Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, 4-(4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl­imino­methyl)­phenol hemi­hydrate, C9H8N4O·0.5H2O or (I)·0.5H2O, mol­ecules of (I) are arranged as layers running along the b axis through intermolecular O—H...N and C—H...O hydrogen bonds. These layers are stabilized by hydrogen-bonded water mol­ecules to form three-dimensional networks.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270199014572/na1438sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270199014572/na1438Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 142776

Comment top

The aroyl Schiff bases of 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole have received considerable attention over the past few decades (Kitaev et al., 1971; Mazza et al., 1976; Kargin et al., 1988). It is of interest that some of them are anti-inflammatory agents (Gupta & Bhargava, 1978) and new coccidiostatic drugs (Colautti et al., 1971). As a continuation of our study on the structure of Schiff-base containing substituted 1,2,4-triazole (Raj et al., 1999), we report here the title structure, (I).

An ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) diagram with numbering scheme is shown in Fig.1. Compared to 9-(4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ylimino)-4,5-diazafluorene (Raj et al., 1999), molecules of (I) are essentially planar [the maximum displacement from the least-squares mean plane through the whole molecule is 0.073 (2) Å for C9]. The bond lengths and angles observed in the structure are in the normal ranges. In contrast with 2-(2-hydroxybenzylidene)-1-(2-picoloyl)-hydrazine hemihydrate (Wang et al., 1998), molecules of (I) are arranged as layers running along the b axis through the strong intermolecular O1—H11···N4 (−1/2 + x, −1/2 − y, 1/2 + z) hydrogen bonds and the weak C9—H9···O1 (1/2 − x, −1/2 + y, −1/2 − z) ones. These layers are stabilized by water molecules to form three-dimensional networks through the strong O1W—H1W···N3 hydrogen bonds and the weak C7—H7···O1W (x, −y, 1/2 + z) ones. The geometry of these interactions are listed in Table 2. The packing diagram of the molecules showing the hydrogen bonds is shown in Fig.2. The water molecules (O1W) lie on crystallographic twofold axes.

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by condensation of equivalent amounts of p-hydroxybenzaldehyde and 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole in ethanol for 5 h (Kitaev et al., 1971). Diffraction quality crystals were obtained by recrystallization from ethanol.

Computing details top

Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1994); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: SHELXTL (Siemens, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL; program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1]
Fig. 1. The structure of (I) showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids with the numbering scheme.

Fig. 2. A view of the crystal packing along the b axis. The hydrogen bonds are shown as broken lines.
4-[(4-Hydroxybenzylidene)amino]-1,2,4-triazole Hemihydrate top
Crystal data top
C9H8N4O·0.5H2OF(000) = 824
Mr = 197.20Dx = 1.413 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 14.134 (2) ÅCell parameters from 36 reflections
b = 12.491 (2) Åθ = 5.2–9.0°
c = 12.063 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 119.483 (10)°T = 293 K
V = 1854.0 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.30 × 0.26 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Siemens P4
diffractometer
1100 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tubeRint = 0.021
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.3°
2θ/ω scansh = 116
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(North et al., 1968)
k = 114
Tmin = 0.954, Tmax = 0.968l = 1412
2043 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
1642 independent reflections intensity decay: 5.8%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.057H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.155Calculated w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0851P)2 + 1.2289P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10(Δ/σ)max = 0.006
1637 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.28 e Å3
133 parametersΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
6 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXLTL (Siemens, 1995), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0022 (6)
Crystal data top
C9H8N4O·0.5H2OV = 1854.0 (5) Å3
Mr = 197.20Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 14.134 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 12.491 (2) ÅT = 293 K
c = 12.063 (2) Å0.30 × 0.26 × 0.20 mm
β = 119.483 (10)°
Data collection top
Siemens P4
diffractometer
1100 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: empirical (using intensity measurements)
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.021
Tmin = 0.954, Tmax = 0.9683 standard reflections every 97 reflections
2043 measured reflections intensity decay: 5.8%
1642 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0576 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.155H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
1637 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
133 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement on F2 for ALL reflections except for 5 with very negative F2 or flagged by the user for potential systematic errors. Weighted R-factors wR and all goodnesses of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The observed criterion of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R factor obs etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.36269 (10)0.22004 (12)0.36220 (12)0.0592 (4)
N20.42052 (10)0.21906 (12)0.42969 (12)0.0555 (4)
N30.50164 (10)0.17763 (14)0.53779 (13)0.0684 (4)
N40.51432 (10)0.28616 (13)0.51165 (13)0.0654 (5)
C10.15648 (12)0.07820 (15)0.14843 (14)0.0547 (4)
C20.18684 (13)0.0064 (2)0.1978 (2)0.0674 (5)
H20.188930.09280.16690.081*
C30.24364 (13)0.0127 (2)0.2618 (2)0.0664 (5)
H30.280240.06000.29600.080*
C40.27119 (12)0.11595 (14)0.27746 (14)0.0512 (4)
C50.24019 (12)0.20009 (14)0.22722 (15)0.0578 (5)
H50.250660.281610.244440.069*
C60.18306 (12)0.1821 (2)0.16360 (15)0.0579 (5)
H60.169980.25540.117700.070*
C70.33137 (12)0.1293 (2)0.34578 (14)0.0571 (5)
H70.349490.05610.382940.068*
C80.44556 (12)0.1390 (2)0.4875 (2)0.0640 (5)
H80.430280.05630.47730.077*
C90.46542 (12)0.3090 (2)0.4471 (2)0.0611 (5)
H90.440660.39050.41920.073*
O10.10159 (9)0.05461 (11)0.08634 (11)0.0718 (4)
H110.070730.123180.072220.086*
O1W0.50000.0672 (2)0.75000.0933 (6)
HW10.50970.1098 (2)0.67310.112*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0714 (5)0.0627 (9)0.0720 (6)0.0007 (6)0.0573 (4)0.0025 (6)
N20.0643 (5)0.0590 (8)0.0663 (6)0.0027 (6)0.0500 (4)0.0033 (6)
N30.0786 (6)0.0777 (10)0.0797 (6)0.0026 (8)0.0627 (5)0.0006 (7)
N40.0686 (6)0.0775 (10)0.0756 (7)0.0004 (7)0.0551 (5)0.0053 (7)
C10.0617 (6)0.0610 (10)0.0637 (6)0.0037 (7)0.0481 (5)0.0055 (7)
C20.0953 (8)0.0492 (10)0.0965 (8)0.0026 (8)0.0771 (6)0.0040 (8)
C30.0949 (8)0.0476 (10)0.0943 (8)0.0053 (8)0.0754 (6)0.0022 (8)
C40.0594 (6)0.0524 (9)0.0587 (6)0.0052 (7)0.0421 (5)0.0056 (7)
C50.0707 (7)0.0504 (10)0.0744 (8)0.0026 (8)0.0526 (6)0.0021 (7)
C60.0712 (7)0.0524 (10)0.0727 (7)0.0043 (8)0.0528 (5)0.0006 (7)
C70.0694 (7)0.0545 (10)0.0696 (7)0.0060 (8)0.0513 (6)0.0067 (7)
C80.0757 (7)0.0663 (11)0.0776 (8)0.0034 (9)0.0590 (6)0.0017 (8)
C90.0666 (7)0.0657 (11)0.0754 (7)0.0004 (8)0.0537 (5)0.0070 (8)
O10.0866 (5)0.0743 (8)0.0895 (5)0.0024 (6)0.0703 (4)0.0038 (5)
O1W0.1481 (11)0.0615 (12)0.1233 (10)0.0000.1077 (8)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C71.267 (2)C1—C21.381 (3)
N1—N21.409 (2)C1—C61.388 (3)
N2—C91.357 (2)C2—C31.382 (3)
N2—C81.362 (2)C3—C41.386 (3)
N3—C81.304 (3)C4—C51.388 (3)
N3—N41.383 (2)C4—C71.456 (3)
N4—C91.302 (2)C5—C61.379 (3)
C1—O11.350 (2)
C7—N1—N2115.4 (2)C2—C3—C4121.1 (2)
C9—N2—C8105.7 (2)C3—C4—C5118.4 (2)
C9—N2—N1122.0 (2)C3—C4—C7117.7 (2)
C8—N2—N1132.3 (2)C5—C4—C7123.9 (2)
C8—N3—N4107.3 (2)C6—C5—C4121.1 (2)
C9—N4—N3107.7 (2)C5—C6—C1119.8 (2)
O1—C1—C2117.2 (2)N1—C7—C4122.5 (2)
O1—C1—C6123.0 (2)N3—C8—N2109.7 (2)
C2—C1—C6119.8 (2)N4—C9—N2109.7 (2)
C1—C2—C3119.9 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H11···N4i1.011.742.717 (2)161
C9—H9···O1ii1.182.153.293 (3)164
O1W—H1W···N31.021.892.898 (2)169
C7—H7···O1Wiii1.102.473.214 (2)123
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y1/2, z1/2; (iii) x, y, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H8N4O·0.5H2O
Mr197.20
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)14.134 (2), 12.491 (2), 12.063 (2)
β (°) 119.483 (10)
V3)1854.0 (5)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.26 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens P4
diffractometer
Absorption correctionEmpirical (using intensity measurements)
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.954, 0.968
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2043, 1642, 1100
Rint0.021
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.057, 0.155, 1.10
No. of reflections1637
No. of parameters133
No. of restraints6
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.28, 0.21

Computer programs: XSCANS (Siemens, 1994), XSCANS, SHELXTL (Siemens, 1995), SHELXTL.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C71.267 (2)N3—N41.383 (2)
N1—N21.409 (2)N4—C91.302 (2)
N2—C91.357 (2)C1—O11.350 (2)
N2—C81.362 (2)C4—C71.456 (3)
N3—C81.304 (3)
C7—N1—N2115.4 (2)C8—N2—N1132.3 (2)
C9—N2—C8105.7 (2)O1—C1—C6123.0 (2)
C9—N2—N1122.0 (2)N1—C7—C4122.5 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H11···N4i1.011.742.717 (2)161
C9—H9···O1ii1.182.153.293 (3)164
O1W—H1W···N31.021.892.898 (2)169
C7—H7···O1Wiii1.102.473.214 (2)123
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x+1/2, y1/2, z1/2; (iii) x, y, z+1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds