Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Single crystals of the title compound, C9H10N3O3+·Cl-·H2O, were obtained by recrystallization from hydro­chloric acid. The cations stack along the crystallographic a direction. The 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydro­quinoxaline group shows a significant deviation from planarity [r.m.s. deviation from the best plane = 0.063 (2) Å]. Hydrogen bonding links the cations, chloride anions and water molecules to form an extended three-dimensional architecture.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109050197/dn3132sup1.cif
Contains datablocks II, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109050197/dn3132IIsup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 765460

Comment top

The compound 6-amino-7-methoxy-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, (I) (see scheme), is an intermediate in the synthesis of quinoxaline-based azo pigments (Herbst & Hunger, 1995; Alfter et al., 1996; Dietz et al., 2001; Schupp et al., 2002; Blum et al., 2004; Schweikart et al., 2007). Compound (I) is synthesized from 2,4,5-triamino-1-methoxybenzene and oxalylchloride. Research on quinoxaline pigments led to Pigment Yellow 213 (Metz & Weber, 1998; Stengel-Rutkowski & Metz, 2000; Metz & Morgenroth, 2009; Schmidt et al., 2009) which is used in water-based automotive coatings. Compound (I) is a dull yellow powder which is poorly soluble; hence, no single crystals have, to date, been grown.

In order to grow crystals of (I) and determine its crystal structure as well as to search for different crystallographic phases, hydrates or solvates, a polymorph screening was performed. Therefore, different crystallization methods were used including (i) recrystallization from various solvents and solvent mixtures by heating and subsequent slow cooling, (ii) overlaying a solution of the compound by an anti-solvent, (iii) diffusion of an anti-solvent into a solution of the compound via the gas phase. The solvents included the most common organic solvents, e.g. dimethylsulfoxide, N-methylpyrrolidone, ethers, esters, alcohols, acids and water. According to X-ray powder diffraction, only two phases, the technical phase and the hydrochloride monohydrate phase, have been found.

Single crystals of the title compound, (II), could be obtained by recrystallizing compound (I) in half-concentrated hydrochloric acid. The molecular structure is shown in Fig. 1. The 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline group shows a significant distortion from planarity. The root-mean- square deviation from the best plane, excluding the H atoms, is 0.063 (2) Å. The largest deviation from the best plane is found for atoms O1, C2 and C8 [0.126 (2), 0.088 (2) and 0.089 (2) Å, respectively]. The benzene ring is less distorted [mean deviation from the plane: 0.015 (2) Å] than the pyrazine ring [mean deviation from the plane: 0.022 (2) Å]. The angle between the planes of the two six-membered rings is 4.0 (1)°. To check whether this distortion from planarity is common for this group or if it may result from crystal-packing forces, the planarity of all 28 entries in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; Allen, 2002) containing the 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline group was calculated. The results are listed in Table 1. In those cases where a crystal structure has been determined more than once, very similar values are obtained, showing that the values reported in Table 1 may be very reliable. The mean-square displacement ranges from 0.005 to 0.071 Å. The non-planarity of the title compound is in the upper range of Table 1. Only one compound shows a larger distortion. The large variation among the compounds suggests that the deviation from planarity is considerably affected by crystal-packing forces. This observation is further supported by the fact that rather different deviations from planarity are observed in crystal structures that contain independent molecules (refcodes CNIXQX, RAVFUQ and RAVGAX) or in different hydrates of the same compound (refcodes SUHHEI, RAVFOK and RAVFUQ). In most structures the 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline groups form stacks. In some structures the 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline groups lie in pairs with their molecular planes aligned. Only a few structures do not show a parallel arrangement of the molecular planes. The non-planarity of the 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline group, however, does not depend on whether the molecules align in stacks or not.

The crystal structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 2. The molecules stack along the crystallographic a direction. Adjacent molecules in the stack are related by a glide planes. The angle between the neighbouring 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline planes in the stack is 3.0 (1)°. The smallest interplanar C···C distance in the stack is 3.247 (4) Å between C5 and C6 (at x - 1/2, y, -z + 1/2). There also is a short intermolecular contact distance of 3.188 (4) Å betweeen O1 and C8 (at x - 1/2, y, -z + 1/2). The methoxy group of (II) is almost coplanar with the bicyclic moiety – the torsion angle C7—C8—O3—C9 is -9.5 (4)°.

The cations, chloride anions and water molecules are connected by a three-dimensional framework of hydrogen bonds involving O—H···Cl-, N—H···Cl-, O—H···O and N—H···O interactions (Table 2). The N3—H3B bond is a donor of a bifurcated hydrogen bond: an intermolecular hydrogen bond to a water molecule and an intramolecular hydrogen bond to the methoxy O atom. The water molecule is a donor of two hydrogen bonds and an acceptor of one hydrogen bond. The Cl- anion accepts hydrogen bonds from three different cations and from a water molecule.

The most prominent features of the hydrogen-bond network are two 12-membered rings. The first one is built from two molecules and one chloride anion (Fig. 3a). According to graph set notation (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995) this ring, containing two acceptors and three donors, is denoted as R23 (12). The second ring is a R46 (12) built from two molecules of (I), two chloride anions and two water molecules (Fig. 3b). A full graph set analysis revealed 56 graph sets for first-, second- and third-order level. Selected graph sets for chain and ring sets are shown in Table 3. C—H···O interactions were not included in this analysis as they are much weaker than interactions of NH and OH groups. For other quinoxalinedione derivatives, extensive graph set analyses are reported in an earlier work (Kubicki et al., 1996). These graph sets are considerably different for [to?] those found for compound (II).

The title compound contains two amide (CONH) groups in cis conformation. Generally, cis-amide groups form eight-membered rings R22(8) or C22(8) chains, as observed e.g. in many benzimidazolone derivatives (Van de Streek et al., 2009). In contrast, the cis-amide groups of compound (II) show neither a ring, nor a chain motif with another amide group, but both NH groups form hydrogen bonds with the chloride anion. This can be explained by the negative charge of the chloride anion which makes the chloride anion a much better hydrogen-bond acceptor than a carbonyl group of an amide fragment.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Alfter et al. (1996); Allen (2002); Bernstein et al. (1995); Blum et al. (2004); Dietz et al. (2001); Etter (1990); Herbst & Hunger (1995); Kubicki et al. (1996); Metz & Morgenroth (2009); Metz & Weber (1998); Schmidt et al. (2009); Schupp et al. (2002); Schweikart et al. (2007); Stengel-Rutkowski & Metz (2000).

Experimental top

The raw material of compound (II) was industrially produced, and obtained from Clariant GmbH, Germany. Single crystals of compound (II) could be grown from hydrochloric acid: in a flask 30 mg of (I) were dissolved in a mixture of 2 ml of concentrated hydrochloric acid and 2 ml of water. Subsequently, the mixture was placed in an oven at 343 K to slowly concentrate the solution. After 48 h yellow–brown rod-shaped crystals of compound (II), with sizes of about 0.6 x 0.06 x 0.05 mm, were obtained.

Refinement top

The H atoms of the water molecule were taken from a difference synthesis and refined. The H atoms at C and N atoms were also taken from a difference synthesis but were constrained using: Cplanar—H = 0.95 Å, Cmethyl—H = 0.98 Å, Nplanar—H = 0.88 Å, Ntetrahedral—H = 0.91 Å, Hiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(Cplanar), Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(N). The torsion angles about the C1—N3 and O3—C9 bonds were refined.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1995); cell refinement: SMART (Siemens, 1995); data reduction: SAINT (Siemens, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1]
[Figure 2]
[Figure 3]
Fig. 1. Molecular structure of compound (II), with atom labels and anisotropic displacement ellipsoids (drawn at 50% probability level) for non-H atoms.

Fig. 2. Section of molecular packing of compound (II) showing the hydrogen-bond architecture; view direction [100]. Only the upper layer of molecules is shown. The hydrogen bonds are drawn as dashed lines.

Fig. 3. Third-order graph sets R23 (12) (a) and R46 (12) (b) of compound (I). The atoms involved are highlighted and appendant hydrogen bonds are drawn as dashed lines.

Fig. 4: Third order graph sets R23 (12) (a) and R46 (12) (b) of compound I. The involved atoms are highlighted and appendant hydrogen bonds are drawn as dashed lines.
7-Methoxy-2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxalin-6-aminium chloride monohydrate top
Crystal data top
C9H10N3O3+·Cl·H2OF(000) = 1088
Mr = 261.67Dx = 1.565 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 81 reflections
a = 6.7339 (11) Åθ = 3–23°
b = 15.469 (4) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 21.327 (4) ÅT = 168 K
V = 2221.5 (8) Å3Rod, yellow brown
Z = 80.60 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART 1K CCD
diffractometer
2609 independent reflections
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube1375 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.153
ω scansθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.890, Tmax = 0.983k = 2020
30122 measured reflectionsl = 2727
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.117H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.99 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.05P)2 + 0.4P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2609 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
164 parametersΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
Crystal data top
C9H10N3O3+·Cl·H2OV = 2221.5 (8) Å3
Mr = 261.67Z = 8
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation
a = 6.7339 (11) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
b = 15.469 (4) ÅT = 168 K
c = 21.327 (4) Å0.60 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART 1K CCD
diffractometer
2609 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
1375 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.890, Tmax = 0.983Rint = 0.153
30122 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0540 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.117H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.99Δρmax = 0.30 e Å3
2609 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
164 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.09665 (11)0.54666 (5)0.13838 (3)0.0278 (2)
O10.1500 (4)0.93846 (17)0.03799 (11)0.0412 (7)
O20.0706 (3)0.95135 (13)0.17874 (9)0.0278 (5)
O30.0349 (3)0.80258 (13)0.11462 (9)0.0278 (5)
O70.1180 (3)0.73505 (12)0.46662 (8)0.0262 (5)
N10.0180 (3)0.88225 (14)0.27058 (10)0.0203 (6)
H1A0.04440.92990.29150.030*
N40.0579 (3)0.73227 (15)0.20767 (10)0.0199 (6)
H4A0.07870.68310.18800.030*
N60.1604 (4)0.58159 (14)0.40701 (10)0.0253 (6)
H6A0.08100.53740.39420.038*
H6B0.14070.59150.44860.038*
H6C0.28980.56730.40030.038*
C20.0254 (4)0.88588 (18)0.20734 (13)0.0202 (7)
C30.0256 (4)0.80313 (19)0.17224 (13)0.0195 (7)
C4A0.0607 (4)0.73109 (18)0.27306 (12)0.0189 (7)
C50.0981 (4)0.65599 (17)0.30703 (13)0.0200 (6)
H5A0.11430.60230.28600.024*
C60.1114 (4)0.66020 (18)0.37120 (13)0.0212 (7)
C70.0891 (4)0.73797 (18)0.40358 (12)0.0205 (7)
C80.0428 (4)0.81223 (18)0.37036 (13)0.0200 (7)
H8A0.02130.86530.39170.024*
C8A0.0282 (4)0.80835 (17)0.30518 (13)0.0175 (7)
C90.1298 (5)0.81634 (18)0.49890 (13)0.0296 (8)
H9A0.23300.85220.47960.044*
H9B0.16290.80620.54300.044*
H9C0.00160.84610.49610.044*
H1B0.120 (6)0.894 (3)0.0609 (17)0.065 (14)*
H1C0.237 (6)0.970 (3)0.0626 (18)0.075 (15)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0375 (4)0.0185 (4)0.0273 (4)0.0023 (4)0.0008 (4)0.0001 (3)
O10.0607 (18)0.0351 (16)0.0279 (14)0.0143 (13)0.0060 (13)0.0022 (12)
O20.0389 (14)0.0181 (11)0.0264 (11)0.0034 (11)0.0049 (10)0.0026 (10)
O30.0361 (14)0.0287 (13)0.0185 (11)0.0014 (10)0.0011 (10)0.0014 (9)
O70.0425 (14)0.0189 (11)0.0172 (11)0.0002 (10)0.0008 (10)0.0013 (9)
N10.0261 (14)0.0148 (13)0.0199 (14)0.0035 (11)0.0001 (11)0.0022 (10)
N40.0231 (15)0.0171 (13)0.0195 (13)0.0015 (11)0.0004 (11)0.0033 (11)
N60.0363 (16)0.0199 (14)0.0197 (13)0.0012 (12)0.0007 (11)0.0035 (11)
C20.0184 (16)0.0183 (16)0.0240 (17)0.0008 (13)0.0042 (13)0.0009 (14)
C30.0142 (16)0.0200 (17)0.0243 (18)0.0028 (13)0.0022 (13)0.0007 (14)
C4A0.0167 (16)0.0180 (16)0.0219 (17)0.0026 (13)0.0006 (13)0.0007 (13)
C50.0215 (16)0.0168 (16)0.0217 (16)0.0002 (14)0.0025 (13)0.0058 (12)
C60.0212 (16)0.0149 (15)0.0275 (18)0.0018 (14)0.0001 (14)0.0023 (13)
C70.0214 (16)0.0215 (17)0.0188 (16)0.0031 (14)0.0019 (13)0.0014 (13)
C80.0226 (17)0.0151 (16)0.0223 (17)0.0008 (13)0.0005 (13)0.0038 (13)
C8A0.0161 (16)0.0145 (16)0.0219 (16)0.0002 (12)0.0017 (12)0.0010 (13)
C90.047 (2)0.0248 (18)0.0171 (16)0.0010 (16)0.0002 (15)0.0047 (13)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—H1B0.87 (4)N6—H6B0.9100
O1—H1C0.93 (4)N6—H6C0.9100
O2—C21.221 (3)C2—C31.522 (4)
O3—C31.230 (3)C4A—C51.392 (4)
O7—C71.359 (3)C4A—C8A1.395 (4)
O7—C91.436 (3)C5—C61.373 (4)
N1—C21.351 (3)C5—H5A0.9500
N1—C8A1.396 (3)C6—C71.395 (4)
N1—H1A0.8800C7—C81.385 (4)
N4—C31.349 (3)C8—C8A1.395 (4)
N4—C4A1.395 (3)C8—H8A0.9500
N4—H4A0.8800C9—H9A0.9800
N6—C61.474 (3)C9—H9B0.9800
N6—H6A0.9100C9—H9C0.9800
H1B—O1—H1C105 (3)C8A—C4A—N4118.5 (3)
C7—O7—C9116.9 (2)C6—C5—C4A119.4 (2)
C2—N1—C8A124.7 (2)C6—C5—H5A120.3
C2—N1—H1A117.6C4A—C5—H5A120.3
C8A—N1—H1A117.6C5—C6—C7121.8 (3)
C3—N4—C4A124.9 (2)C5—C6—N6119.5 (2)
C3—N4—H4A117.5C7—C6—N6118.6 (2)
C4A—N4—H4A117.5O7—C7—C8124.4 (2)
C6—N6—H6A109.5O7—C7—C6116.5 (2)
C6—N6—H6B109.5C8—C7—C6119.1 (3)
H6A—N6—H6B109.5C7—C8—C8A119.3 (3)
C6—N6—H6C109.5C7—C8—H8A120.3
H6A—N6—H6C109.5C8A—C8—H8A120.3
H6B—N6—H6C109.5C4A—C8A—C8121.0 (3)
O2—C2—N1122.8 (3)C4A—C8A—N1118.5 (2)
O2—C2—C3120.5 (3)C8—C8A—N1120.5 (2)
N1—C2—C3116.6 (3)O7—C9—H9A109.5
O3—C3—N4123.1 (3)O7—C9—H9B109.5
O3—C3—C2120.6 (3)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
N4—C3—C2116.4 (2)O7—C9—H9C109.5
C5—C4A—C8A119.2 (3)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C5—C4A—N4122.3 (3)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C8A—N1—C2—O2178.4 (3)C9—O7—C7—C6169.4 (3)
C8A—N1—C2—C31.4 (4)C5—C6—C7—O7175.9 (3)
C4A—N4—C3—O3175.9 (3)N6—C6—C7—O71.0 (4)
C4A—N4—C3—C24.4 (4)C5—C6—C7—C83.2 (4)
O2—C2—C3—O34.9 (4)N6—C6—C7—C8180.0 (3)
N1—C2—C3—O3175.3 (3)O7—C7—C8—C8A176.2 (3)
O2—C2—C3—N4174.8 (3)C6—C7—C8—C8A2.8 (4)
N1—C2—C3—N45.1 (4)C5—C4A—C8A—C83.3 (4)
C3—N4—C4A—C5178.9 (3)N4—C4A—C8A—C8175.6 (3)
C3—N4—C4A—C8A0.1 (4)C5—C4A—C8A—N1177.1 (3)
C8A—C4A—C5—C63.0 (4)N4—C4A—C8A—N14.0 (4)
N4—C4A—C5—C6175.9 (3)C7—C8—C8A—C4A0.4 (4)
C4A—C5—C6—C70.2 (5)C7—C8—C8A—N1180.0 (3)
C4A—C5—C6—N6177.1 (2)C2—N1—C8A—C4A3.1 (4)
C9—O7—C7—C89.5 (4)C2—N1—C8A—C8176.4 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4A···Cl10.882.363.240 (3)173
N1—H1A···Cl1i0.882.373.243 (2)171
N6—H6A···O2ii0.912.052.787 (3)137
N6—H6B···O70.912.262.708 (3)110
N6—H6B···O1iii0.911.962.811 (3)154
N6—H6C···Cl1iv0.912.253.140 (3)166
O1—H1B···O30.87 (4)1.91 (4)2.773 (3)175 (4)
O1—H1C···Cl1v0.93 (4)2.30 (4)3.209 (3)169 (3)
C5—H5A···O2ii0.952.473.185 (3)132
C9—H9B···O3iii0.982.433.144 (4)129
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y, z+1/2; (v) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H10N3O3+·Cl·H2O
Mr261.67
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)168
a, b, c (Å)6.7339 (11), 15.469 (4), 21.327 (4)
V3)2221.5 (8)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.35
Crystal size (mm)0.60 × 0.06 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerSiemens SMART 1K CCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
Tmin, Tmax0.890, 0.983
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
30122, 2609, 1375
Rint0.153
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.660
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.054, 0.117, 0.99
No. of reflections2609
No. of parameters164
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.30, 0.29

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1995), SAINT (Siemens, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), publCIF (Westrip, 2009).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4A···Cl10.882.363.240 (3)173
N1—H1A···Cl1i0.882.373.243 (2)171
N6—H6A···O2ii0.912.052.787 (3)137
N6—H6B···O70.912.262.708 (3)110
N6—H6B···O1iii0.911.962.811 (3)154
N6—H6C···Cl1iv0.912.253.140 (3)166
O1—H1B···O30.87 (4)1.91 (4)2.773 (3)175 (4)
O1—H1C···Cl1v0.93 (4)2.30 (4)3.209 (3)169 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y, z+1/2; (v) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.
Mean deviation from the 2,3-dioxo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline plane. For structures with more than one molecule in the asymmetric unit multiple entries are given. top
Compound/refcodedeviation [Å]
title compound0.063 (2)
BAKGOJ0.024
BAKGOJ010.023
CAHXQX0.034
CNIXQX0.053 / 0.071
HIHZUT0.030
HIJBAD0.048 / 0.055
HIJBIL0.028
HIJBOR0.006
HQOXDO0.027
HQOXDO010.027
HQOXDO020.027
OCUSOU0.021
QERCOF0.016
RAVFEA0.016
RAVFIE0.014 / 0.015
RAVFOK0.005
RAVFOK010.005
RAVFUQ0.015 / 0.021 / 0.046
RAVGAX0.019 / 0.043
RAVGAX010.019 / 0.045
RAVGEB0.024
SUHHEI0.012
SUHHIM0.030
TASWAL0.046
ZILROB0.030
ZILRUH0.053
ZILSAO0.045
QODCAO0.025
Selected graph sets of compound (II). top
First-orderSecond-orderThird-order (chain)Third-order (ring)
C11 (9)C12 (7)C23 (8)R23 (12)a
C12 (8)C23 (9)R46 (12)b
C12 (9)C23 (10)R66 (18)
C22 (10)C23 (11)R36 (24)
C23 (12)R46 (26)
C23 (14)R66 (38)
C23 (17)
C23 (18)
For a,b see Fig. 3.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds