Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a Schiff base: (Z)-6-[(5-chloro-2-meth­oxy­anilino)methyl­idene]-2-hy­droxy­cyclo­hexa-2,4-dien-1-one

Demir Kanmazalp, S.; Doĝan, O.E.; Taşdemir, V.; Dege, N.; Aĝar, E.; Fritsky, I.O.

doi:10.1107/S2056989019002123

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 75| Part 3| March 2019| Pages 362-366

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019002123

Open

access

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a Schiff base: (Z)-6-[(5-chloro-2-methoxyanilino)methylidene]-2-hydroxycyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one

Sibel Demir Kanmazalp,^a ^* Onur Erman Doĝan,^b Volkan Taşdemir,^c Necmi Dege,^d ^* Erbil Aĝar ^b and Igor O. Fritsky ^e ^*

^aGaziantep University, Technical Sciences, 27310, Gaziantep, Turkey, ^bOndokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Chemistry, 55139, Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey, ^cScience Research and Applied Center, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, 65080, Van, Turkey, ^dOndokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Physics, 55139, Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey, and ^eDepartment of Chemistry, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Volodymyrska 64/13, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine
^*Correspondence e-mail: sibeld@gantep.edu.tr, necmid@omu.edu.tr, ifritsky@univ.kiev.ua

Edited by A. V. Yatsenko, Moscow State University, Russia (Received 16 January 2019; accepted 7 February 2019; online 12 February 2019)

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₂ClNO₃, is a Schiff base that exists in the keto–enamine tautomeric form and adopts a Z configuration. In the crystal, the dihedral angle between the planes of the benzene rings is 5.34 (15)°. The roughly planar geometry of the molecule is stabilized by a strong intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. In the crystal, pairs of centrosymmetrically related molecules are linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming R₂²(10) rings. Besides this, the molecules form stacks along the [001] direction with C—H⋯π and C—H⋯Cl contacts between the stacks. The intermolecular interactions in the crystal were analysed using Hirshfeld surfaces. The most significant contribution to the crystal packing is from H⋯H contacts (30.8%).

Keywords: crystal structure; Schiff bases; Hirshfeld surface; hydrogen bonds; stacking interactions.

CCDC reference: 1886956

1. Chemical context

Schiff bases are widely used as ligands in coordination chemistry (Calligaris & Randaccio, 1987 ) and they are also of interest in various fields because of their diverse biological activity (Lozier et al., 1975 ; Costamagna et al., 1992 ). Some Schiff bases derived from salicylaldehyde have attracted the interest of chemists and physicists because they show thermochromism and photochromism in the solid state (Cohen et al., 1964 ; Hadjoudis et al., 1987 ). The origin of their photo- and thermochromism is related to the reversible intramolecular proton transfer associated with a change in the electronic structure (Hadjoudis et al., 1987). The o-hydroxy Schiff bases obtained by the condensation of o-hydroxyaldehydes with aniline have been extensively examined in this context. Such compounds can exist in two tautomeric forms, viz. keto–enamine (N—H⋯O) and phenol–imine (N⋯H—O) (Stewart & Lingafelter, 1959 ; Petek et al., 2010 ). We report herein the synthesis and the crystal and molecular structures of the title compound, as well as an analysis of its Hirshfeld surfaces.

2. Structural commentary

As shown in Fig. 1., the asymmetric unit of the title compound contains only one molecule, which adopts the keto–enamine tautomeric form: the H atom is located at N1, and the lengths of the N1—C7 and C8—C9 bonds indicate their single-bond character, whereas the O2—C9 and C7—C8 bonds are double (Table 1). Overall, the bond lengths in the title structure compare well with those of other keto–enamine tautomers known from the literature (see the Database survey section). The whole molecule is almost planar, with a dihedral angle of 5.34 (15)° between the benzene ring planes. The methoxy C14 atom deviates from the plane of the C1–C6 benzene ring by 0.038 (4) Å. The torsion angles C1—C6—N1—C7 and N1—C7—C8—C9 are 5.8 (5) and −0.6 (5)°, respectively. The planar molecular conformation is stabilized by the intramolecular N1—H2⋯O2 hydrogen bond (Table 2).

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

O2—C9	1.292 (4)	C8—C13	1.410 (5)
O3—C10	1.358 (4)	C9—C10	1.426 (4)
N1—C6	1.413 (4)	C10—C11	1.359 (5)
N1—C7	1.302 (4)	C11—C12	1.402 (5)
C7—C8	1.408 (4)	C12—C13	1.349 (4)
C8—C9	1.429 (4)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 ring.

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C7—H7⋯Cl01ⁱ	0.93	2.88	3.737 (3)	154
C14—H14B⋯O3ⁱⁱ	0.96	2.59	3.295 (4)	131
O3—H3⋯O2ⁱⁱ	0.87 (4)	2.00 (4)	2.780 (4)	148 (4)
N1—H2⋯O2	0.97 (4)	1.82 (4)	2.598 (3)	136 (4)
C3—H3A⋯Cg1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.73	3.463 (3)	136
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y+1, -z; (ii) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (iii) $[x, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]$ .

Figure 1
The molecular structure of the title compound with the displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. The intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond is shown as a dashed line.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, the molecules are connected via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into centrosymmetric pairs with an R₂²(10) graph-set motif (Table 2, Fig. 2). Molecules related by a [001] translation form stacks with an interplanar distance of 3.420 (3) Å and a shortest intercentroid separation of 3.6797 (17) Å. The molecular packing is further stabilized by C—H⋯O, C—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯π interactions between the molecules of the neighbouring stacks (Fig. 3). Details of all these contacts are given in Table 2.

Figure 2
A view of the crystal packing of the title compound. Dashed lines denote the intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds.

Figure 3
The packing diagram showing the stacking, C—H⋯π and C—H⋯Cl interactions.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural database (CSD, version 5.40, update November 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ) for the 3-[(E)-(phenylimino)methyl]-benzene-1,2-diol fragment revealed eight hits where this fragment adopts the keto–enamine tautomeric form and 21 hits where it exists as the phenol–imine tautomer. Distinctive bond lengths (N1—C7, C7=C8, C8—C9, C9=O2) in the title structure are the same within standard uncertainties as the corresponding bond lengths in the structures of 2-hydroxy-6-[(2-methoxyphenyl)aminomethylene]cyclohexa-2,4-dienone (FOCCOQ; Şahin et al., 2005 ) and 6-[(4-chlorophenylamino)methylene]-2,3-dihydroxycyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one (CIRTED; Karabıyık et al., 2008 ). In the structures of typical phenol–imine tautomers, viz., 3-[(3-bromophenyl)iminomethyl]benzene-1,2-diol (CUCZUW; Keleşoğlu et al., 2009b ), 3-[(2-bromophenyl)iminomethyl]benzene-1,2-diol (XEYSOK; Temel et al., 2007 ) and 3-[(4-butylphenyl)iminomethyl]benzene-1,2-diol (XOZJUS; Keleşoğlu et al., 2009a ), the C9—O2 and C7—C8 bond lengths are distinctly longer, being in the ranges 1.324–1.355 Å and 1.427–1.447 Å, respectively. It is likely that the intermolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond, where the keto O atom acts as an hydrogen-bond acceptor, is an important prerequisite for the tautomeric shift toward the keto–enamine form. In fact, in all eight structures of the keto–enamine tautomers, hydrogen bonds of this type are observed. However, in 16 of 21 structures of phenol–imine tautomers, such hydrogen bonds are also present. This means that there is another unknown reason for the formation of keto–enamine tautomers.

5. Hirshfeld surface analysis

The Hirshfeld surface analysis, together with the two-dimensional fingerprint plots, is a powerful tool for the visualization and interpretation of intermolecular contacts in molecular crystals, since it provides a concise description of all intermolecular interactions present in a crystal structure (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ; McKinnon et al., 2007 ). All surfaces and 2D fingerprint plots were generated using CrystalExplorer3.1 (Wolff et al., 2012 ). The mappings of d_i, d_e, d_norm, shape-index and curvedness for the title structure are shown in Fig. 4. The Hirshfeld surface of a molecule in the crystal is presented in Fig. 5, with the prominent hydrogen-bonding interactions shown as intense red spots. The two-dimensional fingerprint plots provide information about the percentage contributions of the various interatomic contacts. As can be seen from these plots (Fig. 6), the most important are the H⋯H interactions, which contribute 30.8% to the total Hirshfeld surface. Other contributions are from O⋯C/C⋯O (1.2%), O⋯H/H⋯O (17.2%), C⋯C (7.2%), O⋯O/O⋯O (1.0%), Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl (17.8%) and C⋯H/H⋯C (21.8%). Analogous features were observed recently for some compounds of the same class (Kansız et al., 2018 ; Özek Yıldırım et al., 2018 ). The donor and acceptor centers of the hydrogen bonding are represented as blue (positive) and red (negative) regions on the Hirshfeld surface mapped over the electrostatic potential (Fig. 7). The electrostatic potential of the Cl01 atom is less negative as compared to those of atoms O2 and O3 of the hydroxy groups, as indicated by the lighter red color.

Figure 4
The Hirshfeld surface of the title compound mapped with (a) d_norm, (b) d_i, (c) d_e, (d) curvedness and (e) shape-index.

Figure 5
The d_norm-mapped Hirshfeld surface showing the intermolecular interactions in the title compound.

Figure 6
Two-dimensional fingerprint plots with d_norm views of all, the H⋯H, O⋯H/H⋯O, C⋯H/H⋯C and N⋯H/H⋯N contacts in the title compound.

Figure 7
The view of the Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over the electrostatic potential energy.

6. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was prepared by mixing solutions of 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (34.5 mg, 0.25 mmol) and 5-chloro-2-methoxyaniline (39.4 mg, 0.25 mmol), both in 15 mL of ethanol, with subsequent stirring for 5 h under reflux. Single crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol solution (yield 65%; m.p. 442–444 K).

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. The C-bound H atoms were geometrically positioned with C—H distances of 0.93–0.96 Å and refined as riding, with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C) or U_iso(H) = 1.5U_eq(C) for methyl H atoms. The O- and N-bound H atoms were located in a difference map and freely refined.

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₁₄H₁₂ClNO₃
M_r	277.70
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P2₁/c
Temperature (K)	296
a, b, c (Å)	14.7251 (9), 14.4444 (9), 6.1698 (4)
β (°)	98.241 (5)
V (Å³)	1298.74 (14)
Z	4
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.30
Crystal size (mm)	0.23 × 0.16 × 0.09

Data collection
Diffractometer	Stoe IPDS 2
Absorption correction	Integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002 )
T_min, T_max	0.948, 0.979
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	13658, 2491, 1120
R_int	0.115
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.617

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.057, 0.100, 0.90
No. of reflections	2491
No. of parameters	181
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.16, −0.24
Computer programs: X-AREA and X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2002), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), ORTEP-3 for Windows and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1886956

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019002123/yk2119sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019002123/yk2119Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019002123/yk2119Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002); data reduction: X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012)and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

(Z)-6-[(5-Chloro-2-methoxyanilino)methylidene]-2-hydroxycyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one top

Crystal data top

C₁₄H₁₂ClNO₃	F(000) = 576
M_r = 277.70	D_x = 1.420 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, P2₁/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 14.7251 (9) Å	Cell parameters from 8086 reflections
b = 14.4444 (9) Å	θ = 1.4–27.1°
c = 6.1698 (4) Å	µ = 0.30 mm⁻¹
β = 98.241 (5)°	T = 296 K
V = 1298.74 (14) Å³	Irregular specimen, red
Z = 4	0.23 × 0.16 × 0.09 mm

Data collection top

Stoe IPDS 2 diffractometer	2491 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focus	1120 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm^-1	R_int = 0.115
rotation method scans	θ_max = 26.0°, θ_min = 2.0°
Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)	h = −18→18
T_min = 0.948, T_max = 0.979	k = −17→17
13658 measured reflections	l = −7→7

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.057	Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F²) = 0.100	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.90	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0293P)²] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
2491 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
181 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.16 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.24 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Cl01	0.49115 (8)	0.36774 (9)	−0.2476 (2)	0.1172 (6)
O1	0.11503 (15)	0.37573 (16)	−0.0556 (4)	0.0611 (6)
O2	0.10563 (15)	0.50349 (16)	0.4247 (4)	0.0601 (7)
O3	0.0461 (2)	0.5981 (2)	0.7618 (4)	0.0782 (9)
N1	0.2392 (2)	0.46609 (18)	0.2056 (5)	0.0497 (8)
C1	0.3568 (2)	0.4173 (2)	−0.0160 (6)	0.0608 (10)
H1A	0.4026	0.4475	0.0774	0.073*
C2	0.3782 (2)	0.3706 (2)	−0.1958 (6)	0.0606 (10)
C3	0.3124 (2)	0.3262 (2)	−0.3362 (6)	0.0583 (10)
H3A	0.3277	0.2961	−0.4592	0.070*
C4	0.2231 (2)	0.3264 (2)	−0.2937 (6)	0.0540 (9)
H4	0.1780	0.2953	−0.3869	0.065*
C5	0.2002 (2)	0.3725 (2)	−0.1142 (5)	0.0459 (8)
C6	0.2675 (2)	0.4193 (2)	0.0256 (5)	0.0454 (8)
C7	0.2902 (2)	0.5189 (2)	0.3445 (6)	0.0546 (9)
H7	0.3515	0.5266	0.3277	0.066*
C8	0.2572 (2)	0.5648 (2)	0.5188 (5)	0.0495 (9)
C9	0.1632 (2)	0.5551 (2)	0.5481 (5)	0.0483 (9)
C10	0.1348 (3)	0.6045 (2)	0.7269 (6)	0.0577 (9)
C11	0.1941 (3)	0.6591 (2)	0.8593 (6)	0.0669 (11)
H11	0.1733	0.6919	0.9723	0.080*
C12	0.2862 (3)	0.6667 (2)	0.8274 (6)	0.0680 (11)
H12	0.3262	0.7037	0.9205	0.082*
C13	0.3171 (3)	0.6206 (2)	0.6623 (6)	0.0619 (10)
H13	0.3784	0.6257	0.6430	0.074*
C14	0.0424 (2)	0.3301 (3)	−0.1933 (6)	0.0698 (11)
H00F	0.0378	0.3546	−0.3392	0.105*
H14B	−0.0144	0.3402	−0.1375	0.105*
H14C	0.0548	0.2649	−0.1959	0.105*
H3	0.016 (3)	0.555 (3)	0.685 (8)	0.104 (18)*
H2	0.175 (3)	0.461 (3)	0.226 (8)	0.130 (17)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Cl01	0.0754 (8)	0.1458 (11)	0.1426 (12)	−0.0326 (7)	0.0573 (8)	−0.0628 (9)
O1	0.0504 (14)	0.0746 (16)	0.0578 (16)	−0.0021 (13)	0.0062 (12)	−0.0180 (13)
O2	0.0581 (15)	0.0667 (16)	0.0544 (17)	−0.0025 (13)	0.0051 (13)	−0.0148 (12)
O3	0.077 (2)	0.087 (2)	0.074 (2)	0.0025 (16)	0.0234 (17)	−0.0277 (16)
N1	0.0535 (19)	0.0501 (19)	0.047 (2)	−0.0040 (14)	0.0114 (17)	−0.0032 (14)
C1	0.063 (3)	0.060 (2)	0.061 (3)	−0.0134 (17)	0.014 (2)	−0.0135 (18)
C2	0.061 (2)	0.057 (2)	0.068 (3)	−0.011 (2)	0.025 (2)	−0.010 (2)
C3	0.073 (3)	0.050 (2)	0.056 (3)	0.001 (2)	0.019 (2)	−0.0059 (19)
C4	0.060 (3)	0.048 (2)	0.053 (2)	−0.0013 (17)	0.005 (2)	−0.0097 (17)
C5	0.051 (2)	0.043 (2)	0.044 (2)	0.0025 (17)	0.0085 (18)	0.0000 (17)
C6	0.055 (2)	0.041 (2)	0.041 (2)	−0.0018 (16)	0.0093 (19)	−0.0023 (15)
C7	0.059 (2)	0.052 (2)	0.053 (2)	−0.0125 (18)	0.010 (2)	−0.0031 (19)
C8	0.063 (2)	0.042 (2)	0.043 (2)	−0.0008 (16)	0.0073 (19)	−0.0044 (16)
C9	0.067 (2)	0.0347 (19)	0.042 (2)	0.0064 (17)	0.004 (2)	−0.0009 (16)
C10	0.072 (3)	0.050 (2)	0.052 (2)	0.007 (2)	0.011 (2)	−0.0005 (19)
C11	0.093 (3)	0.056 (3)	0.053 (3)	0.007 (2)	0.015 (2)	−0.0073 (19)
C12	0.088 (3)	0.058 (2)	0.055 (3)	−0.011 (2)	0.000 (2)	−0.015 (2)
C13	0.074 (2)	0.054 (2)	0.057 (3)	−0.010 (2)	0.008 (2)	−0.0087 (19)
C14	0.053 (2)	0.095 (3)	0.060 (3)	−0.002 (2)	0.002 (2)	−0.010 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Cl01—C2	1.739 (3)	C4—H4	0.9300
O1—C5	1.354 (3)	C5—C6	1.393 (4)
O1—C14	1.429 (4)	C7—C8	1.408 (4)
O2—C9	1.292 (4)	C7—H7	0.9300
O3—C10	1.358 (4)	C8—C9	1.429 (4)
O3—H3	0.87 (4)	C8—C13	1.410 (5)
N1—C6	1.413 (4)	C9—C10	1.426 (4)
N1—C7	1.302 (4)	C10—C11	1.359 (5)
N1—H2	0.97 (4)	C11—C12	1.402 (5)
C1—C2	1.372 (4)	C11—H11	0.9300
C1—C6	1.376 (4)	C12—C13	1.349 (4)
C1—H1A	0.9300	C12—H12	0.9300
C2—C3	1.363 (5)	C13—H13	0.9300
C3—C4	1.379 (4)	C14—H00F	0.9600
C3—H3A	0.9300	C14—H14B	0.9600
C4—C5	1.375 (4)	C14—H14C	0.9600

C5—O1—C14	117.9 (3)	C8—C7—H7	118.3
C10—O3—H3	113 (3)	C7—C8—C13	119.7 (3)
C7—N1—C6	126.1 (3)	C7—C8—C9	119.8 (3)
C7—N1—H2	116 (3)	C13—C8—C9	120.4 (3)
C6—N1—H2	118 (3)	O2—C9—C10	120.3 (3)
C2—C1—C6	119.8 (3)	O2—C9—C8	123.2 (3)
C2—C1—H1A	120.1	C10—C9—C8	116.5 (3)
C6—C1—H1A	120.1	O3—C10—C11	119.6 (3)
C3—C2—C1	121.4 (3)	O3—C10—C9	118.9 (4)
C3—C2—Cl01	118.9 (3)	C11—C10—C9	121.4 (3)
C1—C2—Cl01	119.7 (3)	C10—C11—C12	120.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4	119.2 (3)	C10—C11—H11	119.6
C2—C3—H3A	120.4	C12—C11—H11	119.6
C4—C3—H3A	120.4	C13—C12—C11	120.3 (4)
C5—C4—C3	120.4 (3)	C13—C12—H12	119.8
C5—C4—H4	119.8	C11—C12—H12	119.8
C3—C4—H4	119.8	C12—C13—C8	120.5 (3)
O1—C5—C4	125.1 (3)	C12—C13—H13	119.7
O1—C5—C6	115.0 (3)	C8—C13—H13	119.7
C4—C5—C6	119.9 (3)	O1—C14—H00F	109.5
C1—C6—C5	119.3 (3)	O1—C14—H14B	109.5
C1—C6—N1	123.7 (3)	H00F—C14—H14B	109.5
C5—C6—N1	117.0 (3)	O1—C14—H14C	109.5
N1—C7—C8	123.3 (3)	H00F—C14—H14C	109.5
N1—C7—H7	118.3	H14B—C14—H14C	109.5

C6—C1—C2—C3	0.3 (6)	C6—N1—C7—C8	179.0 (3)
C6—C1—C2—Cl01	−179.7 (3)	N1—C7—C8—C13	179.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4	−1.5 (6)	N1—C7—C8—C9	−0.6 (5)
Cl01—C2—C3—C4	178.6 (3)	C7—C8—C9—O2	2.0 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C5	1.3 (5)	C13—C8—C9—O2	−178.5 (3)
C14—O1—C5—C4	−1.8 (5)	C7—C8—C9—C10	−179.3 (3)
C14—O1—C5—C6	179.2 (3)	C13—C8—C9—C10	0.1 (5)
C3—C4—C5—O1	−178.8 (3)	O2—C9—C10—O3	−1.5 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C6	0.1 (5)	C8—C9—C10—O3	179.8 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C5	1.0 (5)	O2—C9—C10—C11	179.8 (3)
C2—C1—C6—N1	−179.5 (3)	C8—C9—C10—C11	1.2 (5)
O1—C5—C6—C1	177.8 (3)	O3—C10—C11—C12	179.7 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C1	−1.2 (5)	C9—C10—C11—C12	−1.7 (6)
O1—C5—C6—N1	−1.7 (4)	C10—C11—C12—C13	0.9 (6)
C4—C5—C6—N1	179.3 (3)	C11—C12—C13—C8	0.4 (6)
C7—N1—C6—C1	5.8 (5)	C7—C8—C13—C12	178.6 (3)
C7—N1—C6—C5	−174.7 (3)	C9—C8—C13—C12	−0.9 (5)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C6 ring.

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C7—H7···Cl01ⁱ	0.93	2.88	3.737 (3)	154
C14—H14B···O3ⁱⁱ	0.96	2.59	3.295 (4)	131
O3—H3···O2ⁱⁱ	0.87 (4)	2.00 (4)	2.780 (4)	148 (4)
N1—H2···O2	0.97 (4)	1.82 (4)	2.598 (3)	136 (4)
C3—H3A···Cg1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.73	3.463 (3)	136

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey, for the use of the Stoe IPDS 2 diffractometer (purchased under grant F.279 of the University Research Fund).

References

Calligaris, M. & Randaccio, L. (1987). Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry, Vol. 2, edited by G. Wilkinson, pp. 715–738. London: Pergamon. Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D., Schmidt, G. M. J. & Flavian, S. (1964). J. Chem. Soc., 2041–2051. Google Scholar
Costamagna, J., Vargas, J., Latorre, R., Alvarado, A. & Mena, G. (1992). Coord. Chem. Rev. 119, 67–88. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hadjoudis, E., Vittorakis, M. & Moustakali-Mavridis, I. (1987). Tetrahedron, 43, 1345–1360. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Kansiz, S., Macit, M., Dege, N. & Pavlenko, V. A. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 1887–1890. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Karabıyık, H., Ocak-İskeleli, N., Petek, H., Albayrak, Ç. & Ağar, E. (2008). J. Mol. Struct. 873, 130–136. Google Scholar
Keleşoğlu, Z., Büyükgüngör, O., Albayrak, Ç. & Odabaşoğlu, M. (2009a). Acta Cryst. E65, o2022. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Keleşoğlu, Z., Büyükgüngör, O., Albayrak, Ç. & Odabaşoğlu, M. (2009b). Acta Cryst. E65, o2410–o2411. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lozier, R., Bogomolni, R. A. & Stoeckenius, W. (1975). Biophys. J. 15, 955–962. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814–3816. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Özek Yıldırım, A., Gülsu, M. & Albayrak Kaştaş, Ç. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 319–322. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Petek, H., Albayrak, Ç., Odabaşoğlu, M., Şenel, I. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2010). Struct. Chem. 21, 681–690. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Şahin, O., Büyükgüngör, O., Albayrak, C. & Odabaşoǧlu, M. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o1579–o1581. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stewart, J. M. & Lingafelter, E. C. (1959). Acta Cryst. 12, 842–845. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2002). X-AREA and X-RED32. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Temel, E., Albayrak, Ç., Odabaşoğlu, M. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o1319–o1320. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., McKinnon, J. J., Turner, M. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2012). CrystalExplorer3.1. University of Western Australia. Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 75| Part 3| March 2019| Pages 362-366

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019002123

Open

access

Format		BIBTeX
		EndNote
		RefMan
		Refer
		Medline
		CIF
		SGML
		Plain Text
		Text

Format		BIBTeX
		EndNote
		RefMan
		Refer
		Medline
		CIF
		SGML
		Plain Text
		Text

Search IUCr Journals		doi		Advanced search
Author		volume	page

research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a Schiff base: (Z)-6-[(5-chloro-2-meth­­oxy­anilino)methyl­­idene]-2-hy­dr­oxy­cyclo­hexa-2,4-dien-1-one

1. Chemical context

2. Structural commentary

3. Supra­molecular features

4. Database survey

5. Hirshfeld surface analysis

6. Synthesis and crystallization

7. Refinement

Supporting information

Acknowledgements

References

research communications

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a Schiff base: (Z)-6-[(5-chloro-2-methoxyanilino)methylidene]-2-hydroxycyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-one

3. Supramolecular features