Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Cyano­di­methyl­arsine, [As(CH3)2(CN)], and cyano­di­methyl­stibine, [Sb(CH3)2(CN)], have closely related, but not isomorphous, crystal structures containing XCN...XCN... chains. The N...As distance of 3.185 (3) Å is slightly shorter than the expected van der Waals distance of 3.5 Å, while the N...Sb distance of 2.862 (9) Å, compared with the expected value of 3.7 Å, is much shorter. This is consistent with Sb being a stronger Lewis acid than As.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270102006030/bk1648sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I, II

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270102006030/bk1648Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270102006030/bk1648IIsup3.hkl
Contains datablock II

CCDC references: 187915; 187916

Comment top

After the recognition that there were significant CN···X intermolecular interactions in (CH3)2AsCN (Camerman & Trotter, 1963), As(CN)3 (Emerson & Britton, 1963), P(CN)3 (Emerson & Britton. 1964), and CH3As(CN)2 (Schlemper & Britton, 1966), we attempted to extend this series to the corresponding Sb compounds.

Schlemper (1964) prepared (CH3)2SbCN, but found it invariably to be twinned and could only partially solve the structure. [He also prepared Sb(CN)3, but all attempts to prepare single crystals led to amorphous solids. In addition, when he attempted to prepare CH3Sb(CN)2 from CH3SbBr2 and AgCN the product was again (CH3)2SbCN.] With more powerful techniques now available we decided to return to this problem and report here the structure of (CH3)2SbCN, (II). We have also redetermined the structure of (CH3)2AsCN, (I), for comparison. \sch

The atom labelling and displacement ellipsoids for both compounds are shown in Fig. 1, and the bond lengths and angles are compared in Table 1. The differences in the lengths and angles are what would be expected when Sb replaces As. The one unusual feature is that the Sb—C1 distance appears to be larger than the Sb—C2 and Sb—C3 distances; the difference is about eight s.u.s, which is marginally significant. This is opposite to the expected shortening when Csp3 is replaced by Csp.

The most significant intermolecular interactions are the N···As and N···Sb contacts, which are arranged in linear chains in both cases (see Fig. 1). The N···As distance of 3.2 Å is slightly shorter than the 3.5 Å that would be expected from the usual van der Waals radii (Pauling, 1960), but the N···Sb distance of 2.9 Å is much shorter than the van der Waals distance of 3.7 Å. The trend is what would be expected, since Sb should be a stronger Lewis acid than As. The strong N···Sb interaction is also consistent with the greater length of the Sb—C1 bond.

The linear chains formed by the N···X interactions are combined into double layers by X···X interactions (Figs. 2 and 3; Table 2). The As···As distances of 3.7 and 4.0 Å should be compared with the 4.0 Å van der Waals distance and the 3.1 Å distance found in elemental As (Donohue, 1982; the As—As single-bond distance is 2.517 Å). The Sb···Sb distances of 3.8 and 4.1 Å should be compared with the 4.4 Å van der Waals distance and the 3.4 Å distance found in elemental Sb (the Sb—Sb single-bond distance is 2.908 Å). These X···X interactions are weaker than in the pure elements but still appear to be an important part of the packing.

The crystals of the two compounds are not isomorphous but, as can be seen from Figs. 2 and 3, they are closely related. The chains parallel to the b axes and the double layers parallel to (001) are virtually the same in both structures. In both cases, the two halves of the double layers are related by centers of symmetry. The difference between the two lies in the stacking of adjacent double layers, which are related by a center of symmetry in the As compound, (I), but by a 21 axis in the Sb compound, (II).

Experimental top

Please provide brief details of syntheses of (I) and (II).

Refinement top

The As compound, (I), has a conventional cell, with a = 6.181 (2), b = 6.245 (2) and c = 7.875 (2) Å, and α = 78.52 (1), β = 69.69 (1) and γ = 60.43 (1)°. The matrix (110/110/001) converts this to the cell given in the data table. The change was made to facilitate comparison with the Sb structure, (II). [The matrix (010/001/100) converts the conventional cell to the orientation used by Camerman & Trotter (1963).] Schlemper (1964) examined 20 crystals of the Sb compound and found 18 obviously multiple from the diffraction patterns from precession photographs (Mo Kα radiation). The remaining two appeared to be orthorhombic, with a = 32.04 (5), b = 11.58 (2) and c = 6.21 (1) Å. With Z = 16, the calculated density (2.05 Mg m-3) agreed reasonably with the experimental density from flotation in a CCl4—CBr4 mixture [2.15 (1) Mg m-3]. However, the extinctions, for hkl reflections h+k, k+l, h+l all odd, and for hk0 reflections h+k ≠ 4n, did not fit any space group and twinning was suspected even for these two crystals. At this point, Weissenberg photographs were taken with Cu Kα radiation where, with the greater resolution, some split spots could be detected. These data fit a twinned monoclinic cell with a = 11.58 (2), b = 6.21 (1) and c = 17.03 (3) Å, and β = 109.8 (2)°; the extinctions now were appropriate for Cc or C2/c. The Sb atoms could be located but not all of the light atoms could be, and the problem was abandoned.

The new data for (II) could be indexed as a C-centered monoclinic cell (the one reported in the data table) or as an F-centered orthorhombic cell, which can be obtained from the monoclinic cell using the matrix (100/010/102). As found in the earlier work, the As positions could be found readily in the monoclinic cell but only some of the light atoms could be found. Rotating the monoclinic cell by 180° around the a axis produces a pseudo-merohedral twin related by the twin law (100 /010/101). Continuing the solution and refinement treating the crystal as a merohedral twin led to a chemically reasonable solution with a twin fraction of 0.475 (3).

Crystals of both (I) and (II) were too irregular in shape to allow face-indexed absorption corrections. While the SADABS (Sheldrick, 1996) absorption corrections were significant, they were not completely adequate. This problem led to the large peaks in the final difference maps. In both cases, all of the large peaks were close to the heavy atom. Problems with the absorption corrections were also the most likely reason for the elongated displacement ellipsoid for atom C1 in (II). H atoms were placed geometrically, with C—H = 0.98 Å, and refined as riding atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C). Are these the correct constraints?

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1995); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1995); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Views of the molecules of (I) (the As compound) and (II) (the Sb compound). Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. In both cases, a second molecule shows the N···X intermolecular interaction.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The packing of (I) viewed along the b axis. The intermolecular As···As contacts are shown as dotted lines.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The packing of (II) viewed along the b axis. The intermolecular Sb···Sb contacts are shown as dotted lines.
(I) cyanodimethylarsine top
Crystal data top
[As(CH3)2CN]Z = 4
Mr = 131.01F(000) = 256
Triclinic, C1Dx = 1.756 Mg m3
a = 10.738 (2) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 6.253 (2) ÅCell parameters from 2568 reflections
c = 7.875 (2) Åθ = 2.8–27.5°
α = 98.30 (3)°µ = 6.68 mm1
β = 108.39 (3)°T = 173 K
γ = 90.68 (3)°Needle, colorless
V = 495.6 (2) Å30.50 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART area-detector
diffractometer
1125 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1058 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.026
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995)
h = 1313
Tmin = 0.28, Tmax = 0.51k = 88
2927 measured reflectionsl = 1010
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.090H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.07P)2 + 0.11P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1125 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
46 parametersΔρmax = 1.66 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 1.33 e Å3
Crystal data top
[As(CH3)2CN]γ = 90.68 (3)°
Mr = 131.01V = 495.6 (2) Å3
Triclinic, C1Z = 4
a = 10.738 (2) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 6.253 (2) ŵ = 6.68 mm1
c = 7.875 (2) ÅT = 173 K
α = 98.30 (3)°0.50 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
β = 108.39 (3)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART area-detector
diffractometer
1125 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995)
1058 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.28, Tmax = 0.51Rint = 0.026
2927 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0330 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.090H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05Δρmax = 1.66 e Å3
1125 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.33 e Å3
46 parameters
Special details top

Refinement. The structure is refined in space group C-1 to facilitate comparison with the analogous antimony compound.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
As10.83363 (3)0.04319 (4)0.35626 (4)0.02295 (16)
C30.9127 (4)0.0553 (6)0.1661 (5)0.0335 (7)
H3A1.00840.05150.21710.050*
H3B0.89120.18960.11560.050*
H3C0.87840.06910.07010.050*
C10.8271 (3)0.2706 (5)0.3337 (5)0.0273 (6)
C20.6502 (3)0.0542 (6)0.2111 (5)0.0326 (7)
H2A0.59440.04970.28800.049*
H2B0.62550.07010.11350.049*
H2C0.63850.18860.15900.049*
N10.8243 (3)0.4534 (5)0.3301 (5)0.0397 (8)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
As10.0222 (2)0.0195 (2)0.0264 (2)0.00164 (13)0.00633 (15)0.00468 (14)
C30.0375 (19)0.0303 (17)0.0395 (18)0.0052 (14)0.0195 (15)0.0110 (14)
C10.0235 (16)0.0265 (16)0.0339 (16)0.0041 (12)0.0097 (13)0.0094 (12)
C20.0227 (16)0.0280 (16)0.0426 (18)0.0042 (12)0.0027 (14)0.0083 (14)
N10.042 (2)0.0286 (19)0.051 (2)0.0041 (15)0.0170 (16)0.0115 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
As1—C11.943 (3)C3—H3C0.9800
As1—C21.948 (4)C1—N11.139 (4)
As1—C31.950 (3)C2—H2A0.9800
C3—H3A0.9800C2—H2B0.9800
C3—H3B0.9800C2—H2C0.9800
C1—As1—C294.51 (15)H3B—C3—H3C109.5
C1—As1—C394.99 (14)N1—C1—As1176.3 (3)
C2—As1—C398.36 (16)As1—C2—H2A109.5
As1—C3—H3A109.5As1—C2—H2B109.5
As1—C3—H3B109.5H2A—C2—H2B109.5
H3A—C3—H3B109.5As1—C2—H2C109.5
As1—C3—H3C109.5H2A—C2—H2C109.5
H3A—C3—H3C109.5H2B—C2—H2C109.5
(II) cyanodimethylstibine top
Crystal data top
[Sb(CH3)2CN]F(000) = 656
Mr = 177.84Dx = 2.150 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.313 (7) ÅCell parameters from 2092 reflections
b = 6.175 (4) Åθ = 2.6–25.0°
c = 16.701 (11) ŵ = 4.86 mm1
β = 109.673 (9)°T = 173 K
V = 1098.6 (12) Å3Irregular, colorless
Z = 80.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART area-detector
diffractometer
968 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube959 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.051
ω scansθmax = 25.1°, θmin = 1.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995)
h = 1312
Tmin = 0.20, Tmax = 0.38k = 07
1063 measured reflectionsl = 019
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.097H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.076P)2 + 3.19P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
968 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.006
49 parametersΔρmax = 2.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 1.62 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Sb(CH3)2CN]V = 1098.6 (12) Å3
Mr = 177.84Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 11.313 (7) ŵ = 4.86 mm1
b = 6.175 (4) ÅT = 173 K
c = 16.701 (11) Å0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm
β = 109.673 (9)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART area-detector
diffractometer
968 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995)
959 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.20, Tmax = 0.38Rint = 0.051
1063 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0380 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.097H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06Δρmax = 2.19 e Å3
968 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.62 e Å3
49 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Sb10.83284 (5)0.07875 (15)0.42951 (3)0.0246 (2)
C10.8225 (12)0.2804 (14)0.4146 (5)0.035 (2)
N10.8214 (12)0.4601 (14)0.4109 (6)0.047 (2)
C20.6378 (9)0.1055 (17)0.3533 (7)0.042 (2)
H2A0.62170.02180.30090.064*
H2B0.61690.25790.33920.064*
H2C0.58600.04890.38530.064*
C30.9041 (10)0.1064 (19)0.3243 (6)0.041 (2)
H3A0.88230.24900.29770.061*
H3B0.86650.00680.28230.061*
H3C0.99560.08940.34560.061*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Sb10.0280 (3)0.0167 (3)0.0271 (3)0.0003 (3)0.0068 (3)0.00020 (18)
C10.060 (6)0.015 (4)0.036 (4)0.018 (5)0.024 (5)0.001 (3)
N10.054 (5)0.023 (6)0.061 (5)0.005 (5)0.016 (5)0.002 (4)
C20.032 (5)0.035 (5)0.054 (6)0.002 (4)0.006 (4)0.014 (5)
C30.055 (6)0.031 (5)0.045 (6)0.006 (4)0.030 (5)0.000 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Sb1—C22.150 (10)C2—H2B0.9800
Sb1—C32.172 (9)C2—H2C0.9800
Sb1—C12.230 (9)C3—H3A0.9800
C1—N11.112 (12)C3—H3B0.9800
C2—H2A0.9800C3—H3C0.9800
C2—Sb1—C395.8 (4)H2A—C2—H2C109.5
C2—Sb1—C190.3 (4)H2B—C2—H2C109.5
C3—Sb1—C190.4 (4)Sb1—C3—H3A109.5
N1—C1—Sb1176.8 (10)Sb1—C3—H3B109.5
Sb1—C2—H2A109.5H3A—C3—H3B109.5
Sb1—C2—H2B109.5Sb1—C3—H3C109.5
H2A—C2—H2B109.5H3A—C3—H3C109.5
Sb1—C2—H2C109.5H3B—C3—H3C109.5

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formula[As(CH3)2CN][Sb(CH3)2CN]
Mr131.01177.84
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, C1Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)173173
a, b, c (Å)10.738 (2), 6.253 (2), 7.875 (2)11.313 (7), 6.175 (4), 16.701 (11)
α, β, γ (°)98.30 (3), 108.39 (3), 90.68 (3)90, 109.673 (9), 90
V3)495.6 (2)1098.6 (12)
Z48
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)6.684.86
Crystal size (mm)0.50 × 0.15 × 0.100.4 × 0.3 × 0.2
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART area-detector
diffractometer
Siemens SMART area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995)
Multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996; Blessing, 1995)
Tmin, Tmax0.28, 0.510.20, 0.38
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2927, 1125, 1058 1063, 968, 959
Rint0.0260.051
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6500.597
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.033, 0.090, 1.05 0.038, 0.097, 1.06
No. of reflections1125968
No. of parameters4649
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.66, 1.332.19, 1.62

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1995), SAINT (Siemens, 1995), SAINT, SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1994), SHELXTL.

Comparison of bond distances and angles (Å, °) in (I) and (II) top
AsSbAsSb
X-C11.943 (3)2.230 (9)C1-X-C294.51 (15)90.3 (4)
X-C21.948 (4)2.150 (10)C1-X-C394.99 (14)90.4 (4)
X-C31.950 (3)2.172 (9)C2-X-C398.36 (16)95.8 (4)
C1-N11.139 (4)1.112 (12)X-C1-N1176.3 (3)176.8 (10)
Distances and angles (Å, °) in the X···Y contacts in (I) and (II) top
C(X)XYC(Y)C(X)-X···YX···YX···Y-C(Y)
C1N1As1iC1i174.9 (2)3.185 (3)171.6 (2)
C2As1As1iiC2ii172.7 (2)3.671 (1)172.7 (2)
C3As1As1iiiC3iii136.5 (2)4.003 (1)136.5 (2)
C1N1Sb1iC1i171.1 (9)2.862 (9)168.0 (10)
C2Sb1Sb1iiC2ii169.4 (9)3.847 (4)169.4 (9)
C3Sb1Sb1iiiC3iii142.9 (9)4.062 (4)142.9 (9)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y - 1, z; (ii) 2 - x, - y, 1 - z; (iii) 3/2 - x, 1/2 - y, 1 - z.
 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds