research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 72| Part 3| March 2016| Pages 403-406

Sodium dipotassium citrate, NaK2C6H5O7

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aAtlantic International University, Honolulu HI , USA, and bIllinois Institute of Technology, Chicago IL , USA
*Correspondence e-mail: kaduk@polycrystallography.com

Edited by V. V. Chernyshev, Moscow State University, Russia (Received 11 January 2016; accepted 18 February 2016; online 24 February 2016)

The crystal structure of sodium dipotassium citrate, Na+·2K+·C6H5O73−, has been solved and refined using laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data, and optimized using density functional techniques. The Na+ and one of the K+ cations are six-coordinate, with bond-valence sums of 1.13 and 0.92 valence units, respectively, while another crystallographically independent K+ cation is seven-coordinate with a bond-valence sum of 1.20. The [KO6] and [KO7] polyhedra share edges and corners to form layers perpendicular to the b axis. The distorted [NaO6] octa­hedra share edges to form chains along the a axis. The result is a three-dimensional network. The only O—H⋯O hydrogen bond is an intra­molecular one between the hy­droxy group and a terminal carboxyl­ate group.

1. Chemical context

We have carried out a systematic study of the crystal structures of Group 1 (alkali metal) citrate salts to understand the anion's conformational flexibility, ionization, coordination tendencies, and hydrogen bonding. Most of the new structures were solved using powder diffraction data (laboratory and/or synchrotron), but single crystals were used where available. The general trends and conclusions about the 16 new compounds and 12 previously characterized structures are being reported separately (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016a[Rammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2016a). Acta Cryst. B72. Submitted.]). The initial study considered salts containing one type of Group 1 cations. This compound (Fig. 1[link]) represents an extension of the study to salts containing more than one alkali metal cation. The structure of related sodium potassium hydrogen citrate has been published recently (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016b[Rammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2016b). Acta Cryst. E72, 170-173.]).

[Scheme 1]
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The content of asymmetric unit of the title compound showing the atom numbering and 50% probability displacement spheroids.

2. Structural commentary

The root-mean-square deviation of the non-hydrogen atoms in the refined and optimized structures is only 0.069 Å. The excellent agreement between the structures (Fig. 2[link]) is strong evidence that the experimental structure is correct (van de Streek & Neumann, 2014[Streek, J. van de & Neumann, M. A. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 1020-1032.]). This discussion uses the DFT-optimized structure. All of the bond lengths and torsion angles, and most of the bond angles fall within the normal ranges indicated by a Mercury Mogul Geometry Check (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]). Only the O17—C3—C4 [observed = 115.4 (4), optimized = 109.3, normal = 110.6 (3)°, Z-score = 4.9] and O17—C3—C6 [observed = 109.0 (3), optimized = 111.4, normal = 105.4 (6)°, Z-score = 10.5] angles are flagged as unusual. Part of the reason for the high Z-scores is the exceptionally low standard uncertainties on the normal values. The hy­droxy group O17–H18 bridges Na19 and K20, so a small distortion from the normal geometry may be expected. The citrate anion occurs in the trans,trans-conformation (about C2—C3 and C3—C4), which is one of the two low-energy conformations of an isolated citrate. The central carboxyl­ate group and the hy­droxy group occur in the normal planar arrangement. The citrate chelates to Na19 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O12, the central carboxyl­ate oxygen O17, and the hy­droxy oxygen O17. The citrate chelates to K20 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O12 and the hy­droxy oxygen O17. One terminal carboxyl­ate group (C1/O11/O12) chelates to K21. Na19 is six-coordinate (distorted octa­hedral), with a bond-valence sum of 1.13 valence units (v.u.). K20 is also six-coordinate with a bond-valence sum of 0.92 v.u.; K21 is seven-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.20 v.u. Na19 and K21 are thus slightly crowded, while K20 is slightly underbonded. The metal–oxygen bonding is ionic, based on the cation charges and Mulliken overlap populations.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Comparison of the refined and optimized structures of sodium dipotassium citrate. The refined structure is in red, and the DFT-optimized structure is in blue.

3. Supra­molecular features

In the crystal structure (Fig. 3[link]), the [KO6] and [KO7] polyhedra share edges and corners to form layers perpendicular to the b axis. The distorted [NaO6] octa­hedra share edges to form chains along the a axis. The result is a three-dimensional network. The only O—H⋯O hydrogen bond is an intra­molecular one, O17—H18⋯O14 (Table 1[link]), between the hy­droxy group and a terminal carboxyl­ate. Two inter­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds also apparently contribute to the crystal energy.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for the DFT-optimized structure[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O17—H18⋯O14 0.989 1.721 2.614 148.2
C2—H7⋯O13 1.095 2.480 3.448 165.8
C2—H8⋯O17 1.089 2.382 3.513 149.0
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Crystal structure of NaK2C6H5O7, viewed approximately down the a axis.

4. Database survey

Details of the comprehensive literature search for citrate structures are presented in Rammohan & Kaduk (2016a[Rammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2016a). Acta Cryst. B72. Submitted.]). A reduced cell search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014[Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662-671.]) (increasing the default tolerance from 1.5 to 2.0%, to account for the differences between ambient and low-temperature lattice parameters) yielded 25 hits, but limiting the chemistry to C, H, O, Na, and K only resulted in no hits. The powder pattern matched no entry in the Powder Diffraction File (ICDD, 2015[ICDD (2015). PDF-4+ 2015 and PDF-4 Organics 2016 (Databases), edited by Dr. Soorya Kabekkodu. International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA, USA).]).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

2.0764 g (10.0 mmol) H3C6H5O7(H2O) was dissolved in 20 ml deionized water. 0.5365 g Na2CO3 (10.0 mmol Na, Sigma–Aldrich) and 1.3824 g K2CO3 (20.0 mmol K, Sigma–Aldrich) were added to the citric acid solution slowly with stirring. The resulting clear colorless colution was evaporated to dryness in a 393 K oven.

6. Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. The powder pattern (Fig. 4[link]) was indexed using Jade 9.5 (MDI, 2012[MDI (2012). Jade9.5. Materials Data Inc., Livermore, CA, USA.]), which yielded a primitive triclinic unit cell with two formula units and with the lattice parameters as given in Table 2[link]. Pseudovoigt profile coefficients were as parameterized in Thompson et al. (1987[Thompson, P., Cox, D. E. & Hastings, J. B. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 79-83.]), and the asymmetry correction of Finger et al. (1994[Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E. & Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 892-900.]) was applied and microstrain broadening by Stephens (1999[Stephens, P. W. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 281-289.]). The structure was solved with FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002[Favre-Nicolin, V. & Černý, R. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 734-743.]) using a citrate, Na, and two K as fragments. One of the 10 solutions (2 × 106 moves, with a bump penalty with weighting factor = 50) yielded a much lower cost function than the others. All C—C and C—O bond lengths were restrained, as were all bond angles. The hydrogen atoms were included at fixed positions, which were re-calculated during the course of the refinement. The Uiso parameters of C2, C3, and C4 were constrained to be equal, and those of H7, H8, H9, and H10 were constrained to be 1.3 times that of these carbon atoms. The Uiso parameters of C1, C5, C6, and the oxygen atoms were constrained to be equal, and that of H18 was constrained to be 1.3 times this value.

Table 2
Experimental details

  Powder data
Crystal data
Chemical formula Na+·2K+·C6H5O73−
Mr 290.29
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, P[\overline{1}]
Temperature (K) 300
a, b, c (Å) 5.51284 (12), 7.62583 (13), 11.37121 (14)
α, β, γ (°) 83.4276 (17), 88.991 (2), 84.3488 (16)
V3) 472.59 (1)
Z 2
Radiation type Kα1, Kα2, λ = 1.540629, 1.544451 Å
Specimen shape, size (mm) Flat sheet, 24 × 24
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D2 Phaser
Specimen mounting Standard holder
Data collection mode Reflection
Scan method Step
2θ values (°) 2θmin = 4.908 2θmax = 99.914 2θstep = 0.020
 
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fit Rp = 0.030, Rwp = 0.039, Rexp = 0.023, R(F2) = 0.042, χ2 = 3.062
No. of parameters 87
No. of restraints 29
H-atom treatment Only H-atom displacement parameters refined
The same symmetry and lattice parameters were used for the DFT calculation. Computer programs: DIFFRAC (Bruker, 2009[Bruker (2009). DIFFRAC. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), PowDLL (Kourkoumelis, 2013[Kourkoumelis, N. (2013). Powder Diffr. 28, 137-148.]), FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002[Favre-Nicolin, V. & Černý, R. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 734-743.]), GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004[Larson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2004). GSAS. Report LAUR 86-748. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA.]), EXPGUI (Toby, 2001[Toby, B. H. (2001). J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 210-213.]), DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2015[Crystal Impact (2015). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Rietveld plot for the refinement of NaK2C6H5O7. The red crosses represent the observed data points, and the green line is the calculated pattern. The magenta curve is the difference pattern, plotted at the same scale as the other patterns. The vertical scale has been multiplied by a factor of 10 for 2θ > 51.0°. The row of black tick marks indicates the Bragg reflection positions for the phase.

The Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (Bravais, 1866[Bravais, A. (1866). In Etudes Cristallographiques. Paris: Gauthier Villars.]; Friedel, 1907[Friedel, G. (1907). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 30, 326-455.]; Donnay & Harker, 1937[Donnay, J. D. H. & Harker, D. (1937). Am. Mineral. 22, 446-467.]) morphology suggests that we might expect platy morphology for sodium dipotas­sium citrate, with {001} as the principal faces. A 2nd-order spherical harmonic preferred orientation model was included in the refinement. The texture index was only 1.006, indicating that preferred orientation was not significant in this rotated flat-plate specimen. The powder pattern is included in the Powder Diffraction File as entry 00-065-1254.

6.1. Density functional geometry optimization

A density functional geometry optimization (fixed experimental unit cell) was carried out using CRYSTAL09 (Dovesi et al., 2005[Dovesi, R., Orlando, R., Civalleri, B., Roetti, C., Saunders, V. R. & Zicovich-Wilson, C. M. (2005). Z. Kristallogr. 220, 571-573.]). The basis sets for the H, C, and O atoms were those of Gatti et al. (1994[Gatti, C., Saunders, V. R. & Roetti, C. (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10686-10696.]), the basis sets for Na and K were those of Dovesi et al. (1991[Dovesi, R., Roetti, C., Freyria-Fava, C., Prencipe, M. & Saunders, V. R. (1991). Chem. Phys. 156, 11-19.]). The calculation used 8 k-points and the B3LYP functional, and took about 41 h on a 2.8 GHz PC. The Uiso parameters from the Rietveld refinement were assigned to the optimized fractional coordinates.

Supporting information


Chemical context top

We have carried out a systematic study of the crystal structures of Group 1 (alkali metal) citrate salts to understand the anion's conformational flexibility, ionization, coordination tendencies, and hydrogen bonding. Most of the new structures were solved using powder diffraction data (laboratory and/or synchrotron), but single crystals were used where available. The general trends and conclusions about the 16 new compounds and 12 previously characterized structures are being reported separately (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016a). The initial study considered salts containing one type of Group 1 cation. This compound represents an extension of the study to salts containing more than one alkali metal cation. The structure of related sodium potassium hydrogen citrate has been published recently (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016b).

Structural commentary top

The root-mean-square deviation of the non-hydrogen atoms in the refined and optimized structures is only 0.069 Å. The excellent agreement between the structures is strong evidence that the experimental structure is correct (van de Streek & Neumann, 2014). This discussion uses the DFT-optimized structure. All of the bond distances and torsion angles, and most of the bond angles fall within the normal ranges indicated by a Mercury Mogul Geometry Check (Macrae et al., 2008). Only the O17—C3—C4 [observed = 115.4 (4), optimized = 109.3, normal = 110.6 (3)°, Z-score = 4.9] and O17—C3—C6 [observed = 109.0 (3), optimized = 111.4, normal = 105.4 (6)°, Z-score = 10.5] angles are flagged as unusual. Part of the reason for the high Z-scores is the exceptionally low standard uncertainties on the normal values. The hy­droxy group O17–H18 bridges Na19 and K20, so a small distortion from the normal geometry may be expected. The citrate anion occurs in the trans,trans-conformation (about C2—C3 and C3—C4), which is one of the two low-energy conformations of an isolated citrate. The central carboxyl­ate group and the hy­droxy group occur in the normal planar arrangement. The citrate chelates to Na19 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O12, the central carboxyl­ate oxygen O17, and the hy­droxy oxygen O17. The citrate chelates to K20 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O12 and the hy­droxy oxygen O17. One terminal carboxyl­ate group (C1/O11/O12) chelates to K21. Na19 is six-coordinate (distorted o­cta­hedral), with a bond-valence sum of 1.13. K20 is also six-coordinate with a bond-valence sum of 0.92. K21 is seven-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.20. Na19 and K21 are thus slightly crowded, while K20 is slightly underbonded. The metal–oxygen bonding is ionic, based on the cation charges and Mulliken overlap populations.

The Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (Bravais, 1866; Friedel, 1907; Donnay & Harker, 1937) morphology suggests that we might expect platy morphology for sodium dipotassium citrate, with {001} as the principal faces. A 2nd-order spherical harmonic preferred orientation model was included in the refinement. The texture index was only 1.006, indicating that preferred orientation was not significant in this rotated flat-plate specimen. The powder pattern is included in the Powder Diffraction File as entry 00–065-1254.

Supra­molecular features top

The [KO6] and [KO7] polyhedra share edges and corners to form layers perpendicular to the b axis. The distorted [NaO6] o­cta­hedra share edges to form chains along the a axis. The result is a three-dimensional network. The only O—H···O hydrogen bond is an intra­molecular one, O17—H18···O14 (Table 1), between the hy­droxy group and a terminal carboxyl­ate. Two inter­molecular C—H···O hydrogen bonds also apparently contribute to the crystal energy.

Database survey top

Details of the comprehensive literature search for citrate structures are presented in Rammohan & Kaduk (2016a). A reduced cell search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014) (increasing the default tolerance from 1.5 to 2.0%, to account for the differences between ambient and low-temperature lattice parameters) yielded 25 hits, but limiting the chemistry to C, H, O, Na, and K only resulted in no hits. The powder pattern matched no entry in the Powder Diffraction File (ICDD, 2015).

Synthesis and crystallization top

2.0764 g (10.0 mmol) H3C6H5O7(H2O) was dissolved in 20 ml deionized water. 0.5365 g Na2CO3 (10.0 mmol Na, Sigma–Aldrich) and 1.3824 g K2CO3 (20.0 mmol K, Sigma–Aldrich) were added to the citric acid solution slowly with stirring. The resulting clear colorless colution was evaporated to dryness in a 393 K oven.

Refinement details top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The powder pattern was indexed using Jade 9.5 (MDI, 2012), which yielded a primitive triclinic unit cell having a = 5.51284 (12), b = 7.62583 (13), c = 11.37121 (14) Å, α = 83.4276 (17), β = 88.9910 (22), γ = 84.3488 (16)°, V = 472.586 (15) Å3, and Z = 2. Pseudovoigt profile coefficients were as parameterized in Thompson et al. (1987) and the asymmetry correction of Finger et al. (1994) was applied and microstrain broadening by Stephens (1999)·The structure was solved with FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002) using a citrate, Na, and two K as fragments. One of the 10 solutions (2 × 106 moves, with a bump penalty with weighting factor = 50) yielded a much lower cost function than the others. All C—C and C—O bond lengths were restrained, as were all bond angles. The hydrogen atoms were included at fixed positions, which were re-calculated during the course of the refinement. The Uiso of C2, C3, and C4 were constrained to be equal, and those of H7, H8, H9, and H10 were constrained to be 1.3 times that of these carbon atoms. The Uiso of of C1, C5, C6, and the oxygen atoms were constrained to be equal, and that of H18 was constrained to be 1.3 times this value.

Density functional geometry optimization top

A density functional geometry optimization (fixed experimental unit cell) was carried out using CRYSTAL09 (Dovesi et al., 2005). The basis sets for the H, C, and O atoms were those of Gatti et al. (1994), the basis sets for Na and K were those of Dovesi et al. (1991). The calculation used 8 k-points and the B3LYP functional, and took about 41 h on a 2.8 GHz PC. The Uiso from the Rietveld refinement were assigned to the optimized fractional coordinates.

Structure description top

We have carried out a systematic study of the crystal structures of Group 1 (alkali metal) citrate salts to understand the anion's conformational flexibility, ionization, coordination tendencies, and hydrogen bonding. Most of the new structures were solved using powder diffraction data (laboratory and/or synchrotron), but single crystals were used where available. The general trends and conclusions about the 16 new compounds and 12 previously characterized structures are being reported separately (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016a). The initial study considered salts containing one type of Group 1 cation. This compound represents an extension of the study to salts containing more than one alkali metal cation. The structure of related sodium potassium hydrogen citrate has been published recently (Rammohan & Kaduk, 2016b).

The root-mean-square deviation of the non-hydrogen atoms in the refined and optimized structures is only 0.069 Å. The excellent agreement between the structures is strong evidence that the experimental structure is correct (van de Streek & Neumann, 2014). This discussion uses the DFT-optimized structure. All of the bond distances and torsion angles, and most of the bond angles fall within the normal ranges indicated by a Mercury Mogul Geometry Check (Macrae et al., 2008). Only the O17—C3—C4 [observed = 115.4 (4), optimized = 109.3, normal = 110.6 (3)°, Z-score = 4.9] and O17—C3—C6 [observed = 109.0 (3), optimized = 111.4, normal = 105.4 (6)°, Z-score = 10.5] angles are flagged as unusual. Part of the reason for the high Z-scores is the exceptionally low standard uncertainties on the normal values. The hy­droxy group O17–H18 bridges Na19 and K20, so a small distortion from the normal geometry may be expected. The citrate anion occurs in the trans,trans-conformation (about C2—C3 and C3—C4), which is one of the two low-energy conformations of an isolated citrate. The central carboxyl­ate group and the hy­droxy group occur in the normal planar arrangement. The citrate chelates to Na19 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O12, the central carboxyl­ate oxygen O17, and the hy­droxy oxygen O17. The citrate chelates to K20 through the terminal carboxyl­ate oxygen O12 and the hy­droxy oxygen O17. One terminal carboxyl­ate group (C1/O11/O12) chelates to K21. Na19 is six-coordinate (distorted o­cta­hedral), with a bond-valence sum of 1.13. K20 is also six-coordinate with a bond-valence sum of 0.92. K21 is seven-coordinate, with a bond-valence sum of 1.20. Na19 and K21 are thus slightly crowded, while K20 is slightly underbonded. The metal–oxygen bonding is ionic, based on the cation charges and Mulliken overlap populations.

The Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (Bravais, 1866; Friedel, 1907; Donnay & Harker, 1937) morphology suggests that we might expect platy morphology for sodium dipotassium citrate, with {001} as the principal faces. A 2nd-order spherical harmonic preferred orientation model was included in the refinement. The texture index was only 1.006, indicating that preferred orientation was not significant in this rotated flat-plate specimen. The powder pattern is included in the Powder Diffraction File as entry 00–065-1254.

The [KO6] and [KO7] polyhedra share edges and corners to form layers perpendicular to the b axis. The distorted [NaO6] o­cta­hedra share edges to form chains along the a axis. The result is a three-dimensional network. The only O—H···O hydrogen bond is an intra­molecular one, O17—H18···O14 (Table 1), between the hy­droxy group and a terminal carboxyl­ate. Two inter­molecular C—H···O hydrogen bonds also apparently contribute to the crystal energy.

Details of the comprehensive literature search for citrate structures are presented in Rammohan & Kaduk (2016a). A reduced cell search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014) (increasing the default tolerance from 1.5 to 2.0%, to account for the differences between ambient and low-temperature lattice parameters) yielded 25 hits, but limiting the chemistry to C, H, O, Na, and K only resulted in no hits. The powder pattern matched no entry in the Powder Diffraction File (ICDD, 2015).

A density functional geometry optimization (fixed experimental unit cell) was carried out using CRYSTAL09 (Dovesi et al., 2005). The basis sets for the H, C, and O atoms were those of Gatti et al. (1994), the basis sets for Na and K were those of Dovesi et al. (1991). The calculation used 8 k-points and the B3LYP functional, and took about 41 h on a 2.8 GHz PC. The Uiso from the Rietveld refinement were assigned to the optimized fractional coordinates.

Synthesis and crystallization top

2.0764 g (10.0 mmol) H3C6H5O7(H2O) was dissolved in 20 ml deionized water. 0.5365 g Na2CO3 (10.0 mmol Na, Sigma–Aldrich) and 1.3824 g K2CO3 (20.0 mmol K, Sigma–Aldrich) were added to the citric acid solution slowly with stirring. The resulting clear colorless colution was evaporated to dryness in a 393 K oven.

Refinement details top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The powder pattern was indexed using Jade 9.5 (MDI, 2012), which yielded a primitive triclinic unit cell having a = 5.51284 (12), b = 7.62583 (13), c = 11.37121 (14) Å, α = 83.4276 (17), β = 88.9910 (22), γ = 84.3488 (16)°, V = 472.586 (15) Å3, and Z = 2. Pseudovoigt profile coefficients were as parameterized in Thompson et al. (1987) and the asymmetry correction of Finger et al. (1994) was applied and microstrain broadening by Stephens (1999)·The structure was solved with FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002) using a citrate, Na, and two K as fragments. One of the 10 solutions (2 × 106 moves, with a bump penalty with weighting factor = 50) yielded a much lower cost function than the others. All C—C and C—O bond lengths were restrained, as were all bond angles. The hydrogen atoms were included at fixed positions, which were re-calculated during the course of the refinement. The Uiso of C2, C3, and C4 were constrained to be equal, and those of H7, H8, H9, and H10 were constrained to be 1.3 times that of these carbon atoms. The Uiso of of C1, C5, C6, and the oxygen atoms were constrained to be equal, and that of H18 was constrained to be 1.3 times this value.

Computing details top

Data collection: DIFFRAC (Bruker, 2009) for RAMM090_publ. Data reduction: PowDLL (Kourkoumelis, 2013) for RAMM090_publ. Program(s) used to solve structure: FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002) for RAMM090_publ. Program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004) and EXPGUI (Toby, 2001) for RAMM090_publ. Molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2015) for RAMM090_publ. Software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010) for RAMM090_publ.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The content of asymmetric unit of the title compound showing the atom numbering and 50% probability displacement spheroids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Comparison of the refined and optimized structures of sodium dipotassium citrate. The refined structure is in red, and the DFT-optimized structure is in blue.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Crystal structure of NaK2C6H5O7, viewed approximately down the a axis.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Rietveld plot for the refinement of NaK2C6H5O7. The red crosses represent the observed data points, and the green line is the calculated pattern. The magenta curve is the difference pattern, plotted at the same scale as the other patterns. The vertical scale has been multiplied by a factor of 10 for 2θ > 51.0°. The row of black tick marks indicates the reflection positions for the phase.
(RAMM090_publ) Sodium dipotassium citrate top
Crystal data top
Na+·2K+·C6H5O73γ = 84.3488 (16)°
Mr = 290.29V = 472.59 (1) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
Hall symbol: -P 1Dx = 2.040 Mg m3
a = 5.51284 (12) Å Kα1, Kα2 radiation, λ = 1.540629, 1.544451 Å
b = 7.62583 (13) ÅT = 300 K
c = 11.37121 (14) Åwhite
α = 83.4276 (17)°flat sheet, 24 × 24 mm
β = 88.991 (2)°Specimen preparation: Prepared at 393 K and 101 kPa
Data collection top
Bruker D2 Phaser
diffractometer
Data collection mode: reflection
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, Bruker D2 PhaserScan method: step
Specimen mounting: standard holder2θmin = 4.908°, 2θmax = 99.914°, 2θstep = 0.020°
Refinement top
Least-squares matrix: fullProfile function: CW Profile function number 4 with 27 terms Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in P. Thompson, D.E. Cox & J.B. Hastings (1987). J. Appl. Cryst.,20,79-83. Asymmetry correction of L.W. Finger, D.E. Cox & A. P. Jephcoat (1994). J. Appl. Cryst.,27,892-900. Microstrain broadening by P.W. Stephens, (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.,32,281-289. #1(GU) = 2.580 #2(GV) = 0.000 #3(GW) = 1.999 #4(GP) = 0.000 #5(LX) = 2.886 #6(ptec) = 0.00 #7(trns) = 4.34 #8(shft) = 1.7006 #9(sfec) = 0.00 #10(S/L) = 0.0168 #11(H/L) = 0.0200 #12(eta) = 0.9000 Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0100 times the peak Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0
Rp = 0.03087 parameters
Rwp = 0.03929 restraints
Rexp = 0.023Only H-atom displacement parameters refined
R(F2) = 0.04230Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
χ2 = 3.062(Δ/σ)max = 0.09
4701 data pointsBackground function: GSAS Background function number 1 with 6 terms. Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind 1: 1257.26 2: -666.506 3: 46.8166 4: 212.247 5: -159.806 6: 45.8742
Crystal data top
Na+·2K+·C6H5O73β = 88.991 (2)°
Mr = 290.29γ = 84.3488 (16)°
Triclinic, P1V = 472.59 (1) Å3
a = 5.51284 (12) ÅZ = 2
b = 7.62583 (13) Å Kα1, Kα2 radiation, λ = 1.540629, 1.544451 Å
c = 11.37121 (14) ÅT = 300 K
α = 83.4276 (17)°flat sheet, 24 × 24 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D2 Phaser
diffractometer
Scan method: step
Specimen mounting: standard holder2θmin = 4.908°, 2θmax = 99.914°, 2θstep = 0.020°
Data collection mode: reflection
Refinement top
Rp = 0.0304701 data points
Rwp = 0.03987 parameters
Rexp = 0.02329 restraints
R(F2) = 0.04230Only H-atom displacement parameters refined
χ2 = 3.062
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2359 (10)0.6795 (12)0.6968 (6)0.0152 (11)*
C20.2042 (13)0.7850 (8)0.8016 (5)0.011 (2)*
C30.3308 (9)0.9576 (6)0.7836 (4)0.011 (2)*
C40.2348 (14)1.0793 (9)0.8767 (7)0.011 (2)*
C50.3654 (11)1.2454 (8)0.8714 (9)0.0152 (11)*
C60.2669 (10)1.0520 (11)0.6588 (5)0.0152 (11)*
H70.282810.699510.883490.015 (3)*
H80.001820.822530.817150.015 (3)*
H90.259201.002900.968530.015 (3)*
H100.032591.121350.861330.015 (3)*
O110.0522 (11)0.6188 (9)0.6561 (6)0.0152 (11)*
O120.4449 (11)0.6462 (9)0.6513 (6)0.0152 (11)*
O130.2630 (12)1.3811 (8)0.9141 (7)0.0152 (11)*
O140.5910 (10)1.2399 (8)0.8447 (6)0.0152 (11)*
O150.0475 (11)1.0713 (9)0.6249 (6)0.0152 (11)*
O160.4326 (12)1.1231 (9)0.5975 (5)0.0152 (11)*
O170.5886 (10)0.9166 (8)0.7914 (5)0.0152 (11)*
H180.636000.995100.849200.0198 (14)*
Na190.7450 (10)0.8688 (6)0.5942 (4)0.0202 (19)*
K200.7634 (6)0.5460 (4)0.8652 (2)0.0297 (13)*
K210.2569 (6)0.6328 (4)0.4134 (2)0.0197 (14)*
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.5113 (17)O14—K21vii3.111 (7)
C1—O111.269 (3)O15—C61.265 (3)
C1—O121.270 (3)O15—Na19i2.438 (8)
C2—C11.5113 (17)O15—Na19vii2.732 (8)
C2—C31.5409 (17)O15—K21viii2.674 (6)
C3—C21.5409 (17)O16—C61.266 (3)
C3—C41.5405 (17)O16—Na192.467 (7)
C3—C61.5461 (17)O16—Na19vii2.397 (9)
C3—O171.420 (3)O16—K21vii2.642 (7)
C4—C31.5405 (17)O17—C31.427 (3)
C4—C51.5119 (17)O17—Na192.442 (7)
C5—C41.5119 (17)O17—K202.927 (6)
C5—O131.271 (3)Na19—O11ix2.470 (7)
C5—O141.273 (3)Na19—O122.510 (8)
C6—C31.5461 (17)Na19—O15ix2.438 (8)
C6—O151.265 (3)Na19—O15vii2.732 (8)
C6—O161.266 (3)Na19—O162.467 (7)
O11—C11.270 (3)Na19—O16vii2.397 (9)
O11—Na19i2.470 (7)Na19—O172.442 (7)
O11—K20i2.869 (7)K20—O11ix2.869 (7)
O11—K212.958 (7)K20—O123.008 (7)
O11—K21ii2.872 (6)K20—O13x3.158 (7)
O12—C11.270 (3)K20—O13xi2.947 (7)
O12—Na192.510 (8)K20—O13vi2.631 (7)
O12—K203.008 (7)K20—O14x2.641 (6)
O12—K212.930 (7)K20—O172.927 (6)
O12—K21iii2.720 (6)K21—O112.958 (7)
O13—C51.271 (3)K21—O11ii2.872 (6)
O13—K20iv2.947 (7)K21—O122.930 (7)
O13—K20v3.158 (7)K21—O12iii2.720 (6)
O13—K20vi2.631 (7)K21—O14vii3.111 (7)
O14—C51.273 (3)K21—O15viii2.674 (6)
O14—K20v2.641 (6)K21—O16vii2.642 (7)
C2—C1—O11119.5 (4)O11ix—Na19—O1284.1 (2)
C2—C1—O12120.8 (4)O11ix—Na19—O15ix88.6 (3)
O11—C1—O12119.6 (4)O11ix—Na19—O15vii92.6 (2)
C1—C2—C3112.7 (4)O11ix—Na19—O16162.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4109.3 (3)O11ix—Na19—O16vii117.3 (3)
C2—C3—C6108.4 (4)O11ix—Na19—O1797.2 (2)
C2—C3—O17109.7 (4)O12—Na19—O15ix156.9 (3)
C4—C3—C6109.0 (4)O12—Na19—O15vii125.1 (3)
C4—C3—O17111.5 (4)O12—Na19—O1693.0 (3)
C6—C3—O17109.0 (3)O12—Na19—O16vii83.0 (3)
C3—C4—C5112.5 (3)O12—Na19—O1772.3 (2)
C4—C5—O13119.5 (4)O15ix—Na19—O15vii77.0 (3)
C4—C5—O14120.1 (4)O15ix—Na19—O1687.4 (2)
O13—C5—O14119.2 (4)O15ix—Na19—O16vii119.6 (3)
C3—C6—O15119.5 (4)O15ix—Na19—O1787.0 (3)
C3—C6—O16118.7 (4)O15vii—Na19—O16103.0 (2)
O15—C6—O16121.4 (4)O15vii—Na19—O16vii50.46 (15)
C1—O11—Na19i108.7 (6)O15vii—Na19—O17161.0 (3)
C1—O11—K20i102.2 (5)O16—Na19—O16vii79.2 (3)
C1—O11—K2193.1 (4)O16—Na19—O1765.7 (2)
C1—O11—K21ii159.7 (7)O16vii—Na19—O17135.0 (3)
Na19i—O11—K20i87.8 (2)O11ix—K20—O1269.11 (15)
Na19i—O11—K2190.9 (2)O11ix—K20—O13x133.6 (2)
Na19i—O11—K21ii91.5 (2)O11ix—K20—O13xi72.12 (19)
K20i—O11—K21164.2 (2)O11ix—K20—O13vi139.3 (2)
K20i—O11—K21ii77.6 (2)O11ix—K20—O14x105.4 (2)
K21—O11—K21ii86.72 (18)O11ix—K20—O1778.9 (2)
C1—O12—Na19125.6 (7)O12—K20—O13x71.3 (2)
C1—O12—K20102.6 (5)O12—K20—O13xi136.8 (2)
C1—O12—K2194.4 (4)O12—K20—O13vi134.4 (2)
C1—O12—K21iii140.1 (7)O12—K20—O14x79.4 (2)
Na19—O12—K2084.1 (2)O12—K20—O1758.96 (18)
Na19—O12—K2197.1 (3)O13x—K20—O13xi129.1 (2)
Na19—O12—K21iii94.3 (2)O13x—K20—O13vi86.4 (2)
K20—O12—K21158.2 (3)O13x—K20—O14x43.33 (13)
K20—O12—K21iii77.6 (2)O13x—K20—O17100.46 (18)
K21—O12—K21iii80.6 (2)O13xi—K20—O13vi88.1 (2)
C5—O13—K20iv126.4 (6)O13xi—K20—O14x93.4 (2)
C5—O13—K20v86.0 (3)O13xi—K20—O17129.94 (18)
C5—O13—K20vi129.6 (8)O13vi—K20—O14x111.0 (2)
K20iv—O13—K20v129.1 (2)O13vi—K20—O1788.3 (2)
K20iv—O13—K20vi91.9 (2)O14x—K20—O17133.9 (2)
K20v—O13—K20vi93.6 (2)O11—K21—O11ii93.28 (18)
C5—O14—K20v111.1 (3)O11—K21—O1243.76 (12)
C5—O14—K21vii119.0 (7)O11—K21—O12iii119.8 (2)
K20v—O14—K21vii76.9 (2)O11—K21—O14vii163.54 (19)
C6—O15—Na19i134.6 (7)O11—K21—O15viii83.75 (19)
C6—O15—Na19vii83.2 (4)O11—K21—O16vii105.00 (18)
C6—O15—K21viii129.5 (7)O11ii—K21—O12126.6 (2)
Na19i—O15—Na19vii103.0 (3)O11ii—K21—O12iii73.16 (16)
Na19i—O15—K21viii95.6 (2)O11ii—K21—O14vii94.23 (18)
Na19vii—O15—K21viii91.77 (18)O11ii—K21—O15viii99.4 (2)
C6—O16—Na19101.0 (5)O11ii—K21—O16vii161.3 (2)
C6—O16—Na19vii98.5 (5)O12—K21—O12iii99.42 (19)
C6—O16—K21vii145.0 (7)O12—K21—O14vii136.5 (2)
Na19—O16—Na19vii100.8 (3)O12—K21—O15viii103.8 (2)
Na19—O16—K21vii95.8 (2)O12—K21—O16vii71.2 (2)
Na19vii—O16—K21vii108.3 (2)O12iii—K21—O14vii76.41 (19)
C3—O17—H18103.0 (4)O12iii—K21—O15viii155.1 (2)
C3—O17—Na19108.1 (4)O12iii—K21—O16vii100.1 (2)
C3—O17—K20116.5 (3)O14vii—K21—O15viii80.59 (19)
H18—O17—Na19131.6 (4)O14vii—K21—O16vii67.13 (17)
H18—O17—K20111.0 (3)O15viii—K21—O16vii79.24 (16)
Na19—O17—K2087.0 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x, y+1, z+1; (iii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iv) x1, y+1, z; (v) x, y+1, z; (vi) x+1, y+2, z+2; (vii) x+1, y+2, z+1; (viii) x, y+2, z+1; (ix) x+1, y, z; (x) x, y1, z; (xi) x+1, y1, z.
(ramm090_DFT) top
Crystal data top
NaK2C6H5O7α = 83.4276°
Mr = 290.27β = 88.9910°
Triclinic, P1γ = 84.3488°
Hall symbol: -P 1V = 472.59 Å3
a = 5.5128 ÅZ = 2
b = 7.6258 ÅT = 300 K
c = 11.3712 Å
Data collection top
Density functional calculation
Crystal data top
NaK2C6H5O7α = 83.4276°
Mr = 290.27β = 88.9910°
Triclinic, P1γ = 84.3488°
a = 5.5128 ÅV = 472.59 Å3
b = 7.6258 ÅZ = 2
c = 11.3712 ÅT = 300 K
Data collection top
Density functional calculation
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.235280.680120.690070.01520*
C20.203790.793170.794610.01140*
C30.329230.965720.777700.01140*
C40.236851.088530.871870.01140*
C50.370971.256020.872680.01520*
C60.265111.064330.652940.01520*
H70.276140.712640.874520.01480*
H80.010640.829480.809610.01480*
H90.259191.013930.960180.01480*
H100.042441.129210.860150.01480*
O110.043580.630070.648530.01520*
O120.448320.645710.650420.01520*
O130.258461.387570.914380.01520*
O140.590641.250430.834760.01520*
O150.043361.077640.622680.01520*
O160.434631.123850.589160.01520*
O170.586370.921800.790540.01520*
H180.646961.038360.796180.01980*
Na190.752250.871970.597200.02020*
K200.765240.551490.860720.02970*
K210.256130.631390.415330.01970*
Bond lengths (Å) top
C1—C21.544C4—C51.539
C1—O111.274C4—H91.099
C1—O121.265C4—H101.092
C2—C31.537C5—O131.262
C2—H71.095C5—O141.277
C2—H81.089C6—O151.267
C3—C41.549C6—O161.261
C3—C61.557O17—H180.989
C3—O171.430
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O17—H18···O140.9891.7212.614148.2
C2—H7···O131.0952.4803.448165.8
C2—H8···O171.0892.3823.513149.0
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) for (ramm090_DFT) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O17—H18···O140.9891.7212.614148.2
C2—H7···O131.0952.4803.448165.8
C2—H8···O171.0892.3823.513149.0

Experimental details

(RAMM090_publ)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaNa+·2K+·C6H5O73
Mr290.29
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)300
a, b, c (Å)5.51284 (12), 7.62583 (13), 11.37121 (14)
α, β, γ (°)83.4276 (17), 88.991 (2), 84.3488 (16)
V3)472.59 (1)
Z2
Radiation type Kα1, Kα2, λ = 1.540629, 1.544451 Å
Specimen shape, size (mm)Flat sheet, 24 × 24
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D2 Phaser
Specimen mountingStandard holder
Data collection modeReflection
Scan methodStep
2θ values (°)2θmin = 4.908 2θmax = 99.914 2θstep = 0.020
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fitRp = 0.030, Rwp = 0.039, Rexp = 0.023, R(F2) = 0.04230, χ2 = 3.062
No. of parameters87
No. of restraints29
H-atom treatmentOnly H-atom displacement parameters refined

Computer programs: DIFFRAC (Bruker, 2009), PowDLL (Kourkoumelis, 2013), FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002), GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004) and EXPGUI (Toby, 2001), DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2015), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

 

References

First citationBravais, A. (1866). In Etudes Cristallographiques. Paris: Gauthier Villars.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2009). DIFFRAC. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCrystal Impact (2015). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationDonnay, J. D. H. & Harker, D. (1937). Am. Mineral. 22, 446–467.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationDovesi, R., Orlando, R., Civalleri, B., Roetti, C., Saunders, V. R. & Zicovich-Wilson, C. M. (2005). Z. Kristallogr. 220, 571–573.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDovesi, R., Roetti, C., Freyria-Fava, C., Prencipe, M. & Saunders, V. R. (1991). Chem. Phys. 156, 11–19.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationFavre-Nicolin, V. & Černý, R. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 734–743.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFinger, L. W., Cox, D. E. & Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 892–900.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFriedel, G. (1907). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 30, 326–455.  Google Scholar
First citationGatti, C., Saunders, V. R. & Roetti, C. (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10686–10696.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGroom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationICDD (2015). PDF-4+ 2015 and PDF-4 Organics 2016 (Databases), edited by Dr. Soorya Kabekkodu. International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA, USA).  Google Scholar
First citationKourkoumelis, N. (2013). Powder Diffr. 28, 137–148.  Google Scholar
First citationLarson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2004). GSAS. Report LAUR 86-748. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMDI (2012). Jade9.5. Materials Data Inc., Livermore, CA, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationRammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2016a). Acta Cryst. B72. Submitted.  Google Scholar
First citationRammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2016b). Acta Cryst. E72, 170–173.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationStephens, P. W. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 281–289.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationStreek, J. van de & Neumann, M. A. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 1020–1032.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationThompson, P., Cox, D. E. & Hastings, J. B. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 79–83.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationToby, B. H. (2001). J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 210–213.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 72| Part 3| March 2016| Pages 403-406
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds