Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
4-Chloro-5-(2-phen­oxy­eth­oxy)phthalonitrile, C16H11ClN2O2, (I), and 4-chloro-5-[2-(penta­fluoro­phen­oxy)eth­oxy]phthalo­nitrile, C16H6ClF5N2O2, (II), show different types of electrostatic inter­action. In (I), the phen­oxy and phthalonitrile (benzene-1,2-dicarbonitrile) moieties are well separated in an open conformation and inter­molecular C—H...π inter­actions are observed in the crystal packing. On the other hand, in (II), the penta­fluoro­phen­oxy moiety inter­acts closely with the Cl atom to form a folded conformation containing an intra­molecular halogen–π inter­action.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270111008675/gd3379sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I, II

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270111008675/gd3379Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270111008675/gd3379IIsup3.hkl
Contains datablock II

CCDC references: 829703; 829704

Comment top

The anion–π interaction has been found and discussed as one of the most interesting topics regarding electrostatic interactions in the last decade. The provocative title of a paper, `Anion–π interactions: do they exist?', which was a theoretical study of the interaction reported by Quiñonero et al. (2002), attracted the interest of many chemists (Schottel et al., 2008). Since π-conjugated molecules show remarkable electrostatic interactions because of their quadrupole moments (i.e. negative charge of the aromatic centre), benzene molecules show cation–π, C—H···π and the sliding conformation of ππ interactions (Doerksenm & Thakkar, 1999). On the other hand, fluorinated compounds such as hexafluorobenzene have the opposite quadrupole moment (i.e. positive charge of the aromatic centre induced by the surrounding F atoms) and show the opposite electrostatic interactions, e.g. anion···C6F6 (anion–π), CF···C6F6 (CF–π) and the sliding conformation of C6F6···C6F6 (ππ) interactions. Several papers then demonstrated the existence of anion–π interactions between anion sources and aromatic moieties (Demeshko et al., 2004; de Hoog et al., 2004; Berryman et al., 2006; Dawson et al., 2010), which includes noncovalent π-interactions between lone-pair electrons of electronegative atoms (F, Cl, Br, O, S and N) and perfluorobenzene derivatives (Quiñonero et al., 2002). These studies of quadrupole moment and electrostatic interactions prompted us to compare them with the crystal structures of fluorinated compounds, which also show several unique electrostatic interactions in the crystalline state (Hori et al., 2007; Hori & Naganuma, 2010), e.g. the arene–perfluoroarene interaction (Patrick & Prosser, 1960; Williams, 1993) and C—H···F interactions (Desiraju, 1996; Thalladi et al., 1998). In this paper, we discuss the halogen–π interaction, classified as an anion–π interaction, between the pentafluorophenoxy group and Cl atoms in 4-chloro-5-[2-(pentafluorophenoxy)ethoxy]phthalonitrile, (II), in order to understand fluorine-substituted effects, given that no halogen–π interactions are observed in the nonfluorinated compound 4-chloro-5-(2-phenoxyethoxy)phthalonitrile, (I).

The molecular conformations of (I) and (II) are different (Fig. 1), viz. open in (I) and folded in (II), and the folded structure of (II) shows an apparently attractive interaction between atom Cl1 and the pentafluorophenoxy moiety (ring B). The Cl1···CgB distance in (II) is 3.7253 (12) Å, where CgB is the centroid of ring B. Two intramolecular aromatic rings (A and B) are linked by the ethoxy moiety, and significant conformational differences of transgauchetrans and transgauchegauche conformations are observed in the C5/O1/C9/C10/O2/C11 ethoxy moiety of (I) and (II), respectively. The C9—C10—O2—C11 torsion angles in (I) and (II) are trans [173.89 (10)°] and gauche [77.06 (18)°], respectively. The thermodynamically unfavourable gauchegauche conformation is realised in (II) because of the intramolecular interaction between atom Cl1 and ring B. The O1—C9—C10—O2 torsion angles have the same gauche configuration, viz. 75.96 (13)° in (I) and 71.99 (17)° in (II), and the C5—O1—C9—C10 torsion angles are trans, viz. 171.51 (11)° in (I) and 179.93 (13)° in (II). The dihedral angle between the aromatic rings (A and B) of (II) is 68.75 (4)°, which is smaller than the corresponding angle in (I) [70.89 (5)°]. The C4—Cl1 bond distance of 1.7256 (16) Å in (II) is slightly longer than that of 1.7168 (14) Å in (I), although the C10—O2 bond in (II) is longer than that in (I) [1.454 (2) versus 1.4309 (16) Å]. The CN bond distances in (I) and (II) are almost the same [C7N1 = 1.1458 (19) and C8N2 = 1.144 (2) Å for (I), and C7N1 = 1.144 (2) and C8N2 = 1.149 (2) Å for (II)]. The C5—O1 bond distances are also the same, i.e. 1.3535 (16) and 1.3524 (18) Å for (I) and (II), respectively.

In the crystal structure of (I), no ππ stacking is observed, but inversion-related pairs of molecules are linked by a C—H···π interaction (Fig. 2); atom H3 of ring A at (x, y, z) interacts closely with a phenoxy moiety at (-x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 1) [symmetry code (i)]. The intermolecular Cl1···Cl1i distance in the pair is short, at 3.274 (1) Å. The formation of the pair allows stabilization of the gauche configuration of O1/C9/C10/O2 to give the transgauchetrans conformation in (I). Further, the H atoms in ethoxy moieties C10—H10A and C10—H10B interact with rings Bii [symmetry code: (ii) -x + 1, -y, -z + 1] and Aiii [symmetry code: (iii) x, y - 1, z], respectively, through C—H···π interactions; H10A···CgBii = 2.59 Å [C10···CgBii = 3.477 (2) Å] and H10B···CgAiii = 2.71 Å [C10···CgAiii = 3.492 (2) Å]. Accordingly, the molecules are in a head-to-tail arrangement along the a axis and, further, they form zigzag arrangements along the c axis.

In (II), the molecules are aligned parallel to the a axis. In this direction, atom F5 in the pentafluorophenoxy group interacts with ethoxy atom H9B of a neighbouring molecule through a weak C—H···F contact (Howard et al., 1996), with F5···H9Biv = 2.51 Å [symmetry code: (iv) x - 1, y, z]. The F5···C5iv distance is also short, at 2.950 (2) Å. Because the pentafluorophenoxy groups are aligned in the same direction, the F substituents are located close to one another, with F1···F5v = 2.8625 (15) Å and F2···F4v = 2.8914 (17) Å [symmetry code: (v) x + 1, y, z]. Similarly, the molecules are aligned along the b axis and the F3···F4vi distance is short, at 2.7756 (17) Å [symmetry code: (vi) -x, -y, -z + 1]. No ππ stacking is observed in the crystal packing of (II).

In conclusion, the structures of (I) and (II) demonstrate that ring fluorination is associated with the folded structure of (II) through the halogen–π interaction. Since no strong intermolecular interactions are observed between the molecules in either structure, the halogen–π interaction may be the dominant driving force for the folding in (II).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Berryman et al. (2006); Dawson et al. (2010); Demeshko et al. (2004); Desiraju (1996); Doerksenm & Thakkar (1999); Hoog et al. (2004); Hori & Naganuma (2010); Hori et al. (2007); Howard et al. (1996); Patrick & Prosser (1960); Quiñonero et al. (2002); Schottel et al. (2008); Thalladi et al. (1998); Williams (1993).

Experimental top

Compounds (I) and (II) were prepared in one step using general procedures (Durmus et al., 2009). Typically, K2CO3 (11 g, 81 mol) was added in portions over a period of 2 h to a dry dimethylformamide solution (60 ml) of 4,5-dichlorophthalonitrile (4.0 g, 20 mol) and 2-phenoxyethanol (5.1 ml, 40 mol) under an N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then stirred at 333 K for 2 d. The mixture was evaporated to remove the solvent and the residue was extracted by CHCl3. The product was further purified by column chromatography (silica gel, CHCl3/MeOH) and recycled gas-phase chromatography (CHCl3) to give (I) as a white powder. Compound (II) was obtained from 2-(pentafluorophenoxy)ethanol using the same procedure as (I). Each compound was crystallized from CHCl3 by the vapour diffusion of MeOH to give colourless crystals. Data for (I): yield 23%, m.p. 397–398 K; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, TMS, δ, p.p.m.): 7.79 (s, Ar), 7.41 (s, Ar), 7.32 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar), 7.01 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar), 6.93 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, Ar), 4.54–4.51 (m, CH2), 4.44–4.41 (m, CH2); EI-MS: 298 m/z (M+); elemental analysis, calculated for C16H11ClN2O2: C 64.3, H 3.7, N 9.4%; found: C 64.2, H 3.7, N 9.4%. Data for (II): yield 32%, m.p. 405–207 K; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, TMS, δ, p.p.m.): 7.80 (s, Ar), 7.31 (s, Ar), 4.62–4.60 (m, CH2), 4.49–4.47 (m, CH2); EI-MS: 388 m/z (M+); elemental analysis, calculated for C16H6ClF5N2O2: C 49.4, H 1.6, N 7.2%; found: C 49.4, H 1.5, N 7.1%.

Refinement top

All H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and refined as riding, with aromatic C—H = 0.95 Å and aliphatic C—H = 0.99 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

The anion–π interaction has been found and discussed as one of the most interesting topics regarding electrostatic interactions in the last decade. The provocative title of a paper, `Anion–π interactions: do they exist?', which was a theoretical study of the interaction reported by Quiñonero et al. (2002), attracted the interest of many chemists (Schottel et al., 2008). Since π-conjugated molecules show remarkable electrostatic interactions because of their quadrupole moments (i.e. negative charge of the aromatic centre), benzene molecules show cation–π, C—H···π and the sliding conformation of ππ interactions (Doerksenm & Thakkar, 1999). On the other hand, fluorinated compounds such as hexafluorobenzene have the opposite quadrupole moment (i.e. positive charge of the aromatic centre induced by the surrounding F atoms) and show the opposite electrostatic interactions, e.g. anion···C6F6 (anion–π), CF···C6F6 (CF–π) and the sliding conformation of C6F6···C6F6 (ππ) interactions. Several papers then demonstrated the existence of anion–π interactions between anion sources and aromatic moieties (Demeshko et al., 2004; de Hoog et al., 2004; Berryman et al., 2006; Dawson et al., 2010), which includes noncovalent π-interactions between lone-pair electrons of electronegative atoms (F, Cl, Br, O, S and N) and perfluorobenzene derivatives (Quiñonero et al., 2002). These studies of quadrupole moment and electrostatic interactions prompted us to compare them with the crystal structures of fluorinated compounds, which also show several unique electrostatic interactions in the crystalline state (Hori et al., 2007; Hori & Naganuma, 2010), e.g. the arene–perfluoroarene interaction (Patrick & Prosser, 1960; Williams, 1993) and C—H···F interactions (Desiraju, 1996; Thalladi et al., 1998). In this paper, we discuss the halogen–π interaction, classified as an anion–π interaction, between the pentafluorophenoxy group and Cl atoms in 4-chloro-5-[2-(pentafluorophenoxy)ethoxy]phthalonitrile, (II), in order to understand fluorine-substituted effects, given that no halogen–π interactions are observed in the nonfluorinated compound 4-chloro-5-(2-phenoxyethoxy)phthalonitrile, (I).

The molecular conformations of (I) and (II) are different (Fig. 1), viz. open in (I) and folded in (II), and the folded structure of (II) shows an apparently attractive interaction between atom Cl1 and the pentafluorophenoxy moiety (ring B). The Cl1···CgB distance in (II) is 3.7253 (12) Å, where CgB is the centroid of ring B. Two intramolecular aromatic rings (A and B) are linked by the ethoxy moiety, and significant conformational differences of transgauchetrans and transgauchegauche conformations are observed in the C5/O1/C9/C10/O2/C11 ethoxy moiety of (I) and (II), respectively. The C9—C10—O2—C11 torsion angles in (I) and (II) are trans [173.89 (10)°] and gauche [77.06 (18)°], respectively. The thermodynamically unfavourable gauchegauche conformation is realised in (II) because of the intramolecular interaction between atom Cl1 and ring B. The O1—C9—C10—O2 torsion angles have the same gauche configuration, viz. 75.96 (13)° in (I) and 71.99 (17)° in (II), and the C5—O1—C9—C10 torsion angles are trans, viz. 171.51 (11)° in (I) and 179.93 (13)° in (II). The dihedral angle between the aromatic rings (A and B) of (II) is 68.75 (4)°, which is smaller than the corresponding angle in (I) [70.89 (5)°]. The C4—Cl1 bond distance of 1.7256 (16) Å in (II) is slightly longer than that of 1.7168 (14) Å in (I), although the C10—O2 bond in (II) is longer than that in (I) [1.454 (2) versus 1.4309 (16) Å]. The CN bond distances in (I) and (II) are almost the same [C7N1 = 1.1458 (19) and C8N2 = 1.144 (2) Å for (I), and C7N1 = 1.144 (2) and C8N2 = 1.149 (2) Å for (II)]. The C5—O1 bond distances are also the same, i.e. 1.3535 (16) and 1.3524 (18) Å for (I) and (II), respectively.

In the crystal structure of (I), no ππ stacking is observed, but inversion-related pairs of molecules are linked by a C—H···π interaction (Fig. 2); atom H3 of ring A at (x, y, z) interacts closely with a phenoxy moiety at (-x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 1) [symmetry code (i)]. The intermolecular Cl1···Cl1i distance in the pair is short, at 3.274 (1) Å. The formation of the pair allows stabilization of the gauche configuration of O1/C9/C10/O2 to give the transgauchetrans conformation in (I). Further, the H atoms in ethoxy moieties C10—H10A and C10—H10B interact with rings Bii [symmetry code: (ii) -x + 1, -y, -z + 1] and Aiii [symmetry code: (iii) x, y - 1, z], respectively, through C—H···π interactions; H10A···CgBii = 2.59 Å [C10···CgBii = 3.477 (2) Å] and H10B···CgAiii = 2.71 Å [C10···CgAiii = 3.492 (2) Å]. Accordingly, the molecules are in a head-to-tail arrangement along the a axis and, further, they form zigzag arrangements along the c axis.

In (II), the molecules are aligned parallel to the a axis. In this direction, atom F5 in the pentafluorophenoxy group interacts with ethoxy atom H9B of a neighbouring molecule through a weak C—H···F contact (Howard et al., 1996), with F5···H9Biv = 2.51 Å [symmetry code: (iv) x - 1, y, z]. The F5···C5iv distance is also short, at 2.950 (2) Å. Because the pentafluorophenoxy groups are aligned in the same direction, the F substituents are located close to one another, with F1···F5v = 2.8625 (15) Å and F2···F4v = 2.8914 (17) Å [symmetry code: (v) x + 1, y, z]. Similarly, the molecules are aligned along the b axis and the F3···F4vi distance is short, at 2.7756 (17) Å [symmetry code: (vi) -x, -y, -z + 1]. No ππ stacking is observed in the crystal packing of (II).

In conclusion, the structures of (I) and (II) demonstrate that ring fluorination is associated with the folded structure of (II) through the halogen–π interaction. Since no strong intermolecular interactions are observed between the molecules in either structure, the halogen–π interaction may be the dominant driving force for the folding in (II).

For related literature, see: Berryman et al. (2006); Dawson et al. (2010); Demeshko et al. (2004); Desiraju (1996); Doerksenm & Thakkar (1999); Hoog et al. (2004); Hori & Naganuma (2010); Hori et al. (2007); Howard et al. (1996); Patrick & Prosser (1960); Quiñonero et al. (2002); Schottel et al. (2008); Thalladi et al. (1998); Williams (1993).

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structures of (a) (I) and (b) (II), both at 100 K, showing the atom-labelling schemes. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The pair of (I) formed through C—H···π interactions. The unit-cell outline and H atoms not involved in the motif shown have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry code: (i) -x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 1.]
(I) 4-Chloro-5-(2-phenoxyethoxy)benzene-1,2-dicarbonitrile top
Crystal data top
C16H11ClN2O2F(000) = 616
Mr = 298.72Dx = 1.404 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 5581 reflections
a = 9.808 (4) Åθ = 2.7–27.9°
b = 6.555 (3) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
c = 22.018 (9) ÅT = 100 K
β = 93.259 (4)°Prismatic, colourless
V = 1413.2 (10) Å30.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
3228 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2744 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.029
Detector resolution: 8.333 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.7°
φ and ω scansh = 1212
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
k = 88
Tmin = 0.947, Tmax = 0.973l = 2828
15329 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.087H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0367P)2 + 0.8106P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3228 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
190 parametersΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
Crystal data top
C16H11ClN2O2V = 1413.2 (10) Å3
Mr = 298.72Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 9.808 (4) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
b = 6.555 (3) ÅT = 100 K
c = 22.018 (9) Å0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
β = 93.259 (4)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
3228 independent reflections
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
2744 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.947, Tmax = 0.973Rint = 0.029
15329 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0350 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.087H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
3228 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
190 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. IR (KBr disk, cm-1):3447, 3107, 2922, 2359, 2232, 1599, 1584, 1499, 1491, 1451, 1254, 1051, 758, 692, 532.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.74491 (14)0.9594 (2)0.31436 (6)0.0158 (3)
C20.86918 (14)1.0586 (2)0.32848 (6)0.0175 (3)
C30.95904 (14)0.9762 (2)0.37340 (7)0.0198 (3)
H31.04391.04110.38350.024*
C40.92400 (14)0.8000 (2)0.40310 (6)0.0188 (3)
C50.79972 (13)0.6987 (2)0.38881 (6)0.0151 (3)
C60.70992 (14)0.7809 (2)0.34416 (6)0.0154 (3)
H60.62510.71570.33400.018*
C70.64887 (14)1.0428 (2)0.26899 (6)0.0184 (3)
C80.90211 (15)1.2475 (2)0.29898 (7)0.0215 (3)
C90.64597 (13)0.4259 (2)0.40987 (6)0.0164 (3)
H9A0.62800.40180.36580.020*
H9B0.57130.51110.42460.020*
C100.65352 (14)0.2262 (2)0.44356 (6)0.0157 (3)
H10A0.57900.13490.42800.019*
H10B0.74180.15830.43720.019*
C110.65911 (13)0.0998 (2)0.54506 (6)0.0142 (3)
C120.65391 (14)0.1413 (2)0.60719 (6)0.0170 (3)
H120.63690.27620.62050.020*
C130.67362 (14)0.0145 (2)0.64915 (6)0.0202 (3)
H130.66930.01400.69130.024*
C140.69975 (14)0.2132 (2)0.63016 (7)0.0206 (3)
H140.71430.31940.65920.025*
C150.70417 (14)0.2537 (2)0.56855 (7)0.0199 (3)
H150.72160.38860.55530.024*
C160.68337 (14)0.0984 (2)0.52585 (6)0.0172 (3)
H160.68580.12770.48370.021*
Cl11.03241 (4)0.70258 (6)0.459822 (19)0.03207 (12)
N10.57125 (13)1.1075 (2)0.23319 (6)0.0255 (3)
N20.92533 (15)1.4003 (2)0.27667 (6)0.0315 (3)
O10.77600 (9)0.52762 (14)0.42099 (4)0.0168 (2)
O20.64098 (10)0.26465 (14)0.50697 (4)0.0155 (2)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0185 (7)0.0164 (6)0.0128 (6)0.0037 (5)0.0022 (5)0.0004 (5)
C20.0198 (7)0.0157 (6)0.0177 (6)0.0014 (5)0.0066 (5)0.0029 (5)
C30.0140 (6)0.0198 (7)0.0257 (7)0.0015 (5)0.0024 (5)0.0052 (6)
C40.0129 (6)0.0214 (7)0.0218 (7)0.0015 (5)0.0010 (5)0.0067 (6)
C50.0151 (6)0.0148 (6)0.0159 (6)0.0017 (5)0.0041 (5)0.0022 (5)
C60.0157 (6)0.0165 (6)0.0141 (6)0.0002 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0006 (5)
C70.0225 (7)0.0169 (7)0.0162 (6)0.0001 (5)0.0032 (5)0.0015 (5)
C80.0216 (7)0.0217 (7)0.0214 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0044 (6)0.0033 (6)
C90.0138 (6)0.0171 (7)0.0179 (6)0.0028 (5)0.0010 (5)0.0018 (5)
C100.0178 (6)0.0151 (6)0.0142 (6)0.0018 (5)0.0012 (5)0.0004 (5)
C110.0117 (6)0.0147 (6)0.0164 (6)0.0021 (5)0.0016 (5)0.0019 (5)
C120.0163 (6)0.0168 (6)0.0181 (7)0.0009 (5)0.0020 (5)0.0022 (5)
C130.0198 (7)0.0254 (7)0.0154 (6)0.0036 (6)0.0018 (5)0.0002 (6)
C140.0199 (7)0.0202 (7)0.0217 (7)0.0025 (6)0.0009 (5)0.0069 (6)
C150.0200 (7)0.0144 (6)0.0257 (7)0.0008 (5)0.0040 (6)0.0004 (6)
C160.0191 (7)0.0162 (6)0.0165 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0033 (5)0.0011 (5)
Cl10.01731 (18)0.0337 (2)0.0436 (2)0.00739 (15)0.01191 (15)0.02295 (18)
N10.0283 (7)0.0268 (7)0.0212 (6)0.0018 (5)0.0010 (5)0.0067 (5)
N20.0389 (8)0.0229 (7)0.0337 (8)0.0009 (6)0.0105 (6)0.0087 (6)
O10.0140 (5)0.0162 (5)0.0198 (5)0.0031 (4)0.0014 (4)0.0065 (4)
O20.0193 (5)0.0128 (4)0.0145 (5)0.0000 (4)0.0018 (4)0.0002 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C61.3940 (19)C9—H9B0.9900
C1—C21.401 (2)C10—O21.4309 (16)
C1—C71.4410 (19)C10—H10A0.9900
C2—C31.395 (2)C10—H10B0.9900
C2—C81.444 (2)C11—O21.3735 (16)
C3—C41.380 (2)C11—C161.3904 (19)
C3—H30.9500C11—C121.3984 (19)
C4—C51.408 (2)C12—C131.383 (2)
C4—Cl11.7168 (14)C12—H120.9500
C5—O11.3535 (16)C13—C141.396 (2)
C5—C61.3907 (19)C13—H130.9500
C6—H60.9500C14—C151.385 (2)
C7—N11.1458 (19)C14—H140.9500
C8—N21.144 (2)C15—C161.393 (2)
C9—O11.4474 (16)C15—H150.9500
C9—C101.5046 (19)C16—H160.9500
C9—H9A0.9900
C6—C1—C2121.30 (12)O2—C10—C9108.84 (11)
C6—C1—C7118.41 (13)O2—C10—H10A109.9
C2—C1—C7120.28 (13)C9—C10—H10A109.9
C3—C2—C1118.97 (13)O2—C10—H10B109.9
C3—C2—C8120.16 (13)C9—C10—H10B109.9
C1—C2—C8120.82 (13)H10A—C10—H10B108.3
C4—C3—C2119.68 (13)O2—C11—C16124.58 (12)
C4—C3—H3120.2O2—C11—C12115.69 (12)
C2—C3—H3120.2C16—C11—C12119.72 (12)
C3—C4—C5121.65 (13)C13—C12—C11119.87 (13)
C3—C4—Cl1119.68 (11)C13—C12—H12120.1
C5—C4—Cl1118.66 (11)C11—C12—H12120.1
O1—C5—C6124.76 (12)C12—C13—C14120.65 (13)
O1—C5—C4116.50 (12)C12—C13—H13119.7
C6—C5—C4118.72 (13)C14—C13—H13119.7
C5—C6—C1119.67 (13)C15—C14—C13119.24 (13)
C5—C6—H6120.2C15—C14—H14120.4
C1—C6—H6120.2C13—C14—H14120.4
N1—C7—C1179.14 (16)C14—C15—C16120.63 (13)
N2—C8—C2177.85 (16)C14—C15—H15119.7
O1—C9—C10107.41 (11)C16—C15—H15119.7
O1—C9—H9A110.2C11—C16—C15119.87 (13)
C10—C9—H9A110.2C11—C16—H16120.1
O1—C9—H9B110.2C15—C16—H16120.1
C10—C9—H9B110.2C5—O1—C9117.97 (10)
H9A—C9—H9B108.5C11—O2—C10116.22 (10)
(II) 4-chloro-5-[2-(pentafluorophenoxy)ethoxy]benzene-1,2-dicarbonitrile top
Crystal data top
C16H6ClF5N2O2F(000) = 776
Mr = 388.68Dx = 1.728 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 5920 reflections
a = 5.8272 (13) Åθ = 2.6–27.7°
b = 13.319 (3) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
c = 19.380 (4) ÅT = 100 K
β = 96.544 (2)°Prismatic, colourless
V = 1494.3 (6) Å30.24 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
3408 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2890 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.027
Detector resolution: 8.333 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.6°
φ and ω scansh = 77
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
k = 1717
Tmin = 0.925, Tmax = 0.974l = 2425
16533 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.088H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0382P)2 + 1.0883P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3408 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
235 parametersΔρmax = 0.43 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
Crystal data top
C16H6ClF5N2O2V = 1494.3 (6) Å3
Mr = 388.68Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 5.8272 (13) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
b = 13.319 (3) ÅT = 100 K
c = 19.380 (4) Å0.24 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
β = 96.544 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
3408 independent reflections
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
2890 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.925, Tmax = 0.974Rint = 0.027
16533 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0340 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.088H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.43 e Å3
3408 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
235 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. IR (KBr disk, cm-1): 3105, 2931, 2361, 2241, 2230, 1589, 1524, 1514, 1497, 1395, 1310, 1275, 1263, 1071, 993, 980, 905, 789, 534.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.8254 (3)0.27727 (12)0.27255 (8)0.0182 (3)
C20.8091 (3)0.17269 (12)0.26444 (8)0.0185 (3)
C30.6456 (3)0.11995 (12)0.29730 (8)0.0190 (3)
H30.63280.04910.29230.023*
C40.5020 (3)0.17142 (12)0.33720 (8)0.0180 (3)
C50.5150 (3)0.27615 (12)0.34450 (8)0.0172 (3)
C60.6782 (3)0.32895 (12)0.31177 (8)0.0181 (3)
H60.68900.39990.31620.022*
C71.0028 (3)0.33312 (12)0.24306 (8)0.0199 (3)
C80.9638 (3)0.12052 (12)0.22354 (9)0.0210 (3)
C90.3848 (3)0.42571 (12)0.39501 (8)0.0186 (3)
H9A0.36150.46170.35010.022*
H9B0.54000.44270.41830.022*
C100.2010 (3)0.45551 (13)0.44015 (8)0.0210 (3)
H10A0.18530.52950.43960.025*
H10B0.05120.42670.42040.025*
C110.2175 (3)0.32331 (12)0.52643 (8)0.0188 (3)
C120.3881 (3)0.27177 (13)0.56812 (9)0.0213 (3)
C130.3618 (3)0.17320 (14)0.58745 (9)0.0233 (4)
C140.1595 (3)0.12251 (12)0.56594 (9)0.0234 (4)
C150.0159 (3)0.17253 (13)0.52634 (9)0.0226 (4)
C160.0125 (3)0.27144 (13)0.50756 (8)0.0201 (3)
Cl10.30422 (7)0.10616 (3)0.37969 (2)0.02216 (11)
F10.58648 (17)0.31911 (8)0.59067 (5)0.0289 (2)
F20.53286 (19)0.12730 (8)0.62754 (6)0.0318 (3)
F30.1311 (2)0.02670 (8)0.58397 (6)0.0318 (3)
F40.21748 (18)0.12623 (8)0.50688 (6)0.0308 (3)
F50.16755 (17)0.31781 (8)0.47097 (5)0.0264 (2)
N11.1470 (3)0.37862 (11)0.22243 (8)0.0258 (3)
N21.0870 (3)0.07993 (12)0.19061 (8)0.0272 (3)
O10.36507 (19)0.31921 (8)0.38395 (6)0.0188 (2)
O20.2528 (2)0.42182 (9)0.51158 (6)0.0222 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0187 (8)0.0204 (8)0.0156 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0018 (6)0.0014 (6)
C20.0192 (8)0.0207 (8)0.0156 (7)0.0031 (6)0.0012 (6)0.0019 (6)
C30.0221 (8)0.0169 (8)0.0176 (7)0.0011 (6)0.0008 (6)0.0011 (6)
C40.0184 (7)0.0190 (8)0.0167 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0023 (6)0.0006 (6)
C50.0175 (7)0.0189 (8)0.0151 (7)0.0030 (6)0.0013 (6)0.0009 (6)
C60.0212 (8)0.0161 (7)0.0168 (7)0.0009 (6)0.0016 (6)0.0002 (6)
C70.0239 (8)0.0186 (8)0.0175 (8)0.0032 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0011 (6)
C80.0226 (8)0.0199 (8)0.0203 (8)0.0014 (6)0.0018 (7)0.0018 (6)
C90.0205 (8)0.0145 (7)0.0215 (8)0.0021 (6)0.0051 (6)0.0027 (6)
C100.0262 (8)0.0186 (8)0.0189 (8)0.0047 (7)0.0059 (6)0.0026 (6)
C110.0234 (8)0.0186 (8)0.0156 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0077 (6)0.0003 (6)
C120.0185 (8)0.0268 (9)0.0194 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0053 (6)0.0009 (7)
C130.0254 (9)0.0269 (9)0.0186 (8)0.0089 (7)0.0068 (7)0.0045 (7)
C140.0347 (10)0.0171 (8)0.0203 (8)0.0011 (7)0.0117 (7)0.0008 (6)
C150.0243 (8)0.0246 (9)0.0199 (8)0.0044 (7)0.0075 (7)0.0060 (7)
C160.0222 (8)0.0225 (8)0.0157 (7)0.0051 (6)0.0023 (6)0.0013 (6)
Cl10.0239 (2)0.0186 (2)0.0253 (2)0.00235 (15)0.00838 (15)0.00136 (15)
F10.0204 (5)0.0367 (6)0.0292 (6)0.0042 (4)0.0008 (4)0.0055 (5)
F20.0305 (6)0.0356 (6)0.0295 (6)0.0126 (5)0.0050 (5)0.0121 (5)
F30.0493 (7)0.0180 (5)0.0298 (6)0.0011 (5)0.0123 (5)0.0020 (4)
F40.0305 (6)0.0320 (6)0.0301 (6)0.0102 (5)0.0048 (4)0.0075 (5)
F50.0233 (5)0.0297 (6)0.0250 (5)0.0037 (4)0.0024 (4)0.0009 (4)
N10.0286 (8)0.0257 (8)0.0243 (8)0.0001 (6)0.0079 (6)0.0006 (6)
N20.0286 (8)0.0269 (8)0.0271 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0082 (6)0.0050 (6)
O10.0216 (6)0.0156 (5)0.0205 (6)0.0015 (4)0.0073 (5)0.0012 (4)
O20.0301 (6)0.0187 (6)0.0181 (6)0.0001 (5)0.0044 (5)0.0004 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C61.392 (2)C9—H9B0.9900
C1—C21.404 (2)C10—O21.454 (2)
C1—C71.443 (2)C10—H10A0.9900
C2—C31.395 (2)C10—H10B0.9900
C2—C81.444 (2)C11—O21.364 (2)
C3—C41.384 (2)C11—C121.389 (2)
C3—H30.9500C11—C161.392 (2)
C4—C51.403 (2)C12—F11.3455 (19)
C4—Cl11.7256 (16)C12—C131.379 (2)
C5—O11.3524 (18)C13—F21.3396 (19)
C5—C61.392 (2)C13—C141.381 (3)
C6—H60.9500C14—F31.3383 (19)
C7—N11.144 (2)C14—C151.378 (3)
C8—N21.149 (2)C15—F41.342 (2)
C9—O11.4373 (19)C15—C161.382 (2)
C9—C101.511 (2)C16—F51.3475 (19)
C9—H9A0.9900
C6—C1—C2120.93 (15)O2—C10—C9112.73 (13)
C6—C1—C7118.37 (15)O2—C10—H10A109.0
C2—C1—C7120.64 (14)C9—C10—H10A109.0
C3—C2—C1119.32 (14)O2—C10—H10B109.0
C3—C2—C8120.66 (15)C9—C10—H10B109.0
C1—C2—C8120.01 (15)H10A—C10—H10B107.8
C4—C3—C2119.59 (15)O2—C11—C12118.91 (15)
C4—C3—H3120.2O2—C11—C16124.56 (15)
C2—C3—H3120.2C12—C11—C16116.31 (15)
C3—C4—C5121.30 (15)F1—C12—C13118.42 (15)
C3—C4—Cl1119.75 (13)F1—C12—C11119.27 (15)
C5—C4—Cl1118.94 (12)C13—C12—C11122.31 (16)
O1—C5—C6124.20 (14)F2—C13—C12119.60 (16)
O1—C5—C4116.59 (14)F2—C13—C14120.34 (16)
C6—C5—C4119.21 (14)C12—C13—C14120.06 (16)
C1—C6—C5119.64 (15)F3—C14—C15120.03 (16)
C1—C6—H6120.2F3—C14—C13120.94 (16)
C5—C6—H6120.2C15—C14—C13119.03 (16)
N1—C7—C1177.14 (18)F4—C15—C14120.28 (16)
N2—C8—C2179.29 (19)F4—C15—C16119.44 (16)
O1—C9—C10107.18 (13)C14—C15—C16120.26 (16)
O1—C9—H9A110.3F5—C16—C15117.78 (15)
C10—C9—H9A110.3F5—C16—C11120.27 (15)
O1—C9—H9B110.3C15—C16—C11121.94 (15)
C10—C9—H9B110.3C5—O1—C9117.18 (12)
H9A—C9—H9B108.5C11—O2—C10118.56 (13)

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H11ClN2O2C16H6ClF5N2O2
Mr298.72388.68
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/cMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100100
a, b, c (Å)9.808 (4), 6.555 (3), 22.018 (9)5.8272 (13), 13.319 (3), 19.380 (4)
β (°) 93.259 (4) 96.544 (2)
V3)1413.2 (10)1494.3 (6)
Z44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.280.33
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.10 × 0.100.24 × 0.10 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCDBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionEmpirical (using intensity measurements)
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Empirical (using intensity measurements)
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.947, 0.9730.925, 0.974
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
15329, 3228, 2744 16533, 3408, 2890
Rint0.0290.027
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6490.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.035, 0.087, 1.04 0.034, 0.088, 1.03
No. of reflections32283408
No. of parameters190235
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.46, 0.560.43, 0.23

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006), SAINT (Bruker, 2006), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds