Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Recently discovered errors in sample preparation for the original study by Davis & Johnson [J. Appl. Cryst. (1984). 17, 331-333] have revealed that the reference intensity ratio data of Table 1 are incorrect. The reference intensity ratios for the three sets of reflections given in Table 1 have been remeasured and are as follows: 020 + 1{\bar 1}0 = 1.92; 021 + 002 = 1.16; and 1{\bar 3}0 = 0.88. The resulting average reference intensity ratio for the letovicite 111 reflection (the strongest of the pattern) is 1.15(5). Fortunately, the reference constant study was completed independently of the powder diffraction and Laue study and hence the cell constants, diffraction intensities and spacings presented in this paper are not affected by these errors.

Subscribe to Journal of Applied Crystallography

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds