Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The Ni atom in the title complex, [Ni2(C14H20N2O10)(H2O)2]·2H2O or {[Ni2(egta)·2H2O]·2H2O}] [egtaH4 is 3,12-bis­(car­boxy­meth­yl)-6,9-dioxa-3,12-diaza­tetra­deca­nedioic acid], has a square-pyramidal coordination geometry. Both NiII centres are penta­coordinated by one N atom and three O atoms of egta, forming the basal plane, and one O donor water mol­ecule in the apical position. The dinuclear complex is arranged around an inversion centre. The solvent water mol­ecules and coordinated water mol­ecules are involved in hydrogen bonds with uncoordinated O atoms of carboxyl­ate groups, which link the complex mol­ecules to form a three-dimensional supra­molecular network structure.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044893/dn2227sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044893/dn2227Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 663629

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 298 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.024
  • wR factor = 0.060
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.8

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT232_ALERT_2_C Hirshfeld Test Diff (M-X) Ni1 - O1 .. 6.23 su PLAT232_ALERT_2_C Hirshfeld Test Diff (M-X) Ni1 - O6 .. 7.24 su PLAT232_ALERT_2_C Hirshfeld Test Diff (M-X) Ni1 - N1 .. 5.09 su PLAT417_ALERT_2_C Short Inter D-H..H-D H1W .. H4W .. 2.12 Ang.
Alert level G PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 6
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 4 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The coordination of multipyridine and multi-carboxylate ligands to metal centers has proved to be an excellent tool in the assembly process and has been highly influenced by the structural characterizations of tectonic spacers. Polydentate amino-polycarboxylate acid [H4egta=3,12-bis (carboxymethyl)-6, 9-dioxa-3, 12-diazatetradecanedioic acid], being extensively used as a calcium buffer in biological research, possesses symmetrical four potential coordinating sites and renders it an appropriate candidate to improve the extension of the ferrimagnetic lattice from one dimensional (one-dimensional) systems to two-dimensional and three-dimensional networks (Bomas-Almenar et al., 1993). In this paper, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title complex,(I).

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the neutral dinuclear molecule, lies on a centre of symmetry. Both nickel(II) centers are pentacoordinated to one N atom and three O atoms of egta, forming the basal plane, and one O donors of water molecule being in axial position, then leading to a distorted square-pyramid environment. The structural components are connected through O—H···O hydrogen bonding involving the lattice water molecules as donors and the uncoordinated O atoms as acceptors thus forming a three dimensionnal supramolecular network structure (Table 1).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Bomas-Almenar et al. (1993).

Experimental top

The title complex was prepared by the addition of a stoichiometric amount of nickel chloride (1 mmol) to a hot methanol solution (10 ml) of egtaH4 (1 mmol). The resulting solution was filtered, and pale green blocky crystals were obtained on slow evaporation of the solvent over several days at room temperature.

Refinement top

Carbon-bound H atoms were placed at calculated positions and were treated as riding on the parent C atoms with C—H= 97Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). H atoms attached to water molecules were found in a difference map and their positions were refined using restraints (O—H= 0.84 (2)Å and H···H= 1.38 Å) with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Structure description top

The coordination of multipyridine and multi-carboxylate ligands to metal centers has proved to be an excellent tool in the assembly process and has been highly influenced by the structural characterizations of tectonic spacers. Polydentate amino-polycarboxylate acid [H4egta=3,12-bis (carboxymethyl)-6, 9-dioxa-3, 12-diazatetradecanedioic acid], being extensively used as a calcium buffer in biological research, possesses symmetrical four potential coordinating sites and renders it an appropriate candidate to improve the extension of the ferrimagnetic lattice from one dimensional (one-dimensional) systems to two-dimensional and three-dimensional networks (Bomas-Almenar et al., 1993). In this paper, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of the title complex,(I).

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the neutral dinuclear molecule, lies on a centre of symmetry. Both nickel(II) centers are pentacoordinated to one N atom and three O atoms of egta, forming the basal plane, and one O donors of water molecule being in axial position, then leading to a distorted square-pyramid environment. The structural components are connected through O—H···O hydrogen bonding involving the lattice water molecules as donors and the uncoordinated O atoms as acceptors thus forming a three dimensionnal supramolecular network structure (Table 1).

For related literature, see: Bomas-Almenar et al. (1993).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Ref??).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. Free water molecule has been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry code: (i) 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z].
[µ-4,7-dioxa-1,10-diazaoctane-1,1,10,10-tetraacetato- 1κ4O1,O1',N1,O4:2κ4O7,N10,O10,O10'] bis[aquanickel(II)] dihydrate top
Crystal data top
[Ni2(C14H20N2O10)(H2O)2]·2H2OF(000) = 1176
Mr = 565.80Dx = 1.748 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 2007 reflections
a = 21.031 (2) Åθ = 2.9–25.5°
b = 7.5299 (9) ŵ = 1.83 mm1
c = 13.5789 (16) ÅT = 298 K
β = 90.464 (1)°Block, green
V = 2150.3 (4) Å30.34 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII area-detector
diffractometer
2007 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1756 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.027
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
SADABS (Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 2525
Tmin = 0.580, Tmax = 0.931k = 99
7928 measured reflectionsl = 1615
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.060H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0294P)2 + 0.9421P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2007 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
157 parametersΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
6 restraintsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Ni2(C14H20N2O10)(H2O)2]·2H2OV = 2150.3 (4) Å3
Mr = 565.80Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 21.031 (2) ŵ = 1.83 mm1
b = 7.5299 (9) ÅT = 298 K
c = 13.5789 (16) Å0.34 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm
β = 90.464 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII area-detector
diffractometer
2007 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
SADABS (Sheldrick, 1996)
1756 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.580, Tmax = 0.931Rint = 0.027
7928 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0246 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.060H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
2007 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
157 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Ni10.628725 (12)0.21993 (3)0.564464 (18)0.02584 (10)
O10.67589 (7)0.37797 (18)0.47843 (11)0.0328 (3)
O20.74168 (7)0.3724 (2)0.35187 (12)0.0412 (4)
O30.60468 (7)0.02307 (18)0.64666 (10)0.0352 (4)
O40.62324 (9)0.2649 (2)0.66266 (12)0.0497 (5)
O50.53305 (7)0.28393 (19)0.47083 (11)0.0336 (4)
O60.61807 (8)0.3871 (2)0.67071 (12)0.0383 (4)
H1W0.6396 (12)0.354 (3)0.7181 (16)0.057*
H2W0.6247 (12)0.492 (2)0.6580 (18)0.057*
O70.70120 (9)0.2874 (2)0.80982 (13)0.0453 (4)
H3W0.7178 (12)0.385 (3)0.828 (2)0.068*
H4W0.7255 (12)0.239 (3)0.7706 (19)0.068*
N10.63903 (8)0.0375 (2)0.45889 (11)0.0250 (4)
C10.70315 (10)0.2990 (3)0.40776 (16)0.0290 (5)
C20.68935 (9)0.1023 (3)0.39122 (15)0.0282 (5)
H2A0.67570.08400.32360.034*
H2B0.72800.03440.40200.034*
C30.65593 (10)0.1272 (3)0.51335 (15)0.0306 (5)
H3A0.70180.13530.52060.037*
H3B0.64140.23000.47650.037*
C40.62514 (10)0.1259 (3)0.61503 (15)0.0318 (5)
C50.57655 (10)0.0158 (3)0.40651 (15)0.0315 (5)
H5A0.54770.05020.44820.038*
H5B0.58290.05220.34670.038*
C60.54713 (10)0.1921 (3)0.38073 (16)0.0346 (5)
H6A0.57640.26170.34160.042*
H6B0.50840.17420.34260.042*
C70.51520 (11)0.4654 (3)0.45390 (16)0.0399 (6)
H7A0.48550.47290.39910.048*
H7B0.55240.53570.43820.048*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ni10.03413 (17)0.01904 (16)0.02442 (16)0.00075 (11)0.00398 (11)0.00223 (11)
O10.0396 (8)0.0230 (8)0.0360 (8)0.0019 (6)0.0064 (7)0.0023 (6)
O20.0463 (10)0.0303 (9)0.0472 (10)0.0061 (7)0.0184 (8)0.0033 (7)
O30.0509 (9)0.0244 (8)0.0305 (8)0.0004 (7)0.0112 (7)0.0017 (6)
O40.0880 (14)0.0262 (9)0.0349 (9)0.0034 (9)0.0107 (9)0.0057 (7)
O50.0361 (9)0.0321 (8)0.0326 (8)0.0080 (7)0.0034 (7)0.0013 (6)
O60.0560 (11)0.0231 (8)0.0358 (9)0.0043 (8)0.0001 (8)0.0041 (7)
O70.0633 (12)0.0324 (9)0.0404 (10)0.0015 (8)0.0109 (9)0.0031 (8)
N10.0269 (9)0.0236 (9)0.0247 (9)0.0006 (7)0.0034 (7)0.0001 (7)
C10.0274 (11)0.0259 (11)0.0336 (12)0.0016 (9)0.0005 (9)0.0032 (9)
C20.0288 (11)0.0267 (11)0.0293 (11)0.0013 (9)0.0066 (9)0.0014 (9)
C30.0390 (12)0.0225 (11)0.0306 (11)0.0030 (9)0.0043 (9)0.0015 (9)
C40.0390 (13)0.0285 (12)0.0279 (11)0.0033 (9)0.0005 (9)0.0008 (10)
C50.0318 (12)0.0320 (12)0.0308 (11)0.0044 (9)0.0027 (9)0.0060 (9)
C60.0325 (12)0.0442 (14)0.0273 (12)0.0036 (10)0.0003 (9)0.0013 (10)
C70.0415 (13)0.0351 (13)0.0433 (14)0.0119 (10)0.0036 (10)0.0064 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ni1—O31.9255 (14)N1—C51.498 (3)
Ni1—O61.9293 (15)C1—C21.525 (3)
Ni1—O11.9451 (14)C2—H2A0.9700
Ni1—N11.9986 (16)C2—H2B0.9700
O1—C11.270 (2)C3—C41.530 (3)
O2—C11.244 (2)C3—H3A0.9700
O3—C41.277 (2)C3—H3B0.9700
O4—C41.231 (3)C5—C61.505 (3)
O5—C71.436 (3)C5—H5A0.9700
O5—C61.438 (2)C5—H5B0.9700
O6—H1W0.823 (16)C6—H6A0.9700
O6—H2W0.821 (16)C6—H6B0.9700
O7—H3W0.847 (16)C7—C7i1.503 (4)
O7—H4W0.826 (16)C7—H7A0.9700
N1—C31.486 (2)C7—H7B0.9700
N1—C21.489 (2)
O3—Ni1—O692.08 (7)N1—C3—C4110.04 (16)
O3—Ni1—O1163.08 (6)N1—C3—H3A109.7
O6—Ni1—O196.47 (7)C4—C3—H3A109.7
O3—Ni1—N185.25 (6)N1—C3—H3B109.7
O6—Ni1—N1177.32 (7)C4—C3—H3B109.7
O1—Ni1—N186.04 (6)H3A—C3—H3B108.2
C1—O1—Ni1113.76 (13)O4—C4—O3123.9 (2)
C4—O3—Ni1112.98 (13)O4—C4—C3118.98 (19)
C7—O5—C6112.13 (16)O3—C4—C3117.09 (18)
Ni1—O6—H1W108.7 (19)N1—C5—C6111.81 (17)
Ni1—O6—H2W116.7 (19)N1—C5—H5A109.3
H1W—O6—H2W111 (2)C6—C5—H5A109.3
H3W—O7—H4W108 (2)N1—C5—H5B109.3
C3—N1—C2114.36 (16)C6—C5—H5B109.3
C3—N1—C5110.52 (16)H5A—C5—H5B107.9
C2—N1—C5111.58 (15)O5—C6—C5108.25 (17)
C3—N1—Ni1104.10 (11)O5—C6—H6A110.0
C2—N1—Ni1107.40 (12)C5—C6—H6A110.0
C5—N1—Ni1108.41 (12)O5—C6—H6B110.0
O2—C1—O1123.58 (19)C5—C6—H6B110.0
O2—C1—C2117.76 (18)H6A—C6—H6B108.4
O1—C1—C2118.65 (18)O5—C7—C7i108.0 (2)
N1—C2—C1111.27 (16)O5—C7—H7A110.1
N1—C2—H2A109.4C7i—C7—H7A110.1
C1—C2—H2A109.4O5—C7—H7B110.1
N1—C2—H2B109.4C7i—C7—H7B110.1
C1—C2—H2B109.4H7A—C7—H7B108.4
H2A—C2—H2B108.0
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O6—H1W···O70.82 (2)1.86 (2)2.671 (3)169 (3)
O6—H2W···O4ii0.82 (2)1.83 (2)2.625 (2)162 (3)
O7—H3W···O2iii0.85 (2)1.92 (2)2.758 (2)168 (3)
O7—H4W···O2iv0.83 (2)1.99 (2)2.785 (2)161 (3)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x, y+1, z+1/2; (iv) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Ni2(C14H20N2O10)(H2O)2]·2H2O
Mr565.80
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)21.031 (2), 7.5299 (9), 13.5789 (16)
β (°) 90.464 (1)
V3)2150.3 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.83
Crystal size (mm)0.34 × 0.12 × 0.04
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
SADABS (Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.580, 0.931
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7928, 2007, 1756
Rint0.027
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.606
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.024, 0.060, 1.08
No. of reflections2007
No. of parameters157
No. of restraints6
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.34, 0.19

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 1999), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), SHELXTL (Ref??).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O6—H1W···O70.823 (16)1.859 (17)2.671 (3)169 (3)
O6—H2W···O4i0.821 (16)1.832 (18)2.625 (2)162 (3)
O7—H3W···O2ii0.847 (16)1.924 (17)2.758 (2)168 (3)
O7—H4W···O2iii0.826 (16)1.991 (17)2.785 (2)161 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) x, y+1, z+1/2; (iii) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds