Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807028930/bt2385sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807028930/bt2385Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 654986
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 143 K
- Mean (P-N) = 0.002 Å
- R factor = 0.025
- wR factor = 0.066
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 22.6
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT154_ALERT_1_C The su's on the Cell Angles are Equal (x 10000) 3000 Deg.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
For related literature, see: Bond et al. (1985); Desiraju (1996); Scholz et al. (1989).
The title compound is synthesized by reacting Me2S(O)=NSiMe3 with excess phosphorus trichloride [Scholz et al. (1989)].
H-atoms: rigid methyl. Absorption correction was based on delta-F (SHELXA, anonymous). An appropriate number of extra parameters was allowed for in calculating e.s.d.'s.
The title compound has been used as a starting material in a research project devoted to the synthesis and structural characterization of novel diphosphenes [Scholz et al. (1989)]. However, single crystals of dichloro-(dimethylsulfoximino)phosphane have not been obtained until now due to the exceedingly moisture-sensitive nature of the compound. Such crystals have now been obtained by slow cooling of a saturated solution in diethyl ether to -78 ° C.
The sulfur atom is essentially tetrahedrally coordinated with angles between 104.16 (9) [N—S—C2] and 117.27 (9)° [O—S—N]. A comparison with the structures of the N-(diisopropylphosphoryl)-, N-(diphenyldiphosphoryl)-, and N-(2,2-dimethylpropylenephosphoryl)-dimethylsulfoximides [Bond et al. (1985)] reveals similar distortions from an ideal tetrahedron with the widest angle always being O—S—N [119.3 (5), 118.0 (7), 119.3 (2)°]. The S—O bond length of 1.4426 (14) Å is typical of the relatively invariable S—O bond lengths in sulfonyl derivatives.
In accordance with the phosphoryl- sulfoximides, the S—N bond [1.5446 (16) Å] is shorter than the P—N bond [1.6172 (16) Å] implying a higher bond order between nitrogen and sulfur than between nitrogen and phosphorus. The P—N bond, however, is considerably shorter than a "regular" phosphorus nitrogen single bond, indicating a strong N → P back bonding effect. Probably associated with this effect, the S—N—P angle [134.40 (10)°] is significantly widened beyond the normal value for trigonal geometry; the corresponding values for the phosphoryl-dimethylsulfoximides range from 123.8 (6) to 128.5 (3)°.
The phosphorus-chlorine bond distances are almost equal [P—Cl1 2.1249 (11), P—Cl2 2.1086 (10) Å] and are considerably longer than those in N,N-bis(dichlorophosphino)phenylamine [ranging from 2.009 (9) to 2.056 (9) Å] but shorter than those in dichloro(1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazole-2-ylideneimino)phosphane [2.207 (1) and 2.151 (1) Å].
The O—S—N—P backbone of the title compound [torsion angle 66.43 (17)°] adopts a conformation comparable to those of two of the linear phosphoryl-dimethylsulfoximides [63.36, -69.84°]. The N-(2,2-dimethylpropylenephosphoryl)dimethylsulfoximide featuring an endocyclic phosphorus displays a corresponding O—S—N—P angle of 37.76°.
Two intermolecular C—H···O hydrogen bonds are observed. The accumulation of inductive electron-withdrawing effects of the oxygen-sulfur-nitrogen triade presumably polarizes the methyl H atoms and enables them to form this often neglected type of intermolecular interaction, leading to dimers [Desiraju (1996)].
For related literature, see: Bond et al. (1985); Desiraju (1996); Scholz et al. (1989).
Data collection: DIF4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992); cell refinement: DIF4; data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS90 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL-Plus (Bruker, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL-Plus.
Fig. 1. The molecule of the title compound in the crystal. Thermal ellipsoids represent 50% probability levels. H-Atom radii are arbitrary. |
C2H6Cl2NOPS | Z = 2 |
Mr = 194.01 | F(000) = 196 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.734 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 5.987 (2) Å | Cell parameters from 52 reflections |
b = 7.723 (3) Å | θ = 10–12.5° |
c = 8.716 (3) Å | µ = 1.28 mm−1 |
α = 71.59 (3)° | T = 143 K |
β = 79.73 (3)° | Prism, yellow |
γ = 78.25 (3)° | 0.45 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm |
V = 371.5 (2) Å3 |
Stoe Stadi-4 diffractometer | Rint = 0.012 |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.2° |
Graphite monochromator | h = −7→5 |
ω/θ scans | k = −10→10 |
3100 measured reflections | l = −11→11 |
1716 independent reflections | 3 standard reflections every 90 min |
1554 reflections with I > 2σ(I) | intensity decay: none |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.066 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0313P)2 + 0.211P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.11 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1716 reflections | Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3 |
76 parameters | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.045 (4) |
C2H6Cl2NOPS | γ = 78.25 (3)° |
Mr = 194.01 | V = 371.5 (2) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 2 |
a = 5.987 (2) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 7.723 (3) Å | µ = 1.28 mm−1 |
c = 8.716 (3) Å | T = 143 K |
α = 71.59 (3)° | 0.45 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm |
β = 79.73 (3)° |
Stoe Stadi-4 diffractometer | Rint = 0.012 |
3100 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 90 min |
1716 independent reflections | intensity decay: none |
1554 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.066 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.11 | Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3 |
1716 reflections | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
76 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
S | 0.17482 (7) | 0.29180 (6) | 0.38517 (5) | 0.01912 (12) | |
P | 0.17739 (8) | 0.05458 (6) | 0.18258 (6) | 0.02318 (13) | |
Cl1 | 0.30371 (9) | 0.23989 (8) | −0.03857 (6) | 0.03325 (14) | |
Cl2 | −0.17262 (8) | 0.16726 (8) | 0.16807 (6) | 0.03424 (14) | |
O | −0.0580 (2) | 0.3199 (2) | 0.46329 (18) | 0.0316 (3) | |
N | 0.2501 (3) | 0.1195 (2) | 0.32344 (18) | 0.0223 (3) | |
C1 | 0.2263 (4) | 0.4939 (3) | 0.2292 (2) | 0.0315 (4) | |
H1A | 0.1222 | 0.5191 | 0.1471 | 0.038* | |
H1B | 0.3859 | 0.4774 | 0.1783 | 0.038* | |
H1C | 0.1996 | 0.5980 | 0.2751 | 0.038* | |
C2 | 0.3699 (4) | 0.2653 (3) | 0.5220 (2) | 0.0295 (4) | |
H2A | 0.3353 | 0.3710 | 0.5663 | 0.035* | |
H2B | 0.5267 | 0.2588 | 0.4651 | 0.035* | |
H2C | 0.3568 | 0.1512 | 0.6112 | 0.035* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
S | 0.0170 (2) | 0.0212 (2) | 0.0189 (2) | −0.00231 (15) | −0.00131 (15) | −0.00641 (15) |
P | 0.0234 (2) | 0.0232 (2) | 0.0244 (2) | −0.00273 (17) | −0.00211 (18) | −0.01004 (18) |
Cl1 | 0.0312 (3) | 0.0456 (3) | 0.0228 (2) | −0.0105 (2) | 0.00312 (18) | −0.01045 (19) |
Cl2 | 0.0200 (2) | 0.0500 (3) | 0.0353 (3) | −0.0084 (2) | −0.00360 (18) | −0.0140 (2) |
O | 0.0198 (7) | 0.0409 (8) | 0.0393 (8) | −0.0066 (6) | 0.0059 (6) | −0.0231 (7) |
N | 0.0220 (7) | 0.0218 (7) | 0.0231 (7) | −0.0001 (6) | −0.0048 (6) | −0.0071 (6) |
C1 | 0.0455 (12) | 0.0204 (8) | 0.0248 (9) | −0.0049 (8) | −0.0012 (8) | −0.0030 (7) |
C2 | 0.0310 (10) | 0.0333 (10) | 0.0277 (9) | −0.0026 (8) | −0.0120 (8) | −0.0109 (8) |
S—O | 1.4438 (14) | C1—H1A | 0.9800 |
S—N | 1.5442 (16) | C1—H1B | 0.9800 |
S—C2 | 1.753 (2) | C1—H1C | 0.9800 |
S—C1 | 1.757 (2) | C2—H2A | 0.9800 |
P—N | 1.6177 (16) | C2—H2B | 0.9800 |
P—Cl2 | 2.1087 (10) | C2—H2C | 0.9800 |
P—Cl1 | 2.1247 (11) | ||
O—S—N | 117.23 (9) | S—C1—H1B | 109.5 |
O—S—C2 | 110.04 (10) | H1A—C1—H1B | 109.5 |
N—S—C2 | 104.12 (9) | S—C1—H1C | 109.5 |
O—S—C1 | 109.06 (10) | H1A—C1—H1C | 109.5 |
N—S—C1 | 111.17 (10) | H1B—C1—H1C | 109.5 |
C2—S—C1 | 104.38 (11) | S—C2—H2A | 109.5 |
N—P—Cl2 | 105.63 (7) | S—C2—H2B | 109.5 |
N—P—Cl1 | 104.32 (7) | H2A—C2—H2B | 109.5 |
Cl2—P—Cl1 | 95.84 (4) | S—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
S—N—P | 134.40 (10) | H2A—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
S—C1—H1A | 109.5 | H2B—C2—H2C | 109.5 |
O—S—N—P | 66.44 (17) | Cl2—P—N—S | −31.77 (15) |
C2—S—N—P | −171.78 (14) | Cl1—P—N—S | 68.62 (15) |
C1—S—N—P | −59.94 (17) |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C2H6Cl2NOPS |
Mr | 194.01 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 143 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.987 (2), 7.723 (3), 8.716 (3) |
α, β, γ (°) | 71.59 (3), 79.73 (3), 78.25 (3) |
V (Å3) | 371.5 (2) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.28 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.45 × 0.25 × 0.25 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Stoe Stadi-4 |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3100, 1716, 1554 |
Rint | 0.012 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.650 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.025, 0.066, 1.11 |
No. of reflections | 1716 |
No. of parameters | 76 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.48, −0.46 |
Computer programs: DIF4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992), DIF4, REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992), SHELXS90 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL-Plus (Bruker, 1997), SHELXTL-Plus.
Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.
- Information on subscribing
- Sample issue
- If you have already subscribed, you may need to register
The title compound has been used as a starting material in a research project devoted to the synthesis and structural characterization of novel diphosphenes [Scholz et al. (1989)]. However, single crystals of dichloro-(dimethylsulfoximino)phosphane have not been obtained until now due to the exceedingly moisture-sensitive nature of the compound. Such crystals have now been obtained by slow cooling of a saturated solution in diethyl ether to -78 ° C.
The sulfur atom is essentially tetrahedrally coordinated with angles between 104.16 (9) [N—S—C2] and 117.27 (9)° [O—S—N]. A comparison with the structures of the N-(diisopropylphosphoryl)-, N-(diphenyldiphosphoryl)-, and N-(2,2-dimethylpropylenephosphoryl)-dimethylsulfoximides [Bond et al. (1985)] reveals similar distortions from an ideal tetrahedron with the widest angle always being O—S—N [119.3 (5), 118.0 (7), 119.3 (2)°]. The S—O bond length of 1.4426 (14) Å is typical of the relatively invariable S—O bond lengths in sulfonyl derivatives.
In accordance with the phosphoryl- sulfoximides, the S—N bond [1.5446 (16) Å] is shorter than the P—N bond [1.6172 (16) Å] implying a higher bond order between nitrogen and sulfur than between nitrogen and phosphorus. The P—N bond, however, is considerably shorter than a "regular" phosphorus nitrogen single bond, indicating a strong N → P back bonding effect. Probably associated with this effect, the S—N—P angle [134.40 (10)°] is significantly widened beyond the normal value for trigonal geometry; the corresponding values for the phosphoryl-dimethylsulfoximides range from 123.8 (6) to 128.5 (3)°.
The phosphorus-chlorine bond distances are almost equal [P—Cl1 2.1249 (11), P—Cl2 2.1086 (10) Å] and are considerably longer than those in N,N-bis(dichlorophosphino)phenylamine [ranging from 2.009 (9) to 2.056 (9) Å] but shorter than those in dichloro(1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazole-2-ylideneimino)phosphane [2.207 (1) and 2.151 (1) Å].
The O—S—N—P backbone of the title compound [torsion angle 66.43 (17)°] adopts a conformation comparable to those of two of the linear phosphoryl-dimethylsulfoximides [63.36, -69.84°]. The N-(2,2-dimethylpropylenephosphoryl)dimethylsulfoximide featuring an endocyclic phosphorus displays a corresponding O—S—N—P angle of 37.76°.
Two intermolecular C—H···O hydrogen bonds are observed. The accumulation of inductive electron-withdrawing effects of the oxygen-sulfur-nitrogen triade presumably polarizes the methyl H atoms and enables them to form this often neglected type of intermolecular interaction, leading to dimers [Desiraju (1996)].