Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the structure of the title compound, C6H18N22+·2H2PO3, the hexa­methyl­enedi­ammonium dication has a center of symmetry and the asymmetric unit contains half of the dication and one hydrogenphosphite anion. The (P—)O—H...O(—P) and N—H...O(—P) hydrogen bonds link ammonium and hydrogenphosphite groups to form a two-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network. Layers are linked covalently into pillars by bifunctional di­ammonium moieties, making a three-dimensional framework.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801013587/bt6077sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801013587/bt6077Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 172215

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 183 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.004 Å
  • R factor = 0.043
  • wR factor = 0.117
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.8

checkCIF results

No syntax errors found

ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry


Yellow Alert Alert Level C:
PLAT_420 Alert C D-H Without Acceptor P(1) - H(1) ? PLAT_716 Alert C H...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O1[A] H3 O1[A] PLAT_716 Alert C H...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O1[B] H11 O1[B] PLAT_716 Alert C H...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O2[C] H12 O2[C] PLAT_716 Alert C H...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O1[D] H13 O1[D] PLAT_716 Alert C H...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O2[E] H13 O2[E] PLAT_717 Alert C D...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O1[A] O3 O1[A] PLAT_717 Alert C D...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O1[B] N1 O1[B] PLAT_717 Alert C D...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O2[C] N1 O2[C] PLAT_717 Alert C D...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O1[D] N1 O1[D] PLAT_717 Alert C D...A Unknown or Inconsistent Label ........ O2[E] N1 O2[E] PLAT_718 Alert C D-H..A Unknown or Inconsistent label ........ O1[A] O3 H3 O1[A] PLAT_718 Alert C D-H..A Unknown or Inconsistent label ........ O1[B] N1 H11 O1[B] PLAT_718 Alert C D-H..A Unknown or Inconsistent label ........ O2[C] N1 H12 O2[C] PLAT_718 Alert C D-H..A Unknown or Inconsistent label ........ O1[D] N1 H13 O1[D] PLAT_718 Alert C D-H..A Unknown or Inconsistent label ........ O2[E] N1 H13 O2[E]
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
0 Alert Level B = Potential problem
16 Alert Level C = Please check

Comment top

Current interest in supramolecular chemistry and material chemistry has focused on the search for new synthons and the design of building blocks which can be utilized for the engineering of one-, two- or three-dimensional assemblies. These include both organic and organic–inorganic hybrid materials, as well as organometallic moieties. The hydrogen bond plays a key role in this field and a number of hydrogen-bonding synthons have been introduced for the rational design of solids (Braga et al., 1998; Desiraju, 1989; Meleńdez & Hamilton, 1998). It has been found that phosphonic acids are potentially good candidates for the assembly of hydrogen-bonded networks (Ferguson et al., 1998; Gregson et al., 2000; Mahmoudkhani & Langer, 2001a,b; Sharma & Clearfield, 2000; Sharma et al., 2001). Phosphorus acid is the inorganic analogue of phosphonic acids, could thus behave in a similar manner in view of the architecture of the resulting structure and the potential for hydrogen-bonding interactions. This requires a systematic investigation and careful analysis of the already known structures. For example, in the crystal structures of anilinium hydrogenphosphite (Paixäo et al., 2000) and ethylenediammonium hydrogenphosphite (Fleck et al., 2000), the hydrogenphosphite group is involved in hydrogen-bonding networks, forming sheets or layers with a railroad-type section, respectively.

In the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), the hexamethylenediammonium cation is centrosymmetric and the asymmetric unit contains half of the dication and a hydrogenphosphite anion (Fig. 1). The structure exhibits a pillared-layered hydrogen-bonded network, as shown in Fig. 2. The anion acts as both hydrogen-bond donor (through the O3 atom) and acceptor (through the O1 and O2 atoms). The O2 atom is a bifurcated acceptor of hydrogen bonds via the H12 and H13 atoms, while the N1 atom acts as a bifurcated hydrogen-bond donor through the H13 atom. The O1 atom acts as an acceptor of three hydrogen bonds via the H3, H11 and H13 atoms (see Table 2 for the hydrogen-bond geometry and notations). The hydrogen-bonding pattern is presented in Fig. 3. Although the first-level graph set, based on the methodology of Bernstein et al. (1995) and Grell et al. (1999), contains only D and C(4) descriptors, the second and higher levels comprise several motifs, including chains and rings. The assignment of graph-set descriptors were performed using PLUTO, as described by Motherwell et al. (1999). The O3 atom acts only as a donor to the O1 atom, hydrogen bond [a], thus forming C(4) chain motifs along the a axis. A R12(4) ring motif is formed by the combination of [d] and [e] hydrogen bonds. A pair of hydrogenphosphite anions and an ammonium cation are linked together via [a], [c] and [d] hydrogen bonds, forming a R32(8) ring motif. A R33(10) motif is also formed by [a], [c] and [e] hydrogen bonds. A combination of [a], [b], [e], [c] and [b] hydrogen bonds gives a R53(12) ring motif.

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by the reaction of a solution of phosphorus acid in water and 1,6-hexamethylenediamine in water with the molar ratio 2:1 at ambient temperature. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by very slow evaporation of the solution over a period of several days.

Refinement top

The H atom bonded to the P atom was refined isotropically without restraints. The H atoms of the ammonium and hydroxyl groups were refined isotropically with restrained bond distances of 0.85 and 0.80 Å, respectively, whereas the other H atoms were constrained to idealized geometries using the appropriate riding model.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1995); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1995); data reduction: SAINT and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2000).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. Only symmetry-independent atoms are labelled.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Top: the alternating arrangement of organic dications and hydrogenphosphite tetrahedra. Notice the orientation of hydrogen on the P atom pointing out from the layers. Bottom: a view onto a layer showing the arrangement of polyhedra to form chains parallel to the a axis.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The pattern of the hydrogen-bonding network. The hydrogen-bond notations are given in Table 2. C atoms are not shown for clarity.
Hexamethylenediammonium hydrogenphosphite top
Crystal data top
C6H18N22+·2H2PO3F(000) = 300
Mr = 280.20Dx = 1.432 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.9330 (3) ÅCell parameters from 2831 reflections
b = 8.9074 (5) Åθ = 1–25°
c = 14.8407 (8) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
β = 94.751 (1)°T = 183 K
V = 649.86 (6) Å3Parallelipide, colorless
Z = 20.16 × 0.08 × 0.02 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD
diffractometer
1284 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1049 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.042
Detector resolution: no pixels mm-1θmax = 26.1°, θmin = 2.7°
ω scansh = 66
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001)
k = 119
Tmin = 0.946, Tmax = 0.993l = 1618
4004 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.117H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0641P)2 + 0.4391P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1284 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
93 parametersΔρmax = 0.40 e Å3
4 restraintsΔρmin = 0.34 e Å3
Crystal data top
C6H18N22+·2H2PO3V = 649.86 (6) Å3
Mr = 280.20Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 4.9330 (3) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
b = 8.9074 (5) ÅT = 183 K
c = 14.8407 (8) Å0.16 × 0.08 × 0.02 mm
β = 94.751 (1)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD
diffractometer
1284 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001)
1049 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.946, Tmax = 0.993Rint = 0.042
4004 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0434 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.117H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.40 e Å3
1284 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.34 e Å3
93 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.05324 (12)0.12340 (7)0.61326 (4)0.0182 (2)
O10.2067 (3)0.0477 (2)0.63477 (13)0.0272 (5)
O20.1354 (4)0.2562 (2)0.67105 (12)0.0267 (5)
O30.2752 (4)0.0031 (2)0.61785 (15)0.0302 (5)
N10.1298 (5)0.2250 (3)0.72491 (15)0.0219 (5)
C10.1121 (5)0.3440 (3)0.65508 (17)0.0222 (6)
H1A0.04750.43840.68480.027*
H1B0.02220.31370.61250.027*
C20.3850 (5)0.3714 (3)0.60280 (17)0.0220 (6)
H2A0.45700.27510.57750.026*
H2B0.51510.41010.64460.026*
C30.3630 (5)0.4838 (3)0.52585 (18)0.0224 (6)
H3A0.23660.44360.48330.027*
H3B0.28530.57880.55110.027*
H10.027 (5)0.154 (3)0.5297 (16)0.011 (6)*
H130.269 (5)0.240 (3)0.7564 (17)0.021 (7)*
H120.021 (5)0.225 (4)0.7608 (19)0.039 (9)*
H110.152 (7)0.138 (2)0.699 (2)0.034 (9)*
H30.432 (4)0.022 (4)0.624 (2)0.041 (10)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0164 (4)0.0182 (4)0.0200 (4)0.0012 (2)0.0003 (2)0.0002 (3)
O10.0167 (9)0.0277 (11)0.0374 (11)0.0023 (7)0.0039 (8)0.0064 (9)
O20.0295 (10)0.0208 (10)0.0284 (10)0.0024 (8)0.0051 (8)0.0053 (8)
O30.0166 (10)0.0204 (10)0.0535 (13)0.0011 (8)0.0027 (9)0.0037 (9)
N10.0207 (11)0.0224 (13)0.0223 (12)0.0025 (9)0.0000 (9)0.0022 (9)
C10.0217 (13)0.0207 (13)0.0239 (13)0.0021 (10)0.0002 (10)0.0002 (10)
C20.0173 (12)0.0226 (14)0.0258 (13)0.0027 (10)0.0004 (10)0.0028 (11)
C30.0172 (13)0.0219 (13)0.0279 (13)0.0035 (10)0.0002 (10)0.0016 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
P1—O11.5060 (19)C1—C21.517 (3)
P1—O21.4974 (19)C1—H1A0.99
P1—O31.5686 (19)C1—H1B0.99
P1—H11.27 (2)C2—C31.529 (4)
O3—H30.80 (2)C2—H2A0.99
N1—C11.490 (3)C2—H2B0.99
N1—H130.87 (2)C3—C3i1.526 (5)
N1—H120.87 (2)C3—H3A0.99
N1—H110.87 (2)C3—H3B0.99
O1—P1—H1106.4 (11)N1—C1—H1B109.3
O1—P1—O3105.82 (11)C2—C1—H1B109.3
O2—P1—H1113.1 (11)H1A—C1—H1B107.9
O2—P1—O1115.29 (12)C1—C2—C3111.9 (2)
O2—P1—O3112.83 (10)C1—C2—H2A109.2
O3—P1—H1102.3 (11)C3—C2—H2A109.2
P1—O3—H3118 (3)C1—C2—H2B109.2
C1—N1—H13110.9 (19)C3—C2—H2B109.2
C1—N1—H12109 (2)H2A—C2—H2B107.9
H13—N1—H12110 (3)C3i—C3—C2112.6 (3)
C1—N1—H11110 (2)C3i—C3—H3A109.1
H13—N1—H11108 (3)C2—C3—H3A109.1
H12—N1—H11110 (3)C3i—C3—H3B109.1
N1—C1—C2111.7 (2)C2—C3—H3B109.1
N1—C1—H1A109.3H3A—C3—H3B107.8
C2—C1—H1A109.3
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O1[a]ii0.80 (2)1.79 (2)2.587 (3)171 (4)
N1—H11···O1[b]0.87 (2)1.91 (2)2.784 (3)177 (3)
N1—H12···O2[c]iii0.87 (2)1.91 (2)2.781 (3)173 (3)
N1—H13···O1[d]iv0.87 (2)2.50 (3)3.060 (3)123 (2)
N1—H13···O2[e]iv0.87 (2)2.18 (2)3.045 (3)171 (3)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) x+1/2, y1/2, z+3/2; (iv) x1/2, y1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H18N22+·2H2PO3
Mr280.20
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)183
a, b, c (Å)4.9330 (3), 8.9074 (5), 14.8407 (8)
β (°) 94.751 (1)
V3)649.86 (6)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.35
Crystal size (mm)0.16 × 0.08 × 0.02
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2001)
Tmin, Tmax0.946, 0.993
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4004, 1284, 1049
Rint0.042
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.618
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.043, 0.117, 1.04
No. of reflections1284
No. of parameters93
No. of restraints4
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.40, 0.34

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1995), SAINT (Siemens, 1995), SAINT and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2001), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001), SHELXTL, DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2000).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
P1—O11.5060 (19)P1—O31.5686 (19)
P1—O21.4974 (19)P1—H11.27 (2)
O1—P1—H1106.4 (11)O2—P1—O3112.83 (10)
O1—P1—O3105.82 (11)O3—P1—H1102.3 (11)
O2—P1—H1113.1 (11)P1—O3—H3118 (3)
O2—P1—O1115.29 (12)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O1[a]i0.80 (2)1.79 (2)2.587 (3)171 (4)
N1—H11···O1[b]0.87 (2)1.91 (2)2.784 (3)177 (3)
N1—H12···O2[c]ii0.87 (2)1.91 (2)2.781 (3)173 (3)
N1—H13···O1[d]iii0.87 (2)2.50 (3)3.060 (3)123 (2)
N1—H13···O2[e]iii0.87 (2)2.18 (2)3.045 (3)171 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x+1/2, y1/2, z+3/2; (iii) x1/2, y1/2, z+3/2.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds