Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The amino group of the title compound, C13H11N, does not form N—H...N hydrogen bonds, but is engaged only in weaker N—H...Ph and C—H...N interactions. An aromatic ring acts as a double hydrogen-bond acceptor, leading to an infinite H—N—H...Ph...H—N—H...Ph array.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100005035/de1132sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100005035/de1132Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 147663

Comment top

The primary amino group (—NH2) has a double-donor single-acceptor hydrogen-bond function. As a consequence, primary amines often have a surplus of strong hydrogen-bond donors that cannot be satisfied by conventional hydrogen bonding (N—H···X with X = O, N, S etc.). If π-bonded moieties are present, weaker N—H···π hydrogen bonds are often formed as a result (Hanton et al., 1992). Most important of all π acceptors is the phenyl group and today there is a large volume of experimental material on N—H···Ph hydrogen bonds (surveyed by Malone et al., 1997; Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). Even several neutron-diffraction studies have been performed (Allen et al., 1997; Steiner & Mason, 2000; also see Starikov & Steiner, 1998). Nevereless, the roles played by N—H···Ph interactions in hydrogen-bond networks are only poorly explored and deserve further investigation. In this context, 2-aminofluorene, (I), is an obviously interesting molecule. Therefore, its crystal structure was determined in order to characterize the hydrogen-bond pattern formed.

The molecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The geometry of the fluorene moiety is unremarkable [for relevant references see, for example, the structure reports on fluorene by Gerkin et al. (1984), on 2-acetylaminofluorene by van Meersssche et al. (1980) and on 9-fluorenone by Luss & Smith (1972)]. The C—N bond length is 1.372 (4) Å. The amino group is significantly pyramidal, with the sum of angles at N equal to 347 (4)°; the H—N—H angle is 117 (4) °. Both N—H vectors are oriented out of the plane of the neighboring aromatic ring, with torsion angles C1—C2—N—H1N = 163 (3)° and C1—C2—N—H2N = 21 (3)°.

The crystal packing of (I) is depicted in Fig. 2. No N—H···N hydrogen bonds are formed, but both N—H vectors point at the faces of aromatic rings of neighboring molecules. The geometries of these contacts are typical for N—H···Ph hydrogen bonding [for N—H normalized to 1.01 Å (M = aromatic centre): N—H1···Ph(x − 1/2, 1/2 − y, z) with H···M = 2.55, N···M = 3.54 Å; N—H···M = 167°, H···C range = 2.60–3.17 Å; N—H2···Ph(1 − x, −y, z − 1/2) with H···M = 2.86, N···M = 3.82 Å, N—H···M = 160°, H···C range 2.53–3.71 Å]. Since the aromatic ring involved acts as a double acceptor, the resulting hydrogen-bond pattern is an infinite H—N—H···Ph···H—N—H···Ph chain. More commonly, Ph groups act only as single hydrogen-bond acceptors, X—H···Ph, and can then play only very simple roles in hydrogen-bond arrays (i.e. isolated bonds X—H···Ph, pairs Ph···H—X—H···Ph or chain terminators X—H···Y—H···Ph).

Due to its pyramidal geometry, the amino group of (I) can act also as a hydrogen-bond acceptor. Apart from the amino group, (I) contains only the weakly polar C—H groups as potential donors. The shortest intermolecular contact formed by the amino N atom is to C4—H(1 − x, 1 − y, 1/2 + z), with H···N = 2.65, C···N = 3.723 (6) Å, C—H···N = 170° (for C—H normalized to 1.08 Å; not shown in Fig. 2). This is a typical geometry for a weak C—H···N hydrogen bond (Steiner, 1998).

The crystal structure of 2-aminofluorene is an example of a structure containing no conventional hydrogen bonds, although they could be formed in principle. Instead, the amino group is involved only in weak hydrogen bonds of the types N—H···Ph and C—H···N, which have been generally neglected not so long ago.

Experimental top

2-Aminofluorene, (I), was obtained from Aldrich and was recrystallized from MeOH by slow evaporation of the solvent.

Refinement top

H atoms bonded to C atoms were treated with the default riding model, and the amino H atoms were located in difference Fourier calculations and refined isotropically. All H-atom displacement parameters refined to realistic values [H atoms bonded to C: 0.057–0.096 Å2; amino H atoms: 0.119 (16) and 0.100 (16) Å2 for H1N and H2N, respectively]. At first glance, the Ueq values of the amino H atoms appear to be relatively high, but when compared with the Ueq of N [0.0836 (9) Å2] they can be considered as normal.

Computing details top

Program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing of (I) drawn in projection onto the xz plane. N—H···π hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines.
2-Aminofluorene top
Crystal data top
C13H11NDx = 1.281 Mg m3
Mr = 181.23Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pna21Cell parameters from 33 reflections
a = 14.790 (14) Åθ = 8.1–17.3°
b = 5.681 (9) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 11.187 (11) ÅT = 293 K
V = 940 (2) Å3Rod, yellow
Z = 40.80 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm
F(000) = 384
Data collection top
Stoe four-circle
diffractometer
Rint = 0.033
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.8°
Graphite monochromatorh = 1916
ω scansk = 73
2226 measured reflectionsl = 1413
1358 independent reflections3 standard reflections every 90 min
1037 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: none
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0579P)2 + 0.1454P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.128(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.13 e Å3
1358 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.15 e Å3
145 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.019 (5)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 1 (7)
Crystal data top
C13H11NV = 940 (2) Å3
Mr = 181.23Z = 4
Orthorhombic, Pna21Mo Kα radiation
a = 14.790 (14) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
b = 5.681 (9) ÅT = 293 K
c = 11.187 (11) Å0.80 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm
Data collection top
Stoe four-circle
diffractometer
Rint = 0.033
2226 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 90 min
1358 independent reflections intensity decay: none
1037 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.128Δρmax = 0.13 e Å3
S = 1.03Δρmin = 0.15 e Å3
1358 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983)
145 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 1 (7)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N0.3763 (2)0.4268 (7)0.0485 (3)0.0836 (9)
H1N0.341 (3)0.529 (9)0.101 (5)0.119 (16)*
H2N0.347 (3)0.348 (8)0.005 (4)0.100 (16)*
C10.48630 (18)0.1156 (6)0.0491 (3)0.0636 (8)
H10.46430.05890.02320.074 (10)*
C20.44602 (17)0.3086 (6)0.1026 (3)0.0650 (8)
C30.4799 (2)0.3882 (6)0.2121 (3)0.0687 (8)
H30.45250.51590.24940.076 (10)*
C40.55252 (19)0.2823 (6)0.2655 (3)0.0653 (8)
H40.57450.33910.33790.070 (9)*
C50.72689 (19)0.0385 (7)0.3438 (3)0.0683 (8)
H50.71990.08080.40000.069 (10)*
C60.79407 (19)0.2008 (7)0.3569 (3)0.0725 (9)
H60.83330.19050.42160.096 (13)*
C70.8042 (2)0.3789 (7)0.2756 (3)0.0750 (9)
H70.84930.49110.28620.068 (9)*
C80.7471 (2)0.3920 (6)0.1770 (3)0.0710 (9)
H80.75440.51170.12100.083 (10)*
C90.6116 (2)0.2014 (6)0.0637 (2)0.0638 (8)
H9A0.64080.17360.01270.057 (8)*
H9B0.57340.33980.05740.087 (11)*
C100.55830 (16)0.0084 (6)0.1025 (3)0.0578 (7)
C110.59276 (17)0.0918 (5)0.2120 (2)0.0572 (7)
C120.66916 (17)0.0516 (6)0.2468 (3)0.0581 (7)
C130.68059 (18)0.2291 (6)0.1627 (2)0.0596 (7)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N0.0764 (17)0.094 (2)0.081 (2)0.0064 (18)0.0077 (17)0.000 (2)
C10.0626 (15)0.077 (2)0.0507 (16)0.0122 (15)0.0037 (13)0.0035 (16)
C20.0570 (14)0.078 (2)0.0600 (17)0.0085 (15)0.0058 (13)0.0076 (18)
C30.0707 (17)0.0733 (19)0.0621 (18)0.0007 (16)0.0121 (15)0.0057 (16)
C40.0687 (15)0.076 (2)0.0509 (15)0.0052 (16)0.0079 (13)0.0111 (17)
C50.0687 (15)0.084 (2)0.0521 (16)0.0057 (17)0.0026 (14)0.0090 (17)
C60.0672 (16)0.095 (2)0.0556 (17)0.0024 (18)0.0013 (14)0.001 (2)
C70.0764 (18)0.088 (2)0.061 (2)0.0120 (19)0.0095 (15)0.0066 (19)
C80.0839 (18)0.076 (2)0.0528 (18)0.0040 (19)0.0139 (13)0.0015 (17)
C90.0773 (18)0.0687 (19)0.0453 (14)0.0061 (17)0.0051 (12)0.0077 (15)
C100.0577 (12)0.0696 (17)0.0460 (14)0.0125 (14)0.0102 (12)0.0004 (14)
C110.0589 (13)0.0695 (19)0.0430 (13)0.0113 (14)0.0086 (11)0.0045 (14)
C120.0586 (13)0.0715 (18)0.0441 (14)0.0103 (14)0.0098 (11)0.0029 (14)
C130.0648 (14)0.0683 (18)0.0456 (13)0.0118 (15)0.0098 (11)0.0003 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N—C21.372 (4)C6—C71.368 (5)
N—H1N0.97 (5)C6—H60.9300
N—H2N0.86 (4)C7—C81.391 (5)
C1—C101.364 (4)C7—H70.9300
C1—C21.384 (4)C8—C131.360 (5)
C1—H10.9300C8—H80.9300
C2—C31.398 (5)C9—C101.494 (4)
C3—C41.369 (5)C9—C131.514 (4)
C3—H30.9300C9—H9A0.9700
C4—C111.373 (4)C9—H9B0.9700
C4—H40.9300C10—C111.409 (4)
C5—C61.364 (5)C11—C121.446 (4)
C5—C121.383 (4)C12—C131.390 (4)
C5—H50.9300
C2—N—H1N115 (3)C8—C7—H7120.0
C2—N—H2N115 (3)C13—C8—C7119.7 (3)
H1N—N—H2N117 (4)C13—C8—H8120.1
C10—C1—C2120.0 (3)C7—C8—H8120.1
C10—C1—H1120.0C10—C9—C13103.1 (2)
C2—C1—H1120.0C10—C9—H9A111.2
N—C2—C1121.4 (4)C13—C9—H9A111.2
N—C2—C3119.8 (4)C10—C9—H9B111.2
C1—C2—C3118.8 (3)C13—C9—H9B111.2
C4—C3—C2121.4 (3)H9A—C9—H9B109.1
C4—C3—H3119.3C1—C10—C11120.9 (3)
C2—C3—H3119.3C1—C10—C9129.9 (3)
C3—C4—C11119.7 (3)C11—C10—C9109.3 (3)
C3—C4—H4120.1C4—C11—C10119.2 (3)
C11—C4—H4120.1C4—C11—C12131.7 (3)
C6—C5—C12119.9 (3)C10—C11—C12109.1 (3)
C6—C5—H5120.1C5—C12—C13119.7 (3)
C12—C5—H5120.1C5—C12—C11131.6 (3)
C5—C6—C7120.5 (3)C13—C12—C11108.7 (3)
C5—C6—H6119.7C8—C13—C12120.1 (3)
C7—C6—H6119.7C8—C13—C9130.1 (3)
C6—C7—C8120.0 (3)C12—C13—C9109.7 (3)
C6—C7—H7120.0

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC13H11N
Mr181.23
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pna21
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)14.790 (14), 5.681 (9), 11.187 (11)
V3)940 (2)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.80 × 0.25 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerStoe four-circle
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2226, 1358, 1037
Rint0.033
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.043, 0.128, 1.03
No. of reflections1358
No. of parameters145
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.13, 0.15
Absolute structureFlack (1983)
Absolute structure parameter1 (7)

Computer programs: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), PLATON (Spek, 1999).

 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds