Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807028000/cv2261sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807028000/cv2261Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 654924
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 100 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.002 Å
- R factor = 0.041
- wR factor = 0.107
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.4
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT066_ALERT_1_C Predicted and Reported Transmissions Identical . ? PLAT720_ALERT_4_C Number of Unusual/Non-Standard Label(s) ........ 1 PLAT764_ALERT_4_C Overcomplete CIF Bond List Detected (Rep/Expd) . 1.14 Ratio
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 3 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
For general background on molecular recognition and supramolecular chemistry, see: Desiraju (2003); Garcia-Tellado et al. (1991); Lehn (1995); Leiserowitz (1976); Goswami et al. (2000, 2001, 2005, 2006). For standard values of bond lengths, see: Allen et al. (1987).
Commercially available 1,4-phenylenediacetic acid (19.42 mg, 0.1 mmol) was dissolved in methanol–chloroform (v/v 2:1). Single crystals were grown by slow evaporation of the solvent.
The recognition of dicarboxylic acids (Leiserowitz, 1976; Garcia-Tellado et al., 1991) plays a very important role in the field of molecular recognition and supramolecular chemistry due to its nice donor-acceptor arrays. We have used 1,4-phenylenediacetic acid (the title compound) in our continuing work for the recognition of dicarboxylic acids by designed synthetic receptors (Goswami et al., 2000; 2001). It has produced both syn-syn and anti-anti polymeric hydrogen bonded complexes with pyridine amide based receptors in solid phase (Goswami et al., 2005; 2006). Here we disclose the arrangement of the 1,4-phenylenediacetic acid itself in solid phase, which will help us in designing new hydrogen bonding motifs in the field of supramolecular chemistry as well as crystal engineering (Lehn, 1995; Desiraju, 2003).
Molecules of the title compound, lie across crystallographic inversion centres and the asymmetric unit therefore contain one-half of a molecule (Fig. 1). The orientation of acetic acid [C4/C5/O1/O2] with respect to the benzene ring, shown by the torsion angle C1/C2/C4/C5 = 95.59 (14)°, indicates a (+)-anticlinal conformation. The dihedral angle between the mean plane of acetic acid and benzene ring is 84.46 (6)°. All bond lengths and angles are in normal values (Allen et al., 1987).
In the crystal packing in Fig. 2, the molecules are linked by O—H···O intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 1) into chains along the [1 0 1] direction and these chains are stacked along the b axis.
For general background on molecular recognition and supramolecular chemistry, see: Desiraju (2003); Garcia-Tellado et al. (1991); Lehn (1995); Leiserowitz (1976); Goswami et al. (2000, 2001, 2005, 2006). For standard values of bond lengths, see: Allen et al. (1987).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: APEX2; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1998); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2003).
C10H10O4 | F(000) = 204 |
Mr = 194.18 | Dx = 1.457 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 1293 reflections |
a = 10.2747 (4) Å | θ = 4.0–30.0° |
b = 4.7218 (2) Å | µ = 0.11 mm−1 |
c = 10.1686 (4) Å | T = 100 K |
β = 116.220 (2)° | Slab, colourless |
V = 442.57 (3) Å3 | 0.56 × 0.23 × 0.04 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1293 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1047 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.034 |
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 4.0° |
ω scans | h = −14→14 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) | k = −6→6 |
Tmin = 0.939, Tmax = 0.995 | l = −14→14 |
6558 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.107 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.10 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0461P)2 + 0.1424P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1293 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
84 parameters | Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 |
C10H10O4 | V = 442.57 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 194.18 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 10.2747 (4) Å | µ = 0.11 mm−1 |
b = 4.7218 (2) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 10.1686 (4) Å | 0.56 × 0.23 × 0.04 mm |
β = 116.220 (2)° |
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1293 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) | 1047 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.939, Tmax = 0.995 | Rint = 0.034 |
6558 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.107 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.10 | Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 |
1293 reflections | Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 |
84 parameters |
Experimental. The data were collected with the Oxford Cyrosystem Cobra low-temperature attachment. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | 0.66050 (9) | 0.05389 (19) | 0.13965 (9) | 0.0257 (2) | |
O2 | 0.50586 (9) | −0.29448 (19) | 0.11918 (10) | 0.0257 (2) | |
C1 | 0.88216 (13) | 0.0593 (3) | 0.52686 (13) | 0.0225 (3) | |
C2 | 0.86705 (12) | −0.1392 (2) | 0.42009 (12) | 0.0206 (3) | |
C3 | 0.98642 (13) | −0.1978 (3) | 0.39426 (13) | 0.0231 (3) | |
C4 | 0.72489 (14) | −0.2887 (3) | 0.33517 (14) | 0.0253 (3) | |
C5 | 0.62940 (12) | −0.1559 (2) | 0.18932 (13) | 0.0203 (3) | |
H1 | 0.7984 (17) | 0.095 (3) | 0.5453 (17) | 0.028 (4)* | |
H3 | 0.9756 (16) | −0.336 (3) | 0.3220 (18) | 0.026 (4)* | |
H4A | 0.6654 (18) | −0.288 (4) | 0.3894 (19) | 0.037 (5)* | |
H4B | 0.7381 (19) | −0.477 (4) | 0.3108 (19) | 0.035 (4)* | |
H1O2 | 0.453 (2) | −0.204 (4) | 0.033 (2) | 0.052 (6)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0212 (4) | 0.0278 (5) | 0.0206 (4) | −0.0035 (3) | 0.0024 (3) | 0.0053 (3) |
O2 | 0.0207 (4) | 0.0271 (5) | 0.0201 (4) | −0.0046 (3) | 0.0007 (3) | 0.0026 (3) |
C1 | 0.0197 (5) | 0.0265 (6) | 0.0191 (6) | 0.0034 (4) | 0.0066 (5) | 0.0024 (4) |
C2 | 0.0190 (5) | 0.0212 (5) | 0.0149 (5) | 0.0002 (4) | 0.0015 (4) | 0.0041 (4) |
C3 | 0.0254 (6) | 0.0227 (6) | 0.0167 (5) | 0.0018 (4) | 0.0052 (5) | −0.0014 (4) |
C4 | 0.0228 (6) | 0.0251 (6) | 0.0195 (6) | −0.0040 (4) | 0.0017 (5) | 0.0043 (4) |
C5 | 0.0188 (5) | 0.0219 (6) | 0.0174 (5) | 0.0001 (4) | 0.0055 (4) | −0.0012 (4) |
O1—C5 | 1.2169 (14) | C2—C4 | 1.5043 (16) |
O2—C5 | 1.3222 (14) | C3—C1i | 1.3919 (17) |
O2—H1O2 | 0.91 (2) | C3—H3 | 0.952 (17) |
C1—C2 | 1.3901 (17) | C4—C5 | 1.5065 (17) |
C1—C3i | 1.3919 (17) | C4—H4A | 0.988 (18) |
C1—H1 | 0.973 (15) | C4—H4B | 0.950 (18) |
C2—C3 | 1.3909 (18) | ||
C5—O2—H1O2 | 107.9 (13) | C2—C4—C5 | 114.50 (10) |
C2—C1—C3i | 120.80 (11) | C2—C4—H4A | 111.2 (10) |
C2—C1—H1 | 117.7 (9) | C5—C4—H4A | 104.7 (10) |
C3i—C1—H1 | 121.5 (9) | C2—C4—H4B | 112.0 (11) |
C1—C2—C3 | 118.57 (10) | C5—C4—H4B | 103.9 (11) |
C1—C2—C4 | 120.65 (11) | H4A—C4—H4B | 110.1 (14) |
C3—C2—C4 | 120.78 (11) | O1—C5—O2 | 122.99 (11) |
C2—C3—C1i | 120.64 (11) | O1—C5—C4 | 124.83 (10) |
C2—C3—H3 | 118.0 (9) | O2—C5—C4 | 112.17 (10) |
C1i—C3—H3 | 121.3 (9) | ||
C3i—C1—C2—C3 | 0.36 (19) | C1—C2—C4—C5 | 95.59 (14) |
C3i—C1—C2—C4 | 179.93 (11) | C3—C2—C4—C5 | −84.85 (15) |
C1—C2—C3—C1i | −0.36 (19) | C2—C4—C5—O1 | 0.34 (19) |
C4—C2—C3—C1i | −179.93 (11) | C2—C4—C5—O2 | −179.89 (11) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H1O2···O1ii | 0.908 (19) | 1.771 (19) | 2.6766 (12) | 175 (2) |
Symmetry code: (ii) −x+1, −y, −z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H10O4 |
Mr | 194.18 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
a, b, c (Å) | 10.2747 (4), 4.7218 (2), 10.1686 (4) |
β (°) | 116.220 (2) |
V (Å3) | 442.57 (3) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.11 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.56 × 0.23 × 0.04 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.939, 0.995 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 6558, 1293, 1047 |
Rint | 0.034 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.703 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.041, 0.107, 1.10 |
No. of reflections | 1293 |
No. of parameters | 84 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.32, −0.18 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005), APEX2, SAINT (Bruker, 2005), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1998), SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2003).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H1O2···O1i | 0.908 (19) | 1.771 (19) | 2.6766 (12) | 175 (2) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y, −z. |
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
The recognition of dicarboxylic acids (Leiserowitz, 1976; Garcia-Tellado et al., 1991) plays a very important role in the field of molecular recognition and supramolecular chemistry due to its nice donor-acceptor arrays. We have used 1,4-phenylenediacetic acid (the title compound) in our continuing work for the recognition of dicarboxylic acids by designed synthetic receptors (Goswami et al., 2000; 2001). It has produced both syn-syn and anti-anti polymeric hydrogen bonded complexes with pyridine amide based receptors in solid phase (Goswami et al., 2005; 2006). Here we disclose the arrangement of the 1,4-phenylenediacetic acid itself in solid phase, which will help us in designing new hydrogen bonding motifs in the field of supramolecular chemistry as well as crystal engineering (Lehn, 1995; Desiraju, 2003).
Molecules of the title compound, lie across crystallographic inversion centres and the asymmetric unit therefore contain one-half of a molecule (Fig. 1). The orientation of acetic acid [C4/C5/O1/O2] with respect to the benzene ring, shown by the torsion angle C1/C2/C4/C5 = 95.59 (14)°, indicates a (+)-anticlinal conformation. The dihedral angle between the mean plane of acetic acid and benzene ring is 84.46 (6)°. All bond lengths and angles are in normal values (Allen et al., 1987).
In the crystal packing in Fig. 2, the molecules are linked by O—H···O intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 1) into chains along the [1 0 1] direction and these chains are stacked along the b axis.