesis of the ligand, see Peng et al. (2006).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2007).
Fig. 1. View of a fragment of the chain motif in (I) showing the atom numbering scheme of the asymmetric unit and 30% displacement ellipsoids for the non-hydrogen atoms. |
[CuCl2(C16H14N4S2)] | F(000) = 466 |
Mr = 460.87 | Dx = 1.670 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2yn | Cell parameters from 1784 reflections |
a = 8.9243 (9) Å | θ = 2.8–25.7° |
b = 9.9867 (9) Å | µ = 1.72 mm−1 |
c = 10.4339 (10) Å | T = 295 K |
β = 99.667 (2)° | Block, black |
V = 916.71 (15) Å3 | 0.29 × 0.11 × 0.09 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer | 2034 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1517 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.032 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −7→11 |
Tmin = 0.636, Tmax = 0.861 | k = −12→12 |
4908 measured reflections | l = −13→13 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.111 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.01 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0589P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2034 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
115 parameters | Δρmax = 0.60 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
[CuCl2(C16H14N4S2)] | V = 916.71 (15) Å3 |
Mr = 460.87 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 8.9243 (9) Å | µ = 1.72 mm−1 |
b = 9.9867 (9) Å | T = 295 K |
c = 10.4339 (10) Å | 0.29 × 0.11 × 0.09 mm |
β = 99.667 (2)° |
Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer | 2034 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1517 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.636, Tmax = 0.861 | Rint = 0.032 |
4908 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.111 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.01 | Δρmax = 0.60 e Å−3 |
2034 reflections | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
115 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cu1 | 0.5000 | 0.5000 | 0.5000 | 0.0398 (2) | |
Cl1 | 0.57709 (10) | 0.70107 (9) | 0.44428 (9) | 0.0612 (3) | |
S1 | 0.20657 (10) | 0.64387 (9) | 0.57216 (8) | 0.0565 (3) | |
N1 | 0.3033 (3) | 0.5254 (2) | 0.3782 (3) | 0.0411 (6) | |
N2 | 0.0592 (3) | 0.6232 (3) | 0.3285 (2) | 0.0518 (7) | |
C1 | 0.2880 (4) | 0.4759 (3) | 0.2575 (3) | 0.0504 (8) | |
H1 | 0.3661 | 0.4249 | 0.2338 | 0.060* | |
C2 | 0.1601 (4) | 0.4987 (4) | 0.1686 (3) | 0.0633 (11) | |
H2 | 0.1487 | 0.4636 | 0.0849 | 0.076* | |
C3 | 0.0499 (4) | 0.5753 (4) | 0.2079 (3) | 0.0625 (10) | |
H3 | −0.0363 | 0.5953 | 0.1477 | 0.075* | |
C4 | 0.1860 (3) | 0.5945 (3) | 0.4089 (3) | 0.0391 (7) | |
C5 | 0.0246 (4) | 0.7224 (3) | 0.5817 (3) | 0.0485 (8) | |
H5B | −0.0553 | 0.6716 | 0.5286 | 0.058* | |
H5A | 0.0072 | 0.7180 | 0.6709 | 0.058* | |
C6 | 0.0134 (3) | 0.8652 (3) | 0.5382 (3) | 0.0404 (7) | |
C7 | −0.0903 (3) | 0.9039 (3) | 0.4302 (3) | 0.0439 (7) | |
H7 | −0.1515 | 0.8397 | 0.3826 | 0.053* | |
C8 | −0.1037 (3) | 1.0371 (3) | 0.3923 (3) | 0.0445 (8) | |
H8 | −0.1739 | 1.0612 | 0.3197 | 0.053* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cu1 | 0.0352 (3) | 0.0342 (3) | 0.0486 (3) | −0.0014 (2) | 0.0032 (2) | −0.0005 (2) |
Cl1 | 0.0574 (5) | 0.0444 (6) | 0.0783 (6) | −0.0115 (4) | 0.0015 (4) | 0.0115 (4) |
S1 | 0.0658 (6) | 0.0556 (6) | 0.0436 (5) | 0.0203 (4) | −0.0035 (4) | −0.0068 (4) |
N1 | 0.0394 (13) | 0.0373 (15) | 0.0459 (14) | −0.0035 (11) | 0.0052 (11) | 0.0001 (11) |
N2 | 0.0468 (15) | 0.0571 (18) | 0.0479 (15) | 0.0075 (13) | −0.0025 (12) | −0.0003 (13) |
C1 | 0.0462 (18) | 0.057 (2) | 0.0504 (19) | −0.0045 (15) | 0.0162 (15) | −0.0070 (16) |
C2 | 0.060 (2) | 0.092 (3) | 0.0366 (17) | −0.011 (2) | 0.0051 (16) | −0.0100 (17) |
C3 | 0.054 (2) | 0.083 (3) | 0.0458 (19) | −0.0016 (19) | −0.0043 (15) | 0.0035 (19) |
C4 | 0.0429 (15) | 0.0329 (17) | 0.0398 (15) | −0.0017 (13) | 0.0018 (12) | 0.0014 (13) |
C5 | 0.058 (2) | 0.038 (2) | 0.0535 (19) | 0.0023 (15) | 0.0204 (15) | −0.0011 (15) |
C6 | 0.0402 (16) | 0.0373 (18) | 0.0482 (16) | 0.0029 (13) | 0.0205 (13) | −0.0008 (14) |
C7 | 0.0395 (15) | 0.041 (2) | 0.0527 (18) | −0.0059 (13) | 0.0105 (13) | −0.0082 (15) |
C8 | 0.0414 (17) | 0.044 (2) | 0.0485 (17) | 0.0021 (14) | 0.0082 (13) | −0.0012 (15) |
Cu1—N1 | 2.003 (2) | C2—C3 | 1.363 (5) |
Cu1—N1i | 2.003 (2) | C2—H2 | 0.9300 |
Cu1—Cl1i | 2.2311 (8) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
Cu1—Cl1 | 2.2311 (8) | C5—C6 | 1.495 (4) |
S1—C4 | 1.754 (3) | C5—H5B | 0.9700 |
S1—C5 | 1.821 (3) | C5—H5A | 0.9700 |
N1—C4 | 1.336 (4) | C6—C7 | 1.387 (4) |
N1—C1 | 1.339 (4) | C6—C8ii | 1.390 (4) |
N2—C4 | 1.322 (4) | C7—C8 | 1.387 (4) |
N2—C3 | 1.335 (4) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C1—C2 | 1.364 (5) | C8—C6ii | 1.390 (4) |
C1—H1 | 0.9300 | C8—H8 | 0.9300 |
N1—Cu1—N1i | 180.0 | C2—C3—H3 | 118.3 |
N1—Cu1—Cl1i | 90.20 (7) | N2—C4—N1 | 125.6 (3) |
N1i—Cu1—Cl1i | 89.80 (7) | N2—C4—S1 | 119.6 (2) |
N1—Cu1—Cl1 | 89.80 (7) | N1—C4—S1 | 114.8 (2) |
N1i—Cu1—Cl1 | 90.20 (7) | C6—C5—S1 | 114.2 (2) |
Cl1i—Cu1—Cl1 | 180.0 | C6—C5—H5B | 108.7 |
C4—S1—C5 | 103.02 (14) | S1—C5—H5B | 108.7 |
C4—N1—C1 | 117.1 (3) | C6—C5—H5A | 108.7 |
C4—N1—Cu1 | 123.5 (2) | S1—C5—H5A | 108.7 |
C1—N1—Cu1 | 119.4 (2) | H5B—C5—H5A | 107.6 |
C4—N2—C3 | 115.5 (3) | C7—C6—C8ii | 118.5 (3) |
N1—C1—C2 | 121.4 (3) | C7—C6—C5 | 120.9 (3) |
N1—C1—H1 | 119.3 | C8ii—C6—C5 | 120.5 (3) |
C2—C1—H1 | 119.3 | C8—C7—C6 | 120.8 (3) |
C3—C2—C1 | 116.9 (3) | C8—C7—H7 | 119.6 |
C3—C2—H2 | 121.6 | C6—C7—H7 | 119.6 |
C1—C2—H2 | 121.6 | C7—C8—C6ii | 120.6 (3) |
N2—C3—C2 | 123.4 (3) | C7—C8—H8 | 119.7 |
N2—C3—H3 | 118.3 | C6ii—C8—H8 | 119.7 |
Cl1i—Cu1—N1—C4 | 97.7 (2) | Cu1—N1—C4—N2 | 174.1 (2) |
Cl1—Cu1—N1—C4 | −82.3 (2) | C1—N1—C4—S1 | 174.6 (2) |
Cl1i—Cu1—N1—C1 | −85.0 (2) | Cu1—N1—C4—S1 | −8.0 (3) |
Cl1—Cu1—N1—C1 | 95.0 (2) | C5—S1—C4—N2 | 2.1 (3) |
C4—N1—C1—C2 | 2.0 (5) | C5—S1—C4—N1 | −175.9 (2) |
Cu1—N1—C1—C2 | −175.4 (2) | C4—S1—C5—C6 | −82.9 (3) |
N1—C1—C2—C3 | 0.7 (5) | S1—C5—C6—C7 | 116.1 (3) |
C4—N2—C3—C2 | 1.7 (6) | S1—C5—C6—C8ii | −65.9 (3) |
C1—C2—C3—N2 | −2.7 (6) | C8ii—C6—C7—C8 | 0.0 (5) |
C3—N2—C4—N1 | 1.4 (5) | C5—C6—C7—C8 | 178.0 (3) |
C3—N2—C4—S1 | −176.4 (2) | C6—C7—C8—C6ii | 0.0 (5) |
C1—N1—C4—N2 | −3.3 (4) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x, −y+2, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [CuCl2(C16H14N4S2)] |
Mr | 460.87 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/n |
Temperature (K) | 295 |
a, b, c (Å) | 8.9243 (9), 9.9867 (9), 10.4339 (10) |
β (°) | 99.667 (2) |
V (Å3) | 916.71 (15) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.72 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.29 × 0.11 × 0.09 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEX CCD |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.636, 0.861 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 4908, 2034, 1517 |
Rint | 0.032 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.649 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.047, 0.111, 1.01 |
No. of reflections | 2034 |
No. of parameters | 115 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.60, −0.43 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2002), SAINT (Bruker, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b), publCIF (Westrip, 2007).
Cu1—N1 | 2.003 (2) | Cu1—Cl1 | 2.2311 (8) |
N1—Cu1—N1i | 180.0 | N1—Cu1—Cl1 | 89.80 (7) |
N1—Cu1—Cl1i | 90.20 (7) | Cl1i—Cu1—Cl1 | 180.0 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
The coordination chemistry of flexible thioether ligands has attracted considerable attention recently (Caradoc-Davies & Hanton, 2003; Hanton & Lee, 2000; Hong et al., 2000). We are currently involved in the synthesis and study of Cu(I) complexes of a series of N-containing heterocyclic thioether ligands. We have found that the ligand geometry and counteranions play an essential role in the framework formation of the Cu(I) complexes (Peng et al., 2005; Peng et al., 2006). The title compound is obtained from the solvothermal reaction of copper(I) chloride and bis(2-pyrimidinesulfanylmethyl)benzene in the presence of chloroform and acetonitrile solvents. X-ray structure analysis of the crystals shows that atom Cu1 lies on a center of inversion and is coordinated by two chloride anions and two N atoms from two adjacent thioether ligands. The bond angles about the copper atom [exactly 180° for Cl–Cu–Cl and N–Cu–N, and 89.80 (7) and 90.20 (7)° for N–Cu–Cl] confirm that it is in a regular square-planar CuCl2N2 geometry. The necessity to balance charges and the geometrical preferences of metal ions indicate the divalent state of the copper ions, which result from Cu(I) being oxidized in air. The thioether ligands, acting as bidentate connectors, link adjacent Cu(II) ions into a zigzag one-dimensional chain.