Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, C12H13ClO4, was prepared from the Vilsmeier–Haack reaction on phloroaceto­phenone. The chloro­vinyl and one of the methoxy substituents are twisted through about 75° with respect to the aromatic plane, whilst the other substituents are almost coplanar with the ring. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding involving C—H...O interactions generates one-dimensional chains in the direction of the a axis.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100014700/bm1428sup1.cif
Contains datablocks II, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100014700/bm1428IIsup2.hkl
Contains datablock A

CCDC reference: 158271

Comment top

The Vilsmeier-Haack reaction, using disubstituted formamide and phosphorous oxychloride, has been extensively employed for the formylation of active aromatic rings yielding arylaldehydes (Minkin & Dorofeenko, 1960), of acetophenones yielding β-chloro-β-arylacroleins (Rosenblum et al., 1966) and of ortho-hydroxyacetophenones yielding chromon-3-carboxaldehydes (Nohara et al., 1974). β-Chloro β-arylacroleins have been a source for aryl acetylenes, which are useful for the synthesis of 2-arylbenzofurans (Duffley & Stevenson, 1977). In continuation with our work on synthesis of nor-neolignans (Parthasarathy & Mohakhud, 1995), we have investigated the formylation of phloracetophenone trimethyl ether, (III). Instead of the expected product, (I), we obtained a colourless crystalline compound, (II), whose 1H NMR spectrum did not show the expected coupling (J = 7 Hz) between the formyl proton and the α-olefinic proton (Parthasarathy & Mohakhud, 1995). Furthermore, the alkaline degradation of (II) to the corresponding arylacetylene was very sluggish and required a higher temperature and a longer reaction period than reported earlier for compounds similar to (I). The resulting product from alkaline degradation of (II) was a yellow crystalline material, containing a carbonyl group, as indicated by IR and 13C NMR studies. The question of structural identity of (II) was resolved using single-crystal X-ray diffraction. \sch

The molecular structure of (II) is illustrated in Fig. 1. The bond lengths and angles are largely unremarkable. The methoxy substituents at C4 and C6, together with the aldehyde group at C1, are almost coplanar with the aromatic ring (the largest torsional deviation being less than 7°). In contrast, the torsion angles C8—O2—C2—C1 [73.4 (2)°] and C4—C3—C9—Cl1 [75.2 (2)°] (Table 1) illustrate the considerable twisting of the C2 methoxy and chlorovinyl substituents with respect to the aromatic ring.

The intermolecular forces responsible for the integrity of the crystal are of interest. The shortest separation between the centroids of aromatic rings is 4.12 Å and suggests that any intermolecular forces between these rings must be very weak. A detailed analysis of the shortest intermolecular atomic separations suggests that C—H.·O hydrogen bonding is likely to provide the major intermolecular forces. The O1.·C12(1 + x, y, z) separation of 2.998 (3) Å is about 0.22 Å less than the sum of the van der Waals radii of these two atoms (Bondi, 1964); this suggests a weak C12—H contact to O1 and is consistent with C12 adjoining the electron withdrawing O4 atom which will impart a fractional positive charge on the C12 H atoms. Since the C12 methyl H atoms were refined as part of a rigid group, the derived C—H···O angle may not provide a reliable hydrogen-bonding parameter. The overall effect of these C—H.·O interactions [i.e. O1 to C12(1 + x, y, z) and C12 to O1(x - 1, y, z)] is to generate one-dimensional chains in the direction of the a axis.

Experimental top

POCl3 (0.3 ml) was added dropwise at 273 K to a shaken flask containing dry N·N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (0.3 ml). Phloroacetophenone trimethylether (0.4 g) in dry DMF (10 ml) was added to the reaction mixture and the contents were heated on an oil bath at 343–353 K for 6 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to 273 K and a saturated solution of sodium acetate (25 ml) was added slowly with shaking (as the reaction is exothermic). Instantaneous precipitation occurred, the solid was filtered, washed with water and dried to give a brown solid (0.33 g) which was then recrystallized from benzene/petrol to give colourless plates, melting at 388 K. IR (KBr) νmax: 2944, 1676, 1641, 1589, 1140, 1103 cm-1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ (p.p.m.) 3.89 (3H, s), 3.94 (6H, s), 5.38 (1H, s), 5.76 (1H, s), 6.26 (1H, s), 10.32 (1H, s); 13C NMR (75.4 MHz, CDCl3): δ (p.p.m.) 56.1 (q), 63.2 (q), 90.7 (d), 112.2 (s), 117.5 (s), 119.7 (t), 130.7 (s), 162.1 (s), 163.1 (s), 164.1 (s), 187.4 (d); ESMS (m/z, relative intensity): 257/259 (M+ + 1, 35.0/13.0), 243 (30.5), 227 (2.0), 222 (11.0), 221 (100.0), 206 (2.0), 193 (3.0), 178 (1.00, 165 (6.0), 161 (2.5), 122 (1.5), 105 (1.0).

Refinement top

Hydrogen atoms were added at calculated positions and refined using a riding model. H atoms were given isotropic displacement parameters equal to 1.2 (or 1.5 for methyl H atoms) times the equivalent isotropic displacement parameters of their parent atoms and C—H distances were restrained to 0.95 Å for those bonded to C5, C7 and C10 and 0.98 Å for others.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1994); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1994); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL/PC; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL/PC.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. View of a molecule of (II) showing the atomic numbering. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level for non-H atoms.
2,4,6-Trimethoxy-3-(1-chlorovinyl)benzaldehyde top
Crystal data top
C12H13ClO4Z = 2
Mr = 256.67F(000) = 268
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.424 Mg m3
a = 8.0516 (12) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.1214 (12) ÅCell parameters from 2942 reflections
c = 9.9064 (15) Åθ = 2.1–28.5°
α = 88.427 (4)°µ = 0.32 mm1
β = 86.171 (4)°T = 180 K
γ = 67.868 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 598.71 (15) Å30.48 × 0.28 × 0.26 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2478 independent reflections
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube2267 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.029
Detector resolution: 8.192 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.1°
ω scansh = 710
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
k = 910
Tmin = 0.862, Tmax = 0.922l = 1211
3564 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.137H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0703P)2 + 0.3956P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2478 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
157 parametersΔρmax = 0.47 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.71 e Å3
Crystal data top
C12H13ClO4γ = 67.868 (3)°
Mr = 256.67V = 598.71 (15) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 8.0516 (12) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 8.1214 (12) ŵ = 0.32 mm1
c = 9.9064 (15) ÅT = 180 K
α = 88.427 (4)°0.48 × 0.28 × 0.26 mm
β = 86.171 (4)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2478 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
2267 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.862, Tmax = 0.922Rint = 0.029
3564 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0460 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.137H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.47 e Å3
2478 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.71 e Å3
157 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Data were collected over a hemisphere of reciprocal space, by a combination of three sets of exposures. Each set had a different ϕ angle for the crystal and each exposure of 10 s covered 0.3° in ω. The crystal to detector distance was 5.01 cm. Coverage of the unique set was over 94% complete to at least 27° in θ. Crystal decay was monitored by repeating the initial frames at the end of the data collection and analyzing the duplicate reflections.

The temperature of the crystal was controlled using the Oxford Cryosystem Cryostream Cooler (Cosier & Glazer, 1986).

Cosier, J. & Glazer, A·M. (1986). J. Appl. Cryst. 19, 105–107.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.76210 (8)0.27513 (8)0.51505 (5)0.0492 (2)
O10.6511 (2)0.8345 (2)0.08684 (17)0.0396 (4)
O20.77673 (17)0.53509 (17)0.25824 (13)0.0269 (3)
O30.41735 (19)0.19645 (18)0.30810 (15)0.0324 (3)
O40.20520 (18)0.75418 (18)0.06670 (15)0.0321 (3)
C10.4888 (2)0.6497 (2)0.15621 (17)0.0229 (4)
C20.6178 (2)0.5200 (2)0.23225 (17)0.0220 (4)
C30.5946 (2)0.3666 (2)0.27865 (17)0.0239 (4)
C40.4331 (2)0.3459 (2)0.25599 (18)0.0246 (4)
C50.2988 (2)0.4743 (2)0.18613 (18)0.0254 (4)
H5A0.18930.46010.17260.030*
C60.3283 (2)0.6238 (2)0.13654 (17)0.0236 (4)
C70.5202 (2)0.7967 (2)0.08371 (19)0.0269 (4)
H7A0.42790.86940.02880.032*
C80.7585 (3)0.6687 (3)0.3571 (2)0.0370 (5)
H8A0.87790.66050.38000.056*
H8B0.69210.64980.43870.056*
H8C0.69300.78680.31970.056*
C90.7383 (2)0.2269 (2)0.34914 (19)0.0277 (4)
C100.8520 (3)0.0699 (2)0.2923 (2)0.0324 (4)
H10A0.84170.04420.20100.039*
H10B0.94130.01350.34420.039*
C110.2550 (3)0.1670 (3)0.2897 (2)0.0393 (5)
H11D0.26120.05620.33500.059*
H11A0.24150.15840.19290.059*
H11B0.15180.26630.32880.059*
C120.0484 (3)0.7278 (3)0.0311 (2)0.0350 (4)
H12A0.02560.82980.02160.053*
H12B0.02060.71580.11350.053*
H12C0.08370.61940.02310.053*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0526 (4)0.0513 (4)0.0322 (3)0.0050 (3)0.0133 (2)0.0038 (2)
O10.0309 (7)0.0372 (8)0.0559 (10)0.0186 (6)0.0097 (6)0.0174 (7)
O20.0228 (6)0.0288 (7)0.0315 (7)0.0121 (5)0.0054 (5)0.0015 (5)
O30.0332 (7)0.0298 (7)0.0407 (8)0.0192 (6)0.0069 (6)0.0085 (6)
O40.0248 (7)0.0329 (7)0.0403 (8)0.0118 (6)0.0119 (5)0.0094 (6)
C10.0226 (8)0.0230 (8)0.0237 (8)0.0093 (7)0.0017 (6)0.0005 (6)
C20.0204 (8)0.0241 (8)0.0227 (8)0.0096 (7)0.0008 (6)0.0013 (6)
C30.0246 (9)0.0235 (8)0.0234 (8)0.0089 (7)0.0018 (6)0.0003 (6)
C40.0279 (9)0.0242 (8)0.0236 (8)0.0122 (7)0.0001 (7)0.0001 (6)
C50.0223 (8)0.0300 (9)0.0267 (9)0.0131 (7)0.0023 (6)0.0011 (7)
C60.0224 (8)0.0257 (8)0.0226 (8)0.0087 (7)0.0029 (6)0.0005 (6)
C70.0249 (9)0.0241 (8)0.0314 (9)0.0090 (7)0.0038 (7)0.0043 (7)
C80.0421 (11)0.0442 (12)0.0347 (10)0.0265 (10)0.0080 (9)0.0029 (9)
C90.0269 (9)0.0285 (9)0.0305 (9)0.0135 (8)0.0053 (7)0.0065 (7)
C100.0402 (11)0.0176 (8)0.0382 (10)0.0075 (7)0.0161 (8)0.0032 (7)
C110.0386 (11)0.0415 (11)0.0495 (12)0.0279 (10)0.0090 (9)0.0086 (9)
C120.0245 (9)0.0436 (11)0.0382 (11)0.0132 (8)0.0106 (8)0.0054 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C91.739 (2)C1—C61.412 (2)
O1—C71.206 (2)C1—C71.470 (2)
O2—C21.372 (2)C2—C31.390 (2)
O2—C81.441 (2)C3—C41.406 (2)
O3—C41.352 (2)C3—C91.479 (2)
O3—C111.438 (2)C4—C51.395 (3)
O4—C61.358 (2)C5—C61.392 (3)
O4—C121.426 (2)C9—C101.369 (3)
C1—C21.412 (2)
C2—O2—C8114.04 (14)O3—C4—C5123.29 (16)
C4—O3—C11118.57 (15)O3—C4—C3115.46 (16)
C6—O4—C12118.37 (15)C5—C4—C3121.24 (16)
C2—C1—C6117.30 (15)C6—C5—C4118.80 (16)
C2—C1—C7124.03 (15)O4—C6—C5122.52 (16)
C6—C1—C7118.26 (15)O4—C6—C1115.53 (15)
O2—C2—C3116.62 (15)C5—C6—C1121.95 (16)
O2—C2—C1121.48 (15)O1—C7—C1126.65 (17)
C3—C2—C1121.83 (16)C10—C9—C3124.89 (17)
C2—C3—C4118.75 (16)C10—C9—Cl1119.62 (15)
C2—C3—C9120.49 (16)C3—C9—Cl1115.47 (14)
C4—C3—C9120.75 (15)
C8—O2—C2—C3109.77 (18)O3—C4—C5—C6179.93 (16)
C8—O2—C2—C173.4 (2)C3—C4—C5—C61.0 (3)
C6—C1—C2—O2179.08 (15)C12—O4—C6—C56.6 (3)
C7—C1—C2—O28.4 (3)C12—O4—C6—C1173.58 (16)
C6—C1—C2—C34.2 (2)C4—C5—C6—O4179.52 (16)
C7—C1—C2—C3168.25 (16)C4—C5—C6—C10.7 (3)
O2—C2—C3—C4179.21 (15)C2—C1—C6—O4177.95 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C43.9 (3)C7—C1—C6—O49.1 (2)
O2—C2—C3—C91.5 (2)C2—C1—C6—C51.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C9175.37 (16)C7—C1—C6—C5171.06 (16)
C11—O3—C4—C50.6 (3)C2—C1—C7—O15.8 (3)
C11—O3—C4—C3179.54 (17)C6—C1—C7—O1178.24 (19)
C2—C3—C4—O3177.75 (15)C2—C3—C9—C10103.1 (2)
C9—C3—C4—O32.9 (2)C4—C3—C9—C1076.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C51.2 (3)C2—C3—C9—Cl175.24 (19)
C9—C3—C4—C5178.08 (16)C4—C3—C9—Cl1105.46 (17)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C12—H12B···O1i0.982.482.998 (3)113
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H13ClO4
Mr256.67
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)180
a, b, c (Å)8.0516 (12), 8.1214 (12), 9.9064 (15)
α, β, γ (°)88.427 (4), 86.171 (4), 67.868 (3)
V3)598.71 (15)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.32
Crystal size (mm)0.48 × 0.28 × 0.26
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.862, 0.922
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3564, 2478, 2267
Rint0.029
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.639
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.046, 0.137, 1.10
No. of reflections2478
No. of parameters157
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.47, 0.71

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1994), SAINT (Siemens, 1994), SAINT, SHELXTL/PC (Sheldrick, 1994), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL/PC.

Selected torsion angles (º) top
C8—O2—C2—C173.4 (2)C2—C1—C7—O15.8 (3)
C11—O3—C4—C50.6 (3)C2—C3—C9—Cl175.24 (19)
C12—O4—C6—C56.6 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C12—H12B···O1i0.982.482.998 (3)112.8
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds