Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The mol­ecules of the title complex, [Rh(Trop)(CO)2] (Trop is 2-hydroxycyclo­hepta-2,4,6-trienonate, C7H5O2), exhibit symmetrical but non-crystallographic square-planar molecular geometry, with Rh—C distances of 1.825 (10) and 1.826 (9) Å, Rh—O distances of 2.021 (5) and 2.032 (5) Å, and an O—Rh—O bite angle of 79.4 (2)°. Strong Rh...Rh and Rh...C intermolecular interactions of 3.683 (3) and 3.650 (5) Å, respectively, are also observed.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104019304/de1251sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104019304/de1251Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 254893

Comment top

The first known crystal structure of a rhodium tropolonato-type compound was reported for the title compound, (I) (Manojlovic-Muir & Muir, 1975), but unfortunately the authors did not publish the atomic coordinates. As a result of our interest in tropolonate tertiary aryl phosphine compounds of rhodium(I) (Steyl et al., 2001 & Roodt et al., 2003, Steyl & Roodt, 2004), the current investigation was undertaken to clarify the solid-state behaviour of (I).

Dicarbonyl(tropolonato)rhodium(I) crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system with one molecule per asymmetric unit. The molecular geometry is distorted square planar, with an O—Rh—O bite angle of 79.4 (2)° and an intra-carbonyl C—Rh—C angle of 88.3 (4)°. The molecule displays non-crystallographic internal symmetry that approaches C2v, with Rh—C bond distances of 1.825 (10) and 1.826 (9) Å, and Rh—O bond distances of 2.021 (5) and 2.032 (5) Å. A minor distortion in symmetry is observed for the tropolone C—O bond distances [1.267 (9) and 1.324 (8) Å, as listed in Table 1]. High anisotropy is observed for the carbonyl C and O atoms lying on the periphery of the molecule, thus allowing for high flexibility of the carbonyl group.

The whole molecule, including the tropolone ring, is close to planar, as was established by calculating the least-squares plane containing all the non-H atoms. The mean deviation of the fitted atoms is 0.052 Å, with a maximum deviation of 0.104 (6) Å for carbonyl atom O02. The shortest intermolecular contact, between atoms H3 and C4 (-x, 0.5 + y, 0.5 − z) [1.941 (8) Å], illustrates the efficient packing in the unit cell.

Theoretical calculations were performed on the system using B3LYP/Lan2DZ (Gaussian 03 W; Frisch et al., 2003) with no symmetry restraints on the optimization. The stationary point was characterized as a minimum by means of frequency analysis. An r.m.s. overlay of the calculated and solid-state structures gave an error of less than 0.142 Å. A comparison of the geometric parameters for the the solid-state data in Table 1 and the calculated structure (values in parantheses) for the coordinated ligands to the metal centre (Rh—C = 1.872 and 1.872 Å, Rh—O = 2.061 and 2.061 Å, O—Rh—O = 78.6°, C—Rh—O = 94.7 and 94.7°, and C—Rh—C = 92.0°) shows a good correlation. The absence of large-scale distortions in the crystal structure indicates that packing effects do not play a major role in the solid state.

The structure is similar to those of other Rh complexes of this type in that close intermolecular Rh···Rh contacts, roughly perpendicular to the molecular plane, are present. The molecules stack as infinite chains along the the a axis, with an Rh···Rh distance of 3.683 (3) Å (Fig. 2). This is longer than examples that have been observed to date (see Table 2), but the Rh···Rh interactions are not perfectly perpendicular to the molecular planes as a result of the monoclinic stacking. Because of this offset, a second close intermolecular contact, that between Rh and C02 of 3.650 (5) Å, is also observed (Fig. 2).

A further deviation from the stacking pattern normallly observed in other crystal structures, listed in Table 2, is the unique occurrence of head-to-head stacking in the title compound. All the other complexes pack in a head-to-tail pattern or a close variant thereof. This effect is illustrated by the range of O—Rh···Rh—O dihedral angles listed in Table 2 and could be the result of the small steric demand of the tropolonate moiety, which is indicated by the fact that the bidentate bite angle (O—Rh—O) in (I) is small compared with that in other dicarbonyl complexes.

Experimental top

The title compound, (I), was synthesized by dissolving [Rh(µ-Cl)(CO)2]2 (45 mg, 0.116 mmol) in methanol (30 ml), adding 2.2 equivalents of tropolone (30.9 mg, 0.253 mmol) and allowing crystallization to occur under slow evaporation (ca 1 d). Yield 58.5 mg, 90%. IR: νCO 2074, 2014 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): 7.55 (m, 5H).

Computing details top

Data collection: PWPC (Gomm, 1998); cell refinement: PWPC (Gomm, 1998); data reduction: Xtal3.6 (Hall et al., 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. : The molecular conformation of (I), with anisotropic displacement ellipsoids shown at 30% probability level (Brandenburg & Brendt, 2001).
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. : Part of the unit cell of (I), showing the stacking pattern and the intermolecular Rh···Rh and Rh···C interactions.
Dicarbonyl(tropolonato)rhodium(I) top
Crystal data top
[Rh(C7H5O2)(CO)2]F(000) = 544
Mr = 280.04Dx = 2.058 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Hall symbol: -p 2ybcCell parameters from 48 reflections
a = 3.683 (1) Åθ = 4.1–13.3°
b = 21.856 (4) ŵ = 1.87 mm1
c = 11.296 (3) ÅT = 293 K
β = 96.32 (2)°Prism, orange
V = 903.8 (4) Å30.23 × 0.15 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Philips PW1100
diffractometer
1049 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.085
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.3°
ω–2θ scansh = 04
Absorption correction: gaussian
(ABSORB in Xtal3.6; Hall et al., 1999)
k = 2626
Tmin = 0.673, Tmax = 0.872l = 1313
3331 measured reflections1 standard reflections every 50 reflections
1784 independent reflections intensity decay: 0.0%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: Patterson
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.120H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0388P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1784 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
127 parametersΔρmax = 1.26 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.61 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Rh(C7H5O2)(CO)2]V = 903.8 (4) Å3
Mr = 280.04Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 3.683 (1) ŵ = 1.87 mm1
b = 21.856 (4) ÅT = 293 K
c = 11.296 (3) Å0.23 × 0.15 × 0.08 mm
β = 96.32 (2)°
Data collection top
Philips PW1100
diffractometer
1049 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: gaussian
(ABSORB in Xtal3.6; Hall et al., 1999)
Rint = 0.085
Tmin = 0.673, Tmax = 0.8721 standard reflections every 50 reflections
3331 measured reflections intensity decay: 0.0%
1784 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0510 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.120H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02Δρmax = 1.26 e Å3
1784 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.61 e Å3
127 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Rh1.07981 (18)0.08945 (3)0.27514 (5)0.0505 (3)
O110.8663 (16)0.0601 (3)0.1115 (4)0.0561 (14)
O121.0294 (16)0.1697 (2)0.1859 (4)0.0533 (14)
C011.117 (2)0.0140 (4)0.3447 (7)0.055 (2)
C021.260 (3)0.1223 (4)0.4183 (7)0.059 (2)
O011.146 (2)0.0330 (3)0.3884 (6)0.093 (2)
O021.364 (2)0.1437 (3)0.5083 (5)0.081 (2)
C10.788 (2)0.1018 (4)0.0352 (6)0.0459 (19)
C20.881 (2)0.1645 (4)0.0742 (6)0.0455 (19)
C30.841 (2)0.2167 (4)0.0056 (7)0.058 (2)
H30.92120.25230.04530.069*
C40.704 (2)0.2252 (4)0.1102 (7)0.064 (2)
H40.71260.26530.13740.077*
C50.555 (2)0.1840 (5)0.1920 (7)0.066 (3)
H50.47070.19940.26670.079*
C60.517 (2)0.1215 (5)0.1758 (7)0.061 (2)
H60.40250.10050.24110.073*
C70.623 (2)0.0862 (4)0.0778 (7)0.056 (2)
H70.57660.04460.08850.067*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Rh0.0608 (5)0.0511 (4)0.0392 (3)0.0018 (4)0.0038 (3)0.0018 (3)
O110.069 (4)0.055 (3)0.043 (3)0.004 (3)0.000 (3)0.009 (3)
O120.075 (4)0.046 (3)0.037 (3)0.005 (3)0.003 (3)0.007 (2)
C010.059 (6)0.062 (6)0.045 (5)0.001 (5)0.005 (4)0.007 (4)
C020.074 (7)0.056 (5)0.045 (5)0.004 (5)0.002 (4)0.006 (4)
O010.149 (8)0.062 (5)0.070 (4)0.013 (5)0.012 (4)0.007 (4)
O020.127 (6)0.064 (4)0.047 (3)0.007 (4)0.017 (3)0.000 (3)
C10.051 (5)0.050 (5)0.037 (4)0.001 (4)0.006 (3)0.004 (3)
C20.043 (5)0.058 (5)0.035 (4)0.005 (4)0.005 (3)0.011 (3)
C30.067 (6)0.053 (5)0.052 (5)0.002 (5)0.001 (4)0.002 (4)
C40.078 (7)0.070 (6)0.044 (4)0.007 (5)0.004 (4)0.008 (4)
C50.065 (7)0.093 (7)0.039 (4)0.017 (6)0.002 (4)0.007 (5)
C60.053 (6)0.085 (7)0.044 (4)0.001 (5)0.003 (4)0.012 (5)
C70.057 (6)0.062 (5)0.048 (4)0.003 (5)0.003 (4)0.013 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Rh—C011.825 (10)C2—C31.378 (10)
Rh—C021.826 (9)C3—C41.362 (10)
Rh—O122.021 (5)C3—H30.9300
Rh—O112.032 (5)C4—C51.360 (12)
O11—C11.267 (9)C4—H40.9300
O12—C21.324 (8)C5—C61.388 (13)
C01—O011.139 (9)C5—H50.9300
C02—O021.145 (9)C6—C71.370 (11)
C1—C71.394 (10)C6—H60.9300
C1—C21.467 (10)C7—H70.9300
C01—Rh—C0288.3 (4)O12—C2—C3118.2 (7)
O12—Rh—O1179.4 (2)O12—C2—C1115.1 (7)
C01—Rh—O12175.6 (3)C3—C2—C1126.7 (7)
C02—Rh—O1296.1 (3)O11—C1—C7119.4 (7)
C01—Rh—O1196.3 (3)O11—C1—C2116.1 (6)
C02—Rh—O11175.2 (3)C7—C1—C2124.6 (7)
C1—O11—Rh115.3 (5)C5—C4—C3129.8 (9)
C2—O12—Rh114.0 (5)C5—C4—H4115.1
O02—C02—Rh178.0 (9)C3—C4—H4115.1
C6—C7—C1131.2 (8)C4—C5—C6126.9 (8)
C6—C7—H7114.4C4—C5—H5116.5
C1—C7—H7114.4C6—C5—H5116.5
C4—C3—C2131.2 (8)C7—C6—C5129.5 (8)
C4—C3—H3114.4C7—C6—H6115.2
C2—C3—H3114.4C5—C6—H6115.2
O01—C01—Rh178.8 (9)
C01—Rh—O11—C1177.7 (6)O11—C1—C2—C3176.1 (8)
O12—Rh—O11—C13.0 (5)C7—C1—C2—C33.8 (14)
C02—Rh—O12—C2176.5 (6)O12—C2—C3—C4179.2 (9)
O11—Rh—O12—C22.2 (5)C1—C2—C3—C41.7 (16)
Rh—O11—C1—C7176.8 (6)C2—C3—C4—C51.9 (18)
Rh—O11—C1—C23.3 (9)C3—C4—C5—C61.6 (17)
Rh—O12—C2—C3179.0 (6)C4—C5—C6—C71.8 (17)
Rh—O12—C2—C11.2 (9)C5—C6—C7—C12.4 (16)
O11—C1—C2—O121.4 (11)O11—C1—C7—C6178.7 (8)
C7—C1—C2—O12178.7 (7)C2—C1—C7—C61.2 (15)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Rh(C7H5O2)(CO)2]
Mr280.04
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)3.683 (1), 21.856 (4), 11.296 (3)
β (°) 96.32 (2)
V3)903.8 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.87
Crystal size (mm)0.23 × 0.15 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerPhilips PW1100
diffractometer
Absorption correctionGaussian
(ABSORB in Xtal3.6; Hall et al., 1999)
Tmin, Tmax0.673, 0.872
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3331, 1784, 1049
Rint0.085
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.617
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.051, 0.120, 1.02
No. of reflections1784
No. of parameters127
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.26, 0.61

Computer programs: PWPC (Gomm, 1998), Xtal3.6 (Hall et al., 1999), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001), SHELXL97.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Rh—C011.825 (10)O11—C11.267 (9)
Rh—C021.826 (9)O12—C21.324 (8)
Rh—O122.021 (5)C01—O011.139 (9)
Rh—O112.032 (5)C02—O021.145 (9)
C01—Rh—C0288.3 (4)C02—Rh—O1296.1 (3)
O12—Rh—O1179.4 (2)C01—Rh—O1196.3 (3)
O11—C1—C2—O121.4 (11)C3—C4—C5—C61.6 (17)
C7—C1—C2—C33.8 (14)
Comparative data (Å, °) for dicarbonyl diketone rhodium complexes top
ComplexaRh···RhO—Rh···Rh—OO—Rh—ONCb
Rh(TROP)(CO)2c3.683 (5)0.0 (2)79.4 (2)5
Rh(DBSQ)(CO)2d3.252 (6)139.0 (4)80.1 (4)5
Rh(TDN)(CO)2e80.46 (1)5
Rh(TMOX)(CO)2f3.243 (1)180.0 (1)81.0 (2)5
Rh(TECA)(CO)2g3.213 (14)124.4 (1)80.0 (1)5
Rh(Acac)(CO)2h3.253 (1)-180.0 (1)88.93 (1)6
Rh(BTAC)(CO)2i3.537 (1)155.6 (2)89.8 (1)6
Rh(TACC)(CO)2j3.352 (1)-139.4 (1)92.6 (2)6
Rh(TAMO)(CO)2k3.401 (3)-132.8 (2)86.8 (2)6
Rh(HGCA)(CO)2l3.419 (1)168.4 (2)90.2 (2)6
Rh(HGCA)(CO)2l3.315 (1)-169.1 (2)90.4 (2)6
Notes: (a) CSD reference code; (b) number of atoms in chelate; (c) present study, where TROP is tropolonate; (d) Lange et al. (1992), where DBSQ is 3,6-di-tert-butyl-1,2-semiquinonate; (e) Ragaini et al. (1992), where TDN is bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)nitrosobenzenecarboxylate; (f) Real et al. (1989), where TMOX is oxalate; (g) Elduque et al. (1999), where TECA is chloranilate; (h) Huq & Skapski (1974), where ACAC is acetylacetonate; (i) Leipoldt et al. (1977), where BTAC is benzoyl-1,1,1-trifluoroacetonate; (j) Schurig et al. (1983), where TACC is (1S)-3-trifluoroacetylcamphorate; (k) Schurig et al. (1985), where TAMO is (1RS,4SR)-trifluoroacetyl-menthonate; (l) Schurig et al. (1989), where HGCA is 3,3'-hexafluoroglutaryl bis-(1R)-camphorate.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds