organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

4-Acetyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde

aTaishan Medical University, Tai'an 271016, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: yqge@yahoo.cn

(Received 20 August 2012; accepted 13 September 2012; online 19 September 2012)

The title compound, C7H7NO2, was synthesized via a one-pot Vilsmeier–Haack and subsequent Friedel–Crafts reaction. The pyrazole ring makes dihedral angles of 4.50 (9) and 2.06 (8)°, respectively, with the aldehyde and acetyl groups. In the crystal, classical N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and weak C—H⋯O inter­actions assemble the mol­ecules into a chain along the b axis.

Related literature

For the synthetic procedure, see: Ge et al. (2009[Ge, Y. Q., Jia, J., Yang, H., Zhao, G. L., Zhan, F. X. & Wang, J. W. (2009). Heterocycles, 78, 725-736.]). For related structures, see: Ge et al. (2011[Ge, Y. Q., Hao, B. Q., Duan, G. Y. & Wang, J. W. (2011). J. Lumin. 131, 1070-1076.]); Hao et al. (2012[Hao, B.-Q., Xu, W.-R., Meng, F.-C. & Duan, G.-Y. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o877.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C7H7NO2

  • Mr = 137.14

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /n

  • a = 3.811 (5) Å

  • b = 13.219 (5) Å

  • c = 13.167 (5) Å

  • β = 95.602 (5)°

  • V = 660.2 (9) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.15 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005[Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.541, Tmax = 0.556

  • 3752 measured reflections

  • 1348 independent reflections

  • 1010 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.056

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042

  • wR(F2) = 0.128

  • S = 1.04

  • 1348 reflections

  • 93 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.14 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O2i 0.86 2.11 2.876 (2) 148
C7—H7A⋯O1ii 0.96 2.54 3.453 (5) 159
Symmetry codes: (i) [x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) [x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005[Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005[Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999[Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115-119.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999[Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837-838.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

Synthesis of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds has been a subject of great interest due to the wide application in agrochemical and pharmaceutical fields (Ge et al.; 2009, 2011). Some pyrrole derivatives which belong to this category exhibit interesting biological properties, such as anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-tumor, anti-fungal, and immune suppressant activities. The title pyrazole (I) (Fig. 1) was synthesized in order to study its biological properties. (I) was screened for anticancer activities and found to be inactive. We report here the crystal structure of the title compound. In the title compound, C7H7NO2, the pyrazole ring makes dihedral angles of 4.50 (9)° and 2.06 (8)°, respectively, with the aldehyde group and acetyl group. The crystal structure is determined by classical intermolecular N—H···O (H1A···O2 = 2.11 Å) hydrogen bonding and weak C—H···O (H7A···O1 = 2.54 Å) interactions, which assemble the molecules into a one-dimensional chain structure.

Related literature top

For the synthetic procedure, see: Ge et al. (2009). For related structures, see: Ge et al. (2011); Hao et al. (2012).

Experimental top

A solution of dimethylformamide (5.5 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (10 ml) in a 3-necked flask was cooled in an ice bath. To the stirred and cooled solution was added a solution of oxalyl chloride (5.5 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (10 ml) over a period of 10 min. The suspension of white solid was then allowed to stir at room temperature for 15 min. The suspension was cooled in ice and a solution of pyrrole (5 mmol) in 1.2-dichloroethane (10 ml) was added over 10 min. The light orange solution obtained was allowed to stir 15 min at room temperature.To this was added aluminium chloride (11 mmol), followed by acetyl chloride (5 mmol), rapidly and at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for 3 h. The mixture was then poured onto about 50 ml of ice and water, 50% aqueous sodium hydroxide (4 ml) was added, and the mixture was stirred rapidly for about 10 min. The mixture was than made slightly acidic with concentrated hydrochloric acid and the organic and aqueous layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether. The organic extracts were washed with water, dried, filtered and concentrated. The final product was isolated by column chromatography on silica gel (yield 76%). Crystals of (I) suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by allowing a refluxed solution of the product in ethyl acetate (0.10 M) to cool slowly to room temperature (without temperature control) and allowing the solvent to evaporate for 3 d.

Refinement top

All H atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and refined using a riding model with C—H = 0.93 Å (for aldehyde group and pyrrole ring), C—H = 0.96 Å (for CH3) and N—H = 0.86 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C,N) for the aldehyde group and pyrrole hydrogen atoms and Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(C) for CH3.

Structure description top

Synthesis of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds has been a subject of great interest due to the wide application in agrochemical and pharmaceutical fields (Ge et al.; 2009, 2011). Some pyrrole derivatives which belong to this category exhibit interesting biological properties, such as anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-tumor, anti-fungal, and immune suppressant activities. The title pyrazole (I) (Fig. 1) was synthesized in order to study its biological properties. (I) was screened for anticancer activities and found to be inactive. We report here the crystal structure of the title compound. In the title compound, C7H7NO2, the pyrazole ring makes dihedral angles of 4.50 (9)° and 2.06 (8)°, respectively, with the aldehyde group and acetyl group. The crystal structure is determined by classical intermolecular N—H···O (H1A···O2 = 2.11 Å) hydrogen bonding and weak C—H···O (H7A···O1 = 2.54 Å) interactions, which assemble the molecules into a one-dimensional chain structure.

For the synthetic procedure, see: Ge et al. (2009). For related structures, see: Ge et al. (2011); Hao et al. (2012).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of compound, showing displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The one-dimensional infinite chain structure, which is formed by intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonding and weak C—H···O interactions.
4-Acetyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde top
Crystal data top
C7H7NO2F(000) = 288
Mr = 137.14Dx = 1.380 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1324 reflections
a = 3.811 (5) Åθ = 3.1–25.7°
b = 13.219 (5) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 13.167 (5) ÅT = 293 K
β = 95.602 (5)°Block, colorless
V = 660.2 (9) Å30.15 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1348 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1010 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.056
phi and ω scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
h = 44
Tmin = 0.541, Tmax = 0.556k = 1516
3752 measured reflectionsl = 1216
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.128 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0703P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1348 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.20 e Å3
93 parametersΔρmin = 0.14 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.031 (9)
Crystal data top
C7H7NO2V = 660.2 (9) Å3
Mr = 137.14Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 3.811 (5) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 13.219 (5) ÅT = 293 K
c = 13.167 (5) Å0.15 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm
β = 95.602 (5)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1348 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
1010 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.541, Tmax = 0.556Rint = 0.056
3752 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0420 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.128H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
1348 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.14 e Å3
93 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.4828 (4)0.16971 (9)0.21257 (10)0.0472 (4)
H1A0.41310.17390.27260.057*
O20.7983 (4)0.23425 (9)0.10389 (9)0.0634 (4)
C40.5018 (4)0.24663 (12)0.14876 (11)0.0448 (4)
H40.44230.31330.16190.054*
C60.6799 (4)0.27169 (12)0.02967 (12)0.0459 (4)
C20.5910 (4)0.08234 (11)0.16858 (11)0.0452 (4)
O10.4742 (4)0.03023 (10)0.29831 (10)0.0777 (5)
C30.6811 (4)0.10776 (11)0.07349 (12)0.0437 (4)
H30.76520.06380.02640.052*
C50.6236 (4)0.21205 (11)0.05991 (11)0.0413 (4)
C70.5885 (6)0.38131 (13)0.02795 (14)0.0606 (5)
H7A0.65480.41320.08870.091*
H7B0.71260.41260.03080.091*
H7C0.33920.38870.02480.091*
C10.5825 (5)0.01457 (13)0.21628 (14)0.0582 (5)
H10.66610.06960.18190.070*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0623 (9)0.0475 (8)0.0331 (7)0.0014 (6)0.0119 (6)0.0040 (6)
O20.0926 (10)0.0596 (8)0.0412 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0225 (6)0.0005 (6)
C40.0576 (10)0.0385 (8)0.0390 (9)0.0007 (7)0.0082 (7)0.0040 (7)
C60.0535 (9)0.0477 (9)0.0366 (9)0.0042 (7)0.0046 (7)0.0013 (7)
C20.0538 (10)0.0432 (9)0.0383 (9)0.0001 (7)0.0026 (7)0.0017 (7)
O10.1213 (12)0.0589 (9)0.0546 (9)0.0035 (7)0.0173 (8)0.0133 (7)
C30.0503 (9)0.0423 (9)0.0389 (9)0.0017 (7)0.0065 (7)0.0067 (7)
C50.0467 (9)0.0420 (9)0.0356 (8)0.0020 (6)0.0053 (6)0.0024 (6)
C70.0764 (12)0.0480 (10)0.0585 (11)0.0044 (9)0.0112 (9)0.0073 (8)
C10.0797 (13)0.0467 (10)0.0480 (10)0.0001 (8)0.0052 (9)0.0011 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C41.325 (2)C2—C11.429 (2)
N1—C21.373 (2)O1—C11.211 (2)
N1—H1A0.8600C3—C51.405 (2)
O2—C61.2207 (18)C3—H30.9300
C4—C51.378 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
C4—H40.9300C7—H7B0.9600
C6—C51.452 (2)C7—H7C0.9600
C6—C71.491 (2)C1—H10.9300
C2—C31.372 (2)
C4—N1—C2109.91 (13)C5—C3—H3126.1
C4—N1—H1A125.0C4—C5—C3106.19 (13)
C2—N1—H1A125.0C4—C5—C6126.74 (14)
N1—C4—C5109.11 (13)C3—C5—C6127.07 (13)
N1—C4—H4125.4C6—C7—H7A109.5
C5—C4—H4125.4C6—C7—H7B109.5
O2—C6—C5121.72 (16)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
O2—C6—C7120.76 (14)C6—C7—H7C109.5
C5—C6—C7117.52 (14)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C2—N1106.92 (14)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C3—C2—C1129.75 (15)O1—C1—C2124.74 (17)
N1—C2—C1123.23 (15)O1—C1—H1117.6
C2—C3—C5107.87 (13)C2—C1—H1117.6
C2—C3—H3126.1
C2—N1—C4—C50.08 (18)C2—C3—C5—C6179.38 (15)
C4—N1—C2—C30.20 (18)O2—C6—C5—C4177.98 (16)
C4—N1—C2—C1176.51 (16)C7—C6—C5—C41.8 (2)
N1—C2—C3—C50.40 (17)O2—C6—C5—C32.2 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C5176.02 (16)C7—C6—C5—C3177.96 (15)
N1—C4—C5—C30.33 (17)C3—C2—C1—O1174.36 (18)
N1—C4—C5—C6179.50 (14)N1—C2—C1—O11.5 (3)
C2—C3—C5—C40.45 (17)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O2i0.862.112.876 (2)148
C7—H7A···O1ii0.962.543.453 (5)159
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC7H7NO2
Mr137.14
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)3.811 (5), 13.219 (5), 13.167 (5)
β (°) 95.602 (5)
V3)660.2 (9)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.13 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.541, 0.556
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3752, 1348, 1010
Rint0.056
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.625
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.128, 1.04
No. of reflections1348
No. of parameters93
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.20, 0.14

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005), SAINT (Bruker, 2005), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O2i0.862.112.876 (2)148.4
C7—H7A···O1ii0.962.543.453 (5)159.2
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Shandong Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2012BL04).

References

First citationAltomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGe, Y. Q., Hao, B. Q., Duan, G. Y. & Wang, J. W. (2011). J. Lumin. 131, 1070–1076.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGe, Y. Q., Jia, J., Yang, H., Zhao, G. L., Zhan, F. X. & Wang, J. W. (2009). Heterocycles, 78, 725–736.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationHao, B.-Q., Xu, W.-R., Meng, F.-C. & Duan, G.-Y. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o877.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds