Buy article online - an online subscription or single-article purchase is required to access this article.
Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the crystal structure of the title compound [4-methyl­phenyl (E)-3-phenyl­propenoate], C16H14O2, the benzene ring of the cinnamoyl group is slightly distorted due to conjugation with the double bond. The mean plane of the cinnamoyl group forms a dihedral angle of 61.1 (1)° with the plane of the cresyl group.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807050064/bi2242sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807050064/bi2242Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 667378

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 295 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.073
  • wR factor = 0.180
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.2

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for O1
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

In the title compound (Fig. 1), the majority of bond lengths and angles have normal values, in accord with those of related compounds. The geometry of the phenyl ring C4–C9 is mildly distorted, with the endocyclic angle C5—C4—C9 = 117.7 (2)° and the aromatic C—C bonds adjacent to C4 somewhat longer than neighbouring ones. Also, the C3—C4 bond (1.461 (3) Å) is somewhat shorter than the reported average for C(aromatic)—Csp2 bonds (1.483 Å). These distortions can be attributed to hybridization and conjugation effects (Domenicano et al., 1975). The cinnamoyl group is almost perfectly planar and forms an angle of 61.6 (1)° with the cresyl ring.

Cresyl groups participate in C—H···π intermolecular contacts (C15···C13i = 3.613 (5) Å, C15—H15···C13 = 148.4°; symmetry code: (i) 1/2 - x, -1/2 + y, 1/2 - z), while the cinnamoyl groups do not participate in any notable intermolecular interactions.

Related literature top

Several structures of cinnamate esters with simple aromatic alcohols have been reported previously: coumaryl cinnamate (Yang et al., 2006), pentafluorophenyl cinnamate (Andrade et al., 2006) and 2-chlororophenyl cinnamate (Nilofar Nissa et al., 2004). For a discussion of ring deformations induced by substitution in benzene derivatives, see: Domenicano et al. (1975).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared unintentionally while attempting to isolate a 1,3,3'-triketone containing a cinnamoyl group. To an isooctane solution containing sodium dipivaloilmethanate (0.15 g in 10 ml), a solution of cinnamoyl chloride (0.18 g) in isooctane (8 ml) was added. The precipitate of sodium chloride was filtered off and a solution of p-cresol (0.1 g) in dichloromethane (15 ml) was added to the clear solution. Colourless crystals were obtained on standing at room temperature overnight.

Refinement top

H atoms were placed geometrically and included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation, with C—H distances of 0.93 or 0.96 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 or 1.5Ueq(C).

Structure description top

In the title compound (Fig. 1), the majority of bond lengths and angles have normal values, in accord with those of related compounds. The geometry of the phenyl ring C4–C9 is mildly distorted, with the endocyclic angle C5—C4—C9 = 117.7 (2)° and the aromatic C—C bonds adjacent to C4 somewhat longer than neighbouring ones. Also, the C3—C4 bond (1.461 (3) Å) is somewhat shorter than the reported average for C(aromatic)—Csp2 bonds (1.483 Å). These distortions can be attributed to hybridization and conjugation effects (Domenicano et al., 1975). The cinnamoyl group is almost perfectly planar and forms an angle of 61.6 (1)° with the cresyl ring.

Cresyl groups participate in C—H···π intermolecular contacts (C15···C13i = 3.613 (5) Å, C15—H15···C13 = 148.4°; symmetry code: (i) 1/2 - x, -1/2 + y, 1/2 - z), while the cinnamoyl groups do not participate in any notable intermolecular interactions.

Several structures of cinnamate esters with simple aromatic alcohols have been reported previously: coumaryl cinnamate (Yang et al., 2006), pentafluorophenyl cinnamate (Andrade et al., 2006) and 2-chlororophenyl cinnamate (Nilofar Nissa et al., 2004). For a discussion of ring deformations induced by substitution in benzene derivatives, see: Domenicano et al. (1975).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2003); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids shown at 30% probability for non-H atoms.
4-methylphenyl (E)-3-phenylpropenoate top
Crystal data top
C16H14O2F(000) = 1008
Mr = 238.27Dx = 1.22 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 1344 reflections
a = 20.236 (3) Åθ = 4.6–52.0°
b = 7.5613 (11) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 17.379 (3) ÅT = 295 K
β = 102.573 (12)°Bipyramidal, colourless
V = 2595.5 (7) Å30.40 × 0.24 × 0.23 mm
Z = 8
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur CCD
diffractometer
2173 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.076
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 4.1°
ω scansh = 2525
9394 measured reflectionsk = 99
2816 independent reflectionsl = 2221
Refinement top
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.073 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0682P)2 + 1.203P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.180(Δ/σ)max = 0.042
S = 1.13Δρmax = 0.17 e Å3
2816 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
164 parameters
Crystal data top
C16H14O2V = 2595.5 (7) Å3
Mr = 238.27Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 20.236 (3) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
b = 7.5613 (11) ÅT = 295 K
c = 17.379 (3) Å0.40 × 0.24 × 0.23 mm
β = 102.573 (12)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur CCD
diffractometer
2173 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
9394 measured reflectionsRint = 0.076
2816 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0730 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.180H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13Δρmax = 0.17 e Å3
2816 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
164 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.17548 (8)0.7483 (2)0.39340 (10)0.0734 (5)
C100.23187 (10)0.7149 (3)0.36090 (12)0.0548 (5)
C20.06545 (11)0.7133 (3)0.40768 (13)0.0624 (6)
H20.07910.77820.45390.075*
C40.05010 (10)0.6773 (3)0.43304 (12)0.0543 (5)
C130.35019 (11)0.6650 (3)0.30803 (12)0.0573 (5)
C10.11498 (10)0.6761 (3)0.35991 (12)0.0580 (5)
C110.28404 (11)0.6212 (3)0.40606 (12)0.0583 (5)
H110.28010.5750.45440.07*
C120.34259 (10)0.5961 (3)0.37904 (12)0.0578 (5)
H120.37780.53110.40950.069*
C30.00252 (11)0.6586 (3)0.38786 (13)0.0591 (5)
H30.010.60140.33950.071*
C50.03804 (11)0.7590 (3)0.50668 (13)0.0645 (6)
H50.00460.80530.5280.077*
O20.10590 (8)0.5906 (3)0.30051 (10)0.0839 (6)
C90.11400 (11)0.6114 (3)0.40350 (14)0.0670 (6)
H90.12340.55740.35430.08*
C140.29647 (12)0.7582 (3)0.26392 (14)0.0673 (6)
H140.30030.80570.21570.081*
C150.23739 (12)0.7827 (3)0.28933 (14)0.0676 (6)
H150.20150.84450.25840.081*
C60.08837 (13)0.7720 (4)0.54816 (14)0.0716 (7)
H60.07970.82740.59710.086*
C70.15159 (12)0.7033 (4)0.51757 (16)0.0729 (7)
H70.18540.7110.5460.087*
C80.16446 (12)0.6238 (4)0.44532 (17)0.0756 (7)
H80.20720.57810.42430.091*
C160.41478 (13)0.6383 (5)0.27968 (17)0.0884 (9)
H16A0.40560.56870.23230.133*
H16B0.44720.5780.31960.133*
H16C0.43270.75110.26910.133*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0581 (9)0.0885 (13)0.0752 (10)0.0037 (8)0.0182 (7)0.0242 (9)
C100.0516 (11)0.0547 (13)0.0583 (12)0.0037 (9)0.0126 (9)0.0076 (9)
C20.0596 (13)0.0647 (15)0.0621 (13)0.0051 (11)0.0114 (10)0.0103 (11)
C40.0533 (11)0.0498 (11)0.0590 (11)0.0069 (9)0.0107 (9)0.0021 (9)
C130.0594 (12)0.0577 (13)0.0553 (11)0.0116 (10)0.0134 (9)0.0050 (10)
C10.0545 (12)0.0612 (13)0.0582 (12)0.0062 (10)0.0117 (9)0.0012 (10)
C110.0648 (12)0.0629 (14)0.0466 (10)0.0049 (11)0.0109 (9)0.0023 (9)
C120.0570 (12)0.0581 (13)0.0551 (11)0.0022 (10)0.0049 (9)0.0026 (10)
C30.0617 (12)0.0575 (13)0.0568 (12)0.0065 (10)0.0103 (9)0.0050 (10)
C50.0583 (12)0.0745 (16)0.0594 (13)0.0025 (11)0.0101 (10)0.0017 (11)
O20.0670 (10)0.1127 (16)0.0753 (11)0.0096 (10)0.0225 (8)0.0308 (11)
C90.0647 (13)0.0609 (14)0.0756 (14)0.0021 (11)0.0159 (11)0.0122 (12)
C140.0752 (15)0.0693 (15)0.0579 (12)0.0102 (12)0.0155 (11)0.0138 (11)
C150.0681 (14)0.0624 (15)0.0677 (14)0.0069 (11)0.0047 (11)0.0150 (11)
C60.0765 (15)0.0844 (18)0.0564 (13)0.0070 (13)0.0198 (11)0.0014 (12)
C70.0669 (14)0.0771 (18)0.0813 (16)0.0089 (13)0.0307 (12)0.0124 (13)
C80.0603 (13)0.0706 (17)0.0969 (18)0.0080 (12)0.0190 (13)0.0069 (14)
C160.0716 (16)0.113 (2)0.0879 (18)0.0145 (16)0.0338 (14)0.0107 (16)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.351 (3)C3—H30.93
O1—C101.402 (2)C5—C61.374 (3)
C10—C111.368 (3)C5—H50.93
C10—C151.372 (3)C9—C81.379 (3)
C2—C31.312 (3)C9—H90.93
C2—C11.461 (3)C14—C151.374 (3)
C2—H20.93C14—H140.93
C4—C91.376 (3)C15—H150.93
C4—C51.394 (3)C6—C71.376 (4)
C4—C31.461 (3)C6—H60.93
C13—C121.379 (3)C7—C81.365 (4)
C13—C141.380 (3)C7—H70.93
C13—C161.508 (3)C8—H80.93
C1—O21.198 (3)C16—H16A0.96
C11—C121.379 (3)C16—H16B0.96
C11—H110.93C16—H16C0.96
C12—H120.93
C1—O1—C10119.64 (17)C6—C5—H5119.6
C11—C10—C15120.6 (2)C4—C5—H5119.6
C11—C10—O1117.14 (19)C4—C9—C8121.5 (2)
C15—C10—O1122.2 (2)C4—C9—H9119.3
C3—C2—C1122.5 (2)C8—C9—H9119.3
C3—C2—H2118.8C15—C14—C13121.7 (2)
C1—C2—H2118.8C15—C14—H14119.1
C9—C4—C5117.7 (2)C13—C14—H14119.1
C9—C4—C3120.0 (2)C10—C15—C14119.3 (2)
C5—C4—C3122.26 (19)C10—C15—H15120.3
C12—C13—C14117.5 (2)C14—C15—H15120.3
C12—C13—C16121.0 (2)C5—C6—C7120.2 (2)
C14—C13—C16121.4 (2)C5—C6—H6119.9
O2—C1—O1123.0 (2)C7—C6—H6119.9
O2—C1—C2126.7 (2)C8—C7—C6119.8 (2)
O1—C1—C2110.30 (18)C8—C7—H7120.1
C10—C11—C12119.25 (19)C6—C7—H7120.1
C10—C11—H11120.4C7—C8—C9120.0 (2)
C12—C11—H11120.4C7—C8—H8120
C13—C12—C11121.6 (2)C9—C8—H8120
C13—C12—H12119.2C13—C16—H16A109.5
C11—C12—H12119.2C13—C16—H16B109.5
C2—C3—C4127.4 (2)H16A—C16—H16B109.5
C2—C3—H3116.3C13—C16—H16C109.5
C4—C3—H3116.3H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C6—C5—C4120.8 (2)H16B—C16—H16C109.5

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H14O2
Mr238.27
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)20.236 (3), 7.5613 (11), 17.379 (3)
β (°) 102.573 (12)
V3)2595.5 (7)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.24 × 0.23
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur CCD
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
9394, 2816, 2173
Rint0.076
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.639
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.073, 0.180, 1.13
No. of reflections2816
No. of parameters164
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.17, 0.19

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2003), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

 

Subscribe to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

The full text of this article is available to subscribers to the journal.

If you have already registered and are using a computer listed in your registration details, please email support@iucr.org for assistance.

Buy online

You may purchase this article in PDF and/or HTML formats. For purchasers in the European Community who do not have a VAT number, VAT will be added at the local rate. Payments to the IUCr are handled by WorldPay, who will accept payment by credit card in several currencies. To purchase the article, please complete the form below (fields marked * are required), and then click on `Continue'.
E-mail address* 
Repeat e-mail address* 
(for error checking) 

Format*   PDF (US $40)
   HTML (US $40)
   PDF+HTML (US $50)
In order for VAT to be shown for your country javascript needs to be enabled.

VAT number 
(non-UK EC countries only) 
Country* 
 

Terms and conditions of use
Contact us

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds